
One year after ban, offshore gaming shadow still looms in the Philippines
Still, some lawmakers believe the government has learned from the 'bitter lessons' of the Pogo controversy.
'I believe so. The Pogo ban demonstrates the government's commitment to correcting the mistake of allowing Pogos into our country,' said Senator Risa Hontiveros, chair of the Senate committee on women, children, family relations and gender equality, which led the inquiry into Pogo-related crimes.
She described the nationwide ban as a 'major breakthrough.'
'Shutting down massive Pogo scam hubs is certainly an achievement, especially since these hubs were involved in scamming, trafficking and harming not only Filipinos but also thousands of other nationals,' she said.
'Our Senate hearings revealed how Pogos exploited our institutions and corrupted officials to profit from innocent people. I hope these mistakes are never forgotten,' she added.
Thousands of foreign Pogo workers have already been deported, but Hontiveros said some large operations have unfortunately reorganised into smaller, guerrilla-style scam networks.
'There were reports of improper deportation procedures. We called on the Bureau of Immigration to ensure foreign Pogo workers actually return to their countries of origin and don't go to Cambodia or Myanmar to victimise others,' she said.
As of June 2025, over 9,000 former Pogo workers remain at large in the country, according to the Presidential Anti-Organised Crime Commission (PAOCC).
Senator Sherwin Gatchalian, a longtime critic of Pogos, said the effects of the ban were becoming more evident.
'It's only been six months since the ban in 2025. Let's give it three to six months more until all Pogo remnants are gone,' he told the Inquirer in a phone interview. 'I think we're seeing 90 to 95 per cent of the remnants already gone. Their world is getting smaller.'
Gatchalian said remaining workers were likely not involved in operations.
'I saw in the news some Pogo-connected people trying to return, but they're not necessarily operating. Once they go back to China, they will be detained, so they're avoiding prosecution and hiding here,' said the chair of the Senate ways and means committee.
'Some were caught trying to sneak back using backdoors. I think it's just a matter of time before we eradicate all individuals related to Pogos.' He added there was no confirmation that these include Pogo 'big bosses.'
'These are not high-level criminals. Some were just trying to stay because they have girlfriends or babies here,' he said.
In his third State of the Nation Address last year, Marcos ordered an immediate ban on Pogos and directed the Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corp. (Pagcor) to wind down all operations by Dec. 31, 2024.
He later signed Executive Order No. 74, imposing an outright ban on offshore and internet gaming, citing national security and public order.
The EO, based on a Department of Finance study, said the risks and consequences of Pogos — such as increased crime, social instability and exploitation — outweighed their economic benefits. The Anti-Money Laundering Council had also flagged Pogos as prone to money laundering, fraud and other illicit activities, posing threats to the financial system.
Despite the EO, both Hontiveros and Gatchalian are hopeful Marcos will sign Senate Bill No. 2868, or the Anti-Pogo Act of 2025, which seeks to permanently prohibit the industry.
The House of Representatives has adopted the Senate version, which bans the establishment, operation and service provision of Pogos.
'This is the only thing missing. The EO can only do so much—it cannot go beyond the law,' said Gatchalian, the bill's principal author. 'This isn't just a law—it's the people's demand to end the Pogo menace.'
Hontiveros said the measure would ensure the prohibition survives beyond the Marcos administration.
'Whoever sits in Malacañang, it won't be easy to establish a Pogo scam hub in the country. We need this law to ensure Pogos never emerge again,' she said.
If enacted, the bill would repeal Republic Act No. 11590, which legitimised offshore gaming.
Thousands of Chinese nationals who previously worked in now-defunct Philippine Offshore Gaming Operator (Pogo) hubs remain in the country despite President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.'s total ban on the industry a year ago.
The Pogo industry began in 2003 as an unregulated service employing around 80,000 foreign workers. In August 2016, Pagcor issued rules and regulations, allowing the sector to thrive—particularly under the Duterte administration—even as it became increasingly linked to organised crime.
Congressional hearings on Pogos, prompted by raids on large complexes employing foreign nationals, revealed allegations of killings, torture, trafficking, prostitution and cyber scams.
One key case was that of former Bamban, Tarlac Mayor Alice Guo (pic), or Guo Hua Ping. A Senate inquiry found she was an incorporator of Zun Yuan Technology Inc., a Pogo firm raided for alleged human trafficking and illegal detention.
Guo's nationality was questioned, and a Manila court recently declared her 'undoubtedly a Chinese citizen,' disqualifying her from office. Fingerprint analysis proved Guo and Guo Hua Ping were the same person.
She is currently detained at Pasig City Jail, facing 62 counts of money laundering and qualified trafficking.
Once enacted, the Anti-Pogo Act would: Punish corrupt government workers who help individuals with fraudulent documents enter or leave the country.
Forfeit all Pogo-related assets to prevent reuse in illegal operations.
Create an Administrative Oversight Committee, led by PAOCC, to implement the law.
'The measure not only bans offshore gaming but also builds safeguards for our people. We shouldn't compromise public welfare for revenue from illegal and dirty businesses,' said Gatchalian.
Gatchalian said the ban helped reduce Pogo-related crimes and restored order in local communities.
'Before, there were rampant kidnappings—Chinese vs. Chinese. They were notorious for having police escorts and scaring neighbors. But now that atmosphere of fear is gone,' he said.
Hontiveros agreed.
'One year after the ban, Pogo-related crimes—scamming, trafficking, kidnapping—aren't as rampant. Big syndicates, like Guo's associates, have left,' she said. 'These are welcome developments. I trust law enforcers will continue cracking down on illegal centers.'
Gatchalian added that the Pogo crackdown contributed to the Philippines' removal from the Financial Action Task Force's gray list.
'This is another big achievement. It reaffirms our position that the country is better off without Pogos,' he said, adding that the gray list removal could boost foreign investments.
He cautioned, however, that the government must continue addressing risks and strengthening financial regulations.
The crackdown also affected the real estate market.
While Pogos triggered a boom in office and residential demand, especially in Metro Manila, the ban led to a decline in occupancy and rental rates.
Gatchalian said that's a good thing.
'I won't deny prices have gone down. But now it's back to the correct level,' he said. 'Before, rental rates were inflated because Pogo workers could pay triple what locals could afford. Now, locals and even government agencies can afford to rent again.'
'It's more fair for the economy. Prices have reached the fair level. If it goes below that, it's no longer good.'
Both senators blamed Pagcor for the rise of illegal Pogos.
'It's a conflict of interest—both operator and regulator,' said Gatchalian. 'It's the regulator's job to prevent criminal activity. But it failed.'
Hontiveros agreed.
'Pagcor poorly regulated the industry. It approved operations that became scam hubs,' she said.
She also criticised the Bureau of Immigration's Visa Upon Arrival (VUA) scheme under the Duterte administration, which led to the 'Pastillas' bribery scam.
'It allowed Pogo workers, even fugitives, to enter without proper checks. There were other schemes like fake alien employment permits. That worsened the situation.'
'I trust that PAOCC, Philippine National Police, National Bureau of Investigation and Bureau of Immigration continue working together on raids and rescues,' she said. - Philippine Daily Inquirer/ANN
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
44 minutes ago
- The Star
China prepares to unseat US in fight for AI market
While humanoid robots faced off in a boxing ring at China's flagship artificial intelligence conference in Shanghai, a fight in the US-China tech war was fought in suits nearby over who gets to set the rules in the AI age. China's answer is a new global organisation to convene countries to foster safe and inclusive use of the powerful new technology. At the annual World AI Conference over the weekend, Chinese Premier Li Qiang warned of AI "monopoly' and instead called on foreign officials in the room – mostly from developing countries – to cooperate on governance. The new group, known as the World AI Cooperation Organization, embodies China's plan to jostle with the US for sway by positioning itself as a champion of AI for all. More favourable rules may give a global boost to Chinese companies competing with US firms to sell hardware and services in a market estimated to hit US$4.8 trillion (RM20.53 trillion) by 2033. For many of the countries represented at the conference, Chinese firms already offer competitive solutions, even if the US dominates the supply of cutting-edge AI chips. "The Chinese are coming to the table with a very different AI product mix that is going to be extremely appealing to lower-income countries that lack the computing and power infrastructure needed for large-scale implementation of OpenAI-like AI systems,' said Eric Olander of the China-Global South Project. Using technology as both carrot and calling card, Beijing's approach appears to take a page out of its earlier Digital Silk Road initiative, which put Chinese companies at the centre of telecommunications networks spanning continents. China for years has strived to define the global parameters for emerging technologies such as 5G, seeking to influence development and set the stage for its companies to win market share abroad. Huawei Technologies Co's prominent role in standard-setting groups became the subject of scrutiny of the US government when it cracked down on the use of its equipment. Global AI governance has emerged as a new battleground for the world's leading powers, both seeing the technology as critical not just for their economy but national security. President Donald Trump declared last week that his country will "do whatever it takes' to lead in AI, with his plan for actions including countering Chinese influence in international governance bodies. While there are no binding global rules for AI development, China's action plan calls for building more digital infrastructure that uses clean power and unifying computing power standards. The country also said it supports the role of businesses in creating technical standards in security, industry and ethics. Details about the Chinese body, to be headquartered in Shanghai, are scarce. In brief public remarks before media were ushered out of the room, a Chinese Foreign Ministry senior official, Ma Zhaoxu, said the organization would work to establish standards and governance frameworks. China would discuss details with those countries that are willing to join, he added. As US and Chinese companies race to develop systems that could match or even surpassed human intelligence, safety concerns have also prompted calls for guardrails. AI pioneer Geoffrey Hinton, who spoke at the Chinese event, expressed support for international bodies to collaborate on safety issues. Part of Beijing's AI strategy appears to come from its diplomatic playbook, which urges support for Global South countries to step up in international affairs. In his address to kick off the Saturday event, Li emphasised helping those nations develop AI. These countries made up most of more than 30 nations that were invited to the high-level governance talks, including Ethiopia, Cuba, Bangladesh, Russia and Pakistan. A handful of European countries including the Netherlands, France and Germany, the EU and several international organizations were also represented. No nameplate for the US was seen by Bloomberg News. The US Embassy in Beijing declined to comment on any official presence. Achmad Adhitya, special adviser to Indonesia's vice president who attended the meeting, told Bloomberg News that China's initiative is "very appreciated by the Indonesian government.' His country is preparing AI curricula to be rolled out across 400,000 schools and is training 60,000 teachers about the tech, he said. Beijing's emphasis on openness – a word used 15 times in its governance action plan – appears to ride on the success of Deepseek earlier this year. The AI upstart stunned the world not just by releasing AI models that are almost as capable as those of OpenAI but also made them freely available for anyone to download and customize for free. A succession of Chinese companies has done the same, with companies from incumbent giants like Alibaba and newcomers like Moonshot releasing cutting-edge large language models that are similarly open-weight. That accessibility may be especially important to developing countries who may not have the resources to gather vast datasets and train their own AI models from scratch, a process that would involve expensive chips made by companies such as Nvidia Corp. China also emphasises Internet sovereignty, something that may appeal to more autocratic regimes around the world. "We should respect other countries' national sovereignty and strictly abide by their laws when providing them with AI products and services,' according to the country's Global AI Governance Initiative issued in 2023. In contrast, Trump's AI plan vows that the US government will only work with engineers who "ensure that their systems are objective and free from top-down ideological bias.' The US-China rivalry presents a familiar dilemma for countries that may feel pressured to choose a side, but Solly Malatsi, minister of communications and digital technologies of South Africa, rejects the binary choice. "It's not a case of one model over the other,' Malatsi said from the conference. "It's about an integration of the best of both worlds.' – Bloomberg


The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Chinese warships arrive in Russia for joint Pacific naval exercise
Chinese warships have sailed into the main port of Russia's Pacific Fleet ahead of a joint naval exercise this week in the Sea of Japan – also known as the East Sea, according to Russian media. The guided-missile destroyers the Shaoxing and the Urumqi arrived at the eastern port city of Vladivostok for the five-day joint naval drill that starts on Friday, state news agency Sputnik reported on Thursday, quoting Russia's Pacific Fleet. The drills will also involve diesel-electric submarines and naval aircraft from both countries, according to Russia's Tass news agency. The 'Joint Sea 2025' drill would be followed by the sixth joint maritime patrol in the Pacific, China's defence ministry said on Wednesday. The exercise will take place in the sea and airspace near Vladivostok, Russia's far eastern port city. Some of the forces in the exercise will then take part in the subsequent joint patrol in designated ocean areas, according to ministry spokesman Zhang Xiaogang. 'This is an arrangement within the annual cooperation plan between the Chinese and Russian militaries. It is not targeted at any third party, nor is it related to the current international and regional situation,' Zhang said in Beijing. He did not specify the dates of the drill or the size of the event. The drill takes place as the US Air Force is hosting the 'Resolute Force Pacific 2025' exercise in various locations including Hawaii, Guam and Japan, as well as international airspace. The exercise began on July 10 and extends to August 8, and involves more than 400 aircraft and 12,000 personnel from the US and allies such as Japan and Australia. The US Air Force has described it as their 'biggest combat exercise in the region'. 'The US, clinging to its Cold War mentality, has been constantly flexing its muscles in the Asia-Pacific region and attempting to gang up under the guise of 'military drills', intimidate and pressure other countries, and undermine peace and stability in the region,' Zhang said. As Beijing and Moscow have deepened their partnership in recent years, increased joint naval cooperation has become a key component of the strengthening of their military ties. This will be the 11th exercise in the Joint Sea series, also known as 'Maritime Cooperation'. It began in 2012 and has been held annually, except for 2018, 2020 and 2023. Most of the previous exercises were held in the northwestern Pacific, but they have also been held in the Baltic and Mediterranean seas. The series involves warships, aircraft, and support units from both sides, conducting operations including formation manoeuvres, search and rescue exercises, air defence drills, anti-submarine operations and live-fire shootings. Demonstrations of interoperability are also part of the exercise. A similar 'Northern Cooperation' exercise, led by the People's Liberation Army Northern Theatre Command, began in 2023, when there was no Joint Sea exercise, but both events were held last year, with the Joint Sea exercise in July in the South China Sea and the Northern Cooperation drill held in September in the Sea of Japan and the Sea of Okhotsk. The two navies started joint patrols in the Pacific region in 2021, usually occurring before or after a joint exercise. Such patrols happened twice last year, in July and September, by ships of the PLA Southern Theatre Command and the Northern Theatre Command, respectively. - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST


The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Trump says tariffs talks with China ‘moving along well'
US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that talks with China on a tariff deal were 'moving along well' and that the countries would reach a 'fair' deal on trade, without offering additional details of the agreement. 'We're moving along with China. We're doing fine with China,' Trump told reporters before leaving a bill-signing ceremony at the White House. 'I think it's going to work out very well. We're right in step ... I think we're going to have a very fair deal with China,' he added. Though reporters asked about the talks, the president did not confirm that the US and China would extend their 'pause' on tariffs that the world's two largest economies have imposed on each other's goods. On Tuesday, delegations from the countries finished a third round of high-level talks in Stockholm, Sweden, ahead of an August 12 expiration of that pause. Beijing and Washington had been expected to extend their tariff truce another three months, sources on both sides told the South China Morning Post before discussions began on Monday. At separate briefings on Tuesday in Stockholm, US and Chinese negotiators, while calling their discussions 'constructive', diverged on the timing of the fresh tariff pause. Li Chenggang, China's vice-minister of commerce, told reporters that the two sides had reached a 'consensus' concerning the pause extension, though he did not specify a date. But US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent denied that any agreement on a new pause had been reached, insisting that nothing would be agreed to until Trump was briefed. 'I notice ... that the Chinese deputy minister did say that we had agreed on a pause,' Bessent said. 'We have not. Nothing is agreed until we speak with President Trump.' 'I think our Chinese counterparts have jumped the gun a little and said that we do have an extension,' he told CNBC later. En route to the US from Scotland on Tuesday, Trump confirmed that he would review the deal, telling reporters aboard Air Force One that 'we'll either approve it or not'. The Stockholm talks, led by Bessent and Chinese Vice-Premier He Lifeng, were the third time the delegations had met in an effort to stabilise trade after both countries hiked tariffs on each other's goods to triple-digit rates in April. So far, Washington has only reached trade agreements with a handful of major partners, including Britain, Vietnam, Indonesia, Japan and the European Union, with countries other than China facing a Friday deadline to cut deals. The Chinese embassy in Washington did not respond to a request for comment. This month it noted that China's exports to the US declined by 24 per cent year on year in the second quarter of 2025, with the situation 'equivalent to the first quarter of 2020 when the economy activity was stagnant' during the pandemic.