Phoenix Spencer-Horn: Ewan Methven pleads guilty to murdering and decapitating girlfriend
A man has admitted murdering and decapitating his girlfriend before texting her mum pretending to be her in a bid to cover up his crime.
Ewan Methven, 27, killed Phoenix Spencer-Horn, 21, at the home they shared after the couple ordered a takeaway to their flat in East Kilbride's Glen Lee, South Lanarkshire, on 16 November 2024.
The High Court in Glasgow heard how Methven, who worked as a postman for Royal Mail, had complained earlier that day his partner's waitress shifts made him "lonely".
The couple were said to have been together for two years and met at a family party.
At around midnight on 16 November, prosecutors say Methven attacked Ms Spencer-Horn with three knives, stabbing her 20 times, before mutilating her body and severing her head.
He then spent the weekend driving Ms Spencer-Horn's red Corsa, scrolling through her phone and searching for internet pornography, as well as making several attempts to buy cocaine.
Prosecutor Christopher McKenna said: "Late on Saturday November 16, he strangled her and stabbed her. He dialled 999 but not until November 18.
"Her mutilated and decapitated body was discovered only on November 18."
The court heard that Ms Spencer-Horn had seen her mother the day before she was murdered and had been in good spirits at work.
Mr McKenna said: "The police recovered texts between the accused and Phoenix, he complained of feeling lonely because of the hours she worked and he apologised."
The court heard that a food order was placed around 8pm and Methven "did not appear to be drunk or under the influence by the delivery driver", however, in a 999 call, he claimed that the murder happened when he had a psychotic episode induced by cocaine, alcohol and steroids.
Methven pleaded guilty to murder and attempting to defeat the ends of justice at the High Court in Glasgow on Tuesday. He will be sentenced next month.
Detective Chief Inspector Susie Cairns said: "My thoughts remain with Phoenix's family and friends as they continue to try to come to terms with what happened.
"Methven now faces the consequences of his actions. Violence such as this is never acceptable in our communities, and we will work tirelessly to ensure those responsible are brought to justice."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
43 minutes ago
- BBC News
Woman heard 'screaming' on night Louisa Dunne murdered
A woman was heard screaming and "crying out" on the night an elderly widow was allegedly raped and murdered nearly 60 years ago, a jury Dunne, 75, was found dead in her front room in Brittannia Road in Easton, Bristol, by neighbours on 28 June 1967.A jury at Bristol Crown Court heard on Tuesday statements read out by the prosecution which were taken by police at the time of Mrs Dunne's Headley, 92, of Clarence Road in Ipswich, denies raping and murdering Mrs Dunne. Violet Fortune, a married woman who lived close to Mrs Dunne's house, said at the time she was "awoken suddenly by what sounded like a scream" on the night of 27 June 1967. "It wasn't a long, piercing scream, but a crying out," she said."It sounded muffled. I got out of bed and went to the window. I could see up and down the road by the light of the moon but there was no-one in sight."I could distinguish it was the voice of a woman. It lasted for about two to three seconds." A statement from Harold Hodson, who was 64 at the time, explained how he had gone to bed but was woken up by his dog."I heard a loud scream," Mr Hodson's statement explained."It was a frightening scream. It was obviously an adult woman. If sounded as if someone was being attacked."There was a sound I can only describe as moans or being muffled. There were three or four of these moans."At the time of her death, swabs were taken from Mrs Dunne's body which tested positive for semen but scientific examinations were limited. However in 2023 the case was re-examined and DNA testing of the swabs matched Mr Headley - in what the court heard on Monday was a billion-to-one DNA match. The court heard Mrs Dunne, who was a mother-of-two who had been twice widowed and lived alone, was well-known in the local area. The court also heard from a retired GP who was called to the murder scene at Mrs Dunne's home at the cross-examination, when asked if he had taken her pulse Dr Taylor said: "I don't remember specifically doing that but I'm sure I must have done".Dr Taylor, who is regarded as one of the only living witnesses at the time, also said he and the police were not wearing any latex gloves at the time, and he didn't recall paramedics wearing any either as it was not usual practice in the recorded Mrs Dunne's cause of death as asphyxia due to strangulation and pressure on the roll records revealed that Ryland Headley lived in Picton Street, Bristol, less than two miles away from Mrs Dunne's home at the time of her Headley was arrested at his home in Ipswich, Suffolk, in November last year and his palm prints were taken. They allegedly matched the print found at the jury was told on Monday Mr Headley previously admitted breaking into the homes of two widows, aged 84 and 79, and raping them in Suffolk in October trial, which is expected to last up to three weeks, continues.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Umbrella clue & eerie final CCTV – how woman's killer was finally snared but why he may NEVER reveal darkest secret
SUZANNA Pilley's day started like any other - she took the bus to work, then popped into Sainsburys next to her office. But the 38-year-old bookkeeper was never seen again after being brutally murdered by her lover - and her body has never been found. 10 10 10 While cops initially treated the horrifying case as a missing persons inquiry, it later became a murder investigation after police began to unravel Suzanne's complicated life. They found her former lover, David Gilroy, had killed Suzanne in May 2010 after a furious argument when she tried to end their affair. Having moved back in with his wife following the split, he tampered with Suzanne's emails and bombarded her with more than 400 messages, which suddenly stopped when she vanished. Cops believe Suzanne was murdered in the basement of her office block on Thistle Street, Edinburgh where they both worked, before her body was hidden in an alcove while Gilroy returned home to collect his Vauxhall Astra. The callous dad-of-two even kept Suzanne's remains in his car while attending a school play and going for dinner with his family. He is then believed to have driven to Lochgilphead to dump her body - his car was found to have suffered extensive damage from travelling over rough ground that he was unable to explain to police. Despite no body ever being found, Gilroy was convicted in March 2012. He is currently serving a life sentence with a minimum of 18 years. But the monster, now aged 62, continues to maintain his innocence while rotting in jail. Twisted Gilroy previously told a crime podcast he would 'fight until my dying breath' to clear his name. He added: 'I think I've been denied justice. 'I do believe that I have more than enough to prove my innocence beyond any doubt.' In a final insult, Gilroy has never revealed where Suzanne's body is - leading to 15 years of agony for her family. Cops suspect Suzanne's body was buried in Argyll Forest, around 40 miles from Glasgow, but several searches of the area have so far turned up nothing. Judge Lord Bracadale previously told Gilroy he had shown 'quite chilling calmness' when he disposed of his ex-lover's remains. Caging the fiend in 2012, he continued: 'It seems that you are the only person who knows where her body is.' Now, a criminologist has told The Sun Online why the evil killer may never divulge the grisly secret. Nicole Nyamwiza, Senior Lecturer in Criminology at The University of Law said: "Refusing to reveal the location of a body is a pattern we've seen in several high-profile cases. It's often about control. "Even after conviction, the offender can still dictate the terms of closure. "In the case of David Gilroy, the continued silence keeps the family in a state of suspended grief, and that in itself is a form of harm. This is not unique. 10 10 10 10 "Ian Simms, who was convicted of murdering Helen McCourt in 1988, never revealed where he left her body. That refusal went on for decades. Despite forensic evidence, despite a conviction, he held on to that final piece of power. "For some individuals, particularly those with controlling or narcissistic tendencies, keeping that information back is deliberate. It sustains attention, preserves denial, or simply continues the exercise of control." Murder convictions where no body is found are rare, and the Pilley case is one of a handful in the UK where the decision has relied on circumstantial evidence. Despite their torment, Suzanne's family have refused to give up and launched Suzanne's Law in her name to stop killers who refuse to disclose the location of a victim's body from getting parole. Nicole added: "There is also a wider issue here about what justice really means. If someone can serve a sentence without ever disclosing what happened to a victim's remains, we have to question how we assess accountability or rehabilitation. "Proposals like Suzanne's Law are an important step. They recognise that justice involves more than time served. For many families, justice starts with being able to bring their loved one home." Chilling CCTV Suzanne and Gilroy had begun their affair in the spring of 2009 and he'd moved into her former council flat just a few streets away from her parents. Speaking during the court case, Suzanne's mother says the pair had a turbulent relationship and that her daughter had struggled to cope with his jealous behaviour. Two days before Suzanne vanished, the bookkeeper and Gilroy were seen on CCTV food shopping near her flat. Police Scotland also tracked the bookkeeper's last movements on the day of her disappearance through CCTV after she was reported missing by her parents. She boarded the No 2 bus near her home in Stenhouse, Edinburgh. at 8.20am, before changing to a No 4 bus. She entered a Sainsbury's at 8.48am and was seen walking into her office at 8.55am. Suzanne was never seen again. Early on, a person of interest was her married colleague and ex-Royal Navy engineer, Gilroy, due to their tumultuous relationship and his refusal to accept that their love affair was over. During his trial, it was heard that Gilroy met Suzanne when she arrived at work the day she went missing. They went to the basement garage and an argument ensued, after which the jury was told there had been a struggle and he had killed the bookkeeper. 10 10 The court heard he hid her body while he bought air fresheners, put her body in his car and then drove home. Disturbingly, he attended a school play and went out for dinner with his family as her remains lay in the boot of his car on the driveway. The day after Suzanne vanished, Gilroy went on an unplanned trip to Lochgilphead, Argyllshire, 130 miles away, where he had taken his lover for days out in the past. On the way back, police called him in for questioning and spotted scratches on his hand that he tried to cover up with makeup. From then on, he became a prime suspect. Dirt and vegetation on his car wheels suggested he had recently visited a forest - and Gilroy couldn't explain it away. Detectives worked out that he took five hours to drive what should have been a 36 minute journey to Lochgilphead. Cops scoured CCTV once again, tracking Gilroy's movements, and watched as he bought bin bags from a shop. Umbrella clue Street cameras also tracked his car making its way to Lochgilphead, and an umbrella was spotted on the parcel shelf in the boot of the vehicle. On his return journey, the umbrella was no longer there - and cops theorised it had been put back in the boot when the remains were taken out. A dog trained to smell blood and human remains also identified three areas of interest - the basement, and two spots in the boot of Gilroy's car. The evidence was enough for the jury to make a majority verdict after almost three days of deliberation. But nearly 13 years on, one thing remains unsolved - the location of Suzanne's body. Gail Fairgrieve, Suzanne's sister, said in 2019: "For the past decade we have lived in a state of limbo, waiting for the news that Suzanne's body had been found, but we've never been able to get that closure. "We accept that Suzanne was murdered and believe that the person responsible is in prison, but we feel we cannot say a proper goodbye until her body is found. "Both my mother and I want to again thank the public who have continued to contact the police, which has always given us hope that Suzanne has not been forgotten. "We understand that only one person can tell us where Suzanne is but has refused to do so. Police Scotland will respond to any information and are committed to bringing us some form of closure. "Their investigation can only conclude when Suzanne is found and so I would plead with anyone who knows something but hasn't come forward to search their conscience and get in touch. "Not for our sake, but for Suzanne's. Please let us give her the burial and send-off she deserves." Police Scotland said: "We remain committed to finding these answers for Suzanne's mother, Sylvia and sister, Gail." In another brutal blow for the family, Suzanne's dad tragically died in 2019 without ever knowing what happened to his daughter. Time is ticking to finally bring Suzanne home to her remaining loved ones - but it seems certain that her callous killer will look to take his secret to the grave.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Alana Armstrong: Murder accused 'did not know' he had hit e-bike
A man accused of murdering a mother-of-one in his Land Rover "did not know" he had struck her off the back of an electric bike, a murder trial has Muldoon said he would have stopped had he known 25-year-old Alana Armstrong had been knocked off the bike in Batley Lane, near Pleasley, Derbyshire, on 26 November last Crown Court heard Mr Muldoon also ran over Ms Armstrong's boyfriend Jordan Newton-Kay, who had his right leg amputated 15cm above the defendant, who the court heard was a drug dealer, said he feared he was being robbed but did not chase the bikes before Ms Armstrong died at the scene. Mr Muldoon, of Tuckers Lane in Mansfield, Nottinghamshire, said he did not see her go "over" his Land Rover Discovery. The 23-year-old denies Ms Armstrong's murder and causing grievous bodily harm with intent to kill Mr admitted causing death by dangerous driving and causing serious injury by dangerous driving before his trial Sally Howes, prosecuting, cross-examined Mr Muldoon on Tuesday and suggested that he was made a "fool of" in the lay-by of a country lane after he picked up a woman who wanted to buy £30 of cocaine from Howes said: "You were either embarrassed or annoyed by the fact that these bikes had lit up your car."Something happened in that lay-by that made you lose your rag and drive in that intimidating way, didn't it?""No," Mr Muldoon responded. "There was no reason to be embarrassed or annoyed."The prosecutor continued: "We know that the vehicle ran over Jordan Newton-Kay's leg - you would know, because he was run over by you as the driver. You say you were unaware of it." Mr Muldoon told the jury: "If I saw people fall, I would stop. I would not just leave people to suffer. I did not know I had hit anyone."He told the court he thought he had successfully overtaken the bike at a passing point in the country lane, and that the bike was still behind Howes asked: "These are people you feared were robbing you. If you think you are being robbed, why are you pursuing them?"Mr Muldoon told the court: "I was not pursuing them. Just because I'm behind them doesn't mean I'm chasing them. I was behind them doing 30 miles an hour, about a car distance [away]."Ms Howes said to the defendant: "[Ms Armstrong] was scooped into the bonnet, wasn't she? "She was not dragged - there are no injuries consistent with dragging, but there are injuries consistent with an impact onto her, or her onto a hard, unyielding surface."Mr Muldoon said: "I would have seen if someone went over me." 'Constructed lie' The defendant denied that he said he "was only meant to knock them off the bike" to his passenger after the court heard that Mr Muldoon followed Ms Armstrong and Mr Newton-Kay on one bike, and a rider on another bike, for two minutes and 20 seconds before the fatal Muldoon told the jury: "There was no intention to intimidate him. I had no intention to do anything. If my intention was to leave that lay-by and go after them and hit them, why would I leave that amount of time to hit them?"Ms Howes said Mr Muldoon told a "carefully constructed lie" when he told detectives he had not driven the vehicle for days before the collision and said he hoped his uncle "hands himself in".When asked why he lied to police, Mr Muldoon said: "Because I was scared, everything what everyone was saying. It was a murder investigation, obviously I was going to be scared."Mr Muldoon told the court, before becoming tearful: "I knew I wasn't going to see my children for a bit. I just had a newborn baby. I promised I would always be there."The trial continues.
