The History of Cultural Exchange Between the U.S. and China
President Richard Nixon inspects Chinese troops upon his departure from Beijing, China in 1972. Prime Minister Zhou Enlai walks to Nixon's right. Credit - Corbis—Getty Images
Democrats and Republicans united in April 2024 to pass a bill to ban TikTok in the United States. The bill, signed into law by President Joseph Biden, enacts a further clampdown on the reach of Chinese technology in the U.S., stating that it is 'protecting Americans from foreign adversary controlled applications.'
Though TikTok is headquartered in Singapore, a new China-based app soon after went viral in its place. With a sense of curiosity, irony, or perhaps plain spite, more than three million Americans created accounts on RedNote, a Chinese app likened to Instagram and known in China as Xiaohongshu. Prompted by the threatened termination of TikTok's domestic services in January, these so-called 'TikTok refugees' found themselves digital tourists suddenly immersed in Chinese internet culture.
These rare, unmediated exchanges between everyday Chinese and Americans appeared to reflect the simple pleasures inherent to internet culture—cute kids, cats, and comedy. 'The Chinese are so sweet, and so welcoming…I've made Chinese friends [that] I want to come visit,' relays one American user in a widely-circulated clip. In granting Americans intimate access to Chinese people and culture across the chasm of U.S.-China geopolitics, RedNote's window into Chinese life stands in stark contrast to the often menacing depictions of China in U.S. politics.
On President Donald Trump's first day in office, he signed an executive order to delay the enforcement of the ban on TikTok to April 5 and give the app an opportunity to find an American owner. So though RedNote's moment was likely fleeting, the kind of popular exchange it produced has precedent. There is a long history in which Americans and Chinese have sought to remake the relationship between the two nations by forging new relationships with one another through the exchange of books, films, and most importantly, people.
TikTok Restores Service For U.S. Users Based on Trump's Promised Executive Order
During the 1970s, people-to-people exchanges sought to bridge the gap between two nations that had lacked formal diplomatic relations since the formation of the People's Republic of China (PRC) in 1949. For two decades, the U.S. imposed an economic and political embargo on the newly established PRC, a period during which all trade was banned, information was tightly monitored by the FBI, and overseas Chinese Americans were even prosecuted for sending remittances to their families back home.
American leftists and progressives sought a break from U.S. Cold War foreign policy by launching 'friendship delegations' to China in the early 1970s. For instance, Black Panther leaders Eldridge Cleaver and Elaine Brown traveled to Beijing as part of an anti-imperialist tour of Asia, and members of the Committee of Concerned Asian Scholars toured the Chinese mainland. Expanding these efforts after its formation in 1971, the U.S.-China People's Friendship Association (USCPFA) sent more than 5,000 Americans to China in the 1970s. In 1979, one USCPFA delegation sent 22 Detroit youths to Shanghai and Beijing, where they played basketball with high schoolers, picked vegetables at communes, and performed American songs and dances at talent shows with their Chinese peers.
The Committee of Concerned Asian Scholars, a group first founded in opposition to the U.S. war in Vietnam, described these early delegations as an attempt to 'break through the wall of ignorance,' which had long separated Americans from China.
Nixon's 1972 visit to Beijing further peeled back this so-called 'bamboo curtain,' sparking a cultural wave of fascination with the Chinese mainland. China-mania spanned the ideological gamut: Black Power activists brandished copies of Mao's little red book. Friendship stores selling specialty foodstuffs, silks, and Maoist tchotchkes emerged to meet demand from both Chinese immigrants seeking familiar comforts and Americans fascinated by the exotic wares. Even Bloomingdale's got in on the action, unveiling in 1971 a 'China Passage' boutique selling bamboo and rattan housewares. But despite their differences, this array of actors shared a basic assessment: Americans had something to gain from engaging with China and Chinese people.
More importantly, these ambassadors carried the belief that American and Chinese people from all walks of life had the power to shape diplomatic relations. As I Wor Kuen, a Chinese American revolutionary organization that mobilized support for normalization in the Chinese community put it: 'The masses make history and it is the masses who will make normalization a reality.'
On the surface, today's 'TikTok refugees' bear little resemblance to the friendship delegations that came 50 years prior. While many 1970s counterculture youth viewed Mao-era China as a model for social revolution, young Americans today have mostly avoided identifying with foreign political models despite their historic dissatisfaction with U.S. capitalism.
And yet, in pulling back the curtain on contemporary Chinese life, RedNote has inevitably held up a mirror to American ways of living. 'Do you think USA will ever have worker led revolution?' One Chinese user queried. 'Why do you eat like ur healthcare is free,' another joked. Others asked if Americans really had to pay for ambulances, or whether that was just government propaganda. But the most popular bit on RedNote has been a satire of U.S. national security claims about China, with Chinese netizens dead-panning about being individually assigned 'Chinese spies.' A viral TikTok video features an American similarly promising to 'dropship my DNA to the front door of the Chinese Communist Party before I watch an Instagram reel.' The comedic exaggeration is clear, but the bit is also a gesture to something deeper: Americans are skeptical about their government's national security claims against China and open to seeing the country and its people through a different light.
In granting Americans both a window into contemporary China and a mirror to their own country, these exchanges also reflect the extent to which Americans continue to be siloed from Chinese people and culture. China has yet to enjoy the cross-cultural appeal that Korean dramas and Japanese anime have found across the Pacific. Netflix's controversial 2024 remake of Three-Body Problem—the popular Chinese science fiction franchise—reflects the notion that Chinese cultural works require repackaging before reaching American audiences. In this context, RedNote's breakthrough has been claimed by both Chinese state outlets and netizens as a soft power win—with one commentator on the Chinese video platform Bilibili likening the exodus of Americans to RedNote to the fall of the Berlin Wall.
How the U.S. Can Win the New Cold War
The historical allusion is fitting in an era of U.S.-China relations that a range of political commentators agree amounts to a new Cold War. Though largely confined to talk of supply chains, infrastructure, and security, these antagonisms inevitably trickle down to cultural and social exchange. As U.S. popular opinion of China hit an all-time low in 2023, the number of Americans studying in China dropped to around just 800, paling in comparison to its peak of 25,000 a decade ago.
Should TikTok be compelled to find a new American owner, RedNote's moment in the spotlight may prove to be short-lived. And yet, in the quotidian moments of cultural exchange, inside jokes, and social commentary that the platform has afforded, we see an echo of the promise of those early years of U.S.-China detente, when a rising generation of Americans and Chinese dreamed of a future outside of the confines of Cold War antagonism. As Bertha Thomas, a member of the 1979 Detroit youth tour wrote on her return to the United States: 'A most interesting phenomenon occurs when… precocious American teenagers and young adults come into contact with oodles of Chinese teenagers and young people. What transpires is instant rapport and friendship.'
If nothing else, RedNote's viral moment indicates both the rarity—and dire necessity—of such contact.
Mark Tseng-Putterman is a writer and historian working at the intersections of Asian American social movements, Cold War militarism, and US-Asia relations.
Made by History takes readers beyond the headlines with articles written and edited by professional historians. Learn more about Made by History at TIME here. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of TIME editors.
Write to Made by History at madebyhistory@time.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gina Ortiz Jones, lesbian and military vet, elected mayor of San Antonio
Gina Ortiz Jones, a lesbian and military veteran who served in President Joe Biden's administration, has been elected mayor of San Antonio, the second-largest city in Texas and seventh-largest in the U.S. Keep up with the latest in + news and politics. Jones beat Rolando Pablos, a former Texas secretary of state, in a runoff election Saturday. The margin was 54.3 percent to 45.7 percent, according to Ballotpedia. They advanced to the runoff because no candidate out of 27 in the May 3 general election received a majority of the vote. In the general election, Jones led with 27.2 percent and Pablos came in second with 16.6 percent. The current mayor, Ron Nirenberg, could not run again due to term limits. Races for mayor and other city positions in San Antonio are officially nonpartisan, but this election was partisan in practice. Jones emphasized her affiliation with the Democratic Party, while Pablos, who was elected secretary of state as a Republican, highlighted his ties to leading Republicans such as Texas Gov. Greg Abbott. RELATED: Jones was undersecretary of the Air Force during the Biden administration; she was the first lesbian, second member of the LGBTQ+ community, and first woman of color (she's Filipina American) to serve in the post. She twice ran unsuccessfully for the U.S. House as a Democrat. She was an intelligence officer in the Air Force and was deployed to Iraq during the war there, serving under 'don't ask, don't tell.' After leaving the Air Force, she worked for the federal government as an adviser on intelligence and trade, with agencies including the Defense Intelligence Agency and Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. She left government service six months into Donald Trump's first term. In the mayoral race, 'she campaigned on her plans to expand early-childhood education to more children and increase affordable housing and work programs for unskilled workers,' The New York Times reports. 'San Antonio showed up and showed out,' she told supporters Saturday night after the results came in. 'We reminded them that our city is about compassion and it's about leading with everybody in mind. … So I look forward to being a mayor for all.' RELATED: Lesbian Gina Ortiz Jones Wants to Be Texas's First Out Congress Member Two other cities among the largest 10 in the nation have had LGBTQ+, specifically lesbian, mayors. Annise Parker was mayor of Texas's largest city, Houston, from 2010 to 2016. Until recently, she was president and CEO of the LGBTQ+ Victory Fund. Houston is the fourth-largest city in the U.S. Another lesbian, Lori Lightfoot, was mayor of Chicago, the third-largest, from 2019 to 2023. Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson hailed Jones's victory, releasing this statement: 'Every one of us deserves leaders who value equality and will fight to ensure that we can live freely without fear of discrimination. Gina Ortiz Jones is that leader. That's why HRC was proud to make calls and knock doors to help mobilize Equality Voters in San Antonio and put her over the finish line. Her win isn't just exciting, it's historic; as the first ever openly LGBTQ+ mayor of San Antonio during a time of ceaseless attacks on our community, Gina is emblematic of the resilience, strength, and joy that our community has already used to thrive in challenging times. We can't wait to see her get to work tackling the problems that are impacting our neighbors, families and coworkers and standing up for the rights and safety of every San Antonian.' Evan Low, president and CEO of LGBTQ+ Victory Fund, which endorsed Jones, issued this statement: 'Gina Ortiz-Jones is LGBTQ+ Victory Fund family, and we are proud to see her rise to lead America's seventh-largest city as mayor. As a veteran, her service reflects the estimated 1 million LGBTQ+ veterans who have contributed to our nation with honor, distinction, and an unyielding warrior spirit. San Antonio voters made the right call by sending Gina to City Hall, not only making history but selecting a candidate who is driven to make lives better in her hometown.' Jones will be sworn in June 18 for a four-year term.


Axios
35 minutes ago
- Axios
Freshman wishlist: Adam Schiff vs. Trump 2.0
Sen. Adam Schiff has some advice for President Trump when attempting to demean him: Pick one nickname. Why it matters: Schiff rose to cable TV stardom as an anti-Trump foil while leading the first impeachment. "Shifty Schiff" or "Watermelon Head" learned to give as good as he got. Trump called Schiff names. Schiff ensured he was impeached — twice. "[T]he cardinal rule of nicknames is: Just stick with one," Schiff told Axios in an interview. Schiff translated his MAGA notoriety into a safe Senate seat, first battling through a tough, expensive primary. Now he's ready for round two with Trump. "I've been thrust back into a lot of that responsibility again because what he's trying to do in the second term is even worse than what he tried to do in the first term," Schiff said. Zoom out: Before Trump dominated the national conversation, Schiff considered himself a fairly nonpartisan national security expert. He endorsed Jim Mattis for Secretary of Defense in 2016 when other Democrats didn't. Schiff had hoped for another rebrand in the Senate. "I was expecting a Biden or a Harris presidency, and the ability to just focus exclusively on what positive things I could get done," he told Axios. What to watch: He is enjoying visiting redder areas of the state after spending years representing just a slice of heavily Democratic Los Angeles. He shared about one such visit in the state's northeast. "I knew I had made progress when one of the farmers looked at me and said, 'I don't know why he calls you watermelon head. You have a perfectly normal-sized head.'" But it's doubtful he'll revert back to a less partisan posture, given the direction of Trump's second term. Driving the news: Two days after our interview, Trump deployed National Guard troops to tamp down on ICE protests in Los Angeles in opposition to Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.). "This action is designed to inflame tensions, sow chaos, and escalate the situation," Schiff posted on X on Saturday. He also repeatedly called for violence to stop at protests. "Assaulting law enforcement is never ok," he posted Sunday. Zoom in: Schiff tried to pass a resolution shortly before our interview to stop the administration from stripping civil rights leader Harvey Milk's name from a Navy ship. He has demanded financial disclosures from the White House, written letters to stop DOGE from shutting down USDA offices and tried to block the repeal of EV rules. "Most of my days are spent trying to walk this line between stopping the administration from violating the law and ignoring the Constitution on the one hand," Schiff said, "and continuing to deliver for Californians..." Schiff recognizes that his clashes altered his career trajectory. "I have my brand pre-Trump and my brand post-Trump," Schiff told Axios. Between the lines: Schiff's leadership in the House's first Trump impeachment made him a mortal enemy to Trump and his allies, leading to a "weirdly personal" dynamic, Schiff said.


Axios
35 minutes ago
- Axios
Democrats target farmers on Trump's DOGE cuts
Sens. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) and Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) will hold a "shadow hearing" Thursday to draw a direct link between President Trump's plans to cut foreign assistance and the farmers that sell their crops to the programs. Why it matters: Democrats are looking for ways to make Trump's DOGE and budget plans uncomfortable for farm state Republicans and want to appeal directly to their constituents. The Trump administration has called for deep spending reductions for international food programs run by the United States Agency for International Development and the Department of Agriculture. Those programs buy agricultural products from U.S. farmers to the tune of $2 billion a year, according to Shaheen. Some farm state Republicans have questioned administration st officials about programs like Food for Peace. Zoom out: Democrats are trying to broaden their case against the Trump administration's budget, which will receive its first official vote this week, when the House brings up Trump's rescissions package, which cuts funding for NPR, PBS and USAID. Zoom in: On Thursday, Shaheen, the ranking member on the foreign relations committee, and Klobuchar, the ranking member of the agriculture subcommittee on nutrition and forestry will host a group of experts to detail the effect of the cuts to foreign aid on U.S. farmers.