Weeks after Mark Carney's win, Canada's economy appears in crisis; job data at its lowest almost in years
Newly elected Prime Minister
Mark Carney
is confronting a significant economic downturn as Canada's labor market shows alarming signs of deterioration, particularly impacting recent graduates. Fresh data reveals a concerning trend of rapidly rising unemployment and sluggish job creation, exacerbating existing economic vulnerabilities just months into Carney's tenure. In April 2025,
Canada
added a meager 7,400 jobs, a figure far below expectations and insufficient to keep pace with population growth, consequently pushing the national unemployment rate to 6.9%. However, the situation is considerably more severe for young Canadians entering the workforce. The unemployment rate for recent post-secondary graduates has surged to a troubling 11.2%, marking the highest rate at the beginning of a year in at least two decades, according to an analysis of Statistics Canada data by Brendon Bernard, a senior economist at Indeed Canada. This paints a stark and bleak picture for young Canadians attempting to launch their careers, gain financial independence, and secure their long-term financial futures. Indeed, sources like The Globe and Mail are reporting that the current labor market conditions represent the bleakest in decades for this demographic.
Trump Tariffs and more: What is causing employment risis in Canada
The delayed economic recovery, significantly hampered by external factors such as the ongoing trade disputes with the United States – involving substantial tariffs on key Canadian exports like steel, aluminum, and automobiles – has dashed earlier hopes for a swift rebound in the labor market following anticipated interest rate adjustments by the Bank of Canada. Economists are increasingly concerned that graduating during such a pronounced economic downturn could have enduring negative consequences on young individuals' career trajectories, potentially leading to prolonged periods of underemployment, slower income growth, and hindered career advancement. 'If the recovery is swift, people can regain momentum,' Bernard cautioned, 'But right now, it's unclear how long these conditions will persist, and the longer it takes, the greater the potential for lasting damage to their career prospects.'
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
2025 Top Trending local enterprise accounting software [Click Here]
Esseps
Learn More
The financial ramifications of this employment crisis for young Canadians are substantial and long-lasting. Protracted delays in securing stable and meaningful employment directly impede their ability to initiate savings and investment early in their careers – a cornerstone of long-term financial security. Certified financial planner Desmond Nwaerondu of Sun Life in Calgary emphasizes the critical impact of delayed savings on retirement goals. He illustrates this with a compelling example: an individual who begins saving $200 per month at age 20 with a hypothetical 4% annual return would accumulate approximately $296,842 by age 65. In contrast, someone who delays saving until age 30, with the same monthly contribution and return, would amass only $180,642 – a difference of over $116,000 due to just a decade of delayed action. This highlights the power of compounding and the significant disadvantage faced by young individuals who are unable to start saving early due to unemployment or underemployment.
What job seekers in Canada need to do
Despite the challenging economic landscape, experts offer guidance for young job seekers striving to navigate this difficult market. Chris Raper, a portfolio manager at Aspira Wealth (Raymond James Ltd.), advises adopting a pragmatic approach by gaining any form of work experience available, even if it falls outside their immediate field of interest. He argues that these roles, such as camp counseling or positions in the hospitality industry, can be invaluable in developing essential soft skills that are highly valued by employers across various sectors. Furthermore, Raper underscores the growing importance of acquiring high-demand technical skills, particularly in areas like Artificial Intelligence (AI), suggesting the utilization of readily available free online resources such as YouTube for self-directed learning. Networking is also identified as a critical strategy, with professionals recommending active engagement on platforms like LinkedIn and attendance at relevant industry events to build connections and uncover potential opportunities. 'You need to get in front of the people working in the industry you want to join,' Raper advises.
From a financial perspective, advisors strongly recommend that unemployed young individuals exercise caution in accumulating debt, especially high-interest credit card debt, which can create a significant financial burden as they attempt to establish their careers. Once employment is secured, prioritizing savings from the outset is crucial. Nwaerondu advocates for the 'pay yourself first' approach, which involves automatically allocating a portion of each paycheck to savings or investment accounts before any discretionary spending occurs.
The emotional toll of the prolonged job search should not be underestimated. Individuals like Ms. Lashley, whose experience was referenced in the original article, highlight the demoralizing effects of repeated rejections. However, experts like Raper emphasize the importance of resilience and maintaining a long-term perspective, asserting that 'Every rejection brings you one step closer to the right opportunity.'
Grim Economic Outlook
The broader economic outlook for Canada under Prime Minister Carney's leadership appears increasingly precarious. The combination of high unemployment, particularly among young people, and sluggish overall job growth raises serious concerns about potential economic stagnation. The ongoing trade tensions with the US, manifested in tariffs on key Canadian exports, further exacerbate these challenges by negatively impacting crucial sectors of the Canadian economy. Statistics Canada data indicating that approximately 1.6 million Canadians are currently unemployed underscores the significant strain on the national labor market. The net addition of only 7,400 jobs in April, following a loss of 32,600 jobs in March, highlights the volatile and uneven nature of the current economic recovery, further amplifying anxieties about Canada's economic stability in the face of persistent trade headwinds and a weakening labor market.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
23 minutes ago
- Mint
Canada's Ex-Minister Urges Better China Ties to Hedge US Risks
Canada should bolster ties with China to hedge against uncertainty from US President Donald Trump's approach to bilateral relations, according to a former top Canadian official. 'Who are the other reliable partners we have in the world?' said Bill Morneau, who served as finance minister under former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau through 2020. Noting that China is Canada's second-largest trading partner, after the US, he said it's no surprise that Prime Minister Mark Carney is looking to build 'a more stable and expansive trading relationship with China and other countries.' Morneau's comments come as Canada seeks to diversify its economic partnerships while talks with the US drag on. Earlier this month, Carney spoke with Chinese Premier Li Qiang about trade and tackling the fentanyl crisis in a sign of warming ties. Carney's government also invited Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to the Group of Seven leaders' summit in Alberta this weekend. Morneau, speaking Wednesday at the Bloomberg Invest conference in Hong Kong, said that while Ottawa should look to reach a trade deal with Washington and maintain strong ties, officials also need to protect the economy and Canada's own interests from the currently 'very volatile' relationship with its southern neighbor. Canadian and US officials have been holding trade talks for months, with Trump and Carney in direct contact ahead of the G-7 meeting beginning June 15. The two sides are looking to negotiate a deal to ease tariffs on each other's goods. Meanwhile, many of the issues Trump has raised, including undocumented migration into the US, don't relate to Canada, Morneau said. 'My expectation is that much of this is obviously posturing,' said Morneau, who was also previously governor of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank. The renegotiation of the trade agreement between the nations will likely include greater access into Canada's protected dairy market and an increased Canadian role in NATO, Morneau said, while any major change to natural-resource sharing — such as Canadian fresh water — is off the table. Carney this week announced a boost to defense spending to meet NATO's target this year, saying it's needed in a 'darker, more competitive world.' Trump has called for all countries to increase their share of global military spending in order to rely less on the US. 'You want to get to as best you can with as many partners as you can, whether its with China or with other parts of the world,' Morneau said. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
India Today
23 minutes ago
- India Today
Bros again? Elon Musk's posts spark buzz of 'big, beautiful' patch up with Trump
Months of bromance, a surprise resignation, social media rant, public fiery fallout and regret: Elon Musk's relationship with Donald Trump has been nothing short of a Bollywood drama. The duo once appeared inseparable, sharing stages at public events, Oval Office meetings, and joint press conferences. Then came Musk's shock resignation, and with it, an all-out public fallout. What followed was a no-holds-bar attack from both sides, with people and even Musk's father hoping that the frenemies would soon be back regret some of my posts on Donald Trump," said Musk in a humble post on Wednesday after a week of public rants against 'One Big Beautiful Bill'. Though unanticipated, Musk's walk-back didn't come out of nowhere. In recent days, he's been aligning with the Trump administration's stance on the violent protests in Los Angeles, publicly supporting the crackdown while dialling back his earlier attacks."This is not ok," Musk wrote on X just days after calling for Trump's impeachment and denouncing his signature legislation as a 'disgusting abomination.' MUSK DROPPED HINTS Before today's post, Musk softened his stance on Trump, deleted harsh criticisms, reshared US President's posts and re-followed key allies. He reshared posts from Vance, who declared that the 'president will not tolerate rioting and violence,' and included American flag emojis in his also went on a spree to delete his previous posts critical of Trump. In a now-deleted X post, Musk wrote: 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!'Musk also deleted a post promising to apologise only 'as soon as there is a full dump of the Epstein files.' In another post, Trump had expressed support for Trump's impeachment. When a user suggested to replace him with Vance, Musk replied 'Yes.'These posts disappeared gradually, some overnight with the links to these post now showing a message that says, "Nothing to see here."Apart from deleting these posts, he re-followed Stephen Miller, Trump's deputy chief of staff, after unfollowing him during their feud last NOT INTERESTED?On Friday, he told ABC News' Jonathan Karl that he was "not particularly" interested in talking with Musk."You mean the man who has lost his mind?" he Friday evening, Trump told reporters, "I'm not thinking about Elon Musk. I just wish him well."Earlier, Trump warned Musk of "very serious consequences" if the tech billionaire follows through on funding primary challengers against sitting Republican have to pay very serious consequences if he does that," Trump said while speaking to NBC News, adding that he has no intentions of reconciliation with the SpaceX CEO.
Mint
23 minutes ago
- Mint
MAGA's remaking of universities could have dire consequences
'THIS IS an economic revolution and we will win." Donald Trump's line on tariffs sounds like something from Robespierre or Engels. And as any revolutionary knows, to sweep away the old order it is not enough just to raise import duties. You also have to seize and refashion the institutions that control the culture. In America that means wresting control of Ivy League universities which play an outsize role in forming the elite (including Mr Trump's cabinet). The MAGA plan to remake the Ivies could have terrible consequences for higher education, for innovation, for economic growth and even for what sort of country America is. And it is only just beginning. The target has been exquisitely chosen. Over the past decade elite universities have lost the bipartisan support they used to enjoy. This was partly their own fault. In too many cases they succumbed to faddish groupthink about oppression, became scared of their student-customers and turned away speakers in the name of safety. At the same time, American politics became more polarised by educational achievement. Kamala Harris lost the popular vote in the 2024 presidential election. But she won Americans with post-graduate degrees by 20 points. This combination left the academy vulnerable. But the most substantive change has been within the Republican Party. Conservatives considered elite universities to be hostile territory even before William F. Buckley published 'God and Man at Yale" in 1951. Yet they also respected the basic compact that exists between universities and the federal government: that taxpayers fund scientific research and provide grants for students from poor families, and in return, universities do world-changing research. Some of the researchers may have views that irk the White House of the day. Many are foreigners. But their work ends up benefiting America. That is why, in 1962, the government funded a particle accelerator, even though some people who would use it had long hair and hated American foreign policy. And why, later that decade, researchers at American universities invented the internet, with military funding. This deal has been the source of military as well as economic power. It has contributed to almost every technological leap that has boosted output, from the internet to mRNA vaccines and GLP-1 agonists to artificial intelligence. It has made America a magnet for talented, ambitious people from around the world. It is this compact—not bringing car factories back to the rust belt—that is the key to America's prosperity. And now the Trump administration wants to tear it up. His government has used federal grants to take revenge on universities: the presidents of Princeton and Cornell criticised the government and promptly had over $1bn in grants cancelled or frozen. It has arrested foreign students who have criticised the conduct of Israel's war in Gaza. It has threatened to increase the tax on endowments: J.D. Vance (Yale Law School) has proposed raising it on large endowments from 1.4% to 35%. What it wants in return varies. Sometimes it is to eradicate the woke-mind virus. Sometimes it is to eradicate antisemitism. It always involves a double standard on free speech, according to which you can complain about cancel culture and then cheer on the deportation of a foreign student for publishing an op-ed in a college newspaper. This suggests that, as with any revolution, it is about who has power and control. So far, universities have tried to lie flat and hope Mr Trump leaves them alone, just like many of the big law firms that the president has targeted. The Ivy presidents meet every month or so, but have yet to come up with a common approach. Meanwhile, Harvard is changing the leadership of its Middle East studies centre and Columbia is on its third president in a year. This strategy is unlikely to work. The MAGA vanguard cannot believe how quickly the Ivies have capitulated. The Ivies also underestimate the fervour of the revolutionaries they are up against. Some of them don't just want to tax Harvard—they want to burn it down. Resisting the administration's assault requires courage. Harvard's endowment is about the same size as the sovereign-wealth fund of the oil-rich sultanate of Oman, which should buy some bravery. But that mooted tax could shrink it quickly. Harvard receives over $1bn in grants each year. Columbia's annual budget is $6bn; it receives $1.3bn in grants. Other elite universities are less fortunate. If even the Ivies cannot stand up to bullying, there is not much hope for elite public universities, which are just as dependent on research funding and do not have vast endowments to absorb government pressure. How, then, should universities respond? Some things that their presidents want to do anyway, such as adopting codes protecting free speech on campus, cutting administrative staff, banning the use of 'diversity" statements in hiring and ensuring more diverse viewpoints among academics, accord with the views of many Republicans (and this newspaper). But the universities should draw a clear line: even if it means losing government funding, what they teach and research is for them to decide. Like Ike This principle is one reason why America became the world's most innovative economy over the past 70 years, and why Russia and China did not. Yet even that undersells its value. Free inquiry is one of the cornerstones of American liberty, along with the freedom to criticise the president without fear of retribution. True conservatives have always known this. 'The free university", said Dwight Eisenhower in his farewell presidential address in 1961, has been 'the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery". Eisenhower, who was president of Columbia before he was president of the United States, warned that when universities become dependent on government grants, the government can control scholarship. For a long time that warning seemed a bit hysterical. America never had a president willing to exert such authority over colleges. Now it does. Subscribers to The Economist can sign up to our Opinion newsletter, which brings together the best of our leaders, columns, guest essays and reader correspondence.
