Nine key issues in mushroom murder case
It would be more than three months before homicide squad detectives arrested Erin Patterson at her Leongatha home and laid charges of murder and attempted murder.
Over 10 weeks, details of Patterson's actions in the lead up to the fatal lunch and afterwards were drawn into sharp focus as more than 50 witnesses – including Patterson herself – were grilled in the witness box.
On Monday, after seven days of deliberations, the jury unanimously found Patterson guilty of three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder. Erin Patterson spent eight days in the witness box giving evidence. NewsWire / Anita Lester Credit: News Corp Australia
Prosecutors argued the only reasonable explanation for what happened is Patterson knowingly seeking out death cap mushrooms and including them in the lunch on July 29, 2023, intending to kill her or seriously injure her guests.
Her defence, on the other hand, argued Patterson accidentally included the deadly mushrooms and acted poorly out of panic she would be wrongly blamed.
Patterson's parents-in-law, Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson died from multiple organ failure linked to mushroom poisoning in the week following the lunch.
During his final address to the jury, on day 40 of the trial, Justice Christopher Beale listed nine issues the jury would have to decide and summarised the evidence and arguments for each.
These were;
Whether Patterson deliberately included death cap mushrooms in the meal;
Whether she had the state of mind necessary for the charges;
Whether she had good reasons not to kill her lunch guests;
Whether she foraged for edible wild mushrooms;
Why her children were not at the lunch;
Why Patterson cooked individual beef wellingtons;
Whether the lunch guests had different-coloured dinner plates;
Whether Patterson allocated her own plate;
Whether Patterson engaged in incriminating conduct after the lunch. Patterson had maintained she did not intentionally harm anyone. Supplied. Credit: Supplied
The judge said the 'ultimate' issues were whether Patterson deliberately included death caps and whether she had the state of mind necessary, but the other issues could inform their judgement on those issues.
Justice Beale told jurors the case had attracted 'unprecedented media attention' and directed them to not let it influence them.
'No-one in the media, in public, in your workplace, or in your homes have sat in that jury box throughout the trial, seeing and hearing all the witnesses, mostly in person,' he said.
'You, and you alone, are best placed to decide whether the prosecution have proved their case beyond reasonable doubt. No-one else.'
During the trial, the jury heard Patterson extended invitations to her husband Simon Patterson and four of his family members after the Sunday service at the Korumburra Baptist Church on July 16.
Ian Wilkinson, Heather's husband and the Church's pastor, recalled his wife was 'fairly excited'.
'We were very happy to be invited, yes. It seemed like maybe our relationship with Erin was going to improve,' he told the jury. Ian told the court his wife expressed confusion about the differently coloured plates after they fell ill. NewsWire / Diego Fedele Credit: News Corp Australia
Simon initially agreed to attend, but pulled out the night before, texting Patterson that he was 'too uncomfortable' with the prospect.
He told the court he and Patterson had an amicable relationship in the years since their separation in 2015, but things had changed at the end of 2022.
She responded minutes later, saying she was disappointed and urging Simon to change his mind.
' … I wanted it to be a special meal as I may not be able to host a lunch like this again for some time,' she wrote.
On the stand, Patterson said she may have exaggerated but wanted to make Simon feel bad for not attending. Simon Patterson told the jury he remains married to Patterson. Picture. NewsWire/Nadir Kinani Credit: News Corp Australia
The four lunch guests, Don, Gail, Ian and Heather, arrived together about 12.30pm and were shown around the home Patterson had built the year prior.
They sat down and ate the individually-portioned beef wellingtons and left about 3.45pm, with each of the guests falling ill overnight.
Giving evidence, Ian Wilkinson recalled Patterson eating off a smaller 'orangey-tan' coloured plate while the guests ate off larger grey plates.
He also said Patterson revealed a cancer diagnosis, asked for advice on how to break the news to her two children and the group praying together.
Patterson herself, confirmed she had never been diagnosed with cancer and disputed she said she did, but recalled insinuating she was undergoing medical testing for a cancer concern.
This, she agreed, was a lie, but explained she was planning to have weight loss surgery and intended to use the lie as cover to avoid embarrassing conversations. Heather Wilkinson was the first of the lunch guests to die, while Ian survived. Supplied. Credit: Supplied
Patterson told the jury she did not own white plates or any sets of four matching plates, with her lawyers arguing Ian was mistaken.
On the stand, she also claimed she'd never made beef wellington before and modified a RecipeTin Eats recipe from a traditional log to individual portions because she could not find an appropriate cut of meat.
Each of the lunch guests were in hospital the morning of July 30 and their conditions continued to deteriorate to the point the quartet were on life support and in induced comas by August 1.
Patterson meanwhile, said she was suffering regular diarrhoea but drove her son to a flying lesson in Tyabb – a more than two hour round trip – in the afternoon of July 30.
She attended Leongatha Hospital the following day, where she was told by Dr Chris Webster that doctors suspected death cap poisoning in the other guests and she needed immediate treatment.
Patterson discharged herself against medical advice about 5 minutes after arriving and returned an hour and 38 minutes later when she was admitted.
She told the jury she attended thinking she had gastro and was not prepared to be admitted but returned after sorting a few things out at home.
Patterson was taken to hospital in Melbourne, alongside her two children who she claimed to have served leftovers with the pastry and mushrooms scrapped off for dinner on July 30.
The trio were discharged the following day on August 1 and returned home.
None of the medical witnesses in the trial said Patterson appeared unwell and she showed no markers of death cap poisoning but intensive care specialist Professor Andrew Bersten said her medical records were consistent with a diarrhoeal illness.
Heather Wilkinson and Gail Patterson both died on August 4 and Don Patterson died the following day. Simon's parents Don and Gail Patterson died a day apart. Supplied Credit: Supplied
The jury heard the morning after Patterson was discharged, she drove to the Koonwarra Transfer Station and dumped her dehydrator which was later located by police and found to have death cap remnants.
Prosecutors alleged Patterson deliberately sourced the death caps, pointing to two sightings posted to citizen science website iNaturalist in the nearby towns of Loch and Outtrim.
They also pointed to evidence from digital forensic scientist Dr Matthew Sorrell that her phone records indicate possible visits to those towns in April and May.
Prosecutors alleged Patterson made individual portions of beef wellington so she could control what went into them to 'devastating effect'.
They alleged she feigned death cap poisoning, spun a story about feeding the leftovers to her children and dumped the dehydrator as an effort to avoid suspicion.
'She has told lies upon lies because she knew the truth would implicate her,' Crown prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC said.
'When she knew her lies had been uncovered, she came up with a carefully constructed narrative to fit with the evidence – almost.'
Prosecutors called on the jury to reject Patterson's account.
On the stand, Patterson denied deliberately sourcing the death caps but told the jury she was an amateur wild mushroom forager.
She said she picked and dehydrated mushrooms from the Korumburra Botanical Gardens earlier that year and now believes it's possible she accidentally included them in the meal.
Patterson told the jury she'd bought dried mushrooms from an Asian grocer in Melbourne in April that year, storing them in a Tupperware container in her pantry and adding them to the duxelles because she thought the dish was 'a little bland'. Patterson told the jury she developed an interest in foraging in early 2020. Brooke Grebert-Craig. Credit: Supplied
Explaining why she dumped the dehydrator, Patterson said Simon had accused her of using it to poison his parents while in hospital on August 1 and she began to panic fearing she would be wrongly blamed.
She also confirmed she did not tell anyone, from police to doctors and public health authorities about her foraging or suspicion.
'The lies in the days afterwards – everything that she does in the days afterwards, doesn't change what her intention was at the time of serving the meal,' defence barrister Colin Mandy SC said.
'And a person, you might think, who accidentally made four people very unwell … that person has a motive to tell a lot of lies.' There has been a significant media presence in Morwell. NewsWire / Diego Fedele Credit: News Corp Australia
Her defence pointed to a lack of motive put forward by the prosecution, suggesting all the evidence in the case indicated she had good relationships with her in-laws.
'Erin Patterson had a motive to keep these people in her world … especially so they could keep supporting her and her children,' Mr Mandy said.
Patterson's defence pointed to three biological markers; low potassium, elevated haemoglobin and elevated fibrinogen; as evidence she was sick, just not sick as her guests.
Mr Mandy said the evidence in the trial was people could have different severity of illness from death cap poisoning and Patterson had given an account of vomiting in the hours after the lunch.
She will return to court at a later date.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
3 hours ago
- West Australian
Childcare in Perth: Daycare centres charging over maximum rate cap as daily prices surge above $200
More than one third of childcare centres are charging fees above the maximum recommended by the Federal Government — the highest percentage since the subsidy was introduced in 2018 — as daily prices in Perth surge to above $200 in some suburbs. According to Federal Government data, 34.9 per cent of childcare centres in Australia had hourly fees over the maximum rate cap of $14.29 in the March quarter, compared to 29.9 per cent in the previous quarter and 12.5 per cent five years ago. The hourly-fee cap is set by the Government as a guide for what a 'high fee' might be, and it's the maximum rate the government will subsidise. A family's Child Care Subsidy percentage applies to the lowest of either the cap, or the hourly fee charged by their childcare provider, so families pay the difference when childcare centres charge above the cap. Last Monday, July 7, the CCS hourly rate cap increased to $14.63 in line with the Consumer Price Index. But the industry has warned the rise is not enough. Rachelle Tucker, the chief executive of the Australian Childcare Alliance WA, said the increase in centres charging above the hourly cap was concerning from an affordability perspective. 'But it is a reflection of the growing gap between the actual cost of delivering quality early learning and the CCS system's capped rates,' she said. 'The fee cap has not kept pace with the real costs of service delivery, especially for services in high-cost areas or those with higher staffing needs to support quality ratios and educational outcomes.' She added it was important to note that charging above the cap did not necessarily mean services were over-charging. 'It often means they are trying to cover their genuine operating costs,' she said. The revelations come at a time of turmoil for the sector, with educators, parents and providers reeling from allegations against Victorian man Joshua Dale Brown, who was charged with dozens of child sex offences allegedly committed against eight children at a Melbourne childcare centre. The WA Government has ordered a snap review of child safety in the State in light of the allegations. Last weekend, The West Australian revealed that hundreds of WA childcare centres either don't meet minimum quality standards or are yet to be rated. The State has the lowest proportion of centres that exceed the minimum standards, and none of its almost 1500 childcare services are rated 'excellent'. Government data shows fees in WA have increased by 15 per cent or $1.90 an hour in the past two years, to an average of $13.90 an hour across the country. Daily fees across Perth have hit $200 — before the CCS — in some areas. In response to a Facebook post on a parents' forum this week, dozens of Perth mothers shared their daily fees, starting as low as $119 and reaching $215. The six Schools of Early Learning are among the most expensive. Its North Perth centre has a two-day minimum costing $424. The price decreases each additional day to $905 for five days. Last year the Federal Government announced a 15 per cent pay rise for almost 200,000 childcare educators as part of a $3.6 billion package — but centres could only access the funding if they agreed to cap any fee increases at 4.4 per cent. Ms Tucker said while many centres had done their best to remain within the cap, 'the reality is that it is becoming increasingly difficult to absorb the rising costs of operating without passing some of those costs on to families. 'The cap is a blunt instrument that doesn't account for the significant cost increases in wages, utilities, food, rent, and compliance,' she said. 'Services are trying to balance affordability for families with the financial sustainability required to maintain quality and retain staff. Many services are operating on very tight margins, with little financial buffer.' Minister for Early Childhood Education Jess Walsh said the Government's early childhood education reforms, introduced two years ago, had delivered relief to more than one million families. 'For a family earning $168,000, with one child in care 30 hours a week, our reforms have cut out-of-pocket costs by around $7440 than they otherwise would be,' she said. 'We want to make sure workers can be fairly paid without the costs being passed onto families.' The Government is taking compliance action against centres that breach the 4.4 per cent fee cap, but it is understood the vast majority of centres have kept within the rules.
West Australian
5 hours ago
- West Australian
7NEWS Spotlight: Criminal experts say mushroom killer Erin Patterson ‘knew what she was doing'
Criminal experts have described mushroom killer Erin Patterson as a 'formidable witness' who 'knew what she was doing'. Patterson this week was convicted of three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder, following a mammoth 10-week-long trial. The 50-year-old's estranged husband Simon's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, 70, and aunt Heather Wilkinson, 66, all died in hospital days after Patterson served them beef Wellington parcels laced with death cap mushrooms in July 2023. Heather's husband, Ian Wilkinson, was the sole survivor. Now, in a 7NEWS Spotlight special, presenter Michael Usher investigates how the seemingly ordinary mother-of-two became one of the worst female mass murderers in Australian history. Featuring in-depth analysis and expert commentary from industry leaders including criminal barrister Geoffrey Watson, forensic psychologist Peter Ashkar and former detective Damian Marrett, Spotlight dives into the mind of a killer. According to Usher, Mr Ashkar described poisoning someone as an 'act of aggression' and said it was a 'very deliberate act of control of power'. '(Being poisoned) is an absolutely hideous way to die because there's intense pain and suffering,' Usher said. Mr Ashkar also described Patterson as smart and cunning and said 'she knew what she was doing'. 'If you look back at the vision of her at her home when our reports went and door-stopped her, (she was) in tears and was distraught and upset,' Usher said. 'But on the stand, Ashkar said she was formidable — she knew what she was doing and she was clear and smart. '(Ashkar said Patterson) knew what was going on, she was in charge and she owned her narrative. 'Getting inside her mind is a fascinating and frightening exercise.' But Usher said Patterson didn't appear to have a clear motive. 'We're so used to murder cases (where there is a) very clear motive like revenge, fame or money,' he said. 'It's not like she had a proven pattern (of saying), 'I hate my in laws, they have done me wrong, I want to plan something', it wasn't as clear as that.' Inside the Mind of the Mushroom Killer: A 7NEWS Spotlight special airs Sunday at 8.45pm
Perth Now
5 hours ago
- Perth Now
How Erin Patterson went from ordinary mum to mass murderer
Criminal experts have described mushroom killer Erin Patterson as a 'formidable witness' who 'knew what she was doing'. Patterson this week was convicted of three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder, following a mammoth 10-week-long trial. The 50-year-old's estranged husband Simon's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, 70, and aunt Heather Wilkinson, 66, all died in hospital days after Patterson served them beef Wellington parcels laced with death cap mushrooms in July 2023. Heather's husband, Ian Wilkinson, was the sole survivor. Now, in a 7NEWS Spotlight special, presenter Michael Usher investigates how the seemingly ordinary mother-of-two became one of the worst female mass murderers in Australian history. Featuring in-depth analysis and expert commentary from industry leaders including criminal barrister Geoffrey Watson, forensic psychologist Peter Ashkar and former detective Damian Marrett, Spotlight dives into the mind of a killer. Criminal psychologist Peter Ashkar. Credit: Supplied According to Usher, Mr Ashkar described poisoning someone as an 'act of aggression' and said it was a 'very deliberate act of control of power'. '(Being poisoned) is an absolutely hideous way to die because there's intense pain and suffering,' Usher said. Mr Ashkar also described Patterson as smart and cunning and said 'she knew what she was doing'. 'If you look back at the vision of her at her home when our reports went and door-stopped her, (she was) in tears and was distraught and upset,' Usher said. 'But on the stand, Ashkar said she was formidable — she knew what she was doing and she was clear and smart. Credit: Victoria's Supreme Court / Supplied, the deadly meal Erin Patterson used to kill three members of her husband's family have been released by Victoria's Supreme Court. '(Ashkar said Patterson) knew what was going on, she was in charge and she owned her narrative. 'Getting inside her mind is a fascinating and frightening exercise.' But Usher said Patterson didn't appear to have a clear motive. 'We're so used to murder cases (where there is a) very clear motive like revenge, fame or money,' he said. 'It's not like she had a proven pattern (of saying), 'I hate my in laws, they have done me wrong, I want to plan something', it wasn't as clear as that.' Inside the Mind of the Mushroom Killer: A 7NEWS Spotlight special airs Sunday at 8.45pm
