
Government memo reveals research projects targeted in Harvard review
That contract is just one of many on the list for Boston Children's Hospital. In total, the hospital's contracts now under review are valued at more than $122 million. The list also includes $98 million of contracts with Harvard University itself, including the School of Public Health contract.
The memo was sent to Harvard's leaders on March 31 by the US General Services Administration, one of the agencies participating in the antisemitism task force.
Advertisement
It put Harvard on notice that nearly $9 billion of funding would be placed under review.
The vast majority of the funding, $8.7 billion, was in the form of 'multi-year grant commitments,' but no other details were provided. By contrast, the memo provided a specific list of federal research contracts, and said the government was prepared to issue 'Stop Work Orders' for all of them.
Advertisement
It also invoked a broad authority to cancel any contract 'for convenience.' Many federal contracts include clauses that grant the government broad discretion to cancel them.
The contract for tuberculosis funding with the Harvard School of Public Health supports labs across the country working on vaccine development, according to publicly available data on federal research contracts. Another contract with Boston Children's Hospital funds studies on whether the Covid vaccine reduces Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in children, according to publicly available records. There is also a contract with Boston Children's funding development for a vaccine to prevent opioid addiction.
One contract with Mass General Brigham worth $8 million, according to the memo, came from the US Special Operations Command, which hired the hospital to provide research and technical services related to traumatic brain injuries, according to publicly available records.
On Thursday, the Trump administration sent Harvard a list of demands detailing what the school's leaders must do to avoid cancellation of federal funding. The list included: shuttering diversity offices, implementing 'merit-based' admissions and hiring practices, cooperating with federal immigration authorities, and altering student disciplinary procedures.
The Trump administration contends those measures will help combat antisemitism and reduce what officials have described as illegal race-based discrimination.
In a
He also said: 'We fully embrace the important goal of combatting antisemitism, one of the most insidious forms of bigotry' and that Harvard would 'engage with members of the federal government's task force to combat antisemitism to ensure that they have a full account of the work we have done and the actions we will take going forward to combat antisemitism.'
Advertisement
The institutions targeted in the review include Harvard University itself and its affiliated teaching hospitals and research institutions, such as Mass General Brigham, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston Children's Hospital, and the Broad Institute, according to the list of contracts included in the memo.
The memo describes the $255 million as a 'ceiling value.' That may be a reference to the fact that some of the contracts have already been partially paid out and at least one has already been canceled in a separate round of federal research funding cuts, according to a Globe review of federal contract data.
The antisemitism task force says its goal is to investigate universities that have violated civil rights laws by allegedly failing to protect Jewish students from antisemitic harassment related to the campus protest movement over the Israel-Hamas war.
At Columbia University last month, the task force used threats to federal funding to compel the school's leaders to accept a list of demands related to antisemitism and campus protest.
Some have questioned the legality of the task force's methods. Although the government may legally withhold federal funding for civil rights violations, there was no public process to adjudicate the the accusations against Columbia before the task force paused $400 million of funding for the school last month.
Tyler Coward, a lawyer with the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, a free speech advocacy group, said the Trump administration's reliance on the convenience clause in federal contracts may be a way for the task force to bypass the formal process that would require the government to present evidence for its claims.
Advertisement
Neena Hagen of the Globe staff contributed to this report.
Mike Damiano can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
23 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Elon Musk may be the only person in the world who can criticize Donald Trump in public. For now.
If you come at Donald Trump, he's going to respond. Unless, apparently, you're Elon Musk. Trump hasn't said a word about Musk's public complaints about Trump's budget bill. It's hard to imagine Trump staying silent forever. But even this restraint tells you a lot about the Musk/Trump alliance. A pretty fundamental rule of political physics in our age: If you criticize Donald Trump, he roars back. Which makes what's happening now worth noting: Elon Musk is criticizing Donald Trump, and Trump … isn't responding. As you likely know by now, on Monday afternoon, Musk used his X account to complain about the Republican budget bill — the one that's supposed to be Trump's signature legislation, and the one that's literally called the " One Big Beautiful Bill" act because that's the name Trump likes. More specifically: Musk called the bill " a disgusting abomination." "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it," he added. That story — the richest man in the world, and for at least several months, a key Trump ally, blasting a Trump project in public — dominated Monday's news cycle. Even Fox News had to cover it. And under normal circumstances, Trump would rage back. Not this time, though. Trump has yet to acknowledge Musk's broadside out loud, or on his Truth Social platform. When a Fox News reporter asked White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt "how mad" Trump would be when he learned about Musk's comments, she had a restrained answer ready: "The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill. It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big, beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it." And when I asked the White House press office for comment Wednesday morning, they referred me to Leavitt's previous statement. Obvious conclusion: For now, at least, the Trump team is going out of its way not to stoke a feud with Musk. It seems very unlikely that Trump's silence is going to be permanent: Trump loves holding forth in front of the press, so someone's going to ask him about it at some point. Still, this level of what seems to be restraint is remarkable for a man who doesn't usually restrain himself, and who loathes people who poke at him in public. What's happening? For starters, it's worth noting that Trump has already gone through a version of this. Last week, Musk used much more muted language to criticize the same bill in a CBS interview, and those comments also became a news story. And Trump didn't fire back at Musk then, either — even when asked about it at a press conference. It's also worth noting that even though Musk used scathing language to condemn the bill on Monday, he never once criticized Trump directly. That gives both men rhetorical wiggle room: Musk can argue that his problems with the bill have nothing to do with the man who's promoting it. And Trump can lump in Musk's critique along with everyone else who has problems with the bill, including some Republicans like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene. But it's also likely that the most likely thing is the most likely thing: That Donald Trump has enormous admiration for Elon Musk, and treats him differently than just about anyone else in the world. And that even though Musk has officially left his role as a part-time White House advisor, Trump still wants him on his side.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
India's Vedanta says Trump's tariffs damaging, seeks import curbs
By Neha Arora (Reuters) -Indian metals-to-oil conglomerate Vedanta said on Wednesday that U.S. President Donald Trump's doubling of aluminium tariffs to 50% poses a threat to the Indian industry already struggling with surging imports. Trump's latest round of tariffs on aluminium and steel, which took effect on Wednesday, have unsettled the global markets. "The 50% tariff announced by Trump is damaging to the Indian aluminium industry, which is already under pressure from surging imports that threaten to create surplus and risk to domestic market access," a Vedanta spokesperson told Reuters. The miner, which is the country's largest aluminium producer, urged the Indian government to implement tariffs to protect against imports. "..There should be duty guard-rails for the aluminium industry as well which has so far invested more than $20 billion to set up the current domestic primary aluminium capacity," the spokesperson said. India's cumulative aluminum exports fell 19% to 2.24 million metric tons in the fiscal year ended March 2025, according to government data. Separately, the country's federal steel minister said earlier this week that the impact of Trump's steel tariffs would be minor on the local industry, as India, the world's second-largest crude steel producer, does not export to the U.S. in significant quantities. In April, India imposed a 12% temporary tariff on some steel imports, locally known as a safeguard duty, to curb a surge in cheap shipments primarily from China.


Forbes
26 minutes ago
- Forbes
Uncertainty Equals Confusion
If you approach an intersection and you don't know which way to turn to reach your destination, you are 'frozen' in place until an external event compels you to decide: left, right, straight, or reverse? That's how many small business owners feel today. NFIB's Uncertainty Index is based on six questions asked of a random sample of member firms for over 50 years. Since 1986, the Uncertainty Index has averaged 68. But, since 2016 it has averaged 80 and over the last eight months, the Index has reached 51 year-high levels, the highest level hitting 110 in October 2024. For individual owners, the Uncertainty measure is the number of 'uncertain' responses each owner gives to the six questions incorporated by the Index. For all firms, the Index is the sum of the percentages giving an uncertain response to each of the six questions. Interestingly, it appears that the level of uncertainty has increased steadily over the past 50 years. Why that has occurred is unclear, possibly related to the expanding reach of government at all levels. Uncertainty in the current period is undoubtedly related to the significant changes in domestic and international policies impacting the economy. And, trying to pass a tax bill that satisfies 535 elected officials in Congress is always an uncertain process. There is a lot to worry about. The level of uncertainty varies significantly by industry. Small business owners in the transportation industry most frequently registered high levels of uncertainty (4+). Some of this uncertainty is caused by high levels of regulation (e.g., California), tariffs, port uncertainty, and high fuel costs, to name a few. Firms in the manufacturing and services industries also expressed higher levels of uncertainty. Retail firms were least frequently found giving 3 or more uncertain responses, even with tariff uncertainty. They were more 'certain' about how they are or will be impacted. Uncertainty Level by Industry As Chart 2 shows, we are living in a period of elevated uncertainty, starting in 2016 with election issues and then again in the Covid era. Although the 'Covid panic' has passed, politics, elections, and swift policy changes in D.C. continue to stir the pot of concerns. NFIB's Optimism Index has been in recession territory for over a year, as have many traditional indicators. But, the recession stayed away. The future path may become clearer once the budget battle is done and tariff negotiations resolved. Uncertainty Index