Lucid's CEO Issues Stern Warning
Lucid's CEO Issues Stern Warning originally appeared on Autoblog.
For years, electric vehicle startup companies like Tesla faced a tough uphill road on their journey toward making a mark on the U.S. auto market. However, they may face an even steeper climb thanks to new developments arising from Washington, D.C..
In a recent podcast appearance, Lucid Motors interim CEO Marc Winterhoff urged Beltway lawmakers not to mess with homegrown EV makers just as they're gaining traction. His comments come as Congress debates whether to eliminate or extend the federal EV tax credit, a key incentive that has helped some buyers choose electric vehicles over gas-powered cars.
During the June 25 episode of Automotive News' Daily Drive podcast, Winterhoff argued that smaller, startup firms like Lucid deserve more time to benefit from the $7,500 federal tax credit, which has historically helped established automakers sell electric vehicles (EVs) in the U.S. market. He argued that startups and other new companies shouldn't get penalized for not reaching sales milestones that established manufacturers already achieved, and that by granting them the same opportunities would encourage competition and innovation in the EV market, it would ultimately benefit consumers and the industry as a whole.
'It's widely known we haven't yet sold 200,000 EVs. But many others in the past have, and they all had that credit,' he said on the podcast. 'Why would you now change it and basically make it very difficult for new players in the market?'
Currently, lawmakers are divided on the future of EV incentives. The Senate's version of the budget bill proposes eliminating the tax credit within 180 days for all automakers, big or small. On the other hand, the House's version would offer support to smaller manufacturers by extending the credit through 2026 for those who have not yet reached the 200,000-vehicle sales cap. The House's extension could be a significant advantage for Lucid, which has sold only about 21,000 vehicles since the launch of its Air sedan in 2021.
Despite this, Winterhoff emphasized that Lucid isn't just an EV company—it's an American EV company with significant roots in America. Lucid builds both its Air and Gravity vehicles in Casa Grande, Arizona, and its corporate headquarters are located in Newark, California, which is proof that Lucid made a huge investment in U.S.-based production and supply chains.
'We made that decision already years ago to actually vertically integrate extensively here in the United States,' Winterhoff noted. 'I definitely am a proponent that [the EV credit] stays as much as it can and also for the cap of up to 200,000.'
Stripping away that benefit now could slow Lucid's momentum just as it starts to gain footing. The company plans to dramatically increase its sales in 2025. While vehicles like its $69,900 Air sedan are well over the price cap for tax credits under current rules, Lucid buyers can still take advantage of the full $7,500 credit when they lease—a clause that has worked for the company.
Despite this, Winterhoff acknowledged that the EV industry can't rely on subsidies forever. 'Eventually, EV makers will have to succeed without incentives,' he said. 'I mean that's totally clear.'
However, despite EV sales picking up in many major hubs, the overall EV transition is still in its early stages, as adoption rates still lag in many corners and pockets of the country. Despite this, he believes that these are just growing pains, cutting incentives now would be premature and damaging. 'I really think that this is a normal process in the adoption of new technologies,' he says. 'We've seen this in many, many other instances as well.'
As Congress hashes out the final version of the bill, it's important to recognize that the stakes are high not just for Lucid but for the future of American EVs in general, especially if they plan to peg the U.S. as a player in ushering in the next era of transportation.
However, Winterhoff recognizes that affordability is currently the main concern when it comes to EV adoption. EV tax credits have addressed this issue in the past, before the current situation in Washington. However, potential buyers still find the upfront costs of electric vehicles to be much higher compared to traditional gasoline-powered cars. As a result, many consumers are hesitant to make the switch without significant financial incentives.
Lucid's CEO Issues Stern Warning first appeared on Autoblog on Jun 25, 2025
This story was originally reported by Autoblog on Jun 25, 2025, where it first appeared.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC Sports
an hour ago
- NBC Sports
WTA Ventures, Tennis Channel agree to a six-year rights deal through 2032
ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. — The women's professional tennis tour and Tennis Channel announced Wednesday they have a six-year rights deal for U.S. coverage of WTA tournaments through 2032. The agreement with WTA Ventures does not include events held in the United States, which fall under other contracts. The deal comes with four American women in the top 10 of the WTA rankings: No. 2 Coco Gauff, No. 3 Jessica Pegula, No. 6 Madison Keys and No. 10 Emma Navarro.
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Trump Mobile reiterates claims that new phones are 'made in America'
President Donald Trump's newly launched cellular service is defending its claims that its T1 cellphone are produced in the United States, but the device's website no longer touts the "made in America" message it displayed when it launched. Instead, it uses language like "brought to life right here in the USA," and "proudly American." Earlier this month, the Trump Organization, the group that oversees the president's business ventures, unveiled the new T1 Phone, which uses an Android operating system, and an accompanying cellular network with 5G service. Following the announcement, the service's homepage initially featured a banner claiming the phones would be "MADE IN AMERICA," according to technology news outlet The Verge. However, the outlet reported that all language indicating that claim has been scrubbed as of Wednesday, June 25. Chris Walker, a Trump Mobile spokesperson, dismissed the report, saying that "T1 phones are proudly being made in America." "Speculation to the contrary is simply inaccurate," Walker said in a statement to USA TODAY. A pre-order message on its website previously referred to the device as a "MADE IN THE USA 'T1 Phone,'" a June 16 Getty Images photo illustration shows. In a June 16 news release announcing T1 Phone, the Trump Organization touted a "sleek, gold smartphone engineered for performance and proudly designed and built in the United States for customers who expect the best from their mobile carrier." Eric Trump said T1 Phone will be 'made right here' in US In a June 16 interview with Fox Business' "Mornings with Maria", Trump Organization Executive Vice President Eric Trump also alluded to the device being manufactured in the U.S. "You're not calling up call centers in Bangladesh − do it right out of St. Louis, Missouri, and you're going to have phones that are made right here in the United States of America," he said. Eric Trump added that Trump Mobile is "going to revolutionize cell phones, mobile calling" as it will fully operate in the U.S. "I really believe we're gonna have one of the great kind of tech platforms as part of the Trump Organization of any company in the world," he added. How much is Trump's T1 Phone? Trump Mobile's T1 Phone is priced at for $499 with a down payment of $100. The phone is expected to debut later this year. Its cellular service plan, titled "The 47 Plan," offers unlimited talk, text and data and costs $47.45 per month, a nod to the president's first and second White House terms. The plan grants users with free international calling to 100 countries, with Eric Trump adding that it will provide free long distance calling for military members and their families. According to Trump Mobile, other services with the plan include: Contributing: Melina Khan, USA TODAY
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Senate struggle over Medicaid cuts threatens progress on Trump's big bill
WASHINGTON (AP) — One key unsettled issue stalling progress on President Donald Trump's big bill in Congress is particularly daunting: How to cut billions from health care without harming Americans or the hospitals and others that provide care? Republicans are struggling to devise a solution to the health care problem their package has created. Already, estimates say 10.9 million more people would be without health coverage under the House-passed version of the bill. GOP senators have proposed steeper reductions, which some say go too far. 'The Senate cuts in Medicaid are far deeper than the House cuts, and I think that's problematic,' said GOP Sen. Susan Collins of Maine. Senators have been meeting behind closed doors and with Trump administration officials as they rush to finish up the big bill ahead of the president's Fourth of July deadline. Much of the package, with its tax breaks and bolstered border security spending, is essentially drafted. But the size and scope of healthcare cuts are among the toughest remaining issues. It's reminiscent of the summer during Trump's first term, in 2017, when Republicans struggled to keep their campaign promise to 'repeal and replace' the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, only to see the GOP splinter over the prospect of Americans losing health coverage. That legislation collapsed when then-Sen. John McCain famously cast a thumbs-down vote. Senate Majority Leader John Thune is determined to avoid that outcome, sticking to the schedule and pressing ahead with voting expected by the end of the week. 'This is a good bill and it's going to be great for our country,' Thune said Wednesday, championing its potential to unleash economic growth and put money in people's pockets. The changes to the federal health care programs, particularly Medicaid, were always expected to become a centerpiece of the GOP package, a way to offset the costs of providing tax breaks for millions of Americans. Without action from Congress, taxes would go up next year when current tax law expires. The House-passed bill achieved some $1.5 trillion in savings overall, a large part of it coming from changes to health care. The Medicaid program has dramatically expanded in the 15 years since Obamacare became law and now serves some 80 million Americans. Republicans say that's far too high, and they want to shrink the program back to a smaller size covering mainly poorer women and children. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said Republicans are 'trying to take away healthcare from tens of millions of Americans.' Democrats are uniformly opposed to what they call the 'big, ugly bill.' Much of the health care cost savings would come from new 80-hour-a-month work requirements on those who receive Medicaid benefits, even as most recipients already work. But another provision, the so-called provider tax that almost all the states impose to some degree on hospitals and others that serve Medicaid patients, is drawing particular concern for potential cuts to rural hospitals. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., said several senators spoke up Wednesday during a private meeting indicating they were not yet ready to start voting. 'That'll depend if we land the plane on rural hospitals,' he said. States impose the taxes as a way to help fund Medicaid, largely by boosting the reimbursements they receive from the federal government. Critics decry the system as a type of 'laundering' but almost every state except Alaska uses it to help provide the health care coverage. The House-passed bill would freeze the provider taxes at current levels, while the Senate proposal goes deeper by reducing the tax that some states are able to impose. 'I know the states are addicted to it,' said Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan. But he added, 'Obviously the provider tax needs to go away.' But a number of GOP senators, and the hospitals and other medical providers in their states, are raising steep concerns that the provider tax changes would decimate rural hospitals. In a plea to lawmakers, the American Hospital Association said the cuts won't just affect those who get health coverage through Medicaid, but would further strain emergency rooms 'as they become the family doctor to millions of newly uninsured people.' 'And worse, some hospitals, especially those in rural communities, may be forced to close altogether,' said Rick Pollack, president and CEO of the hospital group. The Catholic Health Association of the United States noted in its own letter that Medicaid provides health insurance coverage for one in five people and nearly half of all children. 'The proposed changes to Medicaid would have devastating consequences, particularly for those in small towns and rural communities, where Medicaid is often the primary source of health care coverage,' said Sister Mary Haddad, the group's president and CEO. Trying to engineer a fix to the problem, senators are considering creating a rural hospital fund to help offset the lost Medicaid money. GOP senators circulated a proposal to pour $15 billion to establish a new rural hospital fund. But several senators said that's too high, while others said it's insufficient. Collins has proposed that the fund be set at $100 billion. 'It won't be that big, but there will be a fund,' Thune said. Hawley, who has been among those most outspoken about the health care cuts, said he's interested in the rural hospital fund but needs to hear more about how it would work. He has also raised concerns about a new $35 per service co-pay that could be charged to those with Medicaid, which is in both the House and Senate versions of the bill. 'Getting the fund is good. That's important, a step forward,' Hawley said. But he asked: 'How does the fund actually distribute the money? Who will get it to hospitals? … Or is this just going to be something that exists on paper?' A new analysis from the White House Council of Economic Advisers estimates the package would result in up to $2.3 trillion in deficit reduction over 10 years, a markedly different assessment from other analyses. In contrast, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office's dynamic analysis of the House-passed measure estimates an increase in deficits by $2.8 trillion over the next decade. __ Associated Press writers Kevin Freking, Mary Clare Jalonick, Joey Cappelletti and Fatima Hussein contributed to this story.
