
US limits Covid boosters to over-65s or those at high risk
Writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, the Food and Drug Administration's Vinayak Prasad and Commissioner Martin Makary framed the policy shift as "evidence-based" and would align the United States more closely with guidance in Europe.
But it comes as Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime vaccine skeptic, pushes to remake federal public health policy.
Kennedy previously led a nonprofit that was critical of immunisation programmes, and during the pandemic petitioned the FDA to revoke Covid vaccine authorisations, citing rare side effects including heart inflammation.
Prasad and Makary praised the initial Covid-19 vaccine rollout as "a major scientific, medical, and regulatory accomplishment," but argued that the benefits of repeated boosters for low-risk individuals are uncertain.
They criticised the US approach of recommending boosters for all adults regardless of age or health status, calling it a "one-size-fits-all" model based on the mistaken belief that Americans couldn't handle more nuanced, risk-based advice.
Rather than building public trust, they wrote, it had backfired — fueling vaccine hesitancy that has spilled over into skepticism toward childhood shots, including those for measles.
The FDA said it would rely on lab test results to approve boosters for people who are over 65, or over six months old with at least one underlying condition.
But for healthy individuals between six months and 64 years, regulators will now require data from randomized trials.
"We simply don't know whether a healthy 52-year-old woman with a normal BMI (body mass index) who has had Covid-19 three times and has received six previous doses of a Covid-19 vaccine will benefit from the seventh dose," they wrote.
Some infectious disease experts welcomed the shift.
Amesh Adalja of Johns Hopkins University said it matched with the approach taken by other countries in a population that already carries significant immunity.
"For lower-risk individuals, the goal has always been less clear, as protection against infection is transient and they don't have a high risk of severe disease," he told AFP.
But others voiced concern about the practical consequences. Paul Offit, a leading vaccine expert at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, said it could limit access for people who still want boosters.
"Any use, say in a healthy 35-year-old, would be considered off-label, and you wonder whether an insurance company would pay for it," he told AFP.
Not like annual flu shot
Under the revised framework, companies like Pfizer and Moderna will be encouraged to test updated boosters in adults aged 50 to 64.
These studies should measure whether the vaccines reduce symptomatic infections, hospitalizations and deaths.
Rather than comparing new shots to earlier formulations, Prasad and Makary suggested placebo-controlled trials -- with saline as the comparator -- to better evaluate both benefit and potential side effects.
The proposal, first floated by Kennedy earlier this month, has proved divisive. Critics argue that using a placebo -- when authorized vaccines already exist -- could expose participants to unnecessary harm.
"Imagine if there was a death or two in the placebo group," said Offit. "I don't see how you conscience that."
Supporters of continued Covid-19 boosters often draw parallels to annual flu shots.
But Makary and Prasad pushed back on that comparison, arguing the genetic changes in Covid variants haven't been significant enough to justify automatically updating the vaccine each year.
The FDA officials also sought to reassure Americans concerned they might lose access to boosters under the new framework.
The Centres for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) definition of risk factors is "vast, including obesity and even mental health conditions such as depression," they wrote, noting that between 100 million and 200 million Americans would likely still qualify.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Harpers Bazaar Arabia
a day ago
- Harpers Bazaar Arabia
The 5 Best Plumping Lip Glosses That Don't Sting
Yes, a little tingle is part of the plumping magic, but beauty doesn't have to mean pain. With these next-gen formulas, you can get the plush, full-lipped look you love without the sting Lip plumpers have long been the beauty world's love-hate relationship. On one hand: luscious, fuller-looking lips in seconds. On the other: that unmistakable tingling (or, let's be honest, stinging) sensation that can make even the boldest beauty lover reach for the makeup wipes. Here's the reality: almost all lip plumpers sting to a degree. Why? Because they work by triggering a mild reaction that increases blood flow to the lips, causing them to swell slightly. It's science — and it's why that tingle happens. But not all formulas are created equal. Some keep the sensation subtle, trading aggressive burn for a comfortable warmth, hydrating shine, and just the right amount of plump. Here are five formulas you can use without feeling that familiar burn. Too Faced Lip Injection Maximum Plump The OG IT girl of the lip plumping world, Too Faced's cult-favourite delivers serious volume, but the 'Maximum Plump' version moderates the sting with a cushiony, high-shine finish. Expect a noticeable pout without the tear-inducing burn, plus added hydration to keep lips smooth long after the gloss fades. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Too Faced Cosmetics (@toofaced) Dior Addict Lip Maximiser A runway and red carpet essential, Dior's 'Lip Maximiser' is volume in a tube. The formula is enriched with hyaluronic acid for hydration and comes in a range of chic shades. The plumping effect is subtle and the tingle minimal – think gentle awakening rather than hot pepper panic. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Dior Beauty Official (@diorbeauty) Maybelline Lifter Gloss This lip plump is proof that comfort and gloss don't have to cost a fortune. Infused with hyaluronic acid, Maybelline's 'Lifter Gloss' delivers a glass-like shine and a soft, hydrated pout without noticeable sting. Perfect for everyday wear and available in an impressive range of shades. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Maybelline New York (@maybelline) Fenty Heat Gloss Rihanna's answer to a plumping gloss strikes a balance between instant fullness and wearable comfort. Her 'Heat' range offers a warm, tingly sensation that's more spa-steam than chilli-flake. Bonus: the scent alone is addictive. View this post on Instagram A post shared by FENTY BEAUTY BY RIHANNA (@fentybeauty) About Face Blurred Matte Lip Plump Halsey's 'About-Face' line is known for its fearless colour, but this matte plumper is all about comfort. The blurred finish gives a modern, diffused look, while the plumping action is so subtle you'll barely feel it, until you notice your lips looking just that much more soft and plush. View this post on Instagram A post shared by about-face beauty by Halsey (@aboutfacebeauty)


Zawya
a day ago
- Zawya
Dow set to open at record high on rate-cut hopes, UnitedHealth gains
The blue-chip Dow was on track to open at a record high on Friday, underpinned by expectations of an interest rate cut in September and gains in UnitedHealth's shares after Berkshire Hathaway raised its stake in the health insurer. Futures tracking the tech-heavy Nasdaq were slightly off as chip stocks weakened after Applied Materials warned of weak China demand. UnitedHealth Group jumped 11.5% in premarket trading after Warren Buffett's company revealed a new investment in the health insurer, while a securities filing showed Michael Burry's Scion Asset Management included bullish positions in the company. Rising costs in the broader healthcare sector and an about 46% slump in heavyweight UnitedHealth's shares this year have left the Dow lagging its Wall Street peers on the road to record highs. The price-weighted index last scaled an all-time high on December 4. This week, however, the healthcare sector is the top performer on the benchmark S&P 500 and is on track for its best weekly performance in three. Other insurers also gained, with Elevance up 4.2%, Centene rising 2.9% and Molina adding 3.7% before the bell on Friday. More broadly, the main U.S. stock indexes are on track for their second week of gains, buoyed by expectations that the Fed could restart its monetary policy easing cycle with a 25-basis-point interest rate cut in September. The central bank last lowered borrowing costs in December and said U.S. tariffs could add to price pressures. However, recent labor market weakness and signs that tariff-induced inflation was yet to reflect in headline consumer prices have made investors confident of a potential dovish move next month. "A 25bps rate cut is still almost fully priced in although it has put a dampener on tentative expectations that the Fed could deliver an even larger 50bps rate cut like last September," analysts at MUFG said in a note. "Market participants are still confident that the Fed will resume rate cuts in response to weakness in the labor market and the lack of pass through so far to consumer prices from higher tariffs as evident in this week's CPI report." At 07:16 a.m. ET, Dow E-minis were up 303 points, or 0.67%, S&P 500 E-minis were up 9.25 points, or 0.14%, and Nasdaq 100 E-minis were down 19.25 points, or 0.08%. Focus will now be on July retail sales data, due later in the day, and the University of Michigan's report on consumer confidence, for clues on the health of the American consumer. Among other stocks, Applied Materials tumbled 14.1% after the chip equipment maker issued weak fourth-quarter forecasts on sluggish China demand, fueling concerns over tariff-related risks. Shares of other chip equipment makers such as KLA and Lam Research lost 5.8% and 5%, respectively. Intel rose 2.7% on the heels of a 20% gain this week after a report said the Trump administration was in talks with the struggling chipmaker for the U.S. government to potentially take a stake in the company. On the commodities front, crude prices slipped to around $65 a barrel with attention on a meeting in Alaska between U.S. President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, that markets hope could pave the way for a resolution to the Ukraine conflict. The meeting will take place at 1900 GMT. (Reporting by Johann M Cherian and Sanchayaita Roy in Bengaluru; Editing by Devika Syamnath)


Web Release
2 days ago
- Web Release
Mayo Clinic researchers validate blood test to diagnose Alzheimer's disease in outpatient memory clinics
Alzheimer's disease, marked by memory loss, trouble concentrating and thinking, and changes in personality and behavior, devastates patients, their families and loved ones. With new treatments available for people with early signs of Alzheimer's disease, there is a growing need for accessible and cost-effective tests to diagnose the disease sooner. In a new study, Mayo Clinic researchers confirmed the accuracy of an FDA-approved blood test that can be used at outpatient memory clinics to diagnose the disease in patients with a range of cognitive impairment. The findings are published in Alzheimer's and Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer's Association. Standard ways of measuring the buildup of toxic proteins in the brain that indicate Alzheimer's disease include positron emission tomography, or PET scans, and spinal taps. But these tests can be expensive and invasive. More accessible, non-invasive and cost-effective biomarkers — measurable indicators of a disease — are needed to improve diagnoses broadly in clinical settings. 'Our study found that blood testing affirmed the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease with 95% sensitivity and 82% specificity,' says corresponding author Gregg Day, M.D., a Mayo Clinic neurologist, dementia specialist and clinical researcher. 'When performed in the outpatient clinical setting, this is similar to the accuracy of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of the disease and is much more convenient and cost-effective.' The research team says their findings show promise in: Better identifying research participants with Alzheimer's disease brain changes. Screening and selecting patients with Alzheimer's disease for clinical trials. Assessing how patients respond to therapy in clinical trials. More than 500 patients receiving treatment for a range of memory issues at the outpatient Memory Disorder Clinic at Mayo Clinic in Florida participated in the study. They included patients with early- and late-onset cognitive impairment, typical and atypical Alzheimer's disease, Lewy body dementia and vascular cognitive impairment. Patients ranged from 32 to 89 years old, with the average age of symptom onset being 66. Alzheimer's disease was determined to be the underlying cause of the symptoms in 56% of the patients. The team also conducted serum tests to measure kidney disease, which can influence plasma biomarker concentrations. Mayo Clinic Laboratories tested for two proteins in blood plasma that are associated with amyloid plaque buildup, the hallmark of Alzheimer's disease: A?42/40 and p-tau217. The researchers found that p-tau217 levels were higher in patients with Alzheimer's disease versus those without the disease. Higher plasma p-tau217 concentrations were also associated with impaired kidney function, which researchers say should be taken into account when performing the blood test. Plasma p-tau217 concentrations were positive in 267 out of 509 patients, including 233 of 246 patients (95%) with cognitive impairment attributed to Alzheimer's disease. The study was featured at the American Academy of Neurology Annual Meeting in April. In a previous study, researchers from the Mayo Clinic Laboratories team showed the utility of these blood tests compared to amyloid PET scans in research participants. Dr. Day says the next steps in this research are to evaluate blood-based testing in more diverse patient populations and people with early Alzheimer's disease who show no cognitive symptoms. The team also wants to evaluate disease-specific factors that may alter biomarker accuracy in clinical trials. Other Mayo Clinic authors include Yoav Piura, M.D., Christian Lachner, M.D., Joshua Bornhorst, Ph.D., Alicia Algeciras Schimnich, Ph.D., and Neill Graff-Radford, M.D. For a full list of authors, funding and disclosures, see the paper.