logo
Expanding list of tax-free food items won't benefit poorer households: Treasury

Expanding list of tax-free food items won't benefit poorer households: Treasury

Eyewitness News30-05-2025
CAPE TOWN - The Treasury doesn't believe that expanding the basket of tax-free food items will have the desired effect of lowering living costs for poorer households.
It said that past experience has shown it would benefit retailers instead.
Along with retracting a proposed value-added tax (VAT) increase in the third version of this year's national budget, Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana announced last week that the Treasury would also no longer be adding more items to the essential list of 21.
During public hearings on the budget this week, the South African Poultry Association and dairy manufacturer, Clover SA, appealed to Parliament for chicken and dairy liquid blends to be zero-rated to ward off malnutrition, and to offset the impact of the impending fuel levy increase next week.
ALSO READ:
But Treasury's taxation head, Chris Axelson, said on Friday that zero-rating was viewed as a "blunt instrument".
He said that when the basket was last expanded in 2019, retailers only dropped prices between seven and eight percent and not by the standard VAT rate of 15%.
"So the R5 billion that government is losing, about half of that is going to lower-income households, and the benefit of lower prices, and the other half is going either to retailers or the distributors."
Axelson said that Treasury believes the current list of zero-rated items was well-targeted to spare poorer households.
"If there is no VAT rate increase, we don't believe it is the best course of action to continue with that zero-rating."
Axelson pointed out that agricultural producers stood to gain from a diesel rebate to mitigate against increased food prices as a result of the fuel levy hike.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Emfuleni Municipality wants National Treasury to again write off portion of its Eskom debt
Emfuleni Municipality wants National Treasury to again write off portion of its Eskom debt

Eyewitness News

time11 hours ago

  • Eyewitness News

Emfuleni Municipality wants National Treasury to again write off portion of its Eskom debt

JOHANNESBURG - The cash-strapped Emfuleni Local Municipality wants National Treasury to once again write off a portion of its debt to Eskom. The municipality owed Eskom R8 billion due to unpaid electricity bills before Treasury scrapped a portion of the debt. ALSO READ: - Emfuleni Local Municipality settles R2.6 million debt - Emfuleni Municipality's deal with Rand Water results in R660m payment towards outstanding debt After applying for the debt relief programme, Treasury wrote off nearly R2 billion of this debt. The embattled Emfuleni Local Municipality believes it meets National Treasury's criteria to qualify for another debt write-off. This time, the municipality is seeking a further R2 billion reduction of its debt to Eskom, less than a year after its previous write-off. Finance MMC Hassan Mako said the municipality had already begun engaging the relevant authorities in an effort to reduce what it owed the power utility. "There is also a process that we are undertaking now to see if we can get the second write-off because we believe we meet all the relevant conditions. The amount remaining is R5 billion and if we get another write-off, we'll be left with R3 billion." The municipality recently landed in trouble again over another outstanding debt owed to Rand Water.

Critical funding challenges faced by KwaZulu-Natal Legislature revealed in budget analysis
Critical funding challenges faced by KwaZulu-Natal Legislature revealed in budget analysis

IOL News

timea day ago

  • IOL News

Critical funding challenges faced by KwaZulu-Natal Legislature revealed in budget analysis

KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Legislature discussed budget cuts during a meeting with KZN Treasury. Image: KZN Legislature-Website Budget cuts to the KwaZulu-Natal Legislature operations were a concern to members of the provincial legislature during a meeting with KZN Treasury on Wednesday. The Standing Committee on Oversight (STACOV) met with Treasury to discuss funding for the KZN Legislature. The legislature budget has seen a substantial increase from the various budget allocations from the 2009/10 financial year zero-based budget exercise, showing an increase from R72 million in 2009 /10 to R566 million in 2027/28, explained the Treasury. On the other hand, the budget cuts over the years increased from R5.1 million in 2011 /12 to R190.6 million in 2027/28. Joanna Adu-Boahen, a budget analyst with the KZN Treasury, explained in a presentation that the net effect is that the legislature's budget increases substantially over the years under review despite the implementation of budget cuts. 'It should be noted that the legislature was not impacted by the 2024/25 MTEF budget cuts, and there is an undertaking that the legislature's budget will be exempted from any future budget cuts as far as possible,' Adu-Boahen said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading In comparison with provincial legislature budgets, KZN has the second highest budget for, 2021/22 to 2026/27 financial years, with Gauteng having the highest budget. However, in 2027/28, KZN is projected to overtake Gauteng to be the province with the highest budget, exceeding Gauteng by R17 million. Both provinces have 80 members. She said that the provincial Treasury is using budget spending reviews in determining the 2026/ 27 Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) budget, which is a shift from how budgets were assessed in prior years. The Treasury also advised on how the budget can be improved in order to meet the mandate of the legislature. This includes: Continued implementation of the KZN provincial cost-cutting measures as this might free up some resources which can be allocated to priority service delivery areas. Automation of business processes to improve operational inefficiencies, including reducing printing costs. IT Strategy to include consideration of cloud infrastructure utilising Dube-Trade Port. Assessment of the productivity of its existing administrative staff, to find areas for improved efficiencies Review of various policies that may result in substantial savings, including overtime policy, leave encashment policy, cellphone policy, land line policy (e.g., private calls exceeding R30 per month to be paid for). The legislature has indicated the following funding needs in the 2025 /26 adjustment estimate and over the 2026 /27 MTEF, totalling R201 million. Some of the funding is for: R15.7 million for compensation of employees. R15 million for once-off computer services costs for a server in 2025 /26. R20 million once-off replacement of the main chamber audio-visual system in 2025 /26. The legislature also needed R9 million in 2026/27 with carry through costs for: R1.2 million for LGBTQIA+. R581,000 for sex workers symposium and, R1.7 million for the young women's symposium. Imran Keeka, a DA MPL, described the budget reduction as cut down to the bare bones, adding that committees would be hamstrung without sufficient budgets to carry out oversight. 'Committees are the engine rooms of the legislature. When they cannot function as they should, then oversight is completely diluted,' he explained.

Treasury shuts door on ‘honest mistakes' as tax penalty rules tighten
Treasury shuts door on ‘honest mistakes' as tax penalty rules tighten

The Citizen

timea day ago

  • The Citizen

Treasury shuts door on ‘honest mistakes' as tax penalty rules tighten

Treasury publishes proposals to tighten tax laws. National Treasury published several legislative amendments over the weekend that will give effect to tax announcements made in the 2025 Budget, which was eventually presented to Parliament for the third time in May. One rather controversial amendment relates to taxpayers' reliance on the scope of a 'bona fide inadvertent error' to escape paying huge understatement penalties. The amendments also pave the way for real-time reporting of value added tax (Vat) and an extension of the voluntary disclosure program to include defaults under the Customs and Excise Act. Treasury says in a statement it also intends to reduce the threshold for the ring-fencing of assessed losses to prevent abuse and promote fairness. This is to ensure that losses from non-commercial trades cannot be used to evade paying taxes. Other changes include the removal of the current tax-free limit on imported goods, which means that low-value imports will become subject to Vat. Read more Cybersecurity an 'economic and safety imperative' ALSO READ: Sars makes changes to eFiling for easy use It is also proposed that a senior official from the South African Revenue Service (Sars) may conduct unannounced inspections of business premises when a taxpayer applies for a tax registration. Joon Chong, tax partner at Webber Wentzel, says in terms of the proposed amendment to understatement penalties, the remission of a penalty will only be available for substantial understatement, as it will now be 'explicitly' linked with a substantial understatement. The triggers for understatement penalties include failing to submit a tax return, omissions from a return, an incorrect statement in the return, not paying the correct amount of tax, or being involved in an 'impermissible avoidance arrangement'. According to the Sars guide, the actions or inactions of these triggers must result in prejudice to Sars or the fiscus for an understatement to arise. ALSO READ: Unjustified debt collection measures cause unnecessary taxpayer distress The understatement table: Chong says if the amendment is accepted as is, Sars will be a lot 'tougher on taxpayers.' 'It will be necessary for taxpayers to get detailed and considered tax opinions for any risky tax positions they adopt.' Nico Theron, founder of Unicus Tax Specialists, says as he reads the amendment, the intention is to remove 'bona fide inadvertent error' as the 'gatekeeper' and instead include it as a remittance ground, but only for penalties where there is a substantial understatement. Theoretically, this limits taxpayers' ability to rely on 'bona fide inadvertent error,' he adds. ALSO READ: Estimated assessments: Sars's new 'cash-cow-grabbing' norm? There have been concerns that taxpayers make themselves guilty of 'opinion shopping'. Currently, Sars must remit an understatement penalty if a taxpayer relied on the advice from a legal or tax expert. In some instances, the advice has been 'questionable'. 'It is going to make disputes on understatement penalties more difficult to get them remitted. In terms of the proposed amendment, there will only be one understatement penalty that can be remitted and that is for a substantial understatement.' All the other penalties are now exposed, regardless of whether it was a 'bona fide inadvertent error' or not, says Theron. ALSO READ: SA losing nearly R30bn to illicit cigarettes as Sars tools face delays, says Godongwana New VDP rules Chong adds that the introduction of rules for voluntary disclosure of defaults under the Customs and Excise Act must be welcomed. The Voluntary Disclosure Program (VDP) rules were introduced in terms of the Tax Administration Act that did not apply to the Customs Act. Now, it will be possible to apply for relief under the separate rules proposed under the Customs Act itself. Successful applicants may receive relief from understatement penalties, administrative penalties, and even criminal prosecution – provided the disclosure is both valid and complete. ALSO READ: Vat vendors: Be aware of the different types of tax assessments Vat modernisation Treasury has also published amendments to the Vat Act to support the Vat modernisation project. 'The project forms part of a broader effort to transform tax processes, improve customer service and engagement, reduce the Vat gap, and streamline tax administration for Vat traders, businesses, and Sars,' Treasury said in its statement over the weekend. Chong says the modernisation project is aimed at greater transparency and to simplify compliance. 'It is meant to reduce errors, improve administrative efficiency, and, I assume, to improve collections as well.' The deadline for public comments on the range of proposed amendments in the Taxation Laws Amendment Bill as well as the Tax Administration Laws Amendment Bill is 12 September 2025. This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store