
'India backs terror, persecutes minorities, and exploits Pahalgam-like attacks,' Pakistan's punch goes beyond Simla with severe allegations
India–Pakistan ties nosedived after the Pahalgam terror attack, with Delhi scrapping the Indus Water Treaty and Pakistan suspending the Simla Pact. But Islamabad's response didn't end there—it accused India of exporting terrorism, persecuting minorities, manipulating Kashmir, and staging incidents like Pahalgam to fuel tensions and push its domestic political agenda.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Pakistan statement raises Kashmir, blasts Delhi for 'state oppression'
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
'Minorities persecuted in India': Pakistan slams Waqf Act
India cannot hide its record in Pakistan, says Islamabad
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Was Munir's 'jugular vein' speech a trigger for Pahalgam?
India–Pakistan ties are in freefall after the bloodshed in Pahalgam, with both nations locking horns in a high-stakes showdown. Two Kashmiri operatives, allegedly trained across the border, carried out the attack—prompting India to hit back with muscle: suspending the 1960 Indus Water Treaty and sealing off the Integrated Check Post at Attari with immediate effect.But Pakistan didn't stay silent. On Thursday, it fired back with a full-blown diplomatic and strategic counterattack—suspending the 1972 Simla Agreement , shutting down its airspace to Indian flights, slamming shut the Wagah border crossing, halting all trade, and warning that any attempt by India to reroute water under the Indus Treaty would be treated as an Act of War.These measures followed an emergency huddle chaired by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, where Pakistan's top brass mapped out a hardline response to India's moves.But the boldest punches weren't just the ones making headlines. After the National Security Committee's (NSC) high-level meeting, Pakistan's Prime Minister's Office released a press statement that didn't mince words, laying bare a string of provocative claims and warning shots aimed squarely at Delhi.The National Security Committee, according to Pakistan's Dawn that published the full text of the pres release, said that Kashmir remains an unresolved issue between Pakistan and India, as recognised in several United Nations resolutions. It said Pakistan continues to back the Kashmiri people's right to self-determination. The committee claimed that ongoing Indian state oppression, the scrapping of Kashmir's special status, and political and demographic manipulation have led to a natural backlash from the people of Jammu and Kashmir, fuelling repeated cycles of violence.Morever, it also said, "India's systemic persecution of minorities, particularly Muslims, has become more pervasive. Attempts at forced passage of Waqf Bill is the latest effort to marginalize Muslims across India."The press release also said, "India must resist the temptation to exploit such tragic incidents to its advantage and take full responsibility for its failure to provide security to the people."Pakistan said in the release that it strongly condemns terrorism in every form. It said it has been on the front line in the global fight against terrorism and has suffered huge human and economic losses because of it. According to Pakistan, India is trying to create tension along the eastern border to divert attention from Pakistan's efforts to fight terrorism. It also said that without a proper investigation or solid proof, linking Pakistan to the Pahalgam attack is baseless, unreasonable, and makes no sense."India's worn-out narrative of victimhood cannot obfuscate its own culpability in fomenting terrorism on Pakistan's soil, nor can it distract attention from its systematic and state sponsored oppression and human rights violations," the release said.Pakistan said it holds undeniable evidence of terrorism backed by India, despite India's claims to the contrary. This includes the confession of Commander Kulbhushan Jadhav, an active officer in the Indian Navy, who, according to Pakistan, stands as proof of India's involvement in state-sponsored terrorism.Pakistan, in the release, also raised concerns about what it called India's state-sponsored killings or assassination attempts beyond its borders, urging the international community to stay alert to such actions."These heinous acts were carried out in blatant violation of international law as recently exposed by Pakistan along-with various other states with undeniable evidence. Pakistan will pursue all those responsible, planners and perpetrators alike and ensure that justice is served. Any threat to Pakistan's sovereignty and to the security of its people will be met with firm reciprocal measures in all domains," the statement read.In the statement, Pakistan said India should refrain from its habitual "blame game" and what it described as the "cynical staged managed exploitation of incidents like Pahalgam" to advance a narrow political agenda. Pakistan added that such actions only "inflame" tensions and hinder efforts toward peace and stability in the region.These comments come not only as cross-border tensions are intensifying but also at a time when India's passage of Waqf law had stirred unrest in some parts of the country and Pakistan's army chief General Asim Munir's made pollarising comments on religion and Kashmir.In a speech loaded with historical grievance and nationalistic fervour, Pakistan's army chief General Asim Munir on Thursday urged overseas Pakistanis to instil in their children a sense of national identity shaped by the country's founding ideology.ToI had reported citing a source who suggested the timing of the remarks, coinciding with India's Waqf Act, might be aimed at provoking Indian Muslims and emboldening Pakistan-based terrorist outfits to regroup and destabilise the region.Now, Indian intelligence officials are examining whether a recent speech by Pakistan's Army chief General Asim Munir served as a catalyst for the deadly terrorist attack in Pahalgam. In that address, Munir had described Kashmir as Pakistan's 'jugular vein,' a statement now being scrutinised for its possible influence on the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) proxy group, The Resistance Front (TRF), which has claimed responsibility for the strike.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
20 minutes ago
- India.com
Turkey threatening India's friend, not Armenia, Modi govt may hit back at Erdogan by...
(File) Ankara: Bankrupt Pakistan is not refraining from spreading propaganda despite facing a humiliating loss to India. However, this terror state is getting the full support of its allies. Countries like China and Turkey are openly amplifying Pakistan's propaganda. Turkey, in particular, has now started threatening India's allies. Pakistan claims to have shot down Indian fighter jets. While India has acknowledged the loss of its aircraft, it has not disclosed how the jets were downed or how many were lost. Turkey is now threatening Greece—India's close ally. Turkish media is using Pakistan's statements to intimidate Greece. Greece, like India, has also purchased 24 Rafale fighter jets from France. Turkish conservative media platform TR Haber has launched new propaganda, claiming that Greece is uncertain about the capabilities of the French fighter jets it recently acquired. The main objective of TR Haber's report is to portray that if Pakistan can target Indian aircraft using China-made JF-17 jets and PL-15 missiles, then Greece's reliance on Rafale fighter jets could be dangerous for it. Tensions between Turkey and Greece have existed for decades, and it is evident from Turkish media reports that Turkey is trying to intimidate Greece. In essence, Turkey wants to use the India-Pakistan conflict to serve its own agenda. Meanwhile, Turkish media conveniently omits reports about how India destroyed Turkish drones as easily as slicing vegetables.


Economic Times
22 minutes ago
- Economic Times
This deal can trigger a new India-China power play
Chagos and the colonial legacy India's stakes in Mauritius Live Events China's expanding footprint Chagos, India's strategic leverage? (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The recent agreement between the UK and Mauritius , where the UK has agreed in principle to cede sovereignty of the Chagos Archipelago to Mauritius, marks a watershed moment in post-colonial geopolitics. While India has officially hailed the move as the completion of Mauritius's decolonisation process, the implications go far beyond historical justice or moral diplomacy. For India, this development opens new possibilities in its ongoing strategic contest with China for influence across the Indian Ocean region. On this wider maritime chessboard, the Chagos Islands may prove to be a crucial Chagos Archipelago, a group of over 60 small islands in the central Indian Ocean, has been under British control since the 1960s, when it was separated from Mauritius prior to the latter's independence. The United Kingdom then leased the largest island, Diego Garcia, to the United States, which turned it into a major military base. For decades, the Chagos issue remained a sticking point in Mauritius's decolonisation narrative, and its legal claim was supported by international courts and the United has consistently backed Mauritius's claims, both out of principle and geopolitical calculation. The transfer of sovereignty to Mauritius — albeit with the U.S. base likely to continue operating under existing arrangements — allows New Delhi a more open and potentially influential role in shaping the future security architecture of the central Indian stakes in Mauritius are not new. The two countries enjoy strong diplomatic, economic, and cultural ties, underpinned by a shared history and a large Indo-Mauritian population. Nearly 70% of Mauritians are of Indian origin. Under a unique tradition, only Indian citizens, often top officials of Indian security and defence services, are appointed Mauritius' national security adviser and the head of the coast is among the top trading partners and investors in Mauritius, and it has strategically extended lines of credit, development assistance, and infrastructure investment to maintain its influence. India is building a Metro in Mauritius and also built its new Supreme Court building. Recently, the Indian government asked Indian airlines to bail out loss-hit Air 2015, India built a new airstrip and other military infrastructure on Agalega Island, another Mauritian territory. While officially described as supporting civilian use and improving connectivity, the facility is widely understood to have strategic value, potentially allowing India to monitor key maritime chokepoints and naval activity in the region. This development complements India's broader Indian Ocean strategy, which includes military agreements with Seychelles, Madagascar, and Oman, and a growing naval presence in the however, is not standing still. China's presence in the Indian Ocean has been growing rapidly through its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), naval deployments, port development, and strategic partnerships. In 2019, China signed a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with Mauritius — its first FTA with an African country — giving it a crucial economic and legal foothold in the island addition, China has funded infrastructure projects in Mauritius, including smart city projects and port modernization. While these developments are framed in economic terms, they potentially serve dual-use purposes, a hallmark of Chinese strategic investments. This expanding influence has naturally caused unease in New Delhi, which views China's Indian Ocean ambitions with deep the Chagos Islands possibly coming under the sovereignty of a friendly and closely aligned Mauritius, India gains several advantages in its strategic calculus. Control over the Chagos archipelago by Mauritius — a pro-India partner — alters the balance of influence in the central Indian Ocean. India could gain access or leverage over these islands to enhance its maritime domain awareness and patrol Diego Garcia will remain under US military use, Mauritius's sovereignty introduces a third actor into strategic dialogues. India, which shares robust defense ties with the US, could benefit from this triangle, facilitating intelligence sharing and operational Beijing establishing port access and naval agreements across the Indian Ocean — including Gwadar in Pakistan, Hambantota in Sri Lanka, and Djibouti — India needs strategic outposts of its own. The Chagos Islands, along with Agalega and other island partnerships, can serve as a counterweight. India has positioned itself as a net security provider in the IOR. Having influence over Chagos enhances its ability to counter piracy, trafficking, and other non-traditional threats, while also projecting hard power if strategic opportunity presented by the Chagos handover is significant, but it is not without challenges. First, the degree of India's access to or use of Chagos territory will depend on the terms Mauritius establishes, particularly in the context of the existing US lease of Diego Garcia. Second, India must be cautious not to provoke unnecessary tension with China, especially in a region where both nations are vying for influence through economic as well as military means. Moreover, the local sensitivities, especially surrounding the displaced Chagossian population and ongoing human rights concerns, mean that any Indian role must be diplomatically nuanced and development-oriented.


News18
31 minutes ago
- News18
Will Germany's Strict Immigration Rules Impact Indians? Citizenship Criteria To Curbs Explained
Last Updated: The government has abolished the fast-track route to citizenship that previously allowed well-integrated migrants to apply for citizenship after three years of residency German Chancellor Friedrich Merz's cabinet on May 28 approved sweeping changes to the country's immigration rules. Among the major changes is a temporary two-year suspension of family reunification rights for those with subsidiary protection — refugees not granted full refugee status, such as many Syrians. During this period, these migrants are not allowed to bring their spouses or children to Germany. Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt said that Germany's urban systems have reached their 'breaking point" and cannot handle the inflow without causing challenges for public services. Migration is among German voters' biggest concerns and Merz won the election in February pledging a crackdown on migration. NO FAST TRACK The government also abolished the fast-track route to citizenship that previously allowed well-integrated migrants to apply for citizenship after three years of residency. The new rules now require a minimum of five years of residency for German citizenship. However, foreigners married to German citizens can still apply after three years, provided they have been married for at least two years. WHAT IT MEANS FOR INDIANS Most of the Indian professionals and students in Germany are not under subsidiary protection. The changes, however, may impact vulnerable migrants and delay long-term settlement plans. India remains a key contributor to Germany's skilled labor pool, with initiatives such as the ' Opportunity Card ' being expanded to address labour shortages. Merz recently said that a court ruling against the expulsion by border police of three Somali asylum seekers could restrict his government's migration crackdown but would not stop it. People would continue to be turned away at the German border, he said. A Berlin administrative court last week said the expulsion of the three unnamed Somalis, who were sent back to Poland after arriving at a train station in eastern Germany, was 'unlawful". It said that under the European Union's Dublin Regulation, Germany should have determined which country was responsible for processing their claim before sending them back, in a ruling that Merz's interior minister contested. That marks a big shift since Germany's 'Refugees Welcome" culture during Europe's migrant crisis in 2015 under Merz's conservative predecessor, Angela Merkel. Merz's government issued an order in May to reject undocumented migrants, including asylum seekers, at Germany's borders. Dobrindt defended the expulsions, saying he would provide justifications for banning entry and portraying the ruling as an isolated case. 'I have made it clear several times that this is about being overwhelmed, and I see this overburdening," he told reporters. With Agency Inputs First Published: June 08, 2025, 16:45 IST