Can Abercrombie & Fitch Deliver In Its Next Earnings Report?
Sign for the clothing brand Abercrombie & Fitch on 7th May 2025 in London, United Kingdom. (photo by ... More Mike Kemp/In Pictures via Getty Images)
Abercrombie & Fitch (NYSE: ANF) is set to publish its fiscal first-quarter earnings on Wednesday, May 28, 2025, with analysts expecting earnings of $1.34 per share on revenue of $1.06 billion. This would indicate a 37% decrease in earnings year-over-year and a 4% increase in sales compared to the previous year's figures of $2.14 per share and $1.02 billion in revenue. Traditionally, ANF stock has dropped 60% of the time after earnings announcements, with a median one-day decrease of 1.9% and a maximum observed decline of 10%.
Abercrombie recorded a remarkable full-year 2024 net sales of $4.95 billion, reflecting a 16% year-over-year increase, and its highest operating margin in over a decade at 15%. This robust performance highlights the company's operational strength and strong market position. However, growth is expected to slow down in 2025, with net sales projected to increase by only 3%–5% and operating margins expected to slightly decrease to 14%–15%, due to uncertainty surrounding trade tariffs. The company has a current market capitalization of $3.7 billion. Revenue over the past twelve months was $4.9 billion, and it was operationally profitable with $741 million in operating profits and net income of $566 million.
For event-driven traders, analyzing historical patterns may provide an advantage, whether by positioning in advance of earnings or responding to post-release fluctuations. That said, if you are looking for upside with lower volatility than individual stocks, the Trefis High Quality portfolio offers an alternative, having outperformed the S&P 500 and delivered returns over 91% since its inception.
See earnings reaction history of all stocks.
Here are some insights on one-day (1D) post-earnings returns:
Further information on observed 5-Day (5D) and 21-Day (21D) returns post earnings is summarized in the table below, alongside the statistics.
ANF 1D, 5D, and 21D Post Earnings Return
A relatively lower-risk approach (though not effective if the correlation is minimal) is to analyze the correlation between short-term and medium-term returns post earnings, identify a pair that shows the highest correlation, and execute the corresponding trade. For instance, if 1D and 5D exhibit the highest correlation, a trader could take a "long" position for the next 5 days if the 1D post-earnings return is positive. Here is some correlation data based on both a 5-year and a more recent 3-year history. Note that the correlation 1D_5D refers to the correlation between 1D post-earnings returns and the following 5D returns.
ANF Correlation Between 1D, 5D, and 21D Historical Returns
At times, the performance of peers can impact the post-earnings stock reaction. In fact, the price adjustment may begin prior to the earnings announcement. Here is some historical information regarding the past post-earnings performance of Abercrombie & Fitch stock compared with the stock performance of peers that reported earnings shortly before Abercrombie & Fitch. For a fair comparison, peer stock returns also represent post-earnings one-day (1D) returns.
ANF Correlation With Peer Earnings
Discover more about Trefis RV strategy that has outperformed its all-cap stocks benchmark (a combination of all three, the S&P 500, S&P mid-cap, and Russell 2000), generating strong returns for investors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Abercrombie & Fitch (NYSE:ANF) Reports Mixed Q1 2025 Earnings With Sales Up To US$1097 Million
Abercrombie & Fitch recently posted mixed financial results for Q1 2025, which included a year-over-year sales increase to $1,097 million, but a decrease in net income. The company also adjusted its fiscal 2025 guidance downward, alongside updates to its stock buyback program. These financial movements coincided with a 9.5% price rise over the past month, reflecting broader market trends that have seen modest gains amid favorable trade discussions between the U.S. and China. This market optimism likely added weight to Abercrombie's price performance, despite its mixed earnings report and reduced income projections. Be aware that Abercrombie & Fitch is showing 1 weakness in our investment analysis. This technology could replace computers: discover the 22 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. The recent developments surrounding Abercrombie & Fitch have mixed implications for the company's outlook. The increase in Q1 2025 sales to US$1.1 billion contrasts with a decline in net income, which has led to a downward adjustment to its fiscal 2025 guidance. This downturn, despite a 9.5% share price rise over the past month, suggests that market optimism, possibly stemming from favorable U.S.-China trade discussions, temporarily bolstered investor sentiment. Looking at a broader horizon, Abercrombie & Fitch's total shareholder returns, including dividends, skyrocketed by a very large percentage over the past five years, indicating robust long-term value creation. However, the company has underperformed relative to the US Specialty Retail industry over the past year, which returned 12.3%. Despite strong historical returns, short-term challenges in international market conditions and elevated costs could impact revenue and earnings forecasts. Analysts now anticipate revenue growth of 3.1% per year, with earnings forecasted to reach US$559 million by May 2028. Although the stock has experienced recent gains, it's still priced significantly below the analyst consensus price target of US$121.47, indicating potential upside. The current share price remains at a 42.7% discount to this target, reflecting analyst confidence in future prospects despite present setbacks. Investors should weigh these analyst expectations against their understanding of the company's capacity to manage ongoing risks. Evaluate Abercrombie & Fitch's prospects by accessing our earnings growth report. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include NYSE:ANF. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data
Forbes
32 minutes ago
- Forbes
AI ROI Isn't Just Dollars: How To Measure Intangible Wins
Companies are investing millions in AI, but the biggest returns might be faster decisions, happier ... More teams and smarter workflows. Enterprises are pouring billions into AI. Retail companies alone plan to spend $33.2 million annually on AI initiatives, according to a 2025 IBM survey. But while some are already reporting wins — and others are still waiting for returns — industry experts say too many are asking the wrong question: Is AI making us richer? Instead, they say, the better question might be: Is it making us better? That shift in mindset is becoming essential today. Because, as more businesses deploy AI across their operations, the most valuable results aren't always the ones that show up in quarterly earnings. Sometimes the clearest wins come in faster decisions, smarter workflows and more satisfied employees. It's only natural for companies to prioritize financial gains when measuring the ROI on their AI investments. But according to experts like Adrienne Uthe, managing principal at Kronus Intelligence Group, that's not all that matters. 'Organizations can simply move much faster than ever before. Everyone can develop their own MVPs while solving problems at unprecedented speed. Junior workers gain more experience in a short period thanks to a healthy collaboration with their AI-driven sidekicks,' Uthe told me in an interview. Her argument is that like no other time in human history, professionals now have tools at their disposal that could make them more productive than ever. And there's real-world proof to support Uthe's claims. Consider the National Bank of Australia that, since it began using Microsoft 365 copilot, has drastically reduced the time spent on analyzing millions of security event logs. This increased efficiency has freed up valuable time for the company's engineers who can now apply their expertise to other pressing matters. The trend also aligns with a 2024 survey by PwC, which revealed over 80% of employees believe that the continuous use of generative AI tools will make them more efficient at work. And it's not just about doing more work faster. Companies like Elvee — which uses AI to help contact center agencies address employee attrition, retain top performers and recapture revenue — have also been at the backend of enabling employee performance with AI. In one particular example, Raz Dar, founder and CEO of Elvee, noted how their platform helped a manager notice that a top-performing contact center agent was quietly planning to quit. 'On the surface, it looked like everything was fine. The employee was a top performer. But the manager was shocked to see that the system showed the employee was at a high risk of leaving,' Dar said excitedly. The early alert gave the company time to intervene, rework the agent's schedule, and keep a key team member. No revenue changed hands, but something just as valuable happened: culture was preserved. And that, more than any dashboard metric, is what real AI ROI can look like. For Dar, this is another real-world pointer to the intangible but really powerful benefits of AI. He calls it 'culture-shaping AI,' emphasizing AI's role in helping to set the tone for employee performance and motivation across organizations. As more businesses begin to consider the impact of AI on their daily operations, it makes sense to spotlight the parameters to judge the value of the returns. When CEOs aren't thinking about monetary gains, they can consider other crucial things like employee satisfaction, customer feedback and even ethical concerns. 'Companies should track decision quality through accuracy rates, speed improvements, and confidence levels across key business processes. The best approach measures decision reversal rates and compares predicted versus actual outcomes. Focus on simple metrics that show whether AI-influenced decisions are actually better decisions,' said Brig Barker, managing principal at Kronus Intelligence Group. Uthe added that companies should focus on three areas: how fast decisions get made, how well information flows through the organization and how quickly teams can respond to market changes. 'If your workers say they enjoy greater satisfaction working with AI than before when they worked with it, then it means you're doing something right.' But employees aren't the only stakeholders AI affects. Customers matter, too, in the grand scheme of measuring AI ROI. How the users of an AI-powered product perceive it is crucial in determining whether it deserves to remain available or get pulled off the market. Seasoned customer experience expert Shep Hyken claims that more customers are feeling relaxed with the use of AI in service delivery. For instance, AI chatbots have become more popular in the last few years, enabling businesses to handle large volumes of customer complaints at a quicker pace than human support staff. In fact, the momentum of AI-powered customer support is so high that Hyken's annual CX survey showed 63% of U.S. customers expect more companies to adopt AI chatbots and other forms of automated customer support. In 2021, only 21% of respondents shared this sentiment. While the story of Klarna — which replaced 700 roles with AI chatbots in 2024 but quietly started rehiring for the same roles this year because its customers preferred human support — may cast a shadow over Hyken's claims, the forecast for AI in customer support looks good. Still, for companies whose clients don't speak highly of their AI deployment, it might be time to rethink their strategy and try again. AI ROI isn't just about cost savings or new revenue streams. It's about what changes — and improves — when AI becomes part of how a company works. While financial return may be the headline metric, especially when companies have poured significant capital into AI, it's not the only one that matters. Businesses must first decide why they're investing in AI — and only then decide what success actually looks like. If your AI investments end up making your employees work better and feel more satisfied, or they make your customers happier, or they make you, as a business leader, more efficient, then that's certainly a win. And as Dar said, 'these intangible wins often have tangible impact, even on finance. That's a win-win situation.' Uthe prescribes that companies should focus on decision speed, execution velocity and how fast teams can turn ideas into reality. She added that they must also track the time from problem identification to solution deployment, measure how AI amplifies their best people's capabilities and spread that performance across the organization. 'The goal,' she said 'should be to increase organizational acceleration.' Dar cautioned that replacing human agents with AI can backfire if you're not careful, explaining that many employees get spooked when they hear their company is piloting AI. But ironically, he noted that the best AI models need those same employees to train the system and handle the nuanced, emotional conversations AI can't. 'Retention is key if you want your AI to succeed,' he said.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
SCOTUS Eases Path for 'Reverse Discrimination' Lawsuits
An exterior view of the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on June 20, 2024. Credit - Andrew Harnik—Getty Images Lawsuits for 'reverse discrimination' will face an easier path after the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously sided on Thursday with a woman who argued that she was passed over for a promotion and later demoted because she is straight. The court's ruling is a departure from previous court decisions that have set a higher bar in cases where people who are part of a majority group, such as those who are white and straight, filed lawsuits alleging discrimination under federal civil rights law. But the Supreme Court said in its ruling that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employment discrimination based on race and sexual orientation, among other characteristics, 'draws no distinctions between majority-group plaintiffs and minority-group plaintiffs. Rather, the provision makes it unlawful 'to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.'' 'By establishing the same protections for every 'individual'—without regard to that individual's membership in a minority or majority group—Congress left no room for courts to impose special requirements on majority-group plaintiffs alone,' Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote for the court. The case was brought by Marlean Ames against the Ohio Department of Youth Services, where she started working in 2004. In 2019, she applied for a promotion, but was turned down and a colleague with less seniority—who was a lesbian woman—received the promotion instead. Ames was later demoted and her previous role was given to another colleague who had less seniority, a gay man. She sued under Title VII, alleging in her lawsuit that she was denied the promotion and then demoted due to her sexual orientation. Her supervisors, however, said Ames was passed over for the promotion because she didn't have the vision and leadership skills needed for the role and demoted because they had concerns about her leadership skills. Lower courts had previously ruled against Ames, saying her lawsuit failed to demonstrate 'background circumstances to support the suspicion that the defendant is that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority.' But the Supreme Court ruled that requirement was 'not consistent with Title VII's text or our case law construing the statute.' Contact us at letters@
