Pule Mabe's corruption case postponed to July as final charge sheet is still pending
Former national spokesperson Pule Mabe appeared at the Palm Ridge specialised commercial crimes court in 2024. Mabe and his co-accused face corruption in connection with a million-rand tender, which was allegedly awarded unlawfully to his company, Enviro Mobi, in 2017.
The corruption case involving former ANC national spokesperson Pule Mabe and six co-accused individuals has been postponed to July 7 as the State works to finalise the charge sheet.
The decision was announced during court proceedings on Tuesday at the Palm Ridge Specialised Commercial Crime Court in Ekurhuleni.
Mabe, 44, his wife Mmatlhekelo Elsie Mabe, 46, and five others — Loyiso Mkwana, Thandeka Mbassa, Matilda Gasela, Abdullah Mohamed Ismail, and Mabe's business associate Tinyiko Mahuntsi — appeared briefly before Magistrate Brian Nemavhidi.
All seven accused are currently out on bail of R30 000 each. State prosecutor Magdeline Montwedi Mclean told the court that the defence and prosecution had agreed to postpone proceedings to allow the State time to provide the final charge sheet by June 30. If delivered on time, the accused may be issued a trial date at their next court appearance on July 7.
Mabe, once a prominent figure in the ruling African National Congress, is at the centre of a case stemming from a controversial R27 million tender awarded in 2017 to his company, Enviro Mobi.
The company was contracted by the Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development to supply 200 three-wheeled motorised waste collection vehicles — known as tuk-tuks — intended to support 58 waste pickers in the Ekurhuleni municipality.
According to the state, the contract was awarded under irregular and fraudulent circumstances. Investigations by the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) and the Hawks revealed that Enviro Mobi received R27 231 750 in payments 'without any service rendered.'
In addition, over R6 million was allegedly paid out to cover storage expenses for the tuk-tuks, despite no record of the vehicles being deployed for their intended purpose.
Phindi Mjonondwane, spokesperson for the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA), said that the charges against the accused include theft, fraud, and violations of both the Public Finance Management Act and the Prevention of Organised Crime Act.
Mjonondwane further detailed how the procurement process was manipulated. A public tender was advertised on February 10, 2017, calling for proposals to support the integration of small and medium waste enterprises into Gauteng's waste management economy.
Ten companies responded, including Enviro Mobi, which allegedly lacked the necessary experience and technical capacity to fulfil the tender's requirements.'Enviro Mobi was awarded the tender despite serious shortcomings,' Mjonondwane explained.
'The State alleges that Makwana, Mbassa, and Ismail facilitated the unlawful appointment of Enviro Mobi, represented by Pule Mabe. At the time, the company reportedly denied any links to government officials or members of Parliament.'
Mabe had served as director of Enviro Mobi from 2010 to 2014 and was a signatory on the business account of KGP Media Holdings, one of the companies charged in the case.
Both Star Mass Direct and KGP Media Holdings — formerly known as Kariki Media Holdings and Groen Mintirho, respectively — are also facing charges. The SIU and Hawks allege that from March 2017 onwards, Enviro Mobi submitted invoices exceeding R26 million with no accompanying documentation to verify the completion of work or delivery of services.
Prominent defence attorney Zola Majavu is representing Mabe, his wife, and their companies.
Neither the accused nor their legal representatives made public comments following the postponement on Tuesday.
The next court appearance on July 7 is expected to bring further clarity, with the potential for a trial date to be set depending on the State's readiness and finalisation of charges.
The case has drawn significant attention given Mabe's previous high-profile role in South African politics and the growing scrutiny over government procurement processes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
Reimagining unity: The imperative of National Dialogue 2.0 in SA's political crisis
It is a common cause that 31 years after the formal demise of apartheid, the promises, great expectations and dreams of democracy are rapidly turning into horrific nightmares for the poor and disadvantaged. At the same time (new and old) elites rule the roost. Socioeconomic and spatial inequalities of the apartheid era widened while the politically connected continued to accumulate wealth and power at the expense of the poor. Crime and corruption escalated exponentially and are inextricably connected to political elites; global mafia operations of every genre magnetically gravitate to our country; and gender-based violence is a pandemic. South Africa has one of the highest unemployment rates in the world (33%), especially among young adults. The poor have inadequate access to essential services like water, electricity, healthcare and basic education. Many of these challenges were aggravated by State Capture. As highlighted by the Zondo Commission, State Capture in South Africa involved the systematic and deliberate subversion of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) for private gain. State Capture eroded good governance practices within SOEs and government departments (including law enforcement and intelligence services), decreasing operational performance and effectiveness. This entailed influencing appointments, procurement procedures, governance, and institutional structures to favour specific individuals and organisations. Key SOEs like Eskom, Transnet, and South African Airways were significantly affected by State Capture, with subsequent multiplier effects on all aspects of South African life, destroying the economy. Hegemonic rule of the ANC All these problems and challenges were aggravated during the hegemonic rule and reign of one political party, the ANC. Not surprisingly, some of its senior members were implicated in the State Capture report. Still, no one has yet been convicted because of the hollowing out of capacity in the National Prosecuting Authority. When he was firmly ensconced on the throne, Jacob Zuma said on more than one occasion that the 'ANC will rule until Jesus returns'. However, there were some obvious indications that the ANC was haemorrhaging — for example, in the 2021 Local Government Elections it received 45.59% of the vote. In the May 2024 General Elections, the ANC lost its parliamentary majority, winning 40.18% of the vote. Ironically, Zuma's newly established uMkhonto Wesizwe (MK) party (while he still claimed to be a disciplined member of the ANC) eroded the support of the ANC, winning 14.58% of the vote. The notion of a National Dialogue entered the public domain against the background of the ANC's declining electoral support. Former president Thabo Mbeki initially proposed a national dialogue in May 2024, calling for 'seismic reflections'. This was endorsed by President Cyril Ramaphosa, who in his inauguration address after the May 2024 national elections, invited 'all parties, civil society, labour, business and other formations to a National Dialogue on the critical challenges facing the nation'. Ramaphosa said: 'By establishing the Government of National Unity, by preparing for a National Dialogue, we have deliberately set ourselves along the path towards a 'co-operation nation'. We would like all of us as South Africans to behave like 'weaver birds'… despite all the challenges, despite our differences, despite all the headwinds.' Political legitimacy There is a view that ruling elites have frequently utilised National Dialogues to obtain or regain political legitimacy. According to the Geneva-based Inclusive Peace and Transition Initiative: 'National Dialogues are typically convened when the fundamental nature or survival of a government in power is questioned. Thus, they usually intend to redefine the relationship between the state, political actors, and society by negotiating a new social contract.' A National Dialogue can be used for peacebuilding and reconciliation to increase confidence and trust among national actors, encourage inclusive engagement, and advance agreement on critical social, political, and economic challenges. The National Dialogue Handbook defines National Dialogues as 'nationally owned political processes aimed at generating consensus among a broad range of national stakeholders in times of deep political crisis, in post-war situations or during far-reaching political transitions'. The goal is for national leaders (political, business, religious, civil society, sports, etc.) across the ideological spectrum to debate, discuss and encourage inclusive engagement and advance agreement on significant social, political, and economic challenges. It is worth noting that the first National Dialogue was the Convention for a Democratic South Africa (Codesa), which took place in Johannesburg in December 1991. It was a critical step in the process of transitioning South Africa from apartheid to a democratic state. Nineteen political organisations participated, including the ruling National Party and the dominant African National Congress (ANC), comprising 228 delegates. Key aspects of Codesa included signing a 'Declaration of Intent' committing to negotiations and creating a new, democratic Constitution. The parties agreed on the principles of a unified, democratic, and non-racial South Africa, with a supreme Constitution and an independent judiciary. Crucial step Codesa established the foundation for negotiations for a democratic South Africa. While there were many disagreements, Codesa was a crucial step in the process of dismantling apartheid and building a new nation. The procedure was sufficiently adaptable to permit the creation of new forums and committees and modifications to existing ones based on political exigencies. As South Africa's transition from apartheid proceeded (with all its twists and turns), a Multi-Party Negotiating Process was established in March 1993, culminating in the adoption of an interim Constitution and preparations for the country's first non-racial elections. Parties with opposing views had to make substantial concessions during this process. Given the protracted conflict and violent past, the comparatively quiet and orderly democratic transition was praised globally as a miracle. Essential outcomes from the first National Dialogue were the Reconstruction and Development Programme and the Constitution. The National Development Plan, which presented a long-term vision and goals for South Africa to achieve by 2030, was released in 2012. All three documents can influence outcomes in the National Dialogue 2.0. There is no need to reinvent the wheel. Almost a year after it was initially proposed, on 10 June 2025, Ramaphosa released the names of the Eminent Persons Group to 'guide and champion the National Dialogue'. The problems in South Africa cannot be solved by National Dialogues alone. For a National Dialogue to be successful, several challenges must be addressed, including political actors' opposition and resistance to change, a lack of support from groups, persistent violence, crime, corruption, instability, and a lack of inclusivity. The National Dialogue 2.0 should not be about saving the ANC. It is about saving our country. All stakeholders must put their shoulders to the wheel, rise above personal, parochial, and party interests, and put South Africa first.
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
Transnet averts potential strike after reaching three-year wage agreement with workers unions
Transnet and its majority union United National Transport Union (UNTU) sign a wage agreement after a lengthy process with the intervention of the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA). Image: Leon Lestrade/ Independent Newspapers Transnet has signed a three-year wage agreement with its majorityunion, the United National Transport Union (UNTU), following a protracted negotiation process that required intervention from the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA). In a statement on Thursday, Transnet said that the wage agreement would see an increment of 6% for the 2025/2026, 2026/2027, and 2027/2028 financial years. Transnet stated that this above-inflation agreement corresponds to an overall wage increase of 18% across the three years, encompassing increases to basic salaries and additional components, such as the 13th cheque, pension fund contributions, medical aid subsidies, and housing allowances. 'The finalisation of the three-year wage agreement provides labour stability and will enable the company to focus on its immediate strategic priorities of improving operational and financial performance, while positioning the organisation for future growth, thereby ensuring job security and economic growth,' Transnet said. UNTU general secretary, Cobus van Vuuren, hailed the signing as a pivotal moment following a challenging negotiation period. 'The agreement was signed between the parties on Thursday evening, 12 June 2025, following engagements between UNTU and Transnet this week,' he said. 'UNTU is confident that this agreement is fully aligned with the overwhelming mandate received from our constituencies, which have mandated us to sign the CCMA's facilitator's proposal following the S150 process by two senior Commissioners.' UNTU represents more than 26 000 workers at Transnet and had threatened to issue the State-owned freight and logistics firm with a 48-hour notice for a strike if negotiations deadlocked. Van Vuuren emphasised that this agreement not only represented a notable salary increment but also reinforced job security—one of UNTU's primary demands throughout the negotiation process. 'As UNTU committed, we also secured the back payment for the increased retrospective from 01 April 2025, as our members have made great financial sacrifices during this period, as UNTU continued the fight for a better salary increase and, most importantly, job security. UNTU is the majority union in Transnet; therefore, this agreement will be applicable to all bargaining unit employees,' he said. 'The three-year agreement also ensures much-needed labour stability during a critical period as Transnet works to rebuild its operations, restore service reliability, and regain stakeholder confidence. 'As the majority union representing the voices of more than 26 000 employees at Transnet, UNTU confirms that this newly signed agreement supersedes the previous agreement signed between Transnet and the minority union, Satawu.' Transnet also signed the same wage agreement with its other recognised labour union, the South African Transport and Allied Workers' Union (Satawu). Satawu general secretary, Jack Mazibuko, said the union had proposed an alternative wording for the retrenchment clause committing Transnet to no mandatory retrenchments during the currency of the wage agreement. 'Äccordingly, the new retrenchment clause as contained in the employer's final wage offer reads as follows: 1. Transnet commits that there will be no mandatory retrenchments during the currency of the wage agreement. 2. However, should it be necessary to restructure any areas of its business due to operations. economic and/or organisation restructuring reasons, the following process shall be followed: a) The employer will comply with the provisions of its existing recognition agreement and prevailing legislation b) The employer will establish a multi-disciplinary committee, inclusing labour, to assess the people impact of all restructuting initiatives across the business with the objective to preserve job security for all employees. c) The committee will explore opportunities for retirement, redeployment, reskilling and restructing will be explored as alternatives to ensure that there will be no mandatory retrenchments.' BUSINESS REPORT Transnet and its majority union United National Transport Union (UNTU) sign a wage agreement after a lengthy process with the intervention of the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA). Image: Leon Lestrade/ Independent Newspapers
TimesLIVE
3 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
'Fast Guns' gangsters get life for shots that killed child on Cape Flats
Two members of the Fast Guns gang have been sentenced to life imprisonment in Cape Town for a brazen shooting that claimed the life of a five-year-old child and the attempted murder of nine other people in Lavender Hill, Cape Town. Carlo Hofmeester and Chadwin Isaacs were convicted by the high court in Cape Town for contravening the Prevention of Organised Crime Act and the murder of five-year-old Valentino Grootetjie on December 21 2019. They were also handed 10 years imprisonment for each of the nine counts of attempted murder, five years for illegal possession of firearms and three years for illegal possession of ammunition. The court ordered the sentences to run concurrently. 'State advocate Leon Snyman proved the accused were members of the Fast Guns gang who were engaged in drug turf wars with the Mongrels gang in Lavender Hill and surrounding areas,' said National Prosecuting Authority spokesperson Eric Ntabazalila on Tuesday. On the day of the shooting, Mongrels gang members gathered at 37 Drury Court in Lavender Hill to smoke and socialise in what was regarded as Mongrels gang territory. Two of the other victims were at 36 Drury Court.
