'Fast Guns' gangsters get life for shots that killed child on Cape Flats
Carlo Hofmeester and Chadwin Isaacs were convicted by the high court in Cape Town for contravening the Prevention of Organised Crime Act and the murder of five-year-old Valentino Grootetjie on December 21 2019.
They were also handed 10 years imprisonment for each of the nine counts of attempted murder, five years for illegal possession of firearms and three years for illegal possession of ammunition. The court ordered the sentences to run concurrently.
'State advocate Leon Snyman proved the accused were members of the Fast Guns gang who were engaged in drug turf wars with the Mongrels gang in Lavender Hill and surrounding areas,' said National Prosecuting Authority spokesperson Eric Ntabazalila on Tuesday.
On the day of the shooting, Mongrels gang members gathered at 37 Drury Court in Lavender Hill to smoke and socialise in what was regarded as Mongrels gang territory. Two of the other victims were at 36 Drury Court.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

TimesLIVE
3 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Former rugby player fined for failing to submit tax returns
The Paarl magistrate's court has fined former Springbok rugby player Schalk Burger Sr and his company Welbedacht Wines for failing to submit VAT, pay-as-you-earn (PAYE) and income tax returns. The court fined the company R6,000 on each count of failing to submit a VAT201 return for February 2023 and a monthly employer declaration return for March 2023. Burger, 69, was convicted on 14 counts, which included failure to submit a VAT201 return for February 2023, a monthly employer declaration (EMP201) return for March2023 and IT12 income tax returns for the period 2011 to 2022. He was fined R6,000 or 12 months imprisonment on each count, of which R2,000 or four months imprisonment was suspended for five years. 'This amounts to a payable fine of R56,000, or 112 months imprisonment and a further R28,000 or 56 months imprisonment suspended for five years on specific conditions,' National Prosecuting Authority spokesperson Eric Ntabazalila said. Burger successfully requested the court to grant him a deferred fine and was ordered to pay the R56,000 in instalments of R6,000 per month and a final payment of R8,000. The accused entered into a plea and sentence agreement with the state. The court confirmed the agreement and convicted and sentenced him accordingly. According to the agreement, Burger admitted that Welbedacht Wines was registered for VAT and PAYE at the Paarl office of the South African Revenue Services. Burger failed to submit the returns on behalf of the company. In addition, Burger, in his personal capacity, was registered for income tax at the Paarl Sars office . 'Following his successful registration for e-filing in 2011, he failed to submit his IT12 income tax returns for the tax years of 2011 to 2022. This was despite Sars' best efforts to encourage all taxpayers to submit their income tax returns.' It was only after the institution of a prosecution and his being summoned to appear in court that he submitted all outstanding returns relating to himself and his company, and both are currently tax compliant. 'The accused's son, Christiaan Francois Burger, was on July 21 also convicted and sentenced on 12 counts of failing to submit his IT12 personal income tax returns for the 2011 to 2022 period.' The 40-year-old was sentenced to a fine of R48,000 or 96 months imprisonment, and a further R24,000 or 48 months imprisonment, suspended for five years on conditions. The NPA said the sentence sent a strong message of deterrence. 'With the filing season for income tax currently under way, this is a clear message that failure by persons and juristic persons to file their Income Tax returns will not be tolerated. It is a serious offence that impacts negatively on the fiscus,' he said.


The Citizen
7 hours ago
- The Citizen
Joshlin Smith case: NPA ready to fight appeals in SCA if necessary after latest verdict
The judge also granted key witness Laurentia Lombaard indemnity from prosecution. The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) said it will oppose any further appeals by the three convicted people in the Joshlin Smith case should they take their case to the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA). On Wednesday afternoon, the Western Cape High Court in Cape Town delivered its judgment on the leave to appeal applications after hearing submissions from both the state and the defence. Joshlin's mother, Racquel 'Kelly' Smith, together with Jacquen 'Boeta' Appollis and Van Rhyn, had sought to appeal their convictions and sentences. The trio had been sentenced to life imprisonment for human trafficking, along with an additional 10 years for kidnapping, in connection with Joshlin's disappearance. The young girl went missing from her family's home in Saldanha Bay on 19 February 2024. It is alleged that the child was sold for R20 000. Appeal judgment in Joshlin Smith case Judge Nathan Erasmus dismissed the appeal, finding no reasonable prospect of success. 'There is no compelling reason why the appeal should be granted. 'It is rather pegged on whether there is a reasonable prospect of success,' the judge said. He explained that the court had made factual findings, drawn inferences from circumstantial evidence, and had the advantage of observing witnesses directly, which informed credibility assessments. 'It is clear that it can never be said that a sentence of life imprisonment, in particular on count one, on the human trafficking of a child, where life imprisonment is imposed, where persons have shown no remorse, would be shockingly inappropriate. 'We for that reason leave on the sentence should be refused,' Erasmus remarked. ALSO READ: 'Don't twist facts' – Tense proceedings as Joshlin Smith case judge accused of threats, collusion In addition, the judge granted key witness Laurentia Lombaard indemnity from prosecution. Lombaard, initially an accused in the case, later became a Section 204 witness, providing crucial testimony that helped secure the convictions against Smith, Appollis and Van Rhyn. Erasmus emphasised that he could not ignore the witness's personal circumstances such as her drug addiction, as well as the fact that she had no previous convictions. Therefore, her reluctance to be truthful from the outset should not, the judge said, 'carry that much weight'. He further stated that although Lombaard was aware arrangements had been made to sell Joshlin and she remained silent, this was not an offence. 'Over and above that, you played no active role in either the trafficking and kidnapping of Joshlin Smith.' NPA reacts Speaking to the media outside the court, Western Cape NPA spokesperson Eric Ntabazalila said the state was satisfied with the outcome of the proceedings. Ntabazalila indicated that the state had not yet been told whether the defence intended to appeal the latest judgment. 'We will go to the SCA and still oppose their decision to appeal. We believe there is no other court that can come to a different conclusion than what this court has taken. 'So even if they go to the SCA, we will go there and argue the same,' he said on Wednesday. He also confirmed that key witness Laurentia Lombaard remained under witness protection. 'We cannot talk about that programme, but there will be a process which will unfold. 'In this case, she is not going to be prosecuted; she is indemnified. She has got immunity from prosecution, so she's free.' NOW READ: 'Where's Joshlin and what really happened to her?'

The Herald
17 hours ago
- The Herald
Benoni man accused of raping and impregnating daughter denied bail
The Tsakani magistrate's court on Tuesday denied bail to a 39-year-old man from Lindelani, Benoni, who is accused of raping and impregnating his daughter, who was 15, in 2022. The man had applied for bail on Friday. 'The alleged abuse began in March 2022 when the victim lived with her parents and younger brother in Tsakani,' National Prosecuting Authority spokesperson Lumka Mahanjana said. On the day of the first incident, the mother was at church and left her daughter with her father and brother. The father allegedly called the victim into the house and sent her brother to buy chips. 'When the victim got inside the house she found the father in her room. The father allegedly locked the door behind her, undressed both himself and the victim, raped her, and left her in her room.' Upon the mother's return, she found the victim crying on her bed. 'She told her mother what had happened but the mother did not believe her.' The abuse allegedly continued when the mother was not around and the child stopped telling her mother as she still did not believe the victim. The child became pregnant the same year. The mother brought a concoction and told the child to drink it in an attempt to abort her baby, which failed. The parents then moved the victim to Limpopo to live with her paternal grandmother, where she gave birth to a boy in December 2022. 'After turning 18, the victim opened a case in Limpopo on July 7 2025, resulting in the father's arrest on July 19 2025.' In court, the father sought R1,000 bail, citing his role as the primary caregiver for his three children aged one, 12, and 18 since his unemployed wife could not support them. Prosecutor Sindi Leonora Sejake called investigating officer Sgt Tebogo Lephoto, who opposed the accused's release on bail because the state had a strong case. Lephoto said DNA evidence revealed that the accused was the father of the victim's three-year-old child. 'The investigating officer testified that the accused was likely to interfere with witnesses since he went to Limpopo from Gauteng in attempt to confront the child after he realised that the child had opened a case against him and was speaking about the matter on social media.' Magistrate Tebogo Lekgau denied bail, noting the severity of the charge and the likelihood of a life sentence if convicted. She emphasised the strong state case, the accused's potential to evade trial and the community outcry that prompted the family's relocation. 'Moreover, the magistrate said, the vulnerable child was failed by her father as he repeatedly raped her, while her mother also failed to protect her by refusing to believe her.' The case was postponed to August 28. TimesLIVE