Murray Watt urged to intervene after accusations proposed Queensland coalmine clearing land in greater glider habitat
Images and drone footage obtained by the Queensland Conservation Council over the past two months appear to show large areas of bushland cleared at the site of Magnetic South's proposed Gemini coalmine near Dingo in central Queensland.
Public documents released under freedom of information laws show the environment department told the company in 2022 it strongly recommended referral of the project to consider whether it required an assessment for potentially significant impacts on the Brigalow ecological community, and species including the greater glider, koala and bridled nail-tail wallaby.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
The council wrote to Watt last month alerting him and the federal environment department's compliance unit to what it claimed was the removal of 'approximately 200 hectares of greater glider habitat' since late May in an area earmarked for an open coal pit.
The council wrote it had 'urgent concerns' that construction of the mine might have commenced without referral of the project for an assessment under Australia's environmental laws.
The proposed metallurgical coal project, which would produce up to 1.9m tonnes of coal a year, has attracted concerns in the past due to a Queensland government decision not to require an environmental impact statement and opposition from graziers.
In its letter to Watt, the Queensland Conservation Council asked whether the alleged clearing had been approved by the federal government and whether the government needed to take enforcement action.
The council wrote it believed the clearing could be unlawful and that it expected Watt's department 'to take urgent action accordingly to protect this culturally and ecologically significant place'.
The council's coal and gas campaigner, Charlie Cox, said Watt needed to urgently step in.
'There is now drone footage, satellite imagery, and traditional owners on the ground all suggesting that yet another coal corporation has taken it upon themselves to start building their mine without the relevant federal approvals,' she said.
Cox called on the minister to use enforcement powers to stop the alleged clearing and to call the project in for a federal assessment.
'Murray Watt is committed to reforming our environment laws that are woefully failing nature, he needs to actually enforce the existing laws too,' she said.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Zhanae Dodd is a Ghungalu woman and founder of Guyala Yimba, an Indigenous human rights consultancy. Ghungalu custodians have a camp at the proposed mine site, where they have been conducting cultural ceremony since early this month.
'We're out there engaging in ceremony and keeping a fire burning,' Dodd said. 'We need to preserve these sites because on our country already there are that many mines destroying country, why do we need one more?'
In a letter the council received on Friday, the federal environment department said it was 'aware of the alleged actions and potential impacts to threatened species and ecological communities protected by the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act'. The department said it was engaging with Magnetic South 'regarding their obligations under the act'.
A spokesperson for the federal environment department said 'the department is in receipt of the allegations'.
'As the investigation is ongoing the department will not provide further comment.'
Guardian Australia sought comment from Watt and Magnetic South.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Trial to remove shark nets from three Sydney and Central Coast beaches a good first step, scientists say
A trial to remove shark nets from three Sydney and Central Coast beaches has been welcomed by scientists who say the nets create a false sense of security and are ineffective at preventing shark bites. Shark nets, about 150 metres long and installed roughly 500 metres offshore at selected beaches in New South Wales and Queensland, were 'like a table tennis net on a soccer pitch', said Lawrence Chlebeck, a marine biologist at Humane World for Animals. 'They're not the barriers that people think they are,' he said. 'Sharks can easily swim around, underneath, over the top. In fact, 40% of sharks are caught on the inside of the net – so these animals have already been to the beach.' The nets also 'indiscriminately' catch marine life, killing not just target shark species, but also turtles, dolphins and other marine life, he said. NSW first introduced the nets in the 1930s, with the program since expanded to include 51 beaches between Newcastle and Wollongong. Nets were only one component of the state's shark management program, which also included drone surveillance, shark tagging and real-time detection, SMART drumlines (where sharks were caught, tagged and released) and community education. Last week the state government asked three councils – Waverley, Northern Beaches and Central Coast – to each nominate a beach where the nets could be removed. Sign up to get climate and environment editor Adam Morton's Clear Air column as a free newsletter That was a good first step, Chlebeck said, acknowledging 'it would have been tough for a government to end a program with almost a century of legacy'. Other states such as South Australia and Western Australia had already 'moved with the times' and did not use culling or shark nets, he said. Instead they relied on non-lethal measures like surveillance, shark monitoring, public education and rapid response. In contrast, in May the Queensland government announced it would expand the use of lethal controls including shark nets and baited drumlines, a move one expert described as a 'tough on sharks' approach that was more about culture wars than implementing evidence-backed policy. In South Australia, Dr Brianna Le Busque has been researching public attitudes towards sharks and shark bites for almost 10 years. The environmental science program director at the University of South Australia said while the public's fear of sharks remained steady, there had been a shift in attitudes towards greater support for non-lethal methods. 'People want to be protected, and they want to feel safe in the water, but there's less and less support for lethal mitigation,' Le Busque said. Many people were not aware that the nets were actually lethal – designed to catch and kill sharks rather than acting as a barrier. 'We're essentially talking about a big fishing net floating out in the ocean,' she said. Sign up to Clear Air Australia Adam Morton brings you incisive analysis about the politics and impact of the climate crisis after newsletter promotion The trial removal in NSW was a positive step, Le Busque said, given the nets did not offer protection and harmed marine life. She pointed to Australian research published last year into 196 unprovoked shark incidents, which found no difference in unprovoked human-shark interactions at netted versus non-netted beaches since the 2000s. Even so, their removal would be a big change for people living in those areas, Le Busque said. From that perspective, the trial provided an opportunity to build community awareness and demonstrate the effectiveness of other non-lethal mitigation techniques. The NSW agriculture minister, Tara Moriarty, said the safety of beachgoers was the government's 'number one priority'. In determining its approach to the upcoming season, Moriarty said the government would consider evidence from the last few seasons and feedback from local councils. Councils have until 22 August to respond to the NSW government on their preferred option for the removal of nets for 2025-26 patrol season. Waverley council said its support for the trial was contingent on the increased use of drones and SMART drumlines resourced by the state government. 'Waverley Council's position is clear: the safety of our community comes first,' the mayor, Will Nemesh, said. Shark interactions and bites are rare in Australian waters. In the last 10 years, an average of 20 people were injured and 2.8 people killed in shark incidents each year, according to the Australian Shark Incident Database. That is compared to 150 coastal drowning deaths last year, including 84 drownings at beaches.
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Slade Community group raises money to buy 'hidden gem' woodland
People in Stroud have successfully raised £66,000 to purchase a local woodland. The community benefit society, Stroud Woodland, are now in the process of purchasing Slade Wood, with the hope of protecting it for future generations. Slade Wood forms part of continuous woodland beginning above Summer Street and extending along the Slad valley to Swifts Hill. Co-director of Stroud Woodland , Ben Spencer describes the wood as "a little pocket of woodland which is really treasured". The Stroud Woodland Community Benefit Society was set up in 2010, to purchase Folly Wood, just north of Stroud. "What people really enjoy is having the opportunity to spend time in the space on their own or with their family, at Folly Wood," said Mr Spencer. This week, the group announced it had raised the necessary £66,000 to buy Slade Wood, a steep three-acre piece of woodland on the edge of the Slad Valley, on the outskirts of Stroud. "Because it's tucked away, it's a bit of a hidden gem," Mr Spencer said. Members of the public who bought shares to fund the purchase will get no financial return. Mr Spencer insists the benefit is social and environmental."It's for people taking some time out. People locally have grown up and visited it over the years, as kids and teenagers, as well as parents of young children," he they have taken ownership of Slade Wood, the group plans to keep it open to the public, as it was under the previous owner. "We thought there was a danger it could be bought privately and fenced off with people no longer able to have access to the space," Mr Spencer said. On the environmental side, the group points to successes at Folly Wood where the creation of clearings and ponds has increased biodiversity.
BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
Tougher Bishop Auckland conservation area planning rules proposed
Stricter planning rules have been proposed to protect a town's conservation area.A consultation has begun on the proposals contained in the Conservation Area Management Plan (CAMP) for Bishop Auckland in County could see the introduction of tougher planning measures, called Article 4 Directions, which would allow the council to control changes which can normally go ahead without planning conservation zone could also expand to include the Railway Street industrial area. There are currently no Article 4 Directions in Bishop rules, which affect property rights and can incur fees to secure planning permission, have been used to good effect in many other conservation areas, Durham County Council said. The town's conservation zone was originally designated in 1969 and reviewed and amended in 1990 and historic structures are part of it, including Auckland Castle, the Town Hall, St Anne's Church, Newton Cap Viaduct, Skirlaw Bridge and Gaunless Bridge. Under proposed boundary changes, Peel Street, Chester Street and Railway Street would also be added, as well as 60 and 58 Etherley Lane. Separate proposals have also been put forward for the Durham City conservation changes could see the current large single zone split into seven new conservation areas in an effort to make it more manageable. People have until 15 September to share their views on the plans for both areas. Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
