logo
Stocks fall as oil prices surge following Israel attack on Iran

Stocks fall as oil prices surge following Israel attack on Iran

CBS News16 hours ago

What Israeli airstrikes against Iran means for U.S.
Stocks are down on Friday, with oil prices surging in the wake of the Israel's military strike on Iran.
The S&P 500 slid 48 points, or 0.5%, to 5,998 points in early trading, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 559 points, or 1.3%, to 42,409 points. The Nasdaq Composite shed 0.8%.
The market slide comes after Israel launched strikes on Iran's nuclear sites and other targets early Friday, the start of what Israel said could be a days-long attack. Iran responded by launching over 100 drones, which Israel claimed it was able to mostly intercept.
The strikes come as President Trump seeks to rein in Iran's nuclear capabilities. The U.S. and Iran are scheduled to meet Sunday in Oman, as part of a series on ongoing talks.
The oil market had an even stronger reaction on Friday, with U.S. benchmark crude oil increasing $4.73 or 6.9% to $72.77 per barrel. Bent crude, the international standard, climbed $4.58 to $73.94 per barrel.
The Middle East tensions also affect markets beyond oil, said Joy Yang, head of index product management at MarketVector Indexes, noting a decline in Bitcoin prices and a rally in defense stocks, as airline stocks fall.
Airlines, which use a lot of fuel as part of their business and need their customers feeling confident enough to travel, experienced sharp losses. United Airlines lost 5.2%, Delta Air Lines gave up 4.5% and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings dropped 2.9%.
Boeing shares are down 1% after a 5% dip Thursday following a crash in India involving one of its 787-8 Dreamliner planes.
contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MicroStrategy director cashes out $10M
MicroStrategy director cashes out $10M

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

MicroStrategy director cashes out $10M

MicroStrategy director cashes out $10M originally appeared on TheStreet. Strategy (Nasdaq: MSTR), earlier known as MicroStrategy, director Carl Rickertsen has cashed out all his MSTR shares for more than $10 million this month. Helmed by co-founder and executive chairman Michael Saylor, Strategy is the world's largest public corporate holder of Bitcoin. As of now, the company holds 582,000 BTC worth a whopping $61.25 billion. As per Strategy, Rickertsen has been its board member since October 2002. Protos reported about the recent transactions made by Rickertsen in a news story on June 12. As per Protos, Rickertsen bought $700,000 in MSTR shares in 2022 and sold half of it in 2023. Now, he has let go of all of his MSTR holdings. On June 2, Rickertsen acquired 26,390 shares and then sold the same day for $9,827,636. On 3 June, he sold 980 shares for $371,488.60 that he had acquired on May 13. Notably, Strategy began acquiring Bitcoin in 2020 amidst the coronavirus pandemic, and the MSTR stock has since grown more than 3,100% in value since then. The recent Iran-Israel conflict led to the stock dipping as the market opened on June 13, but it managed to recover later. At press time, MSTR was trading at $379.82. Meanwhile, Bitcoin has grown more than 1,100% in value since 2020. As per Kraken, Bitcoin was trading at $105,245.08 at press time, down 2.81% a day. TheStreet Roundtable reached out to MicroStrategy for a comment on the matter and has not received a response so far. We will update the story if and when the company responds. MicroStrategy director cashes out $10M first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 13, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 13, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Google AI Overviews strike again following the fatal Air India crash
Google AI Overviews strike again following the fatal Air India crash

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Google AI Overviews strike again following the fatal Air India crash

If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, BGR may receive an affiliate commission. Google said at I/O 2025 that AI Overviews are quite popular with users, but I've always found them to be the worst kind of AI product. Google is forcing AI results on as many Google Search queries as it can just because it can. It's not because users want AI Overviews in search. The separate AI Mode is generative AI in Google Search done the right way. It's a separate tab or an intentional choice from the user to enhance their Search experience with a Gemini-powered chat. Today's Top Deals Best deals: Tech, laptops, TVs, and more sales Best Ring Video Doorbell deals Memorial Day security camera deals: Reolink's unbeatable sale has prices from $29.98 The reason I don't like the idea of AI Overviews being forced on users aggressively is their well-known problems with accuracy. We've learned the hard way that AI Overviews hallucinate badly. The glue-on-pizza incident won't be forgotten anytime soon. While Google has improved AI Overviews, the AI-powered Search results still make mistakes. The latest one concerns the fatal Air India crash from earlier this week. Some people who rushed to Google Search to find out what happened saw an AI Overview claiming that an Airbus operated by Air India crashed on Thursday, soon after takeoff. Some AI Overviews even mentioned the type of plane, an Airbus A330-243. In reality, it was a Boeing 787. I've said more than once that Google should abandon AI Overviews. The glue-on-pizza hallucinations were one thing. They were funny. Most people probably realized the AI made a mistake. But this week's hallucination is different. It spreads incorrect information about a tragic event, and that can have serious consequences. The last thing we want from genAI products is to be misled by fake news. AI Overviews do exactly that when they hallucinate. It doesn't matter if these issues are rare. One mistake like the one involving the Air India crash is enough to cause harm. Google is showing It was an Airbus aircraft that crushed today in India. how is this being allowed? byu/Economy_Shallot_9166 inartificial This isn't just about Google's reputation. Airbus could be directly impacted. Imagine investors or travelers making decisions based on that search result. Sure, they could seek out real news sources. But not everyone will bother to verify the snippet at the top of the page. Google's disclaimer that 'AI responses may include mistakes' isn't enough. Not everyone notices, or even reads, that fine print. At least Google corrected this hallucination and gave Ars Technica the following statement: As with all Search features, we rigorously make improvements and use examples like this to update our systems. This response is no longer showing. We maintain a high quality bar with all Search features, and the accuracy rate for AI Overviews is on par with other features like Featured Snippets. I'll also point out that not all AI Overviews may have listed Airbus as the crashed plane. Results can vary depending on what you ask and how you phrase it. Some users might have gotten the correct answer on the first try. We don't know how many times the Airbus detail appeared by mistake. AI Overviews might make similar mistakes on topics beyond tragic news events. We have no way of knowing how often they hallucinate, no matter what Google says about accuracy. If you've been following AI developments over the past few years, you probably have a sense of why these hallucinations happen. The AI doesn't think like a human. It might combine details from reports that mention both Airbus and Boeing, then get the facts mixed up. And it's not just AI Overviews. We've seen other genAI tools hallucinate too. Research has even shown that the most advanced ChatGPT models hallucinate more than earlier ones. That's why I always argue with ChatGPT when it fails to give me sources for its claims. But here's the big difference. You can't opt out of AI Overviews. Google has pushed this AI search experience on everyone without first ensuring the AI doesn't hallucinate. AI Mode, by contrast, is a much better use of AI in Search. It can genuinely improve the experience. I'll also add that instead of talking about AI Overviews and their hallucinations, I could be praising a different AI initiative from Google. DeepMind is using AI to predict hurricane forecasts, which could be incredibly helpful. But here we are, focusing on AI Overviews and their errors, because misleading users with AI is a serious problem. Hallucination remains an AI safety issue that nobody has solved yet. Don't Miss: Today's deals: Nintendo Switch games, $5 smart plugs, $150 Vizio soundbar, $100 Beats Pill speaker, more More Top Deals Amazon gift card deals, offers & coupons 2025: Get $2,000+ free See the

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store