logo
Major report reveals widespread sexism and abuse in politics

Major report reveals widespread sexism and abuse in politics

Engender's report titled 'The Road to Success - Women's Candidate Journey and Way to Advance it' laid bare the enduring challenges faced by women pursuing political office in Scotland, warning that without urgent cultural reform within parties, progress toward gender parity could stall—or reverse.
The research was conducted by the feminist policy organisation between July and November 2024 and examined women's experiences of political candidate selection processes.
The survey involved 159 participants and 15 in-depth interviews with women with candidacy experience across Scotland's political parties.
A total of 33% were SNP, 18% were Greens, 17% Labour, 8% from the Liberal Democrats and 5% from the Conservatives.
One of the most prominent findings was the prevalence of abuse.
Over 70% of respondents reported experiencing online harassment, and only 11% felt "very safe" during their campaigns.
Read more:
'Why are women in Scottish politics still facing hurdles?'
Holyrood 2026: Fears over female MSP representation
'We are outnumbered': Female councillor on 'male aggression' in Scotland's councils
One respondent even said they moved house due to threats they faced. Others said they modified their behaviour as a result of the abuse.
Over a third of respondents said they didn't receive any support around safety from their party.
One comment even alluded to the existence of a culture of silence around raising safety concerns: 'I didn't receive support and I don't think I even reported it - you want to be seen as tough.'
'I have been spat on, shouted at, abused and physically shoved countless times,' wrote one candidate.
Another said they have received "several thousand hateful comments and messages" on social media.
'I have mixed feelings about encouraging other women to stand because of the level of abuse online," one said.
The report also found that candidate selection processes are often biased and rooted in a default model favouring white, male, middle-class, non-disabled candidates.
'We can't win here with someone who looks like her,' recalled one woman, quoting a party member's remark during her candidacy.
One interviewee said: 'The processes are too complex and not easy to understand. This favours established party people 'in the know' who then tend to be the most represented - men, white.'
Another added: 'Unless you're one of the boys, the wife of one of the boys, or in the 'right' political sub-group, it seems there's no interest in your involvement.'
The report also found that many of the crucial structures, cultures and processes surrounding candidate selection still do not work for women.
Everyday sexism, gender stereotypes, sexist bullying, and online abuse are widespread, the report states, and deters women from participating fully — leading to safety concerns, emotional burnout, and a reluctance to stand again.
Talking about the culture in local councils, one respondent said: 'We often persuade great people to join, guide them through the selection process, and they get elected.
"But they may eventually fall away because it can be an unpleasant experience or they experience online harassment or in-person bullying and harassment, council chambers especially can be quite hostile—worse than Holyrood or Westminster, I'd say."
Of those surveyed, 24% of selected candidates said they experienced sexist language or bullying.
The report found evidence of widespread bias at all stages against those with caring responsibilities, and a lack of practical support from parties to help manage these.
One parliamentary candidate said: "I have three children and was a councillor during the election. No thought was given to these responsibilities during the campaign.'
Disabled women also reported a lack of consideration around access and support throughout their journeys.
Women, especially from black, minority ethnic, and disabled groups, encounter multiple systemic barriers across all stages of becoming political candidates, according to the report— including lack of transparency, funding, guidance, sexist attitudes, online harassment, and caring responsibilities.
Only 35% of survey respondents felt their party genuinely prioritised diversity in candidate selection.
Everyday sexism, including inappropriate comments and gendered stereotypes, remains commonplace across parties, with 24% of selected candidates experiencing sexist language or bullying.
While the 2021 Holyrood election secured a 45% representation rate among women MSPs, the report states 'progress has stalled in other electoral spaces'.
Women comprise only 35% of councillors after the 2022 local elections and 35% of Scottish MPs following the 2024 General Election.
The report states that a 'major drive of success' in creating better representation at Holyrood in 2021 was the use of gender quotas by the SNP, Scottish Labour and the Scottish Greens.
However, the report goes on to state that the use of such quotas relies on parties continuing to 'opt-in".
It adds: 'Without the backing of robust legislation to enforce them, the transformative impact of quotas is diluted.'
The report calls for Scottish political parties to go beyond procedural fixes and embrace deep structural and cultural change.
This includes adopting gender-balanced selection panels, offering practical support for candidates with caring responsibilities, and tackling the culture of abuse with proper training and response mechanisms.
The authors stress that the upcoming 2026 Holyrood and 2027 local elections present a crucial opportunity to demonstrate real commitment to equality.
'Without decisive action to address these systematic barriers, progress on women's representation risks stalling or reversing, undermining the health of Scottish democracy,' the report concludes.
Noomi Anyanwu, development officer for Engender, said: "We have been in conversations with women and female politicians all over Scotland for several years now. They all tell a similar story: The political arena is becoming increasingly hostile, especially for women and marginalised women. With our report, we wanted to dig deep and explore the candidate journey—from preparing to stand as a candidate, including all the interview and vetting processes, to being elected and what happens after.
"There is still an image of the ideal candidate: white, middle-class, able-bodied, and male. For anyone who falls out of these categories, this means being prepared for additional barriers.
"Abuse, lack of support, and biases were reported widely among our survey participants and interviewees. Nearly 30% would not recommend candidacy to underrepresented groups. It's understandable considering what women must endure to make it as politicians, but we don't want to settle for this.
"Change needs to happen, so we urge political parties, governments, councils, and other stakeholders to implement measures and commit to equal and diverse representation. I want to see at least 50% women in our parliaments—for that to happen, we need to see a real culture change first."
Responding to the report, the SNP's Rona Mackay said that there should be "no obstacle or impediment to women's participation in politics", adding that the SNP will continue working to ensure equal representation for women and a safe environment for everyone.
She added: 'Representation is vital for progress - the SNP is proud to be one of the first governments in world with a gender balanced cabinet and we are pleased to have consistently improved the gender balance of our MSPs over the years.
'The SNP will continue to utilise networks and events to support women to stand for elected office - recognising the challenges that exist in political culture, the media and wider society.'
Scottish Labour said the report was a "stark reminder" of the "appalling sexism and online abuse too many women in politics continue to face."
A spokesperson for the party added: 'It's clear more must be done to tackle sexism in politics and across society.
'Scottish Labour will continue to promote gender balance in our selection processes through the use of measures like twinning, and we will continue to work to remove the barriers women face.
'All political parties have a responsibility to support women in politics and show leadership in tackling sexism across society, and Scottish Labour is committed to doing so.'
Scottish Lib Dems deputy leader Wendy Chamberlain told The Herald the report is "distressing" but it is "not entirely unsurprising" that so many women have experienced abuse online.
The Scottish MP added: "Sadly, that has become a reality for many women with careers that are so public-facing."
Ms Chamberlain said her party is committed to "nurturing" an environment where female candidates, parliamentarians and staff are safe and valued, highlighting that her party is "clamping down" on hateful and intimidating behaviour and bringing more women on board as spokespeople as well as campaigning for doubling statutory maternity pay and expanding parental leave.
Scottish Conservative deputy leader Rachael Hamilton MSP said: 'The Scottish Conservatives do not tolerate sexism or sexist bullying of any kind.
'We have robust procedures in place to address any incidents of this nature.
'Under Russell Findlay's leadership, we are committed to supporting even more talented women into our ranks.'
The Scottish Greens say they support candidates and elected representatives with media training which includes how to deal with abuse.
A party spokesperson added: "There are support networks within the party through our welfare and conduct officers, representative groups and a conduct and complaints committee that party members, candidates and elected representatives can contact directly for help when they are subjected to abuse, harassment or threatening behaviour, online or offline.
'We have also reported media posts to the police in the past when candidates have been targeted and have worked with the police on candidate safety in response to threats and media posts. This is something we will do in future if necessary.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Highlanders have the right to be angry over explosion of wind farms
Highlanders have the right to be angry over explosion of wind farms

The National

time35 minutes ago

  • The National

Highlanders have the right to be angry over explosion of wind farms

Quite a result for a never previously convened group of volunteers sitting on powerless community councils. But was it a step back for the green transition, a step forward for local democracy or a bit of both? Five hundred people from 56 community councils – representing almost half the Highland population – gathered to highlight the 1305 wind-related infrastructure projects that are either built or going through planning in the Highlands. No-one's denying that's a small avalanche. The big questions are: who is the energy for? (probably not Scots); who benefits financially? (certainly not Scots); who gets to decide? (absolutely not Scots), and how much does net-exporting Scotland or the energy-hungry UK actually need? (Fa kens). READ MORE: Pro-Palestine protesters greet JD Vance as he lands in Scotland It seems Labour and the SNP are bodyswerving all these vital questions, and Highlanders, despite their reputation for feudal cap-doffing and learned silence, have finally snapped, got angry and got organised. So, are they just a bunch of climate-crisis-denying Nimbys? I've been making a film about this unprecedented revolt over the last week and visited folk in straths and glens from Strathdearn near Tomatin to the Dornoch Firth near Strath Oykel. I'm sure there are people who simply hate turbines and are opposed to net zero. I didn't meet any of them. I did meet people from glens with five, seven, or even 13 wind farms already in place who are being told to accept the same again. Without any say. Without any meaningful income. And without the highest energy bills in Europe getting one penny cheaper. They must also watch while those existing wind farms switch off in high wind because the grid can't take their energy. We pay for those constraint payments, and if they are common for existing turbines, how will the new wind farms deliver? (Image: Getty Images) Furthermore, wind farm applications go through planning piecemeal, with complex documents that take hours for community councillors to download and a lawyer's mind to dissect. So far, every application has been approved by the Scottish Government – despite occasional rejection by Highland Council and even a Scottish Government reporter. It feels like a total fait accompli and normally calm people have become stressed, angry, upset and determined not to let this pass. I'm sure some distant pointy heids thought wind farms accepted since 2007 meant Highlanders would be a soft touch. Au contraire. It's a case of once bitten twice, not just shy, but adamant – enough's enough. We met one veteran community councillor who wanted a conversation with the companies, SSEN and the Scottish Government about the totality of wind farms planned for each glen: 'We could negotiate and approve the ones that are completely uncontroversial and try to change or just veto the ones everyone opposes.' If something as reasonable as that isn't even thinkable, what are we saying about local democracy? If Scotland is to house practically all the wind infrastructure for the whole of Britain without any benefit in bills, what does that say about the supposed union of equals? And if all of this happens without opposition by the planning authority, the Scottish Government, we can only assume that they are 100% on side. Or that they worry more about denting the high levels of inward investment to Scotland by placing any restrictions on electricity infrastructure? Or that their green targets and position ahead of the UK will be dented? If so, well done. Every Tom, Dick and Harry (the spivs and speculators from Alex Salmond's era) has a wind company and land on the east coast of the Highlands – near the grid upgrades and the freeports – sitting pretty for the moment when the contracts for difference are awarded and the wind bonanza really begins. No wonder British Energy Minister Michael Shanks declined the invitation to attend the Inverness Convention along with Scottish Energy Minister Gillian Martin and SSEN – the private power company charged with deciding pylon routes and the location of turbines, battery plants and sub-stations. Labour's Western Isles MP Torcuil Crichton did attend and argued for councils to become co-developers of wind cash thereby making money for local services. If it can be done in Stornoway, he argued, why not on the mainland? But he also made no apologies for the huge wind energy targets his government will push through whether local communities like it or not. The audience was not amused. SNP MP Graham Leadbitter drew grumbles for sidestepping responsibility, saying planning is a Holyrood matter and the SNP don't run Westminster. True but unhelpful. SNP MSP Maree Todd prompted snorts of exasperation when she said she was furious about the size of local energy bills and fuel poverty. Fine – why did the SNP not support locational pricing then? And her MSP colleague Emma Roddick was almost shouted down after saying she felt as powerless as the audience and declared the main problem is pitifully low levels of community benefit. They certainly are inadequate – but local opposition has moved way beyond that. Tory MSP Edward Mountain received a roar of approval for saying: 'We in the Highlands are being sacrificed on the altar of net zero. And we need to stop energy companies trying to bribe local communities.' It's supremely ironic. THE Tories are getting ready to clean up in Highland seats in 2026, even though the current situation is almost 100% their fault. Who privatised the energy industry in the 1980s, placing strategic decisions in the hands of private companies like SSE and private operators (many of them the state-owned companies of our European neighbours) – the Tories. Who created a wind energy desert in England that will now be filled with Highland-produced energy – the Tories and their decade-long turbine moratorium south of the border. Who created a devolved settlement that handed energy to Westminster, not Holyrood, unlike every other devolved or federal system – Labour. Who created massive, remote councils like Highland, which has the biggest landmass in the world – the Tories. Who created toothless community councils as a sop to towns, villages and islands when their genuinely local councils were abolished – the Tories. And who's been the implacable opponents of 'Mugabe-style land raids' or for anyone else the overdue process of real land reform that would stop absentee millionaires owning land and taking land use decisions over the heads of local communities – be that for the green transition or any other 'worthy' cause. Yip – the Tories. They've produced chronic disempowerment. Labour have produced the 'ambitious' green energy targets – now set in law – driving the Highland windfarm expansion. And yet it's the SNP who are taking the pounding. Why? Because voters expected them to reverse the tide, stand up for communities, argue, wheedle, deal and protect – and they haven't. Doubtless, some will argue the Scotland Act means they can't. That answer may be right. It may be good law. Great accounting. Satisfactory box-ticking – but it's terrible politics. The Scottish Government believes it must rubber-stamp whatever energy demands the British Government makes of rural Scotland or ... what? If it's a fight where the Scottish Government backs Highland communities, starts a long-overdue process of decentralisation, produces and share an actual strategy and challenges Westminster to do the same and forces Keir Starmer to own an unreconstructed broken, Thatcherite energy market where Scots will never, ever get cheaper bills – then bring it on. Meantime, c'mon the communities.

Scottish Enterprise panned for lack of checks on Israeli-linked arms firms
Scottish Enterprise panned for lack of checks on Israeli-linked arms firms

The National

time2 hours ago

  • The National

Scottish Enterprise panned for lack of checks on Israeli-linked arms firms

A Freedom of Information request has revealed that two major arms companies in receipt of Scottish Enterprise grants – Italian arms giant Leonardo and American multinational Raytheon Systems – haven't received a human right due diligence check since October 2019 This funding comes despite both firms continue to supply Israel with weapons amid its genocide in Gaza. In that timeframe, both firms have also been in receipt of Scottish public money – Leonardo received £786,125 in 2023 while Raytheon Systems, which has a factory in Glenrothes, was given £500k in the first half of 2024. Leonardo produces laser targeting systems for Lockheed Martin, which sells the F-35 jets Israel, and Raytheon makes Paveway II guided missiles which are also used by Israel. READ MORE: JD Vance panned for 'lies about Scotland' ahead of luxury Ayrshire holiday The last time a check was performed on French arms firm Thales was July 2021, while Babcock was last checked in March 2022 and Chemring Energetics in December 2021. Bae Systems received a check in February 2024. In response, human rights charity Amnesty International told The National that the 'more we learn' about the checks 'the more concerning it becomes' that Scottish Enterprise and Scottish ministers are defending the process. Scottish Greens co-leader Lorna Slater, meanwhile, said it was 'shocking', adding: 'There is no point in having human rights checks at all if they are never carried out.' In total, Scottish Enterprise has given £8 million to 13 companies involved in weapons manufacturing since 2019. The Scottish Government has repeatedly insisted that no public funding goes towards the manufacturing of munitions specifically but other areas these companies operate in, including research, training and apprenticeships. Scottish Enterprise, meanwhile, has strongly denied its human rights checks are not adequate. However, that has been called into question given that, of the 199 human rights checks between 2021 and 2023, no firm has ever failed. When pressed on the issue in an exclusive interview with The National last weekend, First Minister John Swinney defended the grants. 'We won't support the production of munitions. That's our hard line. And we get criticised for taking that hard line, and I'm very confident that hard line is applied,' he said. The First Minister was then pressed on the argument that any funding – even if ring-fenced by the Scottish Government – will directly help a company's cash flow and could, hypothetically, free up money to be used elsewhere, including in the building of munitions. 'I understand that point. But there are also defence requirements of Scotland. Scotland is part of an island nation. We require, for example, shipbuilding resources to support the maritime defense of the United Kingdom because nobody wants to see us vulnerable to an attack from Russia. I certainly don't want to,' he responded. An Amnesty International spokesperson said: "Amnesty is aware from our own research that payments were made to companies known to supply Israel without a new check being triggered by the unfolding genocide in Gaza. 'Alarmingly, that is the process Scottish Enterprise and the Scottish Government attempted to characterise as robust and well aligned to international standards. The recent in-house review of the human rights checks recommended some improvements, but unsurprisingly they don't go far enough. We will be meeting with Scottish Enterprise in the coming weeks to take these concerns forward." Slater, meanwhile, said it 'flies in the face of any kind of due diligence'. "These are some of the biggest arms companies in the world. They have armed human rights abusers and dictatorships and some have directly enabled and profited from the genocide in Gaza,' she said. "They should not be receiving public money in the first place, and the Scottish Government absolutely should not be setting up tests to win favourable headlines while refusing to actually implement them. "How can we trust a word they say on ensuring they are applying human rights standards when they are refusing to even ask the right questions of those they are giving public money to?" A spokesperson for Scottish Enterprise said: 'Under our current processes, Human Rights Due Diligence Checks last for three years. New checks are carried out prior to the approval of new funding if they have expired. Funding was authorised and contracted while valid checks or exemptions were in effect in all cases. 'It is important to note that contractual payments are made to companies in stages as the conditions of their contracts are met, in line with the effective management of public funds. Payments can therefore be made over several years. 'The recent review of our HRDD checks affirmed the strength of our processes while identifying areas for enhancement, including increasing the frequency of checks to better respond to emerging risks. We are committed to implementing identified improvements over the course of 2025/26. 'We have been transparent on the frequency of our checks and have corresponded in detail on this with interested parties including Amnesty International, who we look forward to meeting next week.'

The unexpected party that could topple Labour dominance in Cardiff by-election
The unexpected party that could topple Labour dominance in Cardiff by-election

Wales Online

time2 hours ago

  • Wales Online

The unexpected party that could topple Labour dominance in Cardiff by-election

The unexpected party that could topple Labour dominance in Cardiff by-election The Greens argue they have a realistic chance in the Cardiff Council Grangetown by-election this week, having gone the closest to toppling Labour in the past Matt Youde, who will run as the Green Party candidate in the Garngetown by-election, feels his party has a realistic chance of winning (Image: Cardiff Green Party) In an area of Cardiff that will soon go to the polls for another by-election, there is perhaps one issue above all else that people there want to see change. 'Ever since I moved here, particularly the lane down the side [of the] train station… [it is] fly-tipping central,' said prospective councillor for Grangetown, Matt Youde. ‌ He said he is speaking about 'by far' the biggest issue residents have shared with him on the doorstep ahead of the Cardiff Council by-election for the area on Thursday, August 14. ‌ Matt, who has lived in Cardiff now for 10 years, added: 'It just never seems to change. There are bins even on the intersection of Corporation Road and Penarth Road. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here . ‌ 'The businesses there are always having to come out and clean up unspeakable things that are left overflowing in those bins. 'People don't want it, people don't accept it, but it's almost become part of the landscape of Grangetown.' Under normal circumstances, Matt and other candidates like him would usually be discussing such issues in preparation for another council by-election that could well be expected to go under the radar. Article continues below However, it feels like by-elections – even local government ones – are being looked at with greater interest these days as the established parties of the country wrestle with the relatively new threat of Reform UK to keep control of their seats and wards. Only recently, Nigel Farage's party nearly won its first seat on Cardiff Council in the Llanrumney by-election. They came second to Labour in the end. Leader of Reform, Nigel Farage, whose party has had success in a number of by-elections recently (Image: Getty Images) ‌ In Grangetown though, the danger for Labour – a party that's dominated the ward for the past 13 years – comes from somewhere else. Far from putting their hat in the ring just to make up the numbers, Matt Youde said his party, the Greens, have confidence going into this by-election. The Greens came close in past Westminster and local government elections for the area, albeit with the latter under the Plaid Cymru and Greens Common Ground banner. ‌ Past elections aren't the only thing giving the Greens hope this time around, according to Matt, who shed light on the other things residents were telling him on the doorstep besides litter and fly-tipping. Matt Youde, who has lived in Cardiff for about 10 years now, said past success has made his party hopeful (Image: Cardiff Green Party) He said: 'There have been a couple of people who think that they need to vote Reform to get Labour out and they're open to the argument that we [the Greens] came second… in the general election [in the area]. ‌ '[They] really did quite surprisingly well to many people and that's quite hopeful.' Green Party candidate for Cardiff South and Penarth, Anthony Slaughter, came second to Labour's Stephen Doughty in the 2024 General Election. 'They believe that we can potentially topple Labour here,' added Matt. ‌ 'I think it's good for democracy if someone doesn't have free reign. 'I also think that for this by-election, people are so fed up with politics at the moment that it's only fair that all the options are put on the table for them to choose from.' The last by-election in Grangetown was in April 2024, when Labour's Waheeda Sattar won her late husband's seat. ‌ Cllr Abdul Sattar's passing, announced in February of that same year, was met with an outpouring of tributes from fellow councillors and members of the community who knew him. The by-election this year was triggered following the resignation of Sara Robinson, who had been in her post as a councillor for Grangetown since 2022. Those running for the vacant seat on Cardiff Council include: ‌ Ahmed Abdillahi Abdi Samater (Independent) Khuram Chowdhry (Welsh Labour) James Hamblin (Welsh Conservatives) Irfan Latif (Welsh Liberal Democrats) Joseph William Martin (Reform UK) Neil Roberts (Plaid Cymru) Vincent John Yewlett (Propel) Matt Youde (Green Party) When asked what he would like to see change in Grangetown, Matt said he thinks more resources need to be dedicated to the area and not just to deal with litter and fly-tipping. He also wants to see more traffic calming measures introduced to roads in the ward, particularly Paget Street which has its own campaign up and running. ‌ Matt said residents there have been calling for action 'for a really long time' and that the area has witnessed some 'really dramatic crashes'. He added: 'I walked past one not a few weeks ago where a fire engine had to block the street. 'It's not safe and it just needs more attention.' ‌ There is currently a petition calling for traffic calming measures, which can include pedestrian crossings and speed bumps, on Paget Street. To help secure investment for speed calming measures, the petition states that more evidence is required to demonstrate a need for them. However, Matt said some residents don't know what they should do to gather that evidence. He added: 'The number of crashes that the emergency services have been called out to should be something.' ‌ Crash Map UK, which uses data from the Department of Transport, shows two car crashes on Paget Street over the last six years. One in 2019 involved two vehicles and two casualties, and the other in 2020 involved four cars and one casualty. If he wins, some of the other issues Matt said he'd push in the council chamber include introducing rent controls in Cardiff and developing a new Welsh medium secondary school. ‌ Parents have been campaigning for a new Welsh medium secondary school in Cardiff for more than a year (Image: Guto Vaughan ) Welsh Labour argued that in not voting for Cardiff Council's budget proposals this year, Common Ground in effect 'voted against' giving more cleaning resources to Grangetown and said their administration has worked hard to bring about change in the area. A Welsh Labour spokesperson said: 'Our Welsh Labour councillors have been listening to local residents and working alongside them to tackle the issues which they know impact the Grangetown community. ‌ 'They regularly directly report fly-tipping and litter issues to council officers for cleansing, whilst supporting the Labour Council's record investment of £1m extra funding into cleansing services in areas like Grangetown. And the Welsh Government's Tidy Towns fund means more money still to help. 'Conversations with residents and highways officers have led to the installation of speed warning signage, police speed watch sessions and general traffic monitoring. 'As a Labour team we're always listening to our residents and amplify their voices with officers to strive for solutions.' ‌ Plaid Cymru will of course have something to say about who poses the biggest challenge to Labour in Grangetown. A YouGov Senedd voting intention poll undertaken in April shows Plaid Cymru on top, with 30% of the 1,265 adults who participated saying they'd vote for them. 18% of adults said they would vote for Labour in the next Senedd election in 2026, behind Reform UK. ‌ Plaid Cymru is the most favourably viewed party in Wales, according to a recent YouGov poll (Image: Daily Post) Another YouGov poll published this month shows Plaid Cymru as the most favourably viewed political party in Wales, with 52% of 1,104 adults who participated saying they think Plaid are the best party to stand up for the country. However, this poll has also given the Greens reason to be confident going into a future Welsh election, be that national or local. ‌ Close behind Plaid as the second most favourably viewed political party in the country are the Greens. Matt said: 'You look at the recent polling about people rating the parties in Wales and we're sort of biting at the ankles of Plaid. 'That's with very little representation so far and imagine what we can build when we get a little more representation – some councillors, with luck a Senedd member next year. Article continues below 'I think people can really start seeing us as a viable place to put their vote and not just a wasted vote, not a protest vote, but something that actually brings about a different kind of representation and a different kind of politics.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store