logo
How are vaccines tested?

How are vaccines tested?

Reuters14-05-2025

May 14 (Reuters) - U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. plans to require all new vaccines be tested against a placebo in human trials, and has said that almost no shots used in the United States have undergone such rigorous testing, which is not accurate.
The American Academy of Pediatrics, opens new tab has said childhood vaccines are carefully studied in randomized controlled trials — including with placebos — to ensure they're safe and effective. Here is what you need to know about how vaccines are tested and approved in the United States:
What has Kennedy said about vaccine testing?
In an appearance with television personality Dr. Phil McGraw in April, Kennedy said that "the only vaccine that was ever safely tested in a clinical trial against a placebo was the COVID vaccine... None of the others were ever tested against placebo."
He repeated that claim during heated Congressional testimony on Wednesday.
What is a randomized controlled trial?
In order to receive approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, most new medical treatments must be tested in large trials to confirm their effectiveness and safety.
In such trials, participants are randomly assigned to either a group receiving the new medicine or a control group. That ensures that any differences in outcomes can be attributed to the new treatment.
In many randomized trials, a new therapy is compared to an older, well established therapy. If no standard therapy already exists, the new treatment is compared to a placebo – an inert sham treatment without any therapeutic or physiological effect.
Are new vaccines always compared to placebos?
Not always. When a brand new vaccine is developed to protect against a disease that has no preventative therapy on the market, the FDA requires placebo-controlled trials to prove the vaccine is safe and effective.
Drugmakers also develop vaccines to improve upon an existing shot, either by updating an already-approved vaccine or by identifying a mechanism for defending against the virus that offers better protection and/or fewer side effects.
In those cases, the newer vaccine is compared to an existing vaccine. It is considered unethical to randomly assign volunteers to receive an inert placebo, leaving them – and the unvaccinated people they may come in contact with - vulnerable to a disease when a protective vaccine is available.
After successful testing in randomized controlled trials, all vaccines are then monitored in 'real world' studies, which usually include more diverse patient populations and reflect actual use in routine healthcare settings.
Have all childhood vaccines been tested against a placebo?
No. Childhood vaccines currently recommended for use in the United States that have been tested against placebos include Sanofi's (SASY.PA), opens new tab Daptacel, used to protect against diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (whooping cough), Sanofi's immunization against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) Beyfortus, and GSK's Rotarix and Merck's (MRK.N), opens new tab RotaTeq, the two rotavirus vaccines licensed for use in the United States.
Some of the currently available vaccines were tested by comparing them to already-approved vaccines.
For example, the very first combined vaccine against measles, mumps and rubella (MMR), approved in 1971, was compared in randomized controlled trials to a measles-only vaccine and a placebo. But most subsequent MMR vaccines were not compared to placebos because that would have left study participants vulnerable to preventable diseases.
What do experts say about Kennedy's proposal?
Kennedy's proposal to require that all new vaccines undergo safety testing in placebo-controlled trials 'is ethically problematic and will slow testing down for no good reason,' Dr. Seema Shah, director of research ethics at Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, said in a statement.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scots woman 'saved by handprint bruise' after devastating cancer diagnosis
Scots woman 'saved by handprint bruise' after devastating cancer diagnosis

Daily Record

time19 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

Scots woman 'saved by handprint bruise' after devastating cancer diagnosis

Nichola Smith, 44, began her battle with cancer at just 12-years-old. A Scots woman diagnosed with blood cancer three times has told how a handprint bruise "saved her life". Nichola Smith, 44, from Glasgow, fell unwell at the age of 12, suffering fatigue, high temperatures and bouts of diarrhoea. After playing with her brother and cousins, she noticed a strange bruise on her hand. ‌ Speaking to our sister title, Glasgow Live, said: 'I remember one of them had grabbed me and it left a bruise on my arm in the shape of a handprint.' ‌ She went to the GP with her mum, where she was diagnosed with a viral illness. After being sent home, Nichola collapsed and was rushed to hospital. Just hours later, the then-schoolgirl was diagnosed with Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML). Nichola said: 'Mum watched a lot of medical programmes and as soon as I was taken to hospital she said she had a feeling it was leukaemia. She knew that the extreme bruises were a symptom. I went into complete panic mode. I thought I was going to die.' Treatment began immediately for Nichola, and after several blood transfusions and five rounds of chemotherapy, she returned home to begin the road to recovery. But the following year, received the devastating news that her AML was back. She then underwent a bone marrow transplant to put her in remission. Thankfully, the treatment was successful and she was finally able to resume normal teenage life. ‌ She went on to attend regular testing to monitor the potential after-effects of the harsh treatment she had received. It was during one of these appointments in 2006 that a routine mammogram revealed she had pre-cancerous cells in both her breasts - a common side effect of the leukaemia treatment she had received. Nichola was 26 at the time. She said: 'It was another trauma to get through. They said I would need a double mastectomy. I had three major operations and a lot of recovery time. I still get checked every year for any breast cancer cells.' Just when Nichola thought she was finally in the clear, bad news struck again in January 2022, when she contracted COVID-19 and found she struggled to recover. Tests revealed she had myelodysplasia, a blood cancer that could eventually lead, once more, to AML. For the fourth time, Nichola's world was rocked by cancer. ‌ Nichola said: 'I was devastated. I kept saying to myself 'Here we go again' and 'why me'. I have had so much bad luck in my life with my health and I couldn't believe I was going to have to fight again.' Nichola was placed on the 'watch and wait' list, then started on blood transfusions. In August 2023, she received the news that her blood cancer had progressed and she once again needed chemotherapy, as well as radiotherapy and a stem cell transplant. ‌ With significant progress in cancer research since Nichola's first stem cell transplant in 1996, her brother, Andrew, was now able to donate stem cells with only a 50% match. Thankfully, the transplant was successful. Nichola is sharing her story in support of the #SPOTLeukaemia campaign. which aims to raise awareness about the signs and symptoms of the disease. The most common symptoms of leukaemia are: Extreme tiredness (fatigue) Bruising Unusual bleeding Repeated infections Colin Dyer, CEO at Leukaemia Care said: 'Nichola's story is a powerful reminder of why we all need to know the signs and symptoms of leukaemia. The reality is that leukaemia can develop quickly and be life-threatening, yet the early symptoms like fatigue, bruising or repeated infections are often mistaken for less serious illnesses. 'That's why our #SpotLeukaemia campaign is so important. We want everyone to be aware of the signs, because recognising something as seemingly simple as a handprint-shaped bruise can, quite literally, save a life.'

Fears newly-discovered coronavirus is 'one step away' from infecting humans
Fears newly-discovered coronavirus is 'one step away' from infecting humans

Daily Mirror

time39 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Fears newly-discovered coronavirus is 'one step away' from infecting humans

A team of researchers from Washington State University fear the newly-discovered HKU5-CoV-2 coronavirus found in China could mutate enough to cause a pandemic Scientists have warned that a newly-discovered coronavirus could lead to another pandemic. Researchers from Washington State University believe the HKU5-CoV-2 virus, found in China, is only one "small" step away from mutating. This in turn could allow it to infect humans and cause a widespread outbreak. Experts are on guard due to the pathogen's close relation to MERS, a life-threatening virus that kills around a third of people infected. Adding to the fear is that HKU5 was first recorded in bats by scientists from the Chinese lab where some say Covid originally came from in 2019, resulting in millions of deaths. ‌ ‌ The latest study was published in Nature Communications and looked at a lesser-known group of coronaviruses known as merbecoviruses, which includes HKU5 and MERS-CoV. In it, a team from the US looked at how the new pathogen interacts with human cells. Professor Michael Letko, a virologist at Washington State who co-led the study, said: "HKU5 viruses in particular really hadn't been looked at much, but our study shows how these viruses infect cells. What we also found is HKU5 viruses may be only a small step away from being able to spill over into humans." It was found that a small change in the virus' spike protein could mean that it attaches to human ACE2 cells, which are located in people's throats, mouths and noses. At the moment, the pathogen is only spreading in bats. However, scientists are concerned that unregulated wildlife trade in China increases the possibility of it eventually being transmitted to other species. 'Pseudoviruses' were created in the lab that include the HKU5 spike protein but are ultimately harmless and cannot replicate. These were then introduced to different types of cells, with some carrying bat ACE2 and others carrying human ACE2. In the experiments, the virus glowed green when it had entered and replicated inside a cell. The bat cells lit up brightly, meaning that HKU5 can easily infect them. ‌ However, human cells showed hardly any response unless the virus had certain mutations. The fear now is that if HKU5 jumps to an intermediate animal, for example a mink or civet, it could mutate enough before eventually reaching humans. One theory over the origins of the pandemic is that it was caused by a leak from a lab at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. This gained traction after the Director of the FBI Christopher Wray said the bureau believes Covid-19 "most likely" originated in a "Chinese government-controlled lab". However, last year scientists who were part of a major international study rejected this popular belief. They instead claimed that it broke out from a wet market in Wuhan, China. Genetic samples of animals that were sold at the market stalls in 2019 found traces of the Covid virus in some species. Author of the study, Kristian Andersen from Scripps Research, said in the document: "This adds another layer to the accumulating evidence that all points to the same scenario: that infected animals were introduced into the market in mid to late November 2019, which sparked the pandemic."

'I moved from Switzerland to London twice - here are 5 things it gets right'
'I moved from Switzerland to London twice - here are 5 things it gets right'

Daily Mirror

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

'I moved from Switzerland to London twice - here are 5 things it gets right'

As a Swiss girl, there are a few things I enjoy in London more Last July, I moved from Geneva, Switzerland to London for the second time in my life. The first time around, I was studying for my Master's Degree and working my first subsequent 'big girl' job. I promptly left the UK amid the Covid-19 pandemic, moving back to my Swiss village, uncertain of where the world was going. Four years later, I moved back to London, this time as an experienced journalist. ‌ Some may be inclined to believe that the Swiss quality of life is superior to the one experienced in England (other people's words, not mine). But, I'm here to debunk this myth, with some of my top favourite things about living in London. ‌ The NHS I know that these are loaded three-letters, but hear me out. The NHS definitely has its ups and downs, but it is free. I can't stress enough how much of a financial burden healthcare in Switzerland is. The healthcare system in Switzerland is private and based on mandatory insurances that cost a minimum £350 monthly, which covers the bare minimum. Being able to not think daily about how to manage my expenses encompassing my health, has definitely been a huge relief. And while I know waiting time for certain services can be frustrating, my experience with the NHS has been fair, receiving appointments rather quickly. LGBTQIA+ safe spaces Another loaded set of letters, this one close to my heart. While I can't speak for the whole country, I can vouch for London being a queer-friendly city. From its massive Pride events to its numerous spaces curated for the LGBTQIA+ community, I really like how the capital city allows opportunities for queer people to thrive. Coming from a country that just legalised same-sex marriage, it has been refreshing to live in a place where it's not such a struggle to find peers within the community, and places that caters to my specific interests. ‌ Many cities with LGBTQIA+ spaces often focus primarily on gay men, but in London, I've discovered inclusive spaces that truly cater to everyone. For example, I was able to continue training boxing at a club run by queer individuals. There's also an exciting wave of young, talented queer artists emerging in London, creating an atmosphere where breaking away from heteronormative expectations is totally ok. While sexual-orientation-based discrimination exists, I would say that London is genuinely safe to be openly queer. Acceptance and multidiversity I often share with those around me how much I appreciate that I could be on the tube and sit between a woman wearing a hijab on one side and another in a mini skirt on the other. London is so diverse that acceptance of others has just become second nature. ‌ It's also not uncommon to encounter an artist in full drag or a fabulous goth in the TFLs. And no one bats an eye. Moreover, I appreciate the celebrations of all religious holidays displayed in most public spaces in London. The city just feels like a harmonious mix of people from all cultural backgrounds. Dog friendly I'm planning to adopt a dog soon, and as a dog lover, I'm confident in my decision, especially since London is such a dog-friendly city. While I'm used to restrictions and disapproving glances elsewhere, in London, people either enjoy the company of dogs or simply don't mind at all. ‌ It's always a delight to spot a friendly pup hopping onto the tube or Overground, and it never seems to cause any trouble. Many pubs are dog-friendly, and the city boasts plenty of spacious parks, including dedicated dog parks. Direct flights to everywhere I mentioned Switzerland as my home country, but I'm a first generation Swiss, with parents from different countries. As a result, it's always been a struggle to visit my family, which is spread across Europe. Nevertheless, London's airports are hubs that offer direct flights to nearly every country and cities in the continent. If you're a third culture kid, you just know how much of a relief this is. Moreover, you can easily find cheap flights to pretty much anywhere, as London is a hub for most low-cost airlines.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store