Dortmund in race against time if they want to sign Bellingham for CWC
England's Jude Bellingham arrives in the paddock before the Formula 1 Spanish Grand Prix race at the Circuit de Barcelona-Catalunya. Bradley Collyer/PA Wire/dpa
Borussia Dortmund are running out of time in their bid to sign Jobe Bellingham in time for at the Club World Cup.
Bellingham was on Friday nominated into England's squad for the upcoming under-21 European championships in Slovakia, which start on Wednesday.
Advertisement
The 19-year-old Bellingham has also agreed to join Dortmund, where his brother, Jude Bellingham, played in the past, from Sunderland.
Dortmund would like to have him available for the Club World Cup in the United States which starts on June 14, but for that they will have to complete the deal by Tuesday, June 10, when an additional transfer window for Club World Cup teams closes.
Dortmund and Sunderland are in talks but Dortmund are reportedly not ready to pay the alleged release fee of €40 million ($45.7 million), offering only around €30 million.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Revealed – Deadline For Inter Milan To Decide Whether To Sign Nicola Zalewski Permanently From Roma
Revealed – Deadline For Inter Milan To Decide Whether To Sign Nicola Zalewski Permanently From Roma Inter Milan must decide whether to sign Nicola Zalewski permanently from Roma by June 18th. This according to Italian journalist Filippo Biafora. He reports in a tweet that the Nerazzurri have yet to exercise the purchase option in the 23-year-old's loan deal from January. Advertisement Wingback Nicola Zalewski joined Inter Milan on loan during the January transfer window. Al momento la situazione è in stand-by. Il diritto di riscatto scade il 18, per ora non è stato esercitato — Filippo Biafora (@Fil_Biafora) June 7, 2025 The Nerazzurri brought the Polish international in following the departure of Tajon Buchanan. Zalewski's loan only ran until the end of the season. However, it also contained a purchase option, reported to be worth around €6-7 million. Inter Milan Must Decide Whether To Sign Nicola Zalewski From Roma By June 17th TURIN, ITALY – MAY 11: Nicola Zalewski of FC Internazionale celebrates scoring his team's first goal during the Serie A match between Torino and FC Internazionale at Stadio Olimpico di Torino on May 11, 2025 in Turin, Italy. (Photo by) According to Italian journalist Filippo Biafora, the purchase option expires on June 18th. Therefore, the Nerazzurri have just a couple more weeks to decide whether or not to sign Nicola Zalewski on a permanent basis. Advertisement Should Inter sign Zalewski outright, he can be a part of their squad for the Club World Cup this summer. However, the timing of the deadline means that Inter must make a decision before the start of that tournament.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
England were dismal against minnows Andorra but it really doesn't matter
How bad was it? Bad enough to be England's worst result in seven games against Andorra. Bad enough for players used to operating at the highest of levels for the best clubs in the world to find themselves unable to weight simple passes or deliver crosses with precision. Bad enough that Andorra's 37-year-old left-back Marc García nutmegged Noni Madueke in injury time. But, beyond the potential problems it may cause with goal difference, it doesn't matter at all in terms of the main issue: the winning of the World Cup next summer. England could have played scintillating football and beaten Andorra 10-0 and it wouldn't have made them any more likely to be lifting the prize in New Jersey next July. That's not to excuse a dismal performance, just to say it's irrelevant. The game was won, the box ticked, and Thomas Tuchel hopefully learned something from the training sessions. Advertisement Related: Harry Kane saves listless England's blushes as Andorra frustrate Tuchel But nothing ever feels quite so futile as a qualifier against a minnow, particularly not one played at the end of the season when everybody is shattered and dreaming of a luxury resort – or a Club World Cup game against LAFC or Espérance, depending who you play for. The problem with games against minnows is that they require a wholly different approach to the majority of football. The usual dynamics do not apply. When a team sits in a low block, it's very hard to break them down, not just because of weight of numbers behind the ball, but because the sort of movement that might unpick them is so unfamiliar to players used to playing the game at a higher tempo. There's no space to run into, and that makes generating energy and speed very difficult. But there was a clear end-of-term feel to the whole occasion. Around 7,000 England fans spread themselves around the lower tier of a stadium that holds 40,000, the mood relaxed, bordering on the soporific as a pleasantly sunny afternoon yielded to a sultry evening. Everybody was so laid back they didn't even boo the Andorran anthem. Advertisement The streets around the stadium before kick-off had an eerie feel, empty but for occasional pockets of England fans drinking and kicking footballs around in the sunshine, like a pre-season friendly shortly after the apocalypse, chants and shouts echoing disconcertingly along deserted alleys. By half-time, many were probably wishing the apocalypse had been a little more apocalyptic. The game did little to charge the atmosphere. The only thing to jar the afternoon from its slumber was the Andorran band, which specialised in squawking trumpets with the occasional howling siren, like the soundtrack to an experimental late sixties slasher flick. It was all deeply incongruous: the players on the pitch and the fans at either end gently dozing, and an enervating discordance from the Andorra fans in between. England's fans responded with some gentle grumbling and the odd half-hearted song insulting Keir Starmer. But this was not an afternoon for malice and, by the second half, attention had shifted to serenading the Andorra defender Ian Olivera, who wears only his forename on his shirt. Tuchel had said he wanted England to practise attacking against a low block and they got plenty of that. Not unexpectedly, much of their play was fairly pedestrian; as the inevitable cliche has it, they needed to move the ball faster, but that's hard for players who don't play regularly together against a dogged and deep-lying rearguard. The biggest concern, perhaps, was how poor their set-play delivery was. England had 12 corners but, despite the Andorra keeper Iker Álvarez having all the natural authority of a supply teacher covering fifth-form geography, not a single one of them yielded a chance. Advertisement Even the inevitable boos at half-time felt perfunctory. Certainly there was nothing like the furious cacophony that greeted Steve McClaren's England when they went in at half-time drawing 0-0 against Andorra across town at Montjuïc in 2007. Even disgusted rage isn't what it used to be. That Fabio Capello's England also drew a first half 0-0 against Andorra in Barcelona would be little consolation to Tuchel: the dark days of Euro 2008 and the 2010 World Cup are supposed have been left long behind. As it turned out, it took Harry Kane a minute longer than Joe Cole in 2009 and four minutes less than Steven Gerrard in 2007 to break the deadlock, but it did not lead to a deluge. If anybody was still minded to be generous to Tuchel, it was worth noting that the opening that led to Kane's winner was created by a through-ball from Curtis Jones, who was operating in a bespoke position, part right-back, part inside-right. That, at least, suggested boldness and imagination, a willingness to think round problems and come up with unorthodox solutions. More generally, boldness and imagination were in short supply. But it really doesn't much matter. Minnows are minnows. It's other games that decide who wins tournaments.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
It's no wonder that the middle classes are fleeing Rachel Reeves's anti-wealth island
A brain drain is coming. We need to talk about emigration. Yes, you read that right, emigration – not just immigration. You heard the warnings during the Brexit wars – business and investors will leave for Paris, Frankfurt, Milan (and the Earth will stop spinning...) unless we remain in the customs union – and back then it was largely a load of hot air. But hear me out. This time, it's actually happening. Entrepreneurs and businesspeople are fleeing in their droves. In the past year alone, more than 10,000 millionaires have left the UK. Only China saw more high net-worth individuals leave. European countries are now stealing our lunch, with Italy and Portugal styling themselves as destinations for investor flight with attractive low-tax regimes. It wasn't Brexit that did it, but an economically illiterate tax regime determined to squeeze the juice dry. The best-paid 1 per cent already paid about a third of all income tax collected: those with the broadest shoulders were – and still are – bearing the greatest burden. But the Chancellor viewed successful investors and risk-taking entrepreneurs as criminals to punish, rather than assets to court. The non-dom tax changes may have polled well in focus groups, but they've backfired – and the public will now pay the price. Who is going to fund increases in defence, healthcare and transport spending? Yet again, it will fall to the middle classes to bridge the gap left. The Chancellor's ineptitude means further tax rises on working people in the autumn are now inevitable. The social contract with the middle class hasn't simply frayed – it's been shredded. They have been disproportionately targeted to fund a record tax burden while their quality of life has remained largely stagnant. They're paying more than ever to get less than ever in return. The public services they use are crumbling, the streets they walk feel less safe, and the town centres they visit are hollowed out by petty crime and boarded-up shopfronts. In France, discontent leads to riots; in Britain, it seems to dissipate into despair. The very real risk now is that Brits vote with their feet and simply pack up and leave en masse. A recent poll showed that nearly a quarter of UK adults are considering moving abroad in the next five years. These are highly skilled professionals who are the bedrock of any country: 48 per cent of those in the IT industry are considering emigrating, as are 30 per cent of those in the healthcare sector. And it's not just white-collar workers, either – when I speak to tradesmen, they think they would have far better prospects in countries such as Australia and Canada. This is no longer an issue of investor flight, but a full-on brain drain. In the 1970s, a high-tax and anti-business environment led to Britain experiencing a net loss of 500,000 people. Half a century later, history could well repeat itself. Even my generation, now pushing into our 40s, who didn't feel like we had it particularly good entering the jobs market in the 2000s, and with the massive house-price boom of that period, had it so much better. When I speak at universities, I am struck by how many are contemplating opportunities abroad. And who can blame them? Young graduates today pay more than ever to live in tiny bedrooms in shared flats. The prospect of homeownership – or starting a family – has never been more distant. Unlike previously, the alternatives to the UK are increasingly appealing. Their money can go further elsewhere, and they can live in more prosperous countries with a better quality of life. In 2007, the average Brit was richer than the average American, Australian, Austrian, Belgian, Canadian and German, to name just a few. Now, they have all overtaken us. And it's not just them. Finland, the UAE, Hong Kong and Israel have all sailed past us when it comes to GDP per capita. A failed policy consensus of the past 20 years has driven this country into decline – and now the consequences are upon us. We won't return to being a country of net emigration anytime soon. Quite the opposite: Starmer's immigration White Paper was a recipe for more mass legal and illegal migration. That means hundreds of thousands more migrants who, over their lifetime, will take out more then they put in – many of whom are from culturally divergent countries. Meanwhile, net contributors are pushed towards the exit. On average, a millionaire leaves the country every 45 minutes, while an illegal migrant enters the country every 15 minutes. It's the most brain-dead migration policy imaginable. I don't just fear for the raw economic consequences. If middle-class flight takes off, the foot will slam on the accelerator driving the dizzying pace of change. Brits who have grown up here and are imbued with our history, heritage, culture, customs and traditions can't simply be swapped like-for-like. Nations, like all good things, take an age to create but are easily destroyed. Many Brits can sense that the country they love is slipping away: at first gradually, then suddenly. I understand why people consider leaving the UK, although I could never, ever imagine it myself. I too despair sometimes, but I care too much to just shrug my shoulders and resign myself to defeat. We have a fight on our hands to turn this country around. But safe streets, cohesive communities, cheap energy, functioning public services, higher wages and a startup culture are never unobtainable. For all our problems, this is a great country – and I'm convinced we can be greater still. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
