Tamil Nadu Government's initiative to train tribal students for exams such as JEE, AIEEE be renewed, demands activist Karthik
As a recent Right to Information (RTI) Act reply has revealed that an initiative of the Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department in 2013 to train about 50 tribal students every year for competitive examinations such as IIT JEE and AIEEE was dropped in the same year, an activist demands for the revival of the scheme to improve enrolment of tribal students in top institutions in the country.
'Though the sporadic successes of tribal students and Scheduled Caste students entering technical and medical institutions is being celebrated by the media and teachers, the exclusive government platform created for extending a constant support to their higher education should be renewed to increase their participation,' said S. Karthik, a Madurai based social activist.
RTI activist suggests T.N. govt. to amend G.O. on giving special funds to Adi Dravidar schools
Pointing out to the Government Order published on October 15, 2013, Mr. Karthik said the G.O. enabled training 50 tribal students for two years in private coaching centres at a cost of ₹2 lakh per student.
Though such a similar training was already offered to Scheduled Caste students through Tamil Nadu Adi Dravidar Housing and Development Corporation, the G.O. pointed out that for a similar training for tribal students too, private coaching centres could be roped in under Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tenders Act, 1998.
'As the training would include students studying in grade XI and XII, a total of ₹2 lakh would be allocated to each of the 50 students for the course of two years of the training,' it added.
He said that though the exercise would entail an arduous process to persuade students from rural areas and hilly terrains to enrol for the training, the G.O. reminded that it was the duty of the government to democratise the opportunities which was available to only few sections of the society.
'Even when the scattered successes could be attributed to the government measures, a consolidation of efforts was mandatory to improve the enrolment of SC and tribal students in top institutions such as IIT and NIT,' he stated.
'As the initiative was lauded for its efforts to bring about a change in the realm of higher education in the State, dropping off in the same year was a disappointment,' he said.
'Learning about the need to include all students of the society in the run to excellence, the Tamil Nadu government should resume the programme at least from the current academic year,' he demanded.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Former RLP worker arrested for ‘issuing death threats' to MP Upendra Kushwaha
Patna Police Saturday arrested a former party worker for allegedly issuing death threats to Rashtriya Lok Morcha president Upendra Kushwaha. The suspect has been identified as Rakesh Kumar alias Bharat Bhushan Tiwari, a resident of Darouli police station in Siwan district who left the party a few days ago. According to the Patna Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) Kartikeya Sharma, Kushwaha received seven threatening calls and a message on his official mobile number on June 19 – all allegedly made in the name of the Lawrence Bishnoi gang. The calls were allegedly made over speculation that Rajya Sabha MP was rethinking alliances ahead of the upcoming Bihar assembly election. Kushwaha's RLP is currently part of the National Democratic Alliance. The leader had attended Prime Minister rally in Siwan Friday. Kushwaha had tweeted about the threats late Thursday, claiming he had received calls from two mobile numbers between 8:52 pm and 9:20 pm. '…at 8:57 PM, I received an MMS/SMS…stating that if I continue to speak politically against a particular party, I will have to face the consequences, and that I would be finished within 10 days,' the Rajya Sabha member's post on X said, urging the Patna Police to take action. SSP Sharna said an FIR had been registered at Secretariat Police Station Friday under relevant sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and the Information Technology (IT) Act based on a written complaint by his (Kushwaha's) personal assistant. The Special Intelligence Unit conducted a technical investigation to trace the origin of the calls, he said. The SSP claimed that the mobile phone used in the incident has been recovered from the accused. 'We have also recovered a diary from him which contains the contact numbers of several prominent individuals and various other people. He had attempted to contact several people and in the course of this, he spoke to the MP on three occasions,' he said. During interrogation police learnt 'the accused thought that Kushwaha might join another party, which is why he issued the threats'. 'He claims to be his (Kushwaha's) supporter but was recently dissatisfied with some of his statements, which led to the threats,' SSP Sharma said, adding that the suspect had no link with gangster Lawrence Bishnoi.
The Hindu
36 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Invoking anti-gangster law to counter one communal violence incident triggered by a social media post is misuse: SC
The Supreme Court has concluded that the use of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters Act — a law meant to counter organised crime — in a solitary case of communal disturbance caused by an 'incendiary' social media post, amounts to a misuse of the stringent penal law. The recent judgment, authored by Justice Sandeep Mehta, came after the court heard an appeal filed by people accused under the State law for mobbing and vandalising the business establishment of a man who posted content derogatory to a particular religion on social media. 'When juxtaposed with the object and intent of the U.P. Gangsters Act, which was enacted to combat organised gang-based crime and dismantle criminal syndicates that pose a persistent threat to public order, the application of the Act to the appellants based on a single incident of communal violence flaring up from an incendiary post made against a particular religion represents a significant departure from its legislative purpose,' Justice Mehta wrote. 'Colourable exercise of power' The judgment said the application of the Gangsters Act in the current case bore the 'hallmark of colourable exercise of power for purposes extraneous to the Act's legitimate objectives'. The court reminded the State government of Article 21 of the Constitution that 'no person shall be deprived of life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law'. Justice Mehta observed that the procedure prescribed by law must be fair, just, reasonable, and not arbitrary, presumptive, or oppressive. The constitutional guarantee of personal liberty acquired even greater significance when an 'extraordinary legislation with stringent provisions' like the U.P. Gangsters Act was invoked by the State, he said. 'The power conferred upon the State cannot be wielded as an instrument of harassment or intimidation, particularly where political motivations may be at play,' Justice Mehta emphasised. 'Need solid evidence' Extraordinary penal provisions, particularly those that substantially abridge regular procedural safeguards like the U.P. Gangsters Act, must be invoked only if the evidence met a threshold of credibility and substantiality. 'The materials relied upon must establish a reasonable nexus between the accused and the alleged criminal activity… When a statute creates serious fetters on personal liberty, the evidentiary foundation for its invocation must be commensurately strong, supported by concrete, verifiable facts rather than vague assertions,' the top court held. Quashing the FIR and allowing the appeal, the court said the case failed to meet the 'essential threshold' required to invoke the Gangsters Act. It had rested 'largely on presumptive theories rather than presenting tangible material to establish the probability that the appellants were engaged in organised criminal activity,' the court said.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Rohith Vemula Bill proposes to cut govt. aid to institutions for violating rules
The Karnataka government has proposed to introduce the Karnataka Rohith Vemula (Prevention of Exclusion or Injustice) (Right to Education and Dignity) Bill, 2025, in the monsoon session of the legislature to safeguard the right to education and dignity of the Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), other backward classes (OBC), and minorities. The Bill, the draft of which was discussed in the State Cabinet meeting earlier this week, aims to provide equal access and right to education to SC, ST, OBCs, and minorities in all universities under the purview of the Department of Higher Education in the State. For any violation of the law, the person in charge of the affairs of the institution is liable to imprisonment for one year and a fine of ₹10,000. Significantly, the State government would not provide any financial aid or grant to the institutions violating the provisions of this Act. Every offence committed under the proposed Act would be cognisable and non-bailable. Nudge from Rahul Recently, following a letter from the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah assured him that his government would enact the law to eliminate caste- and identity-based discrimination in educational institutions. The court would also grant appropriate compensation payable by the accused to the victim of discrimination, which would extend to a maximum of ₹1 lakh, in addition to the fine. For the repeated offence, the person would be punished with an imprisonment for a term of three years and a fine of ₹1 lakh. On hate speech A draft of the Karnataka Hate Speech and Hate Crimes (Prevention and Control) Bill, 2025, also discussed in the Cabinet, envisages effective prevention and control of hate speech and hate crimes, their negative effects on individuals, groups, and society. A person who commits a hate crime would be punished with three years of imprisonment and a fine of ₹5,000 or both as per the draft law. An offence of hate crime would be non-cognisable and non-bailable, and would be triable by a magistrate of the first class, the draft Bill states. Fake news (prohibition) Bill The Karnataka Misinformation and Fake News (Prohibition) Bill, 2025, proposes a clampdown on misinformation. As per the draft Bill, social media users found guilty of posting fake news would face up to seven years of imprisonment and a maximum fine of ₹10 lakh. The draft, which has been in the making ever since the Congress came to power two years ago, was placed before the Cabinet earlier this week. The draft law defines misinformation as 'knowingly or recklessly making a false or inaccurate statement of fact, whether wholly or in part, in the context in which it appears excluding opinions, religious or philosophical sermons, satire, comedy or parody or any other form of artistic expression if a reasonable man of ordinary prudence does not pursue such communications as statements of fact'. A six-member Fake News on Social Media Regulatory Authority, headed by the Minister for Kannada and Culture, will be constituted, said the draft. Special courts Special courts would be set up for faster trials of offences, which will be cognisable and non-bailable. The law provides for the appointment of at least one special public prosecutor for every special court and one in each Bench of the High Court. The proposed law seeks to prohibit abusive and obscene content, including anti-feminism. It also wants to prohibit the publication of content 'amounting to disrespect of Sanatan symbols and beliefs' on social media.
