What to know about 'Devil in the Ozarks' subject, convicted murderer who escaped prison
What to know about 'Devil in the Ozarks' subject, convicted murderer who escaped prison
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Ex-Arkansas police chief imprisoned for murder escapes prison
Grant Hardin, a former Gateway, Arkansas, police chief serving time for murder and rape, escaped from the North Central Unit in Calico Rock on May 25.
unbranded - Newsworthy
Convicted murderer Grant Hardin escaped from a Calico Rock, Arkansas, prison on May 25, 2025.
Hardin was serving time for the 2017 murder of James Appleton and the 1997 rape of a teacher.
He was a former Gateway, Arkansas, police chief.
A 2023 documentary, "Devil in the Ozarks," covered Hardin's crimes.
A convicted murderer who was the subject of a 2023 documentary remains at large following a May 25 prison escape.
Grant Hardin, 56, escaped from the North Central Unit in Calico Rock, Arkansas, where he was serving time for the 2017 murder of James Appleton and the 1997 rape of a school teacher, according to the Arkansas Department of Corrections.
He was sentenced to 80 years on the combined convictions, according to court records.
Hardin, a former police chief, escaped while wearing "an ADC type uniform," according to the Stone County Sheriff's Office.
"He's a sociopath," former Benton County prosecutor Nathan Smith told Arkansas ABC affiliate KHBS/KHOG May 27. "Prison's not full of people who are all bad. It's full of a lot of people who just do bad things. Grant's different."
What was Grant Hardin convicted of?
Hardin pleaded guilty to in 2017 to murder in the first degree for shooting and killing Appleton in February of the same year, according to court records.
Appleton's brother-in-law, Andrew Tillman, told Benton County Sheriff's investigators that he was on the phone with Appleton when he was shot, according to a probable cause affidavit.
Appleton had filed a police complaint shortly before the phone call and had pulled to the side of the road to complete the conversation, according to the affidavit. Appleton noted that a car had sped by his then stopped, saying, "It must think I'm a policeman or something," according to the affidavit.
"Tillman said the next thing he heard on the phone was what sounded like a loud slammed door and 'that was it,'" the affidavit reads.
A witness told investigators that he saw a white car parked behind Appleton's truck, heard a loud bang and saw the white car speed off. The witness then turned around to check on the truck only to discover Appleton dead, according to the affidavit.
Tillman was the mayor of Gateway, Arkansas when the shooting occurred and his wife, Cheryl Tillman, currently serves as the town's mayor, according to the Northwest Arkansas Democrat Gazette.
"He's just an evil man," Cheryl told the paper. "He is no good for society."
USA TODAY reached out to both Andrew and Cheryl Tillman for comment but did not receive an immediate response.
Hardin was sentenced to 30 years in prison for the murder, according to the plea agreement.
DNA connects Grant Hardin to 1997 rape
A DNA test conducted following the murder conviction connected Hardin to the 1997 rape of a school teacher in Rogers, Arkansas, according to a probable cause affidavit filed in the case.
The victim told investigators that she was attacked on a Sunday morning, a time she normally worked to prepare for the week and noted that a church group was meeting in the school's cafeteria, according to an affidavit filed at the time of the attack.
She was attacked at gunpoint after leaving her classroom for a restroom off of the teacher's lounge, according to the affidavit.
The assailant was described as white male wearing a knit stocking cap and sunglasses, according to an application for a search warrant filed for a storage unit owned by Hardin.
Hardin pleaded guilty to two counts of rape in 2019 and was sentenced to serve 25 years in prison for each count consecutively, according to the plea agreement.
Grant Hardin held police jobs before arrest
Hardin bounced around police departments before becoming the chief of police in Gateway, according to KHBS/KHOG and the Associated Press.
He was with the Fayetteville Police Department from Aug. 6, 1990, to May 22, 1991, according to KHBS/KHOG. The department's chief of police then said he terminated Hardin because his efforts "fall short of the average probationary officer" and that he had a "tendency to not accept constructive criticism along with indecisiveness under stressful situations."
A spell at the Eureka Springs Police Department, from April 1993 to October 1996, was marred by excessive uses of force and poor decisions on the job, the department's former police chief said, according to KHBS/KHOG.
Hardin was the chief of police for Gateway for about four months at the start of 2016, according to the Associated Press.
Grant Hardin's crimes covered in 'Devil in the Ozarks' documentary
The 1997 rape was the focus of a 2023 documentary titled "Devil in the Ozarks," distributed by Investigation Discovery – according to the documentary's IMDB page.
"A vicious sexual assault stuns a small town but goes unsolved for two decades, until a murder nearby reveals a suspect with matching DNA," the documentary's tagline reads.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
"It's All A Lie": Convicted Jan. 6 Rioter "MAGA Granny" Opened Up About Turning Down Trump's Pardon
Pamela Hemphill — a self-described 'ex-MAGA Granny' who was convicted for her role in the deadly Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack — said Tuesday that she declined President Donald Trump's pardon because she didn't want to be part of his 'narrative.' Hemphill — in an interview with CNN's Pamela Brown — pointed to Trump's talk of a 'weaponization' of the Justice Department, adding that other convicted rioters have since tagged along and claimed they weren't allowed due process. Related: A Republican's Response To A "Tax The Rich" Chant At His Town Hall Is Going Viral 'And it's all a lie,' said Hemphill, who spent two months in a federal prison and remains on probation for participating in the riot. She's one of 1,500 people the president pardoned on his first day in office for their roles in the attack. Among those who received pardons were hundreds of rioters convicted of assaulting officers, roughly 1,000 nonviolent offenders, and around 200 people accused of assaulting police. Their cases are pending. A number of those pardoned have since been rearrested. Hemphill has distanced herself from her unofficial 'MAGA' moniker and hit back at Trump in 2023 for 'using' her cancer battle in a Truth Social post. On Tuesday, she emphasized that she had due process and was ultimately 'guilty' of her crimes. Related: "I Am So Torn With What You Are Doing" — 11 Posts From MAGA Business Owners Who Are So Close To Getting It 'I'm not going to be a part of Trump's lying narrative, and plus, you know, it'd be a slap [to] the Capitol police officers, the rule of law,' she said. 'No, I couldn't dare live with myself taking a pardon. I wouldn't be able to sleep at night.' Hemphill — when asked how she's 'done a 180' since the insurrection — said she noticed social media users in a Jan. 6 group on X, formerly Twitter, 'playing the victim role' and felt like people had 'gaslighted' her using disinformation. 'So, I just discovered one lie after another, and I thought 'this narrative is false,'' said Hemphill, noting that she started a separate J6 'gaslighting' group where she uncovered a number of claims she later learned to be false. 'I thought, 'You know, this is insane. I'm done. I'm done with these people. And I'm going to do my own research,'' she added. She explained that she 'didn't realize a president could ever become a cult leader' and realized through leading cult expert Steven Hassan's 2019 book on Trump that she was in a cult. Hemphill stressed that there was 'nothing I could lose' by being honest and pushing back against Trump. 'It doesn't matter,' she said. 'The cost of continuing to lie or be dishonest with yourself, it's not worth it. It's not worth — anything they want to do to me, it's OK. I'm not worried about nothing.' You can watch the full interview below. This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: People Can't Believe This "Disgusting" Donald Trump Jr. Post About Joe Biden's Cancer Diagnosis Is Real Also in In the News: One Body Language Expert Spotted Something Very Telling When Donald Trump "Held His Own Hand" At His Recent Press Conference Also in In the News: Republicans Are Calling Tim Walz "Tampon Tim," And The Backlash From Women Is Too Good Not To Share
Buzz Feed
2 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
Capitol Rioter Speaks Out: 'It Was All A Lie'
Pamela Hemphill — a self-described 'ex-MAGA Granny' who was convicted for her role in the deadly Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack — said Tuesday that she declined President Donald Trump 's pardon because she didn't want to be part of his 'narrative.' Hemphill — in an interview with CNN 's Pamela Brown — pointed to Trump's talk of a 'weaponization' of the Justice Department, adding that other convicted rioters have since tagged along and claimed they weren't allowed due process. 'And it's all a lie,' said Hemphill, who spent two months in a federal prison and remains on probation for participating in the riot. She's one of 1,500 people the president pardoned on his first day in office for their roles in the attack. Among those who received pardons were hundreds of rioters convicted of assaulting officers, roughly 1,000 nonviolent offenders, and around 200 people accused of assaulting police. Their cases are pending. A number of those pardoned have since been rearrested. Hemphill has distanced herself from her unofficial 'MAGA' moniker and hit back at Trump in 2023 for 'using' her cancer battle in a Truth Social post. On Tuesday, she emphasized that she had due process and was ultimately 'guilty' of her crimes. 'I'm not going to be a part of Trump's lying narrative, and plus, you know, it'd be a slap [to] the Capitol police officers, the rule of law,' she said. 'No, I couldn't dare live with myself taking a pardon. I wouldn't be able to sleep at night.' Hemphill — when asked how she's 'done a 180' since the insurrection — said she noticed social media users in a Jan. 6 group on X, formerly Twitter, 'playing the victim role' and felt like people had 'gaslighted' her using disinformation. 'So, I just discovered one lie after another, and I thought 'this narrative is false,'' said Hemphill, noting that she started a separate J6 'gaslighting' group where she uncovered a number of claims she later learned to be false. 'I thought, 'You know, this is insane. I'm done. I'm done with these people. And I'm going to do my own research,'' she added. She explained that she 'didn't realize a president could ever become a cult leader' and realized through leading cult expert Steven Hassan's 2019 book on Trump that she was in a cult. Hemphill stressed that there was 'nothing I could lose' by being honest and pushing back against Trump. 'It doesn't matter,' she said. 'The cost of continuing to lie or be dishonest with yourself, it's not worth it. It's not worth — anything they want to do to me, it's OK. I'm not worried about nothing.'
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Diddy defense preview? His lawyer defended 'sex cult' leader in eerily similar case
NEW YORK ― A charismatic man coerced women into sex and silence. His inner circle transported victims, reaping financial rewards. Sleep deprivation abounded. Those are all allegations against Sean "Diddy" Combs, whose sex-trafficking trial heads to opening statements on Monday, May 12. But they are also similar to the charges in a 2019 sex-trafficking trial against self-help guru Keith Raniere, the so-called NXIVM "sex cult" leader. And the similarities could offer an early window into Combs' defense. After all, the two men went to trial with the same lawyer: Marc Agnifilo. As a federal prosecutor in the 2000s, Agnifilo helped expand the government's use of a 1970 law designed to take down the mafia, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act or "RICO." Agnifilo helped broaden the use of RICO to also tackle street gangs. However, as a defense lawyer Agnifilo argued that using that law against Raniere was a bridge too far. The law is now being used against Combs to allege he ran a criminal enterprise that involved kidnapping, forced labor, and sex trafficking. Agnifilo, who lost Raniere's case, didn't respond to USA TODAY's request for comment on how he will be approaching Combs' defense and whether his strategy will mirror that defense. But Season 2 of HBO's "The Vow," in which Agnifilo let a documentary team follow him through the trial, offers clues to what the defense could look like. The prominent New York defense lawyer is also representing accused UnitedHealthcare CEO-killer Luigi Mangione along with his wife, Karen Agnifilo, who is leading that defense team. Marc Agnifilo also represented former pharmaceutical CEO Martin Shkreli and ex-International Monetary Fund chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn in high-profile cases. To prove their sex-trafficking charges against Combs, prosecutors will have to show that Combs knew his alleged victims were participating in "freak off" parties that involved sexual activities as a result of force, fraud, and coercion. It's an element of the charges that's not just about whether the parties happened, but also about Combs' intent and whether he believed the women had freely consented. When Raniere faced similar sex-trafficking charges, Agnifilo approached that issue head-on, portraying Raniere as a man who lived an atypical sexual lifestyle, but who always had good intentions. "I don't have to defend everything to win this case, but one thing I am going to defend is his intentions," Agnifilo said in his opening statement at Raniere's trial. "I'm going to defend his good faith." Agnifilo has already dropped hints that he will pursue a similar strategy in Combs' case. At an April 25 pre-trial hearing, Agnifilo said he plans to tell jurors that there is a certain alternative sexual lifestyle – "call it swingers" – that Combs belonged to. He said being able to describe that lifestyle to jurors will be crucial to showing Combs didn't have the necessary intent to be guilty. More broadly, Agnifilo tried to humanize Raniere throughout his trial. "Keith undoubtedly believes that his work with NXIVM is good, and I think it's helped a lot of people," Agnifilo said at the time. It's a strategy that's in line with Agnifilo's general style, according to Mitchell Epner, a long-time litigator who worked in the New Jersey federal prosecuting office at the same time as Agnifilo. "His style is to make the jury believe that he is investing his personality in the defendant," Epner said. Epner described it in the following way: "I'm likable. You like me. I'm a charismatic guy. I like my client. I'm standing behind him, I'm putting my hands on his shoulders. I am investing whatever halo effect I have on my client. And therefore, you should think good things about my client." In Raniere's trial, Agnifilo appeared to conclude that the defense's Achilles' heel was evidence that practically any juror would see as morally abhorrent. That included sexual images of someone the jury concluded was a minor. Even though that evidence spoke directly only to charges that Raniere sexually exploited a child and possessed child sexual-abuse material, Agnifilo believed it damned the entire defense. "After Keith's sentencing I said, 'You know, Keith, this was a fascinating debate, and maybe even a debate that we win until you have allegations of, you know, underage sex and pornography,'" Agnifilo said in the documentary. "Then you don't get to be a participant in the debate anymore, and no one's going to listen to your viewpoint the same way." Combs is also going to be up against evidence that no juror is likely to countenance: a video that appears to show Combs dragging and kicking his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, in a hotel hallway. Judge Arun Subramanian ruled April 25 that prosecutors will be able to show the video at trial, despite the defense's objections. Agnifilo's experience in Raniere's trial may cause him to think especially hard about how to challenge the evidence Combs faces. In court filings ahead of trial, the defense has suggested the video may have been doctored. CNN, which made the video public in its broadcast, has denied the allegations. Agnifilo's experience with the Raniere case could also give him food for thought when it comes to picking a jury that is going to see morally troubling evidence. Robert Hirschhorn, a lawyer and jury consultant, told USA TODAY ahead of jury selection that, if he were on the defense team, he might argue Combs is guilty of domestic violence, but he was overcharged with sex trafficking. Hirschhorn would test whether potential jurors could set aside the video by asking if they could work through and compartmentalize a significant other cheating. "Everybody that says, 'compartmentalize,' I don't care what else they say – Unless they say, 'I already think Diddy's guilty,' I'm putting them on the jury every day," Hirschhorn said. Another of Agnifilo's tactics to try to combat the case against Raniere was to use the words of his victims against them. "These women who are saying that they're victims, yet see, how do they speak to Keith?" Agnifilo asked rhetorically ahead of witness testimony. "That's when the jury's gonna start seeing what this case is really about, when we actually get to the evidence." It was a strategy he employed over and over as prosecutors put women on the stand who testified that Raniere coerced them. With one witness who testified that, at Raniere's direction, she started sending him nude images and entered into a "master-slave" relationship with him, Agnifilo pointed to her text messages to cast doubt on her claims of coercion. "You were asking to see Keith on a pretty regular basis?" Agnifilo asked. "I was just following the instructions of my master," the woman responded. "Have you told my client that you love him?" Agnifilo asked. "I tried to be the best slave I could be so that things would work out for me," the woman responded. When another woman, a Mexican citizen, testified that Raniere forced her to stay in a room for two years after she kissed another man, Agnifilo again pointed to what she wrote. "What you write here is, 'From my love for you and what is unfinished between us, I gathered the strength to go against my own momentum and be honest with myself,'" he said. "This is a very complex situation," she replied. "I have no money, no papers, and I was threatened with both being sent back to Mexico, and also threatened with being completely cut off from everyone I knew," she said. Agnifilo has experience with just how impactful an alleged victims' own statements can be. New York prosecutors dropped a sexual assault case against his client, former French politician Strauss-Kahn, based on statements they believed called her story into question. Just as with that woman in Raniere's case, prosecutors in Combs' case say he leaned on other members of his alleged enterprise to help him monitor women and keep them from leaving. They plan to introduce testimony from a psychologist on why victims might stay in abusive or violent relationships. In Raniere's case, Agnifilo also wanted to bring in witnesses who could testify to participating in an organization within NXIVM, "DOS," that prosecutors alleged was used to traffic women. "The only way to rectify it is to hear from these DOS women firsthand and set the record straight and say, 'Listen, I joined DOS for my own reasons,'" Agnifilo said as he was preparing for trial. "Even the power and might of the great federal government hasn't shaken these women from that belief." In practice, that strategy didn't work out for him. When it came time for the defense to present witnesses, nobody wanted to do it. "We went to several different countries and interviewed hundreds of people to be witnesses in this case, and we got what I think was good information," he said after the trial. "But when it came time to actually, you know, travel to Brooklyn, enter that courtroom, sit in the witness chair, not a lot of people wanted to do that." Agnifilo will likely be hoping witnesses for Combs will stay the course even as prosecutors present testimony and evidence over several weeks that could likewise paint Combs in a highly-negative light. In court filings ahead of the trial, the defense team and prosecutors have been arguing over whether Combs should be able to present that kind of testimony. Ultimately, Agnifilo's defense didn't work out for Raniere, who was found guilty on every charge he faced. Still, a recent development – Combs' decision to reject a plea offer – may indicate Agnifilo is optimistic for a better outcome this time. (The details of the offer – or what Agnifilo advised – weren't publicly revealed.) When Raniere was headed to trial, Agnifilo said, "If your client's guilty and the government can prove it, cut a deal and call it a day." Raniere was sentenced to 120 years in prison. His appeal is ongoing. Aysha Bagchi covers the Department of Justice for USA TODAY. She is an attorney, Harvard Law graduate, and Rhodes Scholar. You can follow her on X and Bluesky at @AyshaBagchi. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: A look at Diddy lawyer's strategy in eerily similar 'sex cult' trial
