No commitment to scrap two-child benefit cap until funding is clear
Further calls to scrap the controversial policy were made by Labour backbenchers on Tuesday, during a Conservative-led debate focused on retaining the cap.
There were more than 1.6 million children living in households in England, Wales and Scotland affected by the two-child benefit limit in April, according to figures published by the Department for Work and Pensions last week.
Work and pensions minister Alison McGovern said the Child Poverty Task Force will look at 'all the levers across incomes, costs, debt and local support that we can pull to prevent poverty, including social security reform'.
Speaking during the opposition day debate, she added: 'Our universal credit review is considering ways that the system can improve in order to stabilise family finances and provide routes into good work.
'And on the two-child limit, specifically, the consequences, as I've said in my speech, of the Conservative choices made over the past decade and a half are clear for all to see.
'We have rightly said many times we will not commit to any policy without knowing how we are going to pay for it.'
Labour MP for Rochdale, Paul Waugh, said: '59% of families (who) have more than two children, on universal credit, are in work, and that's far from the feckless parent caricature that we've heard today from the Conservatives.
'And more importantly, does she agree with me that actually it's the children (who) should come first, and because the children should come first, we should urgently scrap the two-child cap as quickly as possible?'
Ms McGovern declined to respond directly to Mr Waugh's question, instead arguing that the Conservative Party 'only wants to divide people'.
Labour MP for Alloa and Grangemouth Brian Leishman also said 'the Government should lift it immediately', adding: 'Having a child is a blessing, not a blessing everyone receives, and the two-child cap is an inherently cruel policy that punishes the least advantaged.
'The idea that a third or a fourth or a fifth child is worth less than the first two is beyond wicked.'
Conservative shadow work and pensions secretary Helen Whately had described the welfare bill as a 'ticking time bomb' as she opened the debate.
She added: 'We have brought forward this debate today on the two-child limit, because somebody has to make the case for fiscal responsibility, for living within our means, for fairness, for making sure work pays, and for keeping the two-child cap.'
MPs rejected the Conservatives' motion that the benefit cap should remain, with 106 voting in favour, 440 against, majority 334.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
13 minutes ago
- Times
Crackdown on international students is self-harm, says Sadiq Khan
The mayor of London will describe plans to charge universities a levy on international students as 'an act of immense economic self-harm' during a speech in west Africa on Wednesday. Khan, who is on a five-day trade mission to Ghana, Nigeria and South Africa, will use a keynote speech in Accra, the Ghanaian capital, to take aim at the British government's proposal to bring in a tax on income generated from foreign students. 'There are people at home who believe we should pull up the drawbridge to international students, or punish universities that choose to welcome people from around the world,' he will say. 'Closing our country to global talent would be an act of immense economic self-harm, one that would slow down growth and leave working people in Britain worse off than before. 'That's why I'm calling on our government not to make it harder for international students to study in the UK.' The issue, in the government's immigration white paper, is the latest flashpoint in an increasingly contentious relationship between the Labour mayor of London and the Labour government. Khan pointedly criticised the chancellor's spending review last month, saying that Rachel Reeves had made a 'colossal mistake' in pitting London against the rest of the country. He was also among those who successfully lobbied the government to row back on proposed welfare changes. Khan will be speaking at Imperial College London's Accra hub and will release new data from London Economics, a think tank, suggesting that international students contribute £12.5 billion in wider economic benefit in London every year during their studies. In the immigration white paper, the government also said it would reduce to 18 months, down from two years at present, graduates' right to stay in the UK after their studies. The levy on income would, the document suggested, be 'reinvested into the higher education and skills system'. More details are expected in the autumn budget. The number of international students coming to the UK has ballooned in recent years. The cohort appeals to universities because they can be charged more than domestic students, whose fees are capped at just shy of £10,000 a year. In the academic year 2023-24, there were 296,655 undergraduate entrants to the UK system whose permanent addresses were overseas, compared with 1.75 million who had UK addresses, according to data from the Higher Education Statistics Agency. There were also more international postgraduates, at 435,620, than UK postgraduates, at 410,870. Substantial increases in recent years have come from India — which passed China in numbers for the first time in 2022-23 — as well as from other Asian countries and Nigeria. The number of students from the European Union has dropped substantially in the same period. London Higher, a membership organisation for universities and higher education institutions, backed Khan's call for the levy to go no further. Its chief executive, Liz Hutchinson, said: 'Our universities are world-leading because they are international, with overseas students enriching not just the economy but also the learning experience and the vibrant, creative communities that the capital is famous for.' She added: 'This is a time when we should be strengthening our position as a hub for talented individuals from across the world; the government's proposed levy on international students does the opposite.'
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
No, Dale Vince: ‘climate denial' shouldn't be illegal
You can tell the environmentalists are on the back foot. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband is issuing doomsday proclamations in parliament, branding Reform and the Tories 'unpatriotic' for refusing to go along with his deranged Net Zero policies. And now Labour donors are also calling for 'climate denial' to be criminalised. Because nothing says 'we're winning the argument' like locking up your opponents. Green tycoon Dale Vince, a man whose woeful politics can be accurately inferred from his appearance, donated £5million to Labour ahead of the last General Election. Ever since, he's been publicly dispensing increasingly crazed – and often totally self-serving – advice to the government he helped put into office. After Miliband announced this week that he was to give the first of what he intends to make an annual climate statement in parliament, Vince took to X to congratulate the energy secretary, and urge him to go further: 'Good move from Ed, it's time to tell it like it is. I'd make climate denial a criminal offence – given the incredible harm it will cause, even by slowing down progress to Net Zero.' This isn't a new idea. Deep greens have been agitating for it for years. Last month, the UN special rapporteur on human rights and climate change, Elisa Morgera, called for 'media and advertising firms' to be held criminally liable for 'amplifying disinformation and misinformation by fossil-fuel companies'. Because, as we all know, the scientific method is all about some bureaucrat deciding what the truth is and then imposing that on the press and civil society. These are not the proposals of a movement that is confident in its arguments. The more that voters bristle against elite greenism, refusing to accept that their lives must become more expensive and less free in order to meet arbitrary climate targets, the more greens start fantasising about the 'deniers' being led away in handcuffs. Ordinary people care about the environment, they're just not buying the eco-austerity the elites are selling. And rightly so. Indeed, for all of Vince's talk of the 'incredible harm' done by 'climate denial', this seems infinitely more true of Net Zero. Cheap and reliable energy is what allows human beings to flourish and prosper. The headlong dash towards so-called renewables, by contrast, has given us nothing but soaring energy prices and deindustrialisation. Miliband warned darkly this week about the supposed 10,000 excess deaths due to heatwaves over the past four years, blithely ignoring the fact that more lives are lost to cold than heat. The brass neck is almost impressive, given Miliband's government has not only worked to make it more expensive for everyone to heat their homes, but also tried to rip away winter fuel payments from freezing pensioners. As for supposed 'misinformation' in the climate debate, the greens haven't got a leg to stand on. Any old cobblers about climate change is now presumed to be legit by the elites, provided it is sufficiently apocalyptic. The BBC's climate editor, Justin Rowlatt, is so cavalier about the facts he was rebuked by the corporation's own complaints unit in 2022 for 'misleading' statements about climate deaths. In a Panorama documentary, Rowlatt suggested that the 'death toll' from extreme weather is 'rising around the world and the forecast is… that worse is to come'. The truth, as the Beeb had to sheepishly concede, is the opposite. The death toll has actually fallen. And not by a little bit. Deaths from climate-related disasters have actually declined by 99 per cent over the past century, thanks to economic growth and new technology fortifying humanity against the brutality of nature. Shall we arrest Justin, too, Dale? From the fossil-fuel workers who backed Donald 'drill, baby, drill' Trump to the gilets jaunes revolt in France against Emmanuel Macron's punishing eco-taxes, ordinary people have had enough of being made worse off to salve the consciences of rich greens posing as saviours of the planet. No wonder Vince is rattled. Now the environmentalists hope to do with censorship what they have failed to do with persuasion. Don't let them get away with it.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
HMRC criticised by watchdog for failing to track billionaires' tax
HM Revenue and Customs has been sharply criticised by parliament's spending watchdog for being unable to track how many billionaires pay tax in the UK. In a highly critical report on the collection of tax from wealthy individuals, the influential Public Accounts Committee (PAC) said HMRC could not say how much the super-rich either contributed to the exchequer or avoided. Highlighting 'significant opportunities to collect more revenue', it warned that the lack of clarity risked damaging public confidence and called on the tax authority to take immediate action. It comes as Keir Starmer's government faces growing demands to increase taxes on wealth after Labour's welfare U-turn earlier this month raised fresh questions over the health of the public finances. Ministers have warned of 'financial consequences' after the backtracking on disability benefits and winter fuel payments for pensioners, which will cost more than £6bn. Alongside a tepid economic outlook and elevated borrowing costs, economists have said Rachel Reeves could be forced to raise taxes at her autumn budget to cover a shortfall of as much as £30bn. Despite mounting speculation over tax rises, Reeves has sought to reassure business leaders and financiers that Labour's priority remains driving up economic growth, including through lighter-touch City regulation, amid a desire to ensure Britain remains attractive to global investors. However, the government last week declined to rule out the introduction of a wealth tax after the former Labour leader Neil Kinnock called for a new levy to be introduced. Successive governments have attempted to close the 'tax gap' – the shortfall between what HMRC expects to receive and actual receipts – including through tackling non-compliance. At her spending review last month, Reeves announced extra funding worth £1.7bn over four years for HMRC to recruit an additional 5,500 compliance and 2,400 debt management staff. The Treasury expects this to raise £7.5bn a year in extra tax by 2029-30 through helping to close the tax gap. However, the PAC report will add to pressure to ensure the wealthy contribute their fair share. The report praised work by tax officials to ensure wealthy individuals complied with the rules, which had brought in an extra £5.2bn of revenue in 2023-24, up from £2.2bn in 2019-20. However, it said the increase suggested either wealthy non-compliance had got worse, or that previous estimates of tax avoidance were too low. While there are relatively few billionaires in Britain, the PAC said it was disappointed that HMRC could not use the wide range of data at its disposal to identify these individuals. HMRC defines wealthy individuals as those with incomes of £200,000 or more, or assets equal to or above £2m, in any of the last three years. The report said that because a billionaire has wealth and assets 500 times greater than this level, there was a huge potential impact on how much tax revenues were generated. Calling on HMRC to urgently improve its understanding of the wealth and assets of UK taxpayers, the PAC said officials could make a start by comparing available public data on known billionaires, such as from the Sunday Times rich list, with its own records. In 2025, the rich list identified 156 billionaires, down from 165 a year before, including the chemicals magnate Jim Ratcliffe, entrepreneur James Dyson, and the property tycoons David and Simon Reuben. Gopi Hinduja and his family, who own the Hinduja Group conglomerate, were ranked as Britain's wealthiest family, with an estimated fortune of £35.3bn. Lloyd Hatton MP, a Labour member of the PAC, said the committee was 'disappointed to find that HMRC, of all organisations, was unable to provide any insight' into the tax affairs of billionaires despite the great deal of information in the public domain. 'Our report shows that, however you slice it, there is a lot of money being left on the table,' he said. A HMRC spokesperson said the extra resources announced in the spending review would allow tax officials to 'significantly step up our work'. 'The government is determined to make sure everyone pays the tax they owe,' it added.
