What Trump should learn from Oscar Wilde's doomed lawsuit
Ironically, Trump's resort to strong-arm litigation will likely lead to yet more damaging disclosures. History tells us why.
Over a century before Trump's ' powerhouse ' defamation case against the Wall Street Journal for publishing an article about his supposed birthday note to Epstein, another outsize figure came to grief by filing an ill-advised libel action that he knew was false.
In 1895, the poet and playwright Oscar Wilde was the most renowned literary figure in the English-speaking world. By sheer force of personality, Wilde led an artistic movement that defied convention, offended propriety and created an esthetic revolution.
Then he wrecked it all by subjecting himself to a relentless cross-examination about his then-scandalous intimate life in a case he could not win.
Trump appears to be making the same mistake. His lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal can expose him to extensive questioning under oath about escapades he has kept mostly under wraps.
The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump sent a risqué birthday note to Epstein, in 2003, featuring a sketch of a naked young woman. Trump immediately issued a sharp denial, calling it 'fake news' and declaring 'I never wrote a picture in my life.'
The president's bluster was quickly disproven when reporters found verified drawings by Trump, at least four of which were publicly auctioned during his first term. The defamation case against the Wall Street Journal, filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, promises to reveal even more.
Parties in federal cases are required to sit for depositions under oath. The scope of inquiry is extremely broad, compelling disclosure of any information 'relevant to any party's claim or defense,' even if it would be inadmissible at trial.
The expansive allegations in Trump's complaint open the relevance door about as widely as possible, which makes the whole story of his association with Epstein available for questioning.
Trump will have to fully describe everything they did together, where and when they did it, and in whose company — with names and details.
Trump cannot object based on relevance, because he raised these very issues in his own lawsuit.
He cannot claim memory failure, at least for the many events documented in photographs (and others that defense counsel may well dig up). He cannot hide behind presidential immunity, which does not apply in civil cases.
Such were the circumstances that destroyed Wilde.
Today, Wilde would be described as gay or bisexual, although neither term was current in the late 19th century. Wilde's lover was young Lord Alfred Douglas, known as Bosie, whose father was the brutish Marquess of Queensberry, author of boxing's modern rules.
Queensberry hounded Wilde in public and private, branding him a ' posing ' sodomite. Although the accusation was true in its way (minus the invective), Wilde believed he had no option but to sue Queensberry for libel.
He retained the prominent barrister, Sir Edward Clarke, who asked him to swear 'that there is not and has never been any foundation' for Queensberry's accusation. Wilde falsely replied that the charges were absolutely 'groundless.'
It was a pretense Wilde could not maintain on the witness stand. His credibility was shredded by Queensberry's counsel, Sir Edward Carson, who would later become attorney general of England.
Carson confronted Wilde with his own words of love for young men, taken from his published writings and private letters to Bosie. Worse, he produced witness after witness, tracked down by private investigators, who testified to Wilde's then-illegal sexual activities.
Recognizing the damage to his client, and embarrassed by his own credulousness, Wilde's attorney attempted to withdraw the case. But the judge wouldn't have it, and Queensberry was exonerated.
That ended the libel case, but it was not the end of Wilde's trials. He was indicted for the crime of 'gross indecency,' based on Queensberry's evidence.
Ultimately convicted, Wilde was sentenced to two years at hard labor. Emerging a broken man, he died three years later.
Both Wilde and Trump believed themselves invulnerable to conventional standards of respectability and decorum. Wilde proved disastrously wrong, while Trump has succeeded beyond all expectations.
Both men somehow convinced attorneys to file outrageous lawsuits. Wilde's case was defeated in the most torturous way.
Trump's remains pending, although it seems almost impossible, given the photographic and other evidence, for him to prove his allegation that he was never Epstein's 'pal.'
We know that Trump's name appears multiple times in the Justice Department's Epstein files, as he was informed by Attorney General Pam Bondi. Thanks to his improvident lawsuit, he may now have to explain that under oath.
After 130 years of social progress, we can understand and sympathize with Wilde's dilemma, although it led him to perjury.
Trump deserves no such indulgence. His claim that the Wall Street Journal 'concocted' a story is all but certain to be proven false and irresponsible. He won't face personal ruin, as did Wilde, but perhaps he will be exposed as one of Epstein's active or passive enablers.
History does repeat itself. First as tragedy, then as farce.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
a minute ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows States Where Homeowners Benefit Most from Capital Gains Tax Plan
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Blue states, including California and Washington, are among those that stand to benefit the most from President Donald Trump's idea to eliminate the federal capital gains tax on home sales, according to a new study. A proposal to abolish the tax was first pushed forward by Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene last month and then echoed by Trump, who told reporters on July 22 that he was "thinking about…no tax on capital gains on houses." While it is not yet clear if the president's suggestion may lead to a real change in the way home sales are taxed by the government, real estate brokerage Redfin has calculated that homeowners in California, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Washington, and New Jersey, in this order, would benefit the most from the abolition of the capital gains tax. What Is the Federal Capital Gains Tax on Home Sales—and Why Does Trump Want To Abolish It? Homeowners who sell a property where they have been living for longer than a year may have to pay capital gains taxes if they sell their property for more than they originally purchased it for. Capital gains taxes are a portion of the profit made by homeowners through the years that their property has appreciated in value. At the moment, capital gains taxes are limited by a cap. Homeowners who have lived in a home as their primary residence for at least 24 months in the five years before the sale receive an exemption on the first $250,000 of gains for individuals and $500,000 for married couples filing jointly. This cap, however, has not been updated since it was introduced in 1997 nor adjusted for inflation—leading many experts to support urgent changes to the exclusion. "It is not indexed for inflation. In real terms, the exclusion has gone down over these last 20-something years," William McBride, Chief Economist & Stephen J. Entin Fellow in Economics at the Tax Foundation, told Newsweek. "The high inflation we had in recent years, during the pandemic and consequently, is one of the things that has caused a lot of home price appreciation." While this is a problem that typically affects wealthier homeowners the most, the rapid appreciation that occurred during the pandemic homebuying frenzy means that "this is no longer just a concern for high-end properties," Shannon McGahn, executive vice president and chief advocacy officer at the National Association of Realtors (NAR), told Newsweek. According to a recent report by NAR, nearly 29 million homeowners, about one-third of the U.S. market, already face potential capital gains taxes if they sell, "and that number is expected to climb sharply over the next decade," McGahn said. If no change is made to the way capital gains are taxed, nearly 70 percent of homeowners could exceed the $250,000 cap, according to NAR. "A sizable portion of homeowners, especially in states with high home prices that have grown quickly, are sitting on more than the $250k/$500k of capital gains that are exempt from capital gains taxes," Chen Zhao, head of economics research at Redfin, previously told Newsweek. "These homeowners generally have owned their homes for a long period of time, but in some places, people are exceeding the current capital gains exemptions solely based on appreciation during the pandemic." Trump has hinted at the idea of abolishing the capital gains tax on home sales as a solution to the ongoing affordability crisis in the U.S. housing market. On July 22, he told reporters that "if the Fed would lower the rates, we wouldn't even have to do that." Greene has framed the tax as an "unfair burden" hurting the "American dream." Which States Will Benefit the Most—and the Least According to Redfin, more than a quarter of homes across the U.S. have gained at least $250,000 in value since the last time they were purchased, with 8 percent having gained more than $500,000. The owners of these homes are the ones that stand to benefit by a potential elimination of the capital gains tax. By the same reasoning, the states where homeowners stand to gain from the abolition of the tax are those where homes have appreciated the most in recent decades. These include some of the most expensive housing markets in the country: California and Hawaii. In the Golden State, the median home value is $766,896 and the typical capital gain of all homes is $332,659, according to Redfin. A total of 62.3 percent of homes in the state have gained at least $250,000 since they were last sold—the highest share of any state in the nation. One in three (33 percent) have gained more than $500,000. Hawaii followed with 61 percent of homes having gained more than $250,000 in value since they were last sold, while 34.6 percent gained over $500,000. The overall capital gain was even higher than that of California, however, at $338,346. The top five states that would benefit most from the abolition of the federal capital gains tax also include Massachusetts, Washington and New Jersey, with respectively 58.4 percent, 54.1 percent, and 52.2 percent of homes that have gained at least $250,000 in value since they were last sold. Do you think abolishing the federal capital gains tax on home sales is a good or bad idea? Let me know your opinion by emailing The states where homeowners would benefit the least from the change, on the other hand, are Mississippi, North Dakota, Iowa, Oklahoma and Wyoming, which have seen the smallest share of homes that have appreciated over $250,000 in the country, respectively at 1.2 percent, 2.2 percent, 2.4 percent, 3.1 percent and 3.4 percent. What Would Be the Impact of Eliminating the Capital Gains Tax? According to experts, eliminating the federal capital gains tax could have a positive impact on the U.S. housing market, unlocking homes that homeowners were previously holding on to to avoid a high fiscal burden. "Ending the capital gains tax could potentially spur some sales by removing a barrier to selling. Home sales have been in a slump for the past couple years, and this might nudge some sellers to consider," Bankrate's Jeff Ostrowski told Newsweek. "However, the tax burden is far from the main cause of the housing market slowdown." Some experts fear that such a move could have unwanted consequences. "Ongoing affordability issues could be exacerbated by abolishing this tax as it could fuel demand and lead to a more competitive housing market, especially where supply is constrained," Hannah Jones, senior economist at told Newsweek. "Removing this tax would favor wealthy owners which could worsen equity inequality and make the market even more challenging for low-to-mid-earning buyers." McBride also said the measure does not address another cause of home price appreciation in recent years: the lack of supply. "There's a shortage of supply and that's the fundamental problem that needs to be addressed directly. This proposal does not address that," he said. "We have a penalty on investment in housing, on the supply of housing, due to its tax treatment through our depreciation system. That should be addressed, that's the way to directly address this."
NBC News
a minute ago
- NBC News
Russia's Medvedev warns enemies of 'new reality' as Kremlin ditches nuclear treaty
Former Russian leader Dmitry Medvedev has warned that the country's rivals now faced a 'new reality' as the Kremlin formally announced it was no longer bound by a treaty limiting the use of short and medium-range nuclear missiles. Medvedev, who today serves as the deputy chairman of the country's Security Council and is known for issuing frequent apocalyptic threats on social media, was continuing a war of words that prompted President Donald Trump to redeploy two nuclear submarines last week. His latest warning came after the Russian Foreign Ministry announced it would no longer abide by the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty, or INF, an agreement banning Washington and Moscow from deploying ground-based missiles with ranges between 500 to 5,500 kilometers (311 to 3,418 miles). It also comes days before the expiration of Trump's deadline ultimatum for Russia to agree to a ceasefire or face additional tariffs. The INF was already obsolete, with the United States accusing Russia of violating the pact for decades and i tself withdrawing from the agreement in 2019, and Russia has made little secret of its use of these missiles during its war with Ukraine. On Monday the Russian Foreign Ministry said it was formally abandoning any 'efforts to maintain restraint in this area' because the U.S. was moving to deploy similarly ranged weapons systems to Europe and Asia. Russia 'no longer considers itself bound by the corresponding previously adopted self-restrictions,' it said. Medvedev said the withdrawal from the INF was 'the result of NATO countries' anti-Russian policy' — a reference to Moscow's longstanding claim that the Western military alliance is aggressively encircling Russia. 'This is a new reality all our opponents will have to reckon with. Expect further steps.' NBC News has contacted NATO for comment on his remarks. Last week the former Russian leader became involved in a social media spat with Trump. While in Scotland, Trump reduced his initial 50-day deadline for Russia to cease fighting, instead giving it 10-12 days. Medvedev responded by saying that 'each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war' between Russia and the U.S. On Friday Trump reacted by ordering two nuclear submarines to be deployed to 'appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that.' This social media back-and-forth is playing out as Russia makes slow, grinding gains on the battlefield in eastern Ukraine. From the skies, Ukrainian civilians endured another hellish night of Russian drone and missile attacks, as well as shelling on the Zaporizhzhia, Kharkiv, Sumy, Kherson and Donetsk regions. Over the past 24 hours at least 15 civilians were killed, officials said. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy thanked Trump for putting pressure on the Kremlin. 'Russia is dragging out the war against Ukraine for one reason only — it has the money to keep the war going,' he said in his nightly address Monday. 'All sanctions that restrict Russia help bring peace. All weapons that strengthen Ukraine help bring peace. All political actions that isolate Russia help bring peace.' Vocing an opinion common among Western experts on Russia, Mark Galeotti, warned against reading too much into comments by Medvedev. 'Medvedev is a professional troll these days. Trying to dig too much meaning into his various iterations is a fool's errand,' said Galeotti, the British-based director of the consultancy Mayak Intelligence. 'Indeed, sometimes I wonder if his statements are precisely intended to tie us into knots as we try to interpret them!'
New York Times
a minute ago
- New York Times
Trump Administration Live Updates: President to Create Task Force for 2028 L.A. Olympics
The Trump administration will restore and reinstall the only statue that had honored a Confederate official in the U.S. capital after demonstrators toppled and set it on fire during the Black Lives Matter protests in 2020. The defaced statue depicts Albert Pike, a Confederate diplomat and general who worked closely with Native Americans from slave-owning tribes that sided with the Confederacy during the Civil War and fought to protect slavery as an institution. He was also a prominent leader of the Freemasons — a secretive fraternal society that included many powerful politicians and elite figures in the 18th and 19th centuries. The bronze, 11-foot-tall statue of Mr. Pike, which had been in storage since it was toppled from its perch near the Capitol grounds five years ago, was approved by Congress in 1898 and built by an order of Freemasons. The monument's inscriptions do not directly mention Mr. Pike's ties to the Confederacy, and the statue itself depicts him as a leader to the Freemasons. Inscriptions on the monument laud Pike as a poet, a scholar, a soldier, an orator, a jurist and a philanthropist. The announcement by the National Park Service on Monday was the latest component of President Trump's sweeping effort to restore Confederate symbols in the military and in public spaces. Earlier this year, Mr. Trump directed the military to restore the names of all Army bases that had been named for Confederate generals and signed an executive order calling for the restoration of public monuments that were removed during the racial justice protests that followed the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer in 2020. Plans to erect the statue were opposed by groups of veterans who had fought for the Union just 30 years prior. Protests and calls for the statue's removal then swelled in the 1990s, as critics pointed to accusations that Mr. Pike had joined the Ku Klux Klan after the war — a claim others have disputed. The District of Columbia Council in Washington passed a resolution in 1992 calling for the statue to be removed and renewed the request in 2017. Mr. Pike's role in the Civil War centered on Native American tribes on the western frontier who were caught between the United States and the Confederacy during the Civil War. Mr. Pike was appointed as a Confederate diplomat to those tribes, and he negotiated alliances with slave-owning tribes — offering the tribes statehood and congressional representation in the Confederacy. A condition of the alliance was a declaration by the tribes that 'the institution of slavery in the said nation is legal and has existed from time immemorial.' After securing tribal support, Mr. Pike was commissioned as a brigadier general and commanded many of the Native troops who sided with the Confederacy. Native Americans fought on both sides of the conflict in the Indian Territory — now the state of Oklahoma — with some Union and Confederate contingents hailing from the same tribe. After the war, the U.S. government negotiated new treaties with the tribes that had sided with the Confederacy, seizing tribal land and abolishing slavery. The descendants of those formerly enslaved people — known as the Freedmen — still face discrimination by the tribes and law enforcement officials. Live footage of Mr. Pike's statue being toppled and burned during the Black Lives Matter protests in 2020 enraged Mr. Trump, who said the act was a 'disgrace to our country.' Federal police officers arrested Jason Charter, a 25-year-old Washington, D.C., resident, and charged him with destruction of federal property, accusing him of dousing the statue with lighter fluid and igniting it. That charge was later dropped, and Mr. Charter pleaded guilty in 2021 to a separate charge of attempting to topple a statue of President Andrew Jackson near the White House. Mr. Charter said on social media on Monday that 'I did not get arrested by the FBI, so that statue could go back up.'
