logo
Reform to ‘modernise' Fish & Game

Reform to ‘modernise' Fish & Game

Otago Fish & Game Council chairman Adrian McIntyre says he welcomes modernisation. FILE PHOTO: NZ HERALD
Southern Fish & Game councils say they broadly welcome proposed improvements to the organisation's operations, signalled by the government earlier this month.
Hunting and Fishing Minister James Meager has announced proposed new legislation governing Fish & Game, aimed at streamlining and compartmentalising the roles of the national body and its 12 regional councils.
He said it would "modernise and strengthen" the organisation.
"I want to make it as easy as possible for Kiwis to go hunting and fishing in New Zealand. This long overdue reform to Fish & Game will refocus the organisation on its core job of managing our sport fishing and game bird resources and implement a more professional approach to national decision making," he said.
Key changes would include clarifying council and national body roles; shifting to a nationalised fee collection and funding distribution system; and voting changes.
The proposed new act would also "require Fish & Game councils to better consider the interests of other stakeholders such as farmers and the aviation sector in decision-making".
New national advocacy policy would restrict court proceedings to within that policy.
Southland Fish & Game chairman David MacGregor said the minister had provided further clarification on that last point.
"The minister has clarified that Fish & Game can still advocate for the health of waterways where it improves fisheries, which is entirely consistent with Southland Fish & Game's involvement in the [environment Southland's] Water & Land Plan, where the court found there were significant adverse effects on aquatic life," he said.
Federated Farmers Southland clashed with Fish & Game Southland last year following a Court of Appeal decision regarding effluent discharge Federated Farmers claimed would prevent them farming.
"Fish & Game has never taken frivolous court action, and funding for much of the Southland case came from the New Zealand council, so I can't see our advocacy function changing," Mr MacGregor said.
Otago Fish & Game Council chairman Adrian McIntyre said he welcomed modernisation.
"Making it easier for New Zealanders to go hunting and fishing is something we all support, and it's encouraging to see a proposal that retains strong regional decision-making — close to where the action is happening.
"Regional autonomy is essential to what we do. It's great to see that the minister has preserved the ability of regional councils to make decisions based on local knowledge and direct engagement with hunters, anglers, landowners, iwi and scientists. That connection is one of our biggest strengths."
A Federated Farmers spokesman said his organisation remained concerned about Fish & Game's political advocacy functions.
"We're welcoming a review of Fish & Game's advocacy function, something Federated Farmers have been vocal in calling for, but we have serious concerns changes won't go far enough."
Key changes
• Clarify the roles and responsibilities so that regional Fish & Game councils focus on delivering hunting and fishing opportunities on the ground, with the New Zealand Council responsible for administrative tasks and policies.
• A nationalised fee collection system to reduce double handling of licence fees and ensuring funding follows the demand on the resource.
• Make more licence holders eligible to vote and stand in Fish & Game elections and requiring councillors to comply with professional standards.
• Fish & Game councils to better consider the interests of other stakeholders such as farmers and the aviation sector in decision-making.
• Develop a national policy around advocacy and restricting court proceedings to within that policy.
richard.davison@alliedpress.co.nz

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iwi files court action against minister, DOC over Ruapehu ski fields
Iwi files court action against minister, DOC over Ruapehu ski fields

1News

time29 minutes ago

  • 1News

Iwi files court action against minister, DOC over Ruapehu ski fields

A central North Island iwi has filed court action against Minister of Conservation Tama Potaka and the Department of Conservation (DOC) over concession made to the commercial operators of Tūroa and Whakapapa ski fields on Ruapehu. The iwi, Te Patutokotoko, alleges the Crown failed their legal obligations under the Treaty of Waitangi by failing to engage with them and actively protect their interests in their ancestral maunga by continuing to deal with private owners over them. Lead claimant Te Kurataiaha Te Wanikau Tūroa told RNZ the the iwi has been looking for a solution to the issue for years, but was "shrugged off no matter what plan we put forward". Tūroa said the iwi had spoken directly to the minister about their concerns. "We actually put in an interest for Whakapapa 18 months back, we got right to the end of it... the Crown just shut us off at the 12th hour. ADVERTISEMENT "It was a let down. But we didn't cry. We just carried on. That's what we're doing," Tūroa said. Conservation Minister Tama Potaka. (Source: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone) Earlier this year, Whakapapa Holdings Limited and Pure Tūroa were granted 10-year concessions by DOC to operate the north and south sides of the maunga respectively. The previous owner went into receivership in 2022 and the successful bid by the private companies came as a relief to Ruapehu mayor Weston Kirton who said the ski fields were vital to the district's economy. Te Kurataiaha Te Wanikau Tūroa said he did not want the companies to be kicked off the mountain, but wanted the iwi to have more say on how the maunga was operated. "It's an activity that our people, and New Zealanders, and foreigners come to do. It just needs to be run better. "We still have no coexistence with iwi our people in this, and that's where the breakdown is," Tūroa said. In a statement, Conservation Minister Tama Potaka said it would not be appropriate to comment as the matter was before the courts.

Reform to ‘modernise' Fish & Game
Reform to ‘modernise' Fish & Game

Otago Daily Times

time7 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Reform to ‘modernise' Fish & Game

Otago Fish & Game Council chairman Adrian McIntyre says he welcomes modernisation. FILE PHOTO: NZ HERALD Southern Fish & Game councils say they broadly welcome proposed improvements to the organisation's operations, signalled by the government earlier this month. Hunting and Fishing Minister James Meager has announced proposed new legislation governing Fish & Game, aimed at streamlining and compartmentalising the roles of the national body and its 12 regional councils. He said it would "modernise and strengthen" the organisation. "I want to make it as easy as possible for Kiwis to go hunting and fishing in New Zealand. This long overdue reform to Fish & Game will refocus the organisation on its core job of managing our sport fishing and game bird resources and implement a more professional approach to national decision making," he said. Key changes would include clarifying council and national body roles; shifting to a nationalised fee collection and funding distribution system; and voting changes. The proposed new act would also "require Fish & Game councils to better consider the interests of other stakeholders such as farmers and the aviation sector in decision-making". New national advocacy policy would restrict court proceedings to within that policy. Southland Fish & Game chairman David MacGregor said the minister had provided further clarification on that last point. "The minister has clarified that Fish & Game can still advocate for the health of waterways where it improves fisheries, which is entirely consistent with Southland Fish & Game's involvement in the [environment Southland's] Water & Land Plan, where the court found there were significant adverse effects on aquatic life," he said. Federated Farmers Southland clashed with Fish & Game Southland last year following a Court of Appeal decision regarding effluent discharge Federated Farmers claimed would prevent them farming. "Fish & Game has never taken frivolous court action, and funding for much of the Southland case came from the New Zealand council, so I can't see our advocacy function changing," Mr MacGregor said. Otago Fish & Game Council chairman Adrian McIntyre said he welcomed modernisation. "Making it easier for New Zealanders to go hunting and fishing is something we all support, and it's encouraging to see a proposal that retains strong regional decision-making — close to where the action is happening. "Regional autonomy is essential to what we do. It's great to see that the minister has preserved the ability of regional councils to make decisions based on local knowledge and direct engagement with hunters, anglers, landowners, iwi and scientists. That connection is one of our biggest strengths." A Federated Farmers spokesman said his organisation remained concerned about Fish & Game's political advocacy functions. "We're welcoming a review of Fish & Game's advocacy function, something Federated Farmers have been vocal in calling for, but we have serious concerns changes won't go far enough." Key changes • Clarify the roles and responsibilities so that regional Fish & Game councils focus on delivering hunting and fishing opportunities on the ground, with the New Zealand Council responsible for administrative tasks and policies. • A nationalised fee collection system to reduce double handling of licence fees and ensuring funding follows the demand on the resource. • Make more licence holders eligible to vote and stand in Fish & Game elections and requiring councillors to comply with professional standards. • Fish & Game councils to better consider the interests of other stakeholders such as farmers and the aviation sector in decision-making. • Develop a national policy around advocacy and restricting court proceedings to within that policy.

Mitchell Contradicted On Lower Police Standards
Mitchell Contradicted On Lower Police Standards

Scoop

time8 hours ago

  • Scoop

Mitchell Contradicted On Lower Police Standards

It's been revealed that Police leadership gave approval for at least two recruits who failed fitness standards to enter Police College. This raises questions about political pressure being applied to the Police College to lower standards. 'Yesterday Mark Mitchell and Richard Chambers emphatically denied any directive to lower standards had been given. However, there are reports that Associate Commissioner Jill Rogers approved at least two recruits who had failed fitness standards to enter Police College,' Labour Police spokesperson Ginny Andersen said. 'This raises serious questions about political pressure being applied to the Police College to fix the Government's failing promise of 500 more police on the beat. 'It also calls into question whether Mark Mitchell was honest with New Zealanders during yesterday's committee hearing. 'He needs to front up and answer whether he was aware that recruits who had failed standards were being allowed to advance. 'When the Government promised 500 more police, the pressure that followed may have contributed to inconsistent and unclear processes. That seriously risks undermining public confidence and the integrity of the Police. 'We need a Police Minister we can trust and who is focused on truly breaking the cycle of crime,' Ginny Andersen said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store