
States take the reins on insurance reform
Presented by
Driving The Day
STATE CRACKDOWN — Congressional lawmakers have tried and failed several times to push through a bipartisan, health-industry-backed bill that would speed up health insurers' prior authorization processes for certain prescription drugs and medical services. Congress will launch another attempt this year, but a growing number of blue and red states have taken the matter into their own hands.
In 2024, at least 10 states passed laws to reform the prior authorization process, according to a report from the American Medical Association. Insurers use prior authorization to control costs.
The state action continues to increase in 2025. Within the past few months, states including California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Iowa, New Jersey, North Carolina and North Dakota have either proposed or enacted reforms aimed at simplifying and streamlining prior authorization. And other states, including Illinois, Georgia, Texas, Rhode Island, Minnesota and Florida, have proposed cracking down on the use of artificial intelligence in prior authorization decisions.
Why it matters: The uptick in state prior authorization reforms comes as health insurers have come under intense public and congressional scrutiny over how often they deny care, especially in the wake of the fatal shooting of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in December. The use of AI to deny care has also put insurers in the hot seat, with UnitedHealth Group facing a lawsuit over allegations that it used AI to wrongfully deny care to Medicare Advantage patients.
The state reforms also come amid a lack of congressional action on the issue, despite widespread bipartisan and industry support for reforming the prior authorization process, which can sometimes be slow and administratively burdensome — impeding patients' access to necessary medical care.
Even so: State power to regulate prior authorization is limited. While states have considerable authority over insurance companies operating within their markets, the federal government has jurisdiction over self-insured employer health plans and Medicare Advantage plans.
'State action is important, but it's not complete without federal action in some ways, because it's a federal requirement for employers, for self-insured and for Medicare Advantage plans, that state activity is not going to touch them,' said Kaye Pestaina, director of KFF's Program on Patient and Consumer Protections.
Background: Last week, bipartisan lawmakers in the House and the Senate reintroduced the Improving Seniors' Timely Access to Care Act — a bill that would streamline prior authorization for older adults enrolled in Medicare Advantage. Despite widespread support from lawmakers, providers, doctors and insurers — and estimated to cost $0 by the last Congress — the repeatedly introduced bill has yet to pass.
WELCOME TO WEDNESDAY PULSE. A new study found that teens living in areas with more access to cannabis retailers face significantly higher rates of mental health issues. Send your tips, scoops and feedback to khooper@politico.com and ccirruzzo@politico.com, and follow along @Kelhoops and @ChelseaCirruzzo.
At the Agencies
A THREAT TO MEDICAL JOURNALS — HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is escalating his war on institutions he says are influenced by pharmaceutical companies, Chelsea reports.
On Tuesday, Kennedy, speaking on the 'Ultimate Human' podcast — a show hosted by a longevity expert that focuses on optimizing health — threatened to stop government scientists from publishing their work in major medical journals, including The New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA and The Lancet. He said the influential medical journals are 'corrupt' and publish studies that pharmaceutical companies fund and approve.
'Unless those journals change dramatically, we are going to stop NIH scientists from publishing in them, and we're going to create our own journals in-house,' he said. NIH is the world's largest funder of health research.
Key context: Kennedy's comments come days after his Make America Healthy Again Commission released a report saying overprescribed medications could be driving a rise in chronic disease in children, suggesting the pharmaceutical industry has an outsize influence on doctors and scientists. It also comes after both JAMA and NEJM received letters from the Department of Justice probing them for partisanship.
A JAMA spokesperson said the journal had nothing to add when asked about Kennedy's remarks, while NEJM and The Lancet did not respond to requests for comment. HHS also did not respond to requests for comment.
Even so: Kennedy's stance conflicts with that of his NIH director, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, who recently told a reporter with POLITICO sister publication WELT that he supports academic freedom, which 'means I can send my paper out even if my bosses disagree with me.'
UPPING STATE OVERSIGHT — The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services is warning states against using federal dollars to pay for the health care of undocumented immigrants.
In a Tuesday letter, the agency notified states it's ramping up financial oversight of state Medicaid expenditures to comply with President Donald Trump's executive order on 'Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Open Borders.' The increased oversight includes 'focused reviews' of certain state spending reports and in-depth reviews of state financial management systems. The agency will also review eligibility rules in federal regulations and 'be proposing revisions as may be necessary.'
'Medicaid is not, and cannot be, a backdoor pathway to subsidize open borders,' said CMS Administrator Mehmet Oz in a news release. 'States have a duty to uphold the law and protect taxpayer funds. We are putting them on notice — CMS will not allow federal dollars to be diverted to cover those who are not lawfully eligible.'
Key context: Undocumented immigrants are generally not eligible for Medicaid, though some states have used state-only funds to expand coverage to noncitizens.
The increased oversight from CMS comes as Republicans' 'big, beautiful bill,' which passed the House, includes a provision that would penalize states that have expanded Medicaid coverage to undocumented immigrants by reducing the federal matching rate for the Medicaid expansion population for those states.
Vaccines
CDC'S COVID VAX CHANGE — The CDC no longer recommends that 'healthy' children and pregnant women receive the Covid-19 vaccine, a controversial change that's perplexed some public health experts, POLITICO's Sophie Gardner and David Lim report.
On Tuesday, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced the guidance change in a post on social media platform X, saying 'it's common sense and it's good science.'
'We're now one step closer to realizing President Trump's promise to make America healthy again,' Kennedy said in a video, standing beside FDA Commissioner Marty Makary and NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya. Kennedy cited 'a lack of any clinical data to support the repeat booster strategy in children.'
Background: The CDC had recommended the vaccine for everyone at least 6 months old. Kennedy has long maintained that Covid vaccines aren't safe, despite the medical consensus that they are.
Most Americans have stopped getting Covid vaccines. The most recent CDC data says about 1 in 8 children under 18 have received the latest shot, while fewer than 1 in 4 adults ages 18 and older have.
Key context: The change bucks the CDC's precedent for updating vaccine recommendations, which typically takes place after a panel of experts votes on proposed changes.
'I'm disturbed for a couple reasons,' said Dr. Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association, which represents public health workers. 'I don't believe that they followed the normal process whereby you bring the advisory committees into this decision.'
Other experts raised concerns about the public health implications of the decision.
'I'm perplexed by this decision,' said Mark Turrentine, an OB-GYN and professor at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston. 'A lot of pregnant people died of Covid, especially during the Delta wave. And we know Covid still hasn't gone away. And we know pregnant people are a high-risk group. And we have a lot of data that the vaccine provides strong protection for both the mother and the baby.'
WHAT WE'RE READING
POLITICO's Victor Goury-Laffont reports on France advancing an assisted-dying bill in a historic vote.
STAT's Jason Mast reports on what one child's success story means for the CRISPR gene-editing industry.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pa. Democrats call on GOP to oppose Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' as state budget season starts
State Rep. Malcolm Kenyatta (D-Philadelphia) decried the "Big, Beautiful Bill" during a press conference outside Pennsylvania Capitol. (Capital-Star photo by Vincent DiFonzo) Pennsylvania Democrats stood on the Capitol steps in Harrisburg Monday and called on Republicans to oppose cuts to entitlement programs that are working their way through Congress. 'They don't want to talk about this massive negative impact it's going to have on the quality of life of so many Pennsylvanians,' Senate Minority Leader Jay Costa (D-Allegheny), said. 'It's not too late for them to join us, to be part of the discussion that says 'no.'' The proposed federal spending cuts are part of what Republicans call their 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' a budget reconciliation package that includes much of President Donald Trump's agenda. The bill has already passed the and can pass the U.S. Senate with a simple majority vote, which Republicans can muster without Democratic support. The bill would renew Trump's 2017 tax cuts that are set to expire and increase funding for immigration enforcement. To offset the costs, it includes dramatic spending cuts, especially to entitlement programs. Though the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found it could add $3.8 trillion to the deficit over the next 10 years. Democrats in Harrisburg say the bill's spending cuts will have dramatic impacts in Pennsylvania. They've warned it could result in hundreds of thousands of Pennsylvanians losing Medicaid coverage, and tens of thousands losing access to food assistance programs like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The state, they say, does not have the funds to make up for that. Sen. Vincent Hughes (D-Philadelphia), the minority chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, said there is little room to make up for potential federal cuts with state funding. 'Knowing the state budget the way I know it, we know that we have no capacity to backfill any of those cuts,' he told the Capital-Star. According to the left-leaning think tank Pennsylvania Policy Center, the bill includes roughly $600 billion in cuts to Medicaid spending over 10 years, and would institute new work requirements for people covered through the program. They say the result could mean more than half a million Pennsylvanians would lose health care. Currently, around 23% of Pennsylvanians, or around 3 million people, are covered by Medicaid, according to the state Department of Human Services. Rep. Arvind Venkat, (D-Allegheny), who is also an emergency physician,said before the Affordable Care Act expanded Medicaid, 20% of his patients didn't have health insurance. 'They would come into the emergency department too late for me to treat them, and that is a real thing,' he said. The reason some gave him was the fear of medical debt that they'd accumulate because they were uninsured. He worries that will happen again if more people lose insurance 'We need to call out the cynicism from our Republican colleagues in Congress. On the one hand they're saying they don't want to take coverage from anybody,' Venkat said. 'But then they're happy to brag that they're going to save $1.7 trillion in decreased federal funding. And the only way that happens is if people lose insurance or stop seeking healthcare when they need it.' The bill's Republican defenders say that the cuts are the result of eliminating fraud and waste, and will ultimately reduce spending to help bring a ballooning budget back in line. Republican Sen. Dave McCormick did not respond to questions from the Capital-Star, but addressed the bill at a televised debate with Democratic Sen. John Fetterman Monday morning. He said entitlement spending has been on the rise, and attributed that to an uptick of claims by people for whom benefits were never intended. 'Those are working-age men without dependents, and those are illegal immigrants in a number of cases,' McCormick said. 'So what I'm arguing for is that we need to cut out the use of those programs … by people for whom they weren't designed.' The reconciliation bill would also cut SNAP spending by nearly $300 billion, according to the Pennsylvania Policy Center, by reducing the federal government's share of spending. It would also expand work requirements. As it stands, parents raising dependent children under 18 are not required to meet them, but the bill would lower the age of qualifying dependents to 7. People 55 and older are also not required to meet work requirements, but the bill would change that to 65 and up. Pennsylvania Department of Human Services Secretary Val Arkoosh has warned that 140,000 Pennsylvanians could lose access to the food assistance program with the changes to work requirements. According to the Department's most recent data, in 2023, around 2 million Pennsylvanians received SNAP benefits every month. 'This bill would be the largest cut ever to food assistance in U.S. history,' Costa said. He added that the bill could mean cuts to the Farmers Market Nutrition Program, which pays farmers to provide fresh food for seniors and people who receive Women, Infants and Children (WIC) nutritional assistance programs. Rep. Malcolm Kenyatta (D-Philadelphia), the vice chair of the Democratic National Committee, called on Republicans to join his party in opposition. 'I think we have an opportunity to stop this, but the problem is it's only Democrats out here,' he said. Spokespeople for Senate Majority Leader Joe Pittman (R-Indiana) and Senate President Pro Tempore Kim Ward (R-Westmoreland) did not respond to questions from the Capital-Star. As it stands, the U.S. Senate is likely to make changes to the bill before returning it to the House. A number of Senate Republicans have raised concerns over how much the bill could add to the deficit. Populist Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Missouri) raised concerns about cuts to Medicaid, which he called 'morally wrong and political suicide.' Gov. Josh Shapiro also warned of a steep impact if the House version of the bill is passed. He said that it could impact not just patients, but hospitals that rely on Medicaid funds. 'We've got 25 rural hospitals that right now are operating on a deficit that likely would have to shutter if these Medicaid cuts go in effect,' Shapiro said at a press conference Monday morning in Harrisburg. 'It is certainly my hope that our federal representatives wouldn't vote for something that takes something away from Pennsylvania students or Pennsylvania seniors and everybody in between,' he added.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Pedro Pascal, Dua Lipa, Daniel Radcliffe among celebs calling on Trump to preserve funding for LGBTQ suicide hotline
More than 100 celebrities across the entertainment industry are calling on President Trump's administration to protect an LGBTQ youth crisis service's funding amid broader spending cuts. An internal budget document first reported by The Washington Post would eliminate specialized services for LGBTQ youth who contact 988, the National Suicide and Crisis Lifeline, a proposal that would have 'devastating, life-threatening consequences for young people across the country,' reads an open letter organized and published Monday by the Trevor Project, a nonprofit group that responds to roughly half of 988's calls and texts from LGBTQ youth. 'As artists, creators, and public figures, our platforms come with responsibility. And today, that responsibility is clear: we must speak out to protect the mental health and lives of LGBTQ+ youth. We will not stay silent,' states the letter, with signatures from actors Pedro Pascal, Daniel Radcliffe, Margaret Cho and Sarah Paulson. Musicians, including Ariana Grande, Sabrina Carpenter, Diplo and Dua Lipa also signed, alongside notable figures including influencer Dylan Mulvaney, celebrity chef Amanda Freitag and Carl Nassib, a former defensive lineman and the first NFL player to publicly come out as gay. 'This is about people, not politics,' the letter states. 'At a time of deep division, let this be something we as people can all agree on: no young person should be left without help in their darkest moment. Stripping away this lifeline leaves LGBTQ+ youth with the message that their lives are not worth saving. We refuse to accept that message. We call on the administration and Congress to do the right thing: restore and protect funding for the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline's LGBTQ+ Youth Specialized Services in the Fiscal Year 2026 budget.' 'We rise together — loudly and determined — for hope, for dignity, and for every LGBTQ+ young person to know that their lives are worthy and that there will always be someone on the other end of the line,' the letter states. The White House did not immediately return a request for comment. The service for LGBTQ youth has received nearly 1.3 million calls, texts and online chat messages since its launch in 2022, according to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). In February, the program received an average of 2,100 crisis contacts daily. More than 100 House Democrats — and two Republicans, in a separate letter — have also urged the Trump administration to spare 988's specialized services for LGBTQ youth from funding cuts, arguing that such a move would have 'lethal consequences if enacted.' The proposed cuts, which need approval from Congress, would not take effect until October. Trump signed the bipartisan National Suicide Hotline Designation Act in October 2020, and the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline officially launched in 2022 under former President Biden's administration. Congress increased funding for the hotline's LGBTQ youth specialized services last year on a bipartisan basis. 'I am deeply grateful to the influential voices in entertainment who are speaking out and reminding the public that suicide prevention is about people – not politics,' Jaymes Black, the Trevor Project's CEO, said in a statement on Monday. 'LGBTQ+ young people disproportionately experience rejection, stigma, and discrimination, and are navigating a world that too often tells them they don't belong. We must send a louder message back: millions of people are fighting for you to lead the happy, healthy lives you deserve,' Black said. A report released by the group last year found that 39 percent of LGBTQ 13- to 24-year-olds in the U.S. considered suicide over the past year, including 46 percent of transgender and nonbinary youth. Half of LGBTQ young people who wanted mental health care said they were unable to access it. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Kshama Sawant, a Seattle socialist, to challenge veteran WA Democratic congressman
Kshama Sawant, the socialist who served on the Seattle City Council until last year, launched a campaign for Congress on Monday. Above, she is speaking at a rally in Seattle in 2017. (Photo by) Kshama Sawant, the socialist who served a decade on the Seattle City Council, launched a 'working-class, antiwar, anti-genocide' campaign Monday to unseat incumbent Democratic U.S. Rep. Adam Smith in the 2026 election. At her campaign kick-off in Seattle, Sawant called for a $25 an hour minimum wage, universal health care and a halt in U.S. military aid to Israel for its ongoing offensive against Hamas. Sawant did not seek re-election in 2023 as she established Workers Strike Back, an activist group focused on pro-labor causes and other issues. The Seattle resident vowed, if elected, to 'flip the script on how to use elected office' as she did as a city leader from 2014 to 2024. 'My socialist city council office went to war for working people to defeat the strenuous opposition from both big business and the Democratic Party,' she said in a statement. 'Our experience in Seattle shows that we can defeat the rich and their political servants.' Sawant filed as an independent with the Federal Election Commission. Smith, who's served in the U.S. House since 1997, said Sawant's candidacy will offer voters 'a clear contrast.' 'Her record on the Seattle City Council is defined by extreme, divisive tactics and policies that left lasting harm,' he said in a statement. The war in Gaza will be a major issue in the campaign. Sawant hit hard Monday, saying that because the Democrats and Republican parties have backed U.S. support of Israel 'to the hilt,' they both are 'responsible for what is in reality a new holocaust' in which thousands have died and Gaza has been reduced to rubble. Smith, the ranking Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, has 'blood on his hands' for fully endorsing the policies, she said. He, in turn, said Sawant bears responsibility for Republican Donald Trump winning the presidency because she actively campaigned against former Vice President Kamala Harris' bid for the office, undermining Democratic efforts to defeat Trump. 'I have constantly fought against Donald Trump and the devastating policies he is forcing on the American people,' Smith said. The two will duel to represent the 9th Congressional District, which encompasses parts of Seattle and Bellevue as well as the south King County communities of Renton, Tukwila, Kent, Des Moines and Federal Way. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX