Skills training overhaul risks the same old pitfalls
Opinion: The coalition Government appears determined to dismantle many policies introduced by the previous Labour government – particularly those impacting workers. The latest example is the Education and Training (Vocational Education and Training System) Amendment Bill introduced earlier this week.
To understand its potential impact, and its pitfalls, it's instructive to look back at former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair's New Labour reforms two decades ago, which ultimately failed to deliver lasting benefits for workers or the economy.
Blair's New Labour and the New Deal
In 1998, Tony Blair's government launched the New Deal initiatives in the UK, promising to revitalise skills and foster economic growth through a more responsive, industry-led approach to vocational training. The policies emphasised expanding micro-credentials, creating flexible pathways, and strengthening employer partnerships. But, despite the lofty rhetoric, they ultimately failed to deliver genuine benefits for workers or the broader economy.
The focus on expanding qualifications often led to credential inflation – the devaluation of educational credentials over time – where micro-credentials proliferated without clear links to improved wages or job quality. Labour market demand was not adequately addressed, and many workers found themselves with qualifications that did not translate into better employment outcomes.
Key changes in the New Zealand bill
The Government's bill proposes a significant overhaul of the existing system within the next two years. Key elements include:
shifting away from the centralised Te Pūkenga model toward a more regional, industry-led structure
establishing a Federation of Polytechnics, with 'anchor polytechnics' for shared services
creating industry skills boards, which will set skill standards, oversee assessments, advise on funding, and initially manage work-based training before shifting this to polytechnics and private providers
potentially introducing industry levies to fund workforce initiatives
Tertiary Education Commission and New Zealand Qualifications Authority oversight, with ministerial intervention, if needed.
The overarching goal is to make vocational education more responsive to local and industry needs, fostering regional decision making and greater industry involvement.
On the surface, these reforms aim to address longstanding criticisms of a centralised, one-size-fits-all approach to vocational education. By decentralising control and involving regional and industry voices, the Government hopes to create a more responsive and locally relevant system. Yet, history suggests that without tackling deeper structural issues – worker power, funding, and real demand – these reforms risk superficiality.
Without addressing the fundamental issues of labour market demand and worker empowerment, the reforms could be little more than a reshuffling of titles and structures.
There are three main problems with the Government's approach.
Over-reliance on qualifications as a proxy for skills and power
The UK's experience under Blair revealed that expanding qualifications without addressing underlying labour market issues can lead to credential inflation – more micro-credentials that do little to improve actual skills or economic power. Expanding micro-credentials and qualifications failed to translate into improved wages or job quality.
New Zealand's focus on micro-credentials and industry standards may also lead to credential inflation if not carefully managed. It also risks devaluing genuine skills if these credentials do not align with actual labour market needs. Qualifications should be meaningful indicators of capability, not just boxes to tick.
2. Neglect of labour market demand and structural conditions
New Labour's reforms emphasised basic skills but failed to tackle sector-specific shortages or improve employment quality. New Zealand's reforms aim to be more locally responsive but must ensure they are rooted in real labour market demand. Otherwise, there's a danger of creating a qualifications system full of micro-credentials that don't translate into better jobs or wages.
3. Failure to acknowledge power dynamics and role of collective action
The Blair government's policies largely overlooked the importance of workplace power and collective bargaining. Unless reforms here strengthen workers' voices and collective bargaining beyond industry-led boards, gains in skills may not lead to improved wages or conditions.
There is also the elephant in the room: funding shortfalls. Chronic underfunding is a persistent obstacle in upgrading vocational training. Without adequate investment – covering modern facilities, fair pay for trainers and educators, and accessible programmes – these reforms are unlikely to succeed. Underfunding undermines quality and relevance, resulting in a system that's more about appearances than genuine transformation.
Lessons we need to learn
The UK's experience demonstrates that simply expanding micro-credentials and decentralising governance is insufficient. Without prioritising meaningful employment outcomes, empowering workers through collective voice, and, critically, sustained investment, such reforms risk worsening credential inflation and delivering only superficial progress.
To truly reform vocational education, policymakers must invest strategically, align training with labour market needs, and strengthen worker representation. However, even well-designed policies will fail without adequate funding, leaving a system that looks good on paper but delivers little in practice. Lasting change depends on structural reforms, long-term investment, and genuine worker empowerment to create a vocational education system that benefits both workers and the economy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
an hour ago
- Newsroom
New Zealand's invisible children
When Helen Clark's Labour government brought in a law that would create waves of undocumented children, even the immigration experts had no idea of the impact it would have on thousands of lives. The 2006 Citizenship Amendment Act ended automatic citizenship for children born here to overstayers or parents with temporary visas. It was also supported by the National Party. Immigration lawyer Alastair McClymont has been working in the sector for more than 25 years but only recently discovered the fallout from the law. 'It never really occurred to me that this would actually be a problem,' he says. 'It was only really when these children started coming forward that I thought 'This is really unusual, I wonder how many other children are in this sort of situation'. 'It is only recent because these children are now finishing high school and realising that their life has now come to an end, they don't have any options as to what to do.' They are called 'the invisible children', says RNZ immigration reporter Gill Bonnett. They are mainly children of overstayers or temporary visa holders from Pacific countries, India or China. She's known about them for many years but they have been hidden or protected by their parents and communities. 'These people don't want to come forward because they are scared about the consequences of doing so and they don't want to speak up either in the media or necessarily don't want to put their case in front of immigration officials in case it means that they or their parents get deported.' The case of Daman Kumar brought the issue to light, she says, when he bravely spoke to RNZ Asia reporter Blessen Tom two years ago. At the time, the teenager's voice was disguised and he went unnamed for fear he would be deported to India, along with his parents. This year he hit the headlines and his identity was revealed when he was on the verge of deportation. 'He'd been able to go to school okay but when it came to thinking about university or work he realised that he had nowhere to go,' says Bonnett. To further complicate the matter, Kumar's sister was unaffected because she was born before the 2006 law, meaning she is legally a New Zealand citizen. And it is not unique to the Kumar family, Bonnett says. She explains to The Detail what was happening in New Zealand when the law was brought in, including the sense of moral panic. At the time Helen Clark said she was concerned about incidents of people flying to New Zealand for a short time and having babies here to ensure they gained passports, known as 'birth tourism'. Clark said the government would be silly not to look at this, given what other countries were doing. 'They call it the 'anchor babies',' says Bonnett. 'The idea that if your child had citizenship that later on in life you might be able to get citizenship yourself or that you would just be bestowing good privileges on them for later on.' She says there were concerns on both sides of the ledger at the time: one side about birth tourism, where a child born on New Zealand soil would automatically get citizenship, and on the other side concerns about children who had lived here all their lives but didn't have citizenship. It is not clear how many children are undocumented, but McClymont says it could be thousands and the number will keep growing. 'Every year now more and more children are going to be coming out of high school and realising that they can't study, they can't go and get jobs because it would be a breach of the law for employers to employ someone who's here unlawfully. So they can't work, they can't study, they can't travel, they just simply cannot do anything.' McClymont says he has not had a satisfactory response from the Government to his suggestion that New Zealand follow Australia and Britain by giving children birthright citizenship after 10 years of habitual residence. 'Really, it's hard to see what the justification is for punishing these children. Nobody is making the argument that these children have done something wrong and that they deserve to be punished. 'The only potential argument is that these children are being punished as a deterrent for others against having children here in New Zealand,' he says. 'It's just unfathomable as a society that we can actually do this to children and use them for this purpose. There doesn't seem to be any moral justification whatsoever for treating them so badly.' Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here. You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.
The Spinoff
2 hours ago
- The Spinoff
Ruth Richardson's state honour is a slap in the face for the poor
The architect of 1991's 'mother of all budgets', who was made a Companion of the New Zealand Order of Merit in the King's Birthday honours this week, did immense damage to the country's poorest and most vulnerable, writes Max Rashbrooke. In the early 1990s, two Porirua preschoolers burned to death when their state house was set alight by a candle their family had begun using after the power was cut off. They had been forced to this extremity by a National government that, obsessed by 'market forces', had decided to remove their housing subsidy and require them to pay market rents instead. This sharp rise in costs had left them unable to pay their power bill; hence the candle. Labour MP Graham Kelly caused an uproar in parliament when he attributed these deaths to National's policies – but even allowing for imponderable factors, like whether a candle falls over or not, he was in the broadest sense right. Policies that target the poor always have consequences in the end. And no one targeted the poor harder than Ruth Richardson, who on Monday was made a Companion to the New Zealand Order of Merit. Alongside the market-rent reforms, Richardson is most notorious for the 1991 'mother of all budgets', which cut the benefits of some of the poorest and most vulnerable New Zealanders by up to one-quarter. In a move familiar throughout history, she decided that the burden of tackling New Zealand's (admittedly severe) budget deficit was to fall disproportionately on the poor, rather than those better able to bear it. The result was immediate: a doubling of the number of those living in the most extreme poverty – that is, on less than 40% of the typical income – from 4% in 1990 to 8% two years later. Most policies are much slower to show their effects; Richardson is among a select few who can claim to have doubled poverty overnight. The effects of this stark rise, quite apart from the pain and misery inflicted on families, have spread right throughout New Zealand. Food banks used to be virtually unknown in this country; in the 1990s they became commonplace. Unable to afford to heat their homes, or indeed pay the rent, multiple families began living under one roof, enduring the cold or huddling together for warmth. Mould and damp proliferated. Diseases like rheumatic fever, long since eliminated in other developed nations, flourished in these conditions, wrecking childhoods and ending lives prematurely. A sharp uptick in the hospitalisations of children for medical conditions – from 50 per 1,000 to 70 per 1,000 – began in 1992, just after Richardson's budget. While she was not, of course, the sole author of these misfortunes, she undoubtedly wrote much of the script. Child poverty leaves scars that later affluence never really erases. Children born into hardship have, in adulthood, twice the rate of heart conditions of those born into wealth. They also have far lower reading scores and educational results. Quite apart from being devastating in their own right, these deficits create colossal financial costs: the annual bill from child poverty in this country is estimated at anywhere between $12 billion and $21 billion. This is particularly ironic because Richardson's legacy on the right is one of financial rectitude: she is seen, in particular, as the author of the 1994 Fiscal Responsibility Act, which aimed to improve the transparency and long-term management of the government's accounts. But not only is this relatively small beer compared to the appalling damage poverty inflicts on people's lives, the long-term economic costs of increased hardship are an example of massive financial irresponsibility. Not that Richardson has ever been able to acknowledge as much. Interviewed by the academic Andrew Dean a decade ago, she denied her policies had resulted in any wider harm: 'Over time, was there a social cost? No, there was a social benefit.' That, then, is the person the New Zealand state decided to honour this week: someone who not only did immense damage to the country's poorest but is also quite disconnected from the realities of that harm. The puzzle is less – as some commentators suggested – that it took so long for her to be recognised, but rather that she has been recognised at all. Maybe, though, we should not be surprised. Over in the UK, a similar strategy of slashing government budgets and benefit payments took place under the Conservatives between 2010 and 2024. This austerity cut access to the social services on which ordinary people rely, reduced ambulance services, and sparked poverty-related 'deaths of despair'. All up, it is conservatively estimated by researchers to have caused 190,000 preventable deaths. The man most responsible for this social devastation, former chancellor George Osborne, nonetheless occupies a gilded position in British life, having moved smoothly into editing the Evening Standard newspaper and pontificating on global politics. Inflicting misery on the poor is, in short, socially acceptable as long as it is clothed in the classic establishment rhetoric of taking 'difficult' choices, 'balancing' the books and fiscal 'responsibility'. The poor may be, as the Christians say, always with us, but that does not guarantee that their lives will ever be accorded the proper respect.
Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Momona cheese makes judges smile
Cheeses on display at the Otago A and P Society winter show, in Dunedin. — Otago Witness, 9.6.1925 Ponga frond claim staked The Otago Winter Show was continued yesterday, and there was a good attendance throughout the day and evening. Yesterday's admission takings amounted to £342. The Taieri and Peninsula Milk Supply Company offered a challenge cup, valued at 15 guineas, for a cheese grading competition, open to bona fide cheese-factory managers. The cheese was graded by Government officials, and the particulars of points allocated lodged with the secretary. The cup was awarded to the competitor whose grading card was the nearest to the points allocated by the Government graders. On this occasion J.G. Wilson, third assistant at Momona Dairy Factory, won with 98 points. Wellington, June 4: At a meeting of the New Zealand Football Association to-night the Secretary reported that he had written to the New Zealand Rugby Union stating: "The association has no desire to use the title 'All Blacks,' and considers that as you represent the original holders of such a title you should now have the role right to use it. My council does, however, feel that the fern leaf, being the national emblem of New Zealand, should be worn by any person or persons representing New Zealand bodies in any field of sport. The uniform is a black jersey with a silver fern leaf, white knickers, black stockings, and black cap with a silver fern leaf. Our colours, black or white, have been in use for 30 years, and we contend we are entitled to use them for all time." Intermediates explained Mr J. Caughley, Director of Education, addressed members of the School Committees' Association last evening on the subject of Junior High Schools. There was no English-speaking country that had not adopted the principle that primary education should finish at 12 years and higher education commence at 12 and proceed onwards; it was remarkable that New Zealand was the last to adopt this principle. At about the age of 12 boys and girls were entering upon that period which was described as adolescence. They were becoming youths and maidens. . Boys and girls at about that age should be learning the elements of the subject they were going to take up later on. To those taught in their teens it became tedious, whereas taken at an earlier age it became easier and more agreeable. We should not wait till 13 or 14 years of age before commencing. It was too great a jump to tackle all at once. The junior high school would mean that the primary school course would end at about the Fourth Standard. Three schools in Auckland had had their Fifth Standards cut off to form the Kowhai School, and the head masters had reported that the work in the First, Second, Third, and Fourth Standards had never been better. The remaining pupils were getting just as good education as ever. This form of high school had been such a success that there had been pressure to secure more. There was a junior high school at Matamata now. Instead of having 60 pupils with two teachers the school how had 180 pupils from nine adjacent schools with five teachers. That school was working very satisfactorily. At Northcote there was a system with only three schools. In the smaller country districts he did not see how the scheme could be carried out, but there were places in Otago whore there could be a type of junior high school if arrangement could be made for collecting the children. — ODT, 5.6.1925 Compiled by Peter Dowden
