Judge rules that some Texas schools don't have to display Ten Commandments in classrooms
The colorful 55-page opinion issued Wednesday by US District Judge Fred Biery is the latest court victory in a series of legal challenges to laws that have been enacted in three southern states over the last year that require public schools to display the Ten Commandments.
'Even though the Ten Commandments would not be affirmatively taught, the captive audience of students likely would have questions, which teachers would feel compelled to answer. That is what they do,' Biery wrote.
The judge – who was appointed by Bill Clinton – skewered the controversial law, known as S.B. 10, concluding that it's likely unconstitutional and cannot be enforced in several Texas school districts, including ones in Houston, Austin and Fort Bend County.
'Teenage boys, being the curious hormonally driven creatures they are, might ask: 'Mrs. Walker, I know about lying and I love my parents, but how do I do adultery?'' Biery added. 'Truly an awkward moment for overworked and underpaid educators, who already have to deal with sex education issues, … and a classic example of the law of unintended consequences in legislative edicts.'
The judge ended his opinion by writing, 'For those who disagree with the Court's decision and who would do so with threats, vulgarities and violence, Grace and Peace unto you. May humankind of all faiths, beliefs and non-beliefs be reconciled one to another. Amen.'
More than a dozen Texas families of various faiths sued over the state's law – which was signed by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott in June and is set to take effect statewide starting next month – arguing it violates the First Amendment's Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause.
Biery agreed.
The law, he said, 'impermissibly takes sides on theological questions and officially favors Christian denominations over others.'
The Texas law requires public schools to post in classrooms a 16-by-20-inch (41-by-51-centimeter) poster or framed copy of a specific English version of the commandments, even though translations and interpretations vary across denominations, faiths and languages and may differ in homes and houses of worship.
Similar laws were enacted this year and last year in Arkansas and Louisiana. Court challenges to those measures have also resulted in favorable rulings. Legal experts have said that it's likely the cases will eventually be appealed to the US Supreme Court.
Attorneys for the families behind the Texas case cast Biery's ruling as a strong rejection of state lawmakers' push to impose their religious preferences on to public school students in the Lone Star State.
'Today's ruling is a major win that protects the constitutional right to religious freedom for Texas families of all backgrounds,' said Tommy Buser-Clancy, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union. 'The court affirmed what we have long said: Public schools are for educating, not evangelizing.'
CNN has reached out to Abbott's office and the Texas attorney general's office for comment on the ruling.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
California Democrats pass Newsom's redistricting plan
California's Democrat-controlled legislature on Thursday formally approved a plan to redraw the state's congressional lines, teeing up a special election this fall that will let Californians weigh in on mid-decade redistricting in response to a plan pushed by Texas Republicans. Both the state Assembly and Senate approved three pieces of the 'Election Rigging Response Act' legislative package, which include a proposed constitutional amendment and two separate bills that lay out the logistics for the special election and map proposal. Those bills now head to Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) desk for approval. Democrats in the Golden State have been racing against the clock to get the package through by Friday in order to set up a Nov. 4 special election. Unlike in Texas, where the GOP-controlled legislature and the governor's approval will be enough to make the Lone Star State maps official, California ultimately has to put the question before voters. Californians will be asked to greenlight plan that could give Democrats five additional House seats, effectively cancelling out the five would-be Republican gains in Texas, by going around the state's independent redistricting commission until the end of the decade. 'This proposal would give Californians a choice to fight back — and bring much needed accountability and oversight to the Trump Administration,' Newsom said in a statement this week. Newsom has pitched the plan as a way to 'fight fire with fire' after President Trump pushed Texas to find five new GOP seats. He's also underscored that the plan would be temporary, reverting back to the independent commission's regular post-census redistricting schedule after the 2030 cycle. Republicans, on the other hand, argue that the plan goes against the will of the voters, who approved the commission in 2008 and 2010. During hours of proceedings on Thursday, they also raised questions about who drew the maps and concerns about the cost of a special election. California GOP legislators earlier this week filed suit with a petition asking the state Supreme Court to block action on the legislation, arguing that the sprint to vote on the legislation package violated the state constitution. The state court rejected that petition on Wednesday, allowing the efforts to move forward in the Legislature. California's plan comes after talk of new maps in Texas kicked off a national redistricting tit-for-tat in the run-up to next year's high-stakes midterms. Republicans hold a slim 219-212 majority in the House, and control of Congress could come down to just a few seats. The GOP currently controls just nine of California's 52 House slots. The Republican incumbents affected by the new map are Reps. Kevin Kiley (R), Doug LaMalfa (R), Darrell Issa (R), Ken Calvert (R) and David Valadao (R). Redistricting has also been floated in the red states of Ohio, Florida, Indiana and Missouri — and in Democratic strongholds such as Maryland and Illinois. Meanwhile, the Texas House advanced its redistricting plan on Wednesday. Now, both Houses have to reconcile the legislation before it kicks over to Gov. Greg Abbott (R) for approval.
Los Angeles Times
25 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump backs huge Arizona copper mine as Apache win late reprieve to halt it
President Trump this week threw his full support behind a massive project to turn a sacred Apache site outside Phoenix into one of the world's largest copper mines, meeting with mining executives at the White House and ridiculing a recent court decision that temporarily halted the transfer of federal lands to their companies. Trump and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum met in the White House on Tuesday with several executives from Rio Tinto and BHP, the two multinational mining companies behind the planned Resolution Copper mine. As proposed, the mine would turn Oak Flat — a long-preserved site of rocky outcroppings and desert waterways on the edge of the Tonto National Forest — into a nearly two-mile-wide, 1,000-foot-deep industrial crater. Trump also posted about the project on his Truth Social site, calling the three-judge U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals panel that blocked the transfer a 'Radical Left Court' and saying it was 'sad' that 'Radical Left Activists' could stall such a project. '3,800 Jobs are affected, and our Country, quite simply, needs Copper — AND NOW!' Trump wrote. He also wrote, without evidence, that those fighting the mine are 'Anti-American' and working on behalf of 'other Copper competitive Countries.' The San Carlos Apache Tribe, which is among the plaintiffs suing to block the mine, called the court's decision a 'last minute victory' in its ongoing battle to save the land. 'The Apache people will never stop fighting for Chí'chil Biłdagoteel,' tribe Chairman Terry Rambler said in a statement, using the traditional Apache name for Oak Flat. 'We thank the court for stopping this horrific land exchange and allowing us to argue the merits of our pending lawsuit in court.' Trump's decision to directly weigh in further elevates the already large profile of a monumental legal battle. It has aligned environmental activists and religious liberty proponents, and has major implications for the nation's ability to meet its rapidly growing demand for copper, which is an essential element in telecommunications networks, electric vehicles and other growing technologies. Oak Flat was federally protected land for decades. Members of the San Carlos Apache Tribe describe it as sacred land home to spiritual guardians akin to angels, and say it has been used for coming-of-age and other tribal ceremonies for generations. In 2004, prospectors discovered that one of the world's largest copper ore deposits, estimated to hold enough copper to supply up to a quarter of U.S. demand, sat somewhere between 5,000 and 7,000 feet below the surface. The battle to extract the deposit has raged ever since, but particularly since 2014, when former Arizona Republican Sens. John McCain and Jeff Flake inserted language mandating the land transfer into a last-minute defense appropriations bill. A lawsuit brought by the group Apache Stronghold and led by Apache elder Wendsler Nosie Sr. resulted in a split 9th Circuit ruling against the Apache and in favor of the mining companies in March 2024. In May, the Supreme Court declined to hear an Apache appeal of that decision, clearing the way for the U.S. Forest Service to issue a final environmental impact report and hear a last round of public comment before handing the land over to Resolution Copper. The decision marked a major loss to the mine opponents, but it did not end other lawsuits filed to stop it — including one filed by the San Carlos Apache Tribe, and another by a group called the Arizona Mining Reform Coalition. On Aug. 15, a district court judge in Arizona issued an order clearing the way for the land transfer to move forward on Tuesday. The groups appealed, and the three-judge 9th Circuit panel put the district court decision on hold Monday, pending its own hearing of arguments over the transfer — one of which is that the federal government bypassed a required step in the environmental review process. The panel — composed of two Clinton appointees and one Trump appointee — said it was not taking a position on the merits of those arguments, and would 'expedite' the case, with all briefs due by Oct. 14. The court's reprieve, if only temporary, was cheered by Apache groups and other organizations whose members use the Oak Flat land for rock climbing and other recreation. Some also spoke out against Trump's remarks, calling them anti-American. Rambler, the San Carlos tribe chairman, said the mine's opponents 'are working to save the U.S. from making a disastrous decision that would give up American resources to foreign interests,' and that Trump had been 'misinformed' to think otherwise by the mine's supporters. Rambler said BHP and Rio Tinto are foreign companies with ties to Chinese state-owned companies, and will be exporting the copper taken from Oak Flat — 'likely to China.' Rambler said he looks forward 'to sitting down with the administration and providing factual information to protect American assets.' Nosie, in a statement provided to the The Times, also accused Trump of siding with foreign interests over those of indigenous Americans. 'Our nation cannot survive if we sacrifice what is sacred in pursuit of temporary profits,' he said. He said the Apache people are grateful for all of the support they have received from people of all political stripes and religious backgrounds, who he said have recognized the fight for what it is — a 'moral one.' 'If we destroy our sacred land and poison our environment, we are betraying our children and grandchildren and hurting ourselves,' he said. 'The future of the entire human race is at stake.' A Resolution Copper spokesperson said they are confident the 9th Circuit will 'ultimately affirm' the district court's 'well-reasoned' ruling in favor of the land transfer. 'Over the past 11 years, the Resolution Copper project has undergone a rigorous, independent review under the National Environmental Policy Act, led by the U.S. Forest Service. This review has included extensive consultation with numerous Native American Tribes with ancestral ties to this land, local communities, civil society organizations, and a dozen federal, state, and county agencies,' the spokesperson said. 'The collaborative process has directly led to major changes to the mining plan to preserve and reduce potential impacts on Tribal, social, environmental, and cultural interests.' The spokesperson said the project has other local support and 'the potential to become one of America's biggest copper mines, contributing $1 billion annually to Arizona's economy and creating thousands of local jobs in a region where mining has played an important role for more than a century.' Tuesday's meeting at the White House included Trump and Burgum, as well as current Rio Tinto chief executive Jakob Stausholm, incoming Rio Tinto chief executive Simon Trott and BHP chief executive Mike Henry, as well as other White House officials. The Resolution Copper spokesperson said the discussion centered on 'the mining industry's capacity to deliver long-term domestic supplies of copper and other critical minerals' from the Oak Flat deposit.
Politico
26 minutes ago
- Politico
California Legislature moves forward with gerrymander to counter Texas
'This bill gives voters a choice — a choice to keep the current districts or adopt maps to counter the actions of MAGA extremists in Texas who are obediently working to tip the scales for President Trump,' California Senate Majority Leader Lena Gonzalez said. Texas' House approved a Republican-favoring gerrymander Wednesday, and its state Senate is expected to send the new map to Gov. Greg Abbott on Thursday evening for his promised signature. Unlike in California, Texas legislators can redraw maps mid-decade without voter approval. California Democrats previously planned to pass a map that would take effect only if Texas acts. But on Thursday morning, they removed that contingency, arguing it was nearly inevitable that Texas would move forward and that voters could be confused by the trigger. The new maps for both states are the first blows in what could amount to a nationwide redistricting war between the two parties, whose leaders are pushing to reshuffle the national congressional map to boost their odds of winning control of the House in 2026. Republicans are hoping Indiana, Missouri and Florida draw new Republican-majority seats, while Ohio's legally mandated redraw will likely create new GOP-leaning congressional districts. Democrats have few opportunities to match Republican efforts beyond Newsom's ballot measure. California Republicans have promised state and federal lawsuits aimed at preventing the measure from going before voters in November. But their first attempt to blunt Democrats' efforts was tossed out by the California Supreme Court on Wednesday. Famous figures from the state party's past including former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy and former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger are gearing up for an intense campaign this fall. 'We're going to do everything we can to stop this Gavinmander from moving forward,' California Assembly Republican leader James Gallagher told reporters. Aaron Pellish contributed to this report.
