logo
A $3,710 Elk Tag? Utah Set to Double Hunting Fees for Nonresidents

A $3,710 Elk Tag? Utah Set to Double Hunting Fees for Nonresidents

Yahoo20-03-2025

In the last few years many states, particularly in the West, have been increasing fees for hunting license, tag, and application fees. No matter how long it's been since your state saw a license fee increase, raising the cost of hunting fees is never popular among residents. But one strategy usually has overwhelming support: Require out-of-staters to shoulder the heftiest price increases.
Following this strategy, Utah plans to increase nonresident license fees by 100 percent this year, which will price many DIY hunters out of the state and — potentially — out of the application process.
Although Utah has already increased nonresident hunting fees several times in the last five years. In 2022 it raised prices for both residents and nonresidents. And in 2020, Utah raised the fees for nonresidents while resident fees remained in place from 2014. The Utah Department of Wildlife Resources is 92 percent self-funded and receives only limited funding from the state's General Fund, the agency reported that year.
The newest provisions are included in Senate Bill 8, a massive 263-page appropriations proposal that authorizes fee increases for all nonresident hunting and fishing licenses. SB8 already passed the state House and Senate, and if it's signed by Governor Spencer Cox, it'll go into effect this July.
Here's a look at the price difference for some key examples:
Fees for nonresident landowner mitigation hunts have also doubled, with a cow tag now slated to cost $700. You can find the rest of the fee increases in the bill on page 128.
Resident tags will remain unchanged. The language of the bill sets the below fees as the maximum amount the DWR can charge for a hunting license fee. So although the DWR could theoretically charge less than these amounts, it's unlikely.
While the fees are hefty for nonresidents, the hikes aren't nearly as extreme as what neighboring states have considered. (Earlier this year, Wyoming was considering quadrupling hunting license fees.) In general, nonresident deer licenses range from roughly five times the cost of a resident license, as in Pennsylvania, to as much as 28 times, as in Montana.
As we've reported previously, charging nonresident hunters half a grand for a deer tag, say, is a smart tradeoff for state agencies. If you're traveling out of state to hunt, your primary motivation is likely recreation rather than subsistence.
Read Next: How Much Should a Deer License Cost?
Nonresident hunters are also a minority customer base, so wildlife managers and lawmakers are more comfortable subjecting them to extreme price hikes and keeping resident hunters happy. And in states like Utah, where license fee increases must be approved by the legislature, politicians are more likely to put the squeeze on out-of-staters than their own constituents.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

As Cox advances nuclear agreements, he says the cost to develop technology is nothing so far
As Cox advances nuclear agreements, he says the cost to develop technology is nothing so far

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

As Cox advances nuclear agreements, he says the cost to develop technology is nothing so far

Gov. Spencer Cox answers questions from the media during his monthly PBS news conference in Salt Lake City on Tuesday, June 10, 2025. (Pool photo by Bethany Baker/The Salt Lake Tribune) When thinking about Utah's nuclear future, Gov. Spencer Cox said he wants people to think less of the giant nuclear plant where Homer Simpson works, and visualize more a picture of dozens of small modular reactors, stacking in the state over time. While many Utahns are still trying to wrap their heads around the idea Cox is envisioning, he has already signed a couple of memorandums of understanding with companies to help it materialize — and, he said, he wants to go big. On May 23, Cox joined the founder of Valar Atomics, a California nuclear developer, in announcing their partnership to meet President Donald Trump's goal to have an operational advanced reactor on American soil by July 4, 2026, at the San Rafael Energy Research Center in Emery County. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX On Monday, he signed another agreement with another company for the nuclear efforts, Cox said during his monthly news conference broadcast by PBS Utah. A plan for Utah nuclear energy industry's foundation is taking shape 'We're going to be working with all of these companies. We want to find the best technology. We're not betting on any one technology or any one company. That doesn't make sense,' Cox said on Tuesday. 'We're betting on the idea that there is going to be a nuclear renaissance.' While research shows that nuclear developments usually go for a hefty price tag, Cox said that currently the initial plans won't cost anything to the state, since the state already acquired the San Rafael Energy Lab during the 2024 legislative session and that will be one of the state's main contributions in the agreement. 'We're just providing space for these companies to come in and run their new technology there to see if it actually works,' Cox said. 'And so that's not going to cost us anything. The hope is it will save us down the road.' Lawmakers did agree to fund $10 million for Cox's Operation Gigawatt nuclear initiative; the governor said that money is for siting. Utah has also sought to ease the regulations to make nuclear energy production a reality. First by suing the federal government in January — then still under the Biden administration — over its strict rules to permit the resource. Then, by passing big legislation to set the foundation for the state's nuclear energy future. Glowing pains: Developing nuclear power could cost Utah tens of billions The U.S. is lagging behind countries like China in the development of nuclear plants, Cox said. Now, with a new White House administration prioritizing a quicker licensing process for nuclear reactors and ordering a plan to add 300 gigawatts of nuclear energy capacity in the country by 2050, Cox believes Utah can lead the way. 'The market will decide how big that is,' Cox said, 'government is not going to decide that, but we're going to present opportunities.' Other agreements happening across the state have centered around the construction of power-hungry data and AI centers. While Cox says he remains 'fairly agnostic' on them, he believes they'll be built in many areas of the country either way, drawing a substantial amount of energy from states' shared grid. 'Even if we didn't have a single data center here, we would still need to significantly increase our power production,' Cox said. 'If we're going to significantly increase our power production, we might as well put them here.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Jim Beam column:Bad bills often surface late
Jim Beam column:Bad bills often surface late

American Press

time9 hours ago

  • American Press

Jim Beam column:Bad bills often surface late

The civil service system that serves Louisiana so well is targeted by late Legislative action. Writing about the Louisiana Legislature the day before it has to adjourn the next day at 6 p.m. is a risky undertaking. Sometimes lawmakers leave controversial bills sitting on the calendar and then pass them at the last minute. Senate Bill 8, a proposed state constitutional amendment that is designed to make it easier to fire employees protected by the state's civil service system, passed the Senate on May 15 with a 26-11 vote, the exact two-thirds vote needed. The House vote didn't take place until Monday and it cleared the lower chamber with a 70-28 vote, again with the exact two-thirds vote needed. Southwest Louisiana's 12 Republican senators and representatives voted for the bill. The Senate has to agree with a House amendment before the bill goes to the governor who is expected to sign it. Sen. Jay Morris, R-West Monroe, sponsored pretty much the same bill in 2024 that came up eight votes short of the 70 House votes needed. What he said last year explained his motive for sponsoring the legislation. The Louisiana Illuminator on May 29, 2024, reported that Morris 'said his preference would be to do away with civil service entirely, even though his bill stops short of doing so.' The Illuminator on June 5 reported that Morris' SB 8 was 'trying to change the state constitution to wrestle power away from the Civil Service Commission to eliminate state worker protections and could, according to some critics, allow for the quick firing of thousands of employees for any reason, creating fear that some dismissals could be politically motivated.' The Morris amendment would give lawmakers the power that currently rests with the Civil Service Commission. It is a seven-member independent review panel that oversees the hiring and firing of 28,000 'classified' state workers. Unclassified workers don't have that protection and can be fired 'at will' for no reason. Morris said, 'If you believe in democracy or republicanism — (because) we're a republic — then the Legislature should have some ability to alter how our civil service system works. Right now we can't do anything because the constitution prevents it.' Yes, it does prevent changes because voters approved the civil service system during the administration of the late-Gov. Sam Jones of Lake Charles (1940-44). Charles E. Dunbar Jr. is credited with drafting the 1940 and 1952 civil service basic laws and is considered the 'father' of the system. The Illuminator said some Democrats have taken issue with the ballot language on Morris' bill. They say it doesn't explicitly mention classified employees and could mislead voters into thinking the amendment doesn't affect those state workers who are currently protected under civil service. The news report said Republican Gov. Jeff Landry has tried repeatedly to exert authority over the civil service commission. In February, he tried unsuccessfully to revoke civil service classifications from 900 state jobs, mostly positions for engineers and attorneys, shortly after President Donald Trump made a similar move at the federal level. The state Civil Service Commission rejected Landry's request in a 4-2 decision. Daniel Sullivan, retired CEO with the Louisiana Civil Service League, in a letter to The Advocate said, '…This legislation would allow the entire classified civil service workforce in our state to be politicized…' Sullivan said 39,000 classified employees would be affected by Morris' legislation. He added that state civil service isn't perfect, but it is one of the most successful reforms in the state's history. He said it had received numerous national awards for the effectiveness of its human resource program. 'Our present system must be retained to ensure the most qualified applicants are hired and promoted, protected from political influence, and the incompetent or nonperforming are removed,' Sullivan said. 'Stop this political ploy before it returns us to the days of Huey Long and the deduct box.' The deduct box was a system where state employees, particularly those appointed by Long, were required to give 5% to 10% of their salary to Long himself. The major civil service complaint is that it's too hard to fire classified employees who aren't performing well. However, the Civil Service Commission has the power to make reforms that are necessary. Voters statewide will decide the fate of Morris' amendment on April 18, 2026. I hope the voters reject the amendment because of what it is — an effort to deny classified workers the job protection they deserve. Jim Beam, the retired editor of the American Press, has covered people and politics for more than six decades. Contact him at 337-515-8871 or Reply Forward Add reaction

November statewide special election for collective bargaining referendum ‘not off the table,' Cox says
November statewide special election for collective bargaining referendum ‘not off the table,' Cox says

Yahoo

time16 hours ago

  • Yahoo

November statewide special election for collective bargaining referendum ‘not off the table,' Cox says

SALT LAKE CITY () — Governor Spencer Cox is mulling whether to call a special statewide election this November that would allow Utahns to vote on repealing that bans public labor unions from collective bargaining. 'It's not off the table,' . 'We could have a special election this year, it's still possible.' During a monthly news conference with reporters, the Governor was asked about whether he would call a special election in 2025 or hold off until Utah has a scheduled statewide election in 2026. State law requires the referendum to be placed on a statewide ballot, but state law allows him to decide whether that's in the 'next regular general election' or whether he calls a special election. The Governor said he's still having conversations with the legislature and county clerks who would be tasked with overseeing a statewide election in a municipal year, to analyze the cost and other factors like whether it's a burden to cities that may cancel elections in 2025. 'Just trying to see what's best — is it best to get it on now and get it over with, is that easier? Is it too much pressure on places that won't be having an election?' Cox said. 'What kind of burden with that add? We're looking at all of those things, and we'll make a decision when that deadline gets closer.' Utah lawmakers oppose AI regulation in Trump's 'Big, beautiful bill' The Governor has until June 21 to make that call; that's when the Lt. Governor declares whether the referendum signature gathering effort was sufficient, which is all but certain after public labor unions . The office has from taking effect. 'No matter when this issue appears on the ballot, we are confident that when Utah voters decide, public workers will win. We are strong, ready, and united,' said a spokesperson for the Protect Utah Workers coalition — the group of labor unions that organized the referendum effort. 'The HB267 referendum made history with nearly 10% of Utahns signing the petition in just 30 days to put it on the ballot. Our success sends a powerful message: Utahns believe in the right to organize and stand with public workers,' their statement said. 'HB267 is a power grab by politicians trying to silence the voices of everyday working people. But more than a quarter million Utah voters saw through it and pushed back.' Neither the public labor unions nor Governor Cox elaborated on which year they would prefer, but it's almost certain that politics are at play for both sides. 'Somebody has to stop it:' Gov. Cox defends Trump's decision to deploy troops to LA Political insiders have told that holding a special election in 2025 could favor the law staying in place because turnout is lower in a municipal year, meaning there might be less support overall for the teachers, firefighters, and the other public workers whom voters, by and large, want to support. However, a recency bias from this past legislative session and the momentum from their signature gathering efforts, coupled with perceived injustices to those public workers, may also be a factor, those insiders noted. A 2025 election also gets the issue decided on faster. However, paying for a statewide election would come at a cost to taxpayers, likely in the millions. A 2026 election, however, could be the preferred path as it gives both sides more time to message and raise more money to fight off any counter-messaging. Bureau of Land Management approves construction of Millard County potash mine November statewide special election for collective bargaining referendum 'not off the table,' Cox says Family, police seeking information on missing 15-year-old girl from West Jordan RSL hoping to make a run in second half of season Utah lawmakers oppose AI regulation in Trump's 'Big, beautiful bill' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store