Trump meeting a wake-up call for South Africa
South African Minister of Agriculture John Steenhuisen speaks during a meeting with US President Donald Trump and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on May 21, 2025. Picture: Jim Watson / AFP
The SA delegation to the White House emerged 'in better shape than we went in', says Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen, with all hopeful the relationship between Pretoria and Washington can be reset, after 'giving the Trump White House some food for thought.'
Experts called the meeting a diplomatic draw, but said US President Donald Trump was noncommittal about whether he is willing to come to South Africa this year for the G20 summit, where the US will take over from SA as head.
His secretary of state, Marco Rubio, said this week Trump and the US would not be part of the meeting.
It was 'instructive when Trump was asked, 'Is your mind made up about the genocide?' He said, 'No, it's not.' I think we've given them some room to think,' said Steenhuisen.
'Kill the Boer' videos and surprise printouts
It was 'never going to be an easy meeting', he said, adding that 'obviously the big surprise was the videos shown in the Oval Office'.
The videos were of Julius Malema leading EFF supporters singing Kill the Boer, Kill the Farmer, as well as Jacob Zuma singing similar apparently anti-white songs from the struggle years.
Trump also produced a sheaf of article print-outs which, he claimed, were evidence of the South African 'genocide'.
Steenhuisen said despite the surprise, 'that gave us an opportunity to distinguish the new partners from the protagonists in the video, which were Malema and Zuma.
ALSO READ: Ramaphosa says Trump meeting a success despite ambush [VIDEO]
'We're in government to keep them out'
'And that's what gave me the great pivot to be able to say: 'Look. we are in government to keep those people out of government'.'
Away from the glare of the TV cameras and microphones 'Trump was really warm and generous', Steenhuisen said. In the private exchanges, Steenhuisen, along with golf stars Ernie Els and Retief Goosen, got to talk about SA's problems.
'I think the golfers did a lot of work to defend things, particularly over the lunch, where Trump was very clearly relaxed,' said Steenhuisen. 'I enjoyed the banter about golf. He is clearly very engrossed with golf.'
Farm murders, crime and political optics
However, 'the meeting was a wake-up call for us', he said. 'We've clearly got a crime problem that probably is on the radar of the world now. It certainly is on America's radar and we've now got to deal with it.
'The white House visit has given us and opportunity to really start to make some strides on farm attacks and farm murders. It was important to say that we're not going to sugarcoat this. We have a problem.'
Former DA leader and ambassador Tony Leon said the White House meeting was 'theatrical, bordering on the absurd' and, in the end, 'there was no true victory, yet, for either side'.
'While the SA delegation set out to dispel some of the falsehoods, the truth is that the high level of crime in South Africa is not reassuring,' Leon said.
ALSO READ: Here is the origin of the white cross video Trump used to ambush Ramaphosa
Competing agendas and geopolitical fallout
Trump 'was not really interested in much else at the time other than coming across as the saviour of white people the world over', he added.
Political analyst Ntsikelelo Breakfast believes the tension between the US and South Africa will be mended soon.
'The fact that Trump agreed to listen to South Africa's side of the story shows he cares about relations between the two countries.
'There is no South African president who wishes to be held accountable for failing to save the country's relationship with the US because it is vital. We simply cannot afford to jeopardise our relationship with that country,' said Breakfast.
Political analyst André Duvenhage said Ramaphosa and his team's visit to the US was a historical moment: it was the first time since 1994 that, in public, an international superpower has taken the side of white people because of farm murders and racial discrimination.
'That must be a turnaround in some way and talking about what happened in the open session, it was clear that the two parties worked with different agendas. I think the Trump agenda was to put certain blame on the ANC,' said Duvenhage.
'I believe it has a lot to do with the Jewish connection and the fact that South Africa initiated the court case against Israel.
'From the side of South Africa, it was more aligned with getting trade opportunities, getting investment from the United States and clarifying their positions.'
NOW READ: Will Trump go after Malema and Zuma? IRR says 'Kill the Boer' chant created problems for SA
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
Gayton slams SAHRC stance, implies 'Kill The Boer' ruling was worse
Gayton McKenzie has admonished a statement by the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) in which they labelled his old tweets, containing the racial slur of the K-word, as 'hate speech'. This comes after the Minister of Sport, Art and Culture claimed that he would not apologise to the public over his controversial comments. In a statement issued by the Patriotic Alliance, Gayton McKenzie strongly opposed the SAHRC's statement, labelling his old tweets as 'hate speech'. The minister and political party leader accused the organisation of supporting a 'political campaign against me, led by cowardly, anonymous accounts' and 'playing to the gallery and trying me in the court of public opinion. Gayton McKenziehas denied his K-word tweets constitute hate speech. Images via X He shared: 'The SAHRC in this way made itself the prosecutor, the judge, the jury, the sentencer and the executioner – all in a single day's work. What they did not do was make themselves the investigator, because they have investigated nothing, questioned nothing, and cross-examined nothing. 'They have merely taken at face value what social media and rival politicians told them I did. Without even attempting to speak to me, they were already convinced enough of my evident 'hate speech' to go public about it'. Gayton implied that SAHRC had questionable standards. He continued: 'This is the same organisation that, in 2019, declared that the words 'Kill the Boer' do not constitute hate speech. However, they were quick to find hate speech in my tweets'. Gayton denied that his tweets displayed intent to harm, incite harm, or promote hatred, as stipulated by the Equity Act. He then elaborated on a few of his tweets, which he claimed did not constitute racism. In the statement issued last week, the SAHRC revealed that it had formally opened an investigation into Gayton McKenzie's old tweets after receiving several complaints from political parties and the public. It found that the minister had violated the Equity Act and had sent a letter of allegations informing of such. The commission pledged to navigate the way forward, which includes instituting proceedings at the Equality Court. It stated: 'The commission wishes to remind members of the public that the right ot freedom of expression is not absolute. Hate speech is prohibited in terms of the Equality Act and the Prevention and Combating of Hate Crimes and Hate Speech Act. 'Given his position, Minister McKenzie's conduct is expected to confirm ethical standards that is becoming of a minister and member of parliament. 'The commission calls on everyone in the country to uphold the principles enshrined in the Constitution, including human dignity, equality, and non-discrimination.' Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Eyewitness News
an hour ago
- Eyewitness News
PROF ZONDI: Despite early controversy, Ramaphosa's National Dialogue signals a path forward
The idea of a National Dialogue to get the nation talking about things that matter for the present and the future has been on our lips for a while now. It was first suggested as a Convention for a Democratic South Africa (CODESA) 2 over 15 years ago. It was also suggested as an economic CODESA in the past, but there was no urge to convene it. Now that President Cyril Ramaphosa has kick-started the process, there is contestation about the process and approach to this. The controversies preceding the 15-16 August National Convention put these differences in the open for all to see. First, the legacy foundations representing the legacies of major political figures in South African history announced a dispute within the preparatory team and pulled out of the convention. In a joint letter, these entities, including the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, the Ahmed Kathrada Foundation, Steve Biko Foundation and the FW De Klerk Foundation, protested against a government takeover of what was announced to be a citizen-led national dialogue. As a result of this alleged government takeover, the foundations said, there was a rush to convene the convention before all was ready for this and decisions to undertake emergency procurement in possible violation of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA). The government, through the Presidency, disputed this, and the president convened the preparatory task team to confirm that there was no merit to the foundations' concerns. Indeed, the National Convention happened with much fanfare and produced some notable decisions. The convention went off quite smoothly and signalled a thoughtful process. It seemed the foundations' decisions had not harmed the process and signalled that they do not have as much influence as some thought. But their decision had put a damper on the idea and caused many questions to be raised, including in talk shows, on social media and other public exchanges. Of course, a discussion of this nature could not avoid displaying the agony of many about the failure of the post-apartheid transition to deliver a better life for all. This is the failure to overcome poverty and reduce unemployment. The transition has not been successful in reducing inequalities according to race, class, gender and other dimensions. The beautiful post-apartheid democracy has been marked by a long period of lower economic growth, growing crime and corruption, fragmentation and disillusionment in the population. The sixth administration elected with great hope has delivered failures and disappointments while promising positive change. Couple this with a growing population, including illegal immigration swelling the numbers of the poor and climate change effects, the crisis keeps deepening, and despair is growing. This was evident in the discussions and submissions at the national convention. Some of the areas of consensus achieved are significantly important for moving forward. The decision to give a strong focus to discussions of problems and solutions in the economy towards an inclusive economy and livelihoods is a noble one. This subject is closely tied to the matter of land reform, agrarian transformation and food security. This was elevated into a priority on its own. We hope the discussion will reflect on why we have failed to achieve what was set out in the National Development Plan about this. Crime and corruption were ranked the second most important priority by virtue of public concern and the scale of it as a national crisis. On that score, the scourge of gender-based violence and femicide (GBVF) stood out as a matter for focused attention as the dialogue begins. The subject of education and health is framed as about winning the future. The discussions elevated the State as a subject of discussion because of its association with problems and its key role in managing many solutions to national crises. Indeed, the National Development Plan (NDP), too, made building a capable developmental State a key task of the nation back in 2012. If discussions clarify what has been achieved and what has not been achieved, and why it would have helped the country move forward. The subject of values and culture as a matter critical for rebuilding the social fabric on which the nation and the State are built was made prominent by civil society voices worried that failures were not incidental but systemic. The NDP had enjoined us to work hard to achieve social cohesion, a sort of renewal for the nation's soul. The convention re-emphasised the vagaries of inter-generational trauma and called for healing. This dialogue could help us find out how progress can be achieved. In the final analysis, what is said and recommended in response to growing poverty and inequality will be a measure by which the success of the dialogue will be judged. All these issues were interlinked. The attainment of one relies on the achievements in other areas. It seems that the National Dialogue is now back on track. But there are pointers to consider, which, when applied, would improve the process. The first is that it is to be expected that the National Dialogue will not be a smooth, quiet and united discussion but could have tough edges as stakeholders jostle for the nation's soul. It could even be messy and chaotic, without being a disaster. It can be dogged by controversy without collapsing. Professor Siphamandla Zondi Director: Institute for Pan-Africa Thought & Conversation; and co-director: Institute for Global African Affairs Professor: Department of Politics and International Relations
Eyewitness News
an hour ago
- Eyewitness News
DA WC retains ward in the Matzikamma Municipality town of Vanrhynsdorp
CAPE TOWN - In the ongoing battle for the grassroots vote in the Western Cape's rural communities, the Democratic Alliance (DA) has retained its ward in the Matzikamma Municipality town of Vanrhynsdorp. The party has recently been embroiled in a bitter battle to retain control over the hung council after the Western Cape High Court recently overturned an attempt by a coalition of the African National Congress (ANC), Patriotic Alliance (PA) and Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) to wrest control. Wednesday's by-election result is the DA's highest ever vote tally in that ward, which was originally won by the PA in the 2021 municipal election before its councillor defected to the DA. DA Western Cape leader Tertuis Simmers said its councillor Richard van Huyssteen will continue the party's trend of solid governance. Meanwhile, the ANC said while it's disappointed by the outcome in Matzikamma, where it's only placed third, it's managed to retain ward three in the Knysna Municipality by only 31 votes, with the PA nipping at its heels. Lukhanyiso Nohana will now take charge as the councillor. ANC Western Cape spokesperson Khalid Sayed said, despite the Knysna victory, it will nevertheless be dissecting the reasons for the 8% decline in support. "The Knysna Municipality is now able, through the ANC-led coalition, to continue improving the state of the municipality and serving all residents."
