
The homeowners being slapped with petty fines of up to £1,000 by jobsworth councils for leaving a SINGLE item of rubbish outside their properties
Homeowners are being slapped with petty fines of up to £1,000 by jobsworth council officials for leaving even a single item of rubbish outside their properties and campaigning against local cuts to services.
Bungling staff have threatened a single mother who left furniture outside her property to go to a good home with prison and fined a man for putting his bins out a day early when he was going on holiday.
Officials have even slapped a five-year-old girl with a £1,000 fine and threatened to take her to court after falsely claiming a warden saw her fly-tipping - before being forced to admit no worker had seen anything of the kind.
It comes after a woman was issued an on-the-spot fine for passing out leaflets to fellow residents in Leicester campaigning against council cuts because she set up a camping table.
As UK councils are being accused of lacking common sense, residents up and down the country are being warned to have extra caution before doing anything outside of their own home and driveway.
Experts told MailOnline councils may seek to fine people for offences ranging from leaving a single black bin bag next to a full bin to not having a level bin lid.
But they added it's 'always' worth challenging a fine if individuals think they have been issued incorrectly.
A grandmother was this week slapped with a £100 fine for setting up a camping table in the street - after being told it breached anti-social behaviour laws.
Heather Rawling, 72, of Fleckney, Leicestershire, was hit with the penalty notice after setting up the 2m table in Leicester to campaign against council cuts.
But while she was campaigning on May 31 she was approached by a street warden who ordered her to dismantle it, branding it an 'unauthorised structure'.
The retired humanities teacher was told she was in breach of a public spaces protection order (PSPO), designed to combat anti-social behaviour such as street drinkers and e-bike riders.
She received a £100 fine three days later but vowed to fight the matter in court, where she estimates the bill could rise to £1,000 if she loses.
Mrs Rawling has now slammed council bosses for trying to prevent political campaigning after they accused her of putting up an 'unauthorised structure on the highway.'
She said: 'We were in the city centre and had a little campaign stall where we were protesting against the cuts by Leicester City Council.
'We were there for about half an hour and then the street wardens saw us. I accept the PSPO can be needed to deal with people on e-bikes, noisy speakers or street drinkers.
'But this was a small camping table which we had for leaflets and so people could sign a petition. I firmly stood my ground as I feel this is an attack on people's rights to campaign.
'There are people up and down the county who do campaign stalls and tables everywhere. All I had was a camping table two metres long in a wide pedestrian area. I don't think we were in anybody's way. There was plenty of space.
'I was not obstructing anybody, I wasn't causing a nuisance. The council might think I'm a nuisance, but in terms of passersby and pedestrians, they didn't care at all.
'The warden asked me if I was aware of the PSPO and explained what it was and asked me if I was prepared to take the stall table down.
'He asked for my details and I was reluctant to at first. He even said he would call the police so I gave him my information. He issued me with a fixed penalty notice.
'I think this was political - we were asked to take it down because we were campaigning about council cuts.'
Mrs Rawling, who is a member of the Socialist Party, now has until June 14 to pay the fine - but says she would rather go to court than pay.
She added: 'I plan to plead not guilty to it. The danger is if I lost in court, they could charge court costs. I am taking a risk, but I feel strongly about this issue.
'I'm not going to pay it on principle, and if I have to go to court, I will. All groups should have a right to campaign.
'The council issued the PSPO order that includes amplification, people on e-bikes and e-scooters. At the end of the order they've tagged on unauthorised structures like stall tables.
'We are in an era full of austerity and cutbacks and despite more and people getting angry about what's happening they don't want us to protest about it.'
A Leicester City Council spokesperson said: 'This group had put up a table, in breach of the Public Spaces Protection Order (PSPO) that covers the city centre.
'One of our wardens asked them to take down the table and advised that if they didn't, they would be issued with a fixed penalty notice. They refused to take it down and so a fine was issued.'
It is just the latest example of overbearing council officials issuing fines for petty 'offences' including offering free furniture and putting out bins 'too early'.
Meanwhile a husband who surprised his wife by tidying up the garden has been hit with a £1,000 fine after leaving a bag of waste at the back of their property.
While his wife was away caring for her father, Adam Castledine, 42, wanted to clear the garden before the return of his partner.
After mowing the lawn, Mr Castledine, from Bramcote, deposited all the garden waste in a bag, which he placed near the back gate.
This was due to the bag being too heavy to lift alone, with the couple planning to put the bag in the car and take it to the tip upon Mr Castledine's wife's return.
Two days later, however, on May 22, the family was hit with a £1,000 fixed penalty notice from Broxtowe Borough Council for fly-tipping.
Just last month a 37-year-old from West Kensington was fined £1,000 after putting his bins out a day early before going on holiday.
Clyde Strachan decided to help refuse collectors by placing his rubbish outside his West Kensington home shortly before midday in May.
He then went away for a week and when he returned was faced with an 'environmental enforcement notice', which demanded he make contact with Hammersmith and Fulham Council.
The engineer then received an £1,000 fixed penalty notice, stating: 'There was one large box, six bags of waste, and one food bin deposited on the pavement and left.
'It isn't collection day so it shouldn't be there. There is no formal right to appeal, however the council will accept representations from you within seven days.'
He said at the time: 'I spoke on the phone to one of the council officers and said I was willing to receive a warning but felt a £1,000 fine was excessive.
'I said I had put the bins out early as I was not available the next day. It was an honest mistake. I didn't feel as though I needed to grovel, but it felt like that was what he was after.'
The fine has since been retracted after a review found 'Mr Strachan made an honest mistake and is not a persistent fly-tipper.'
In September, single mother Isabelle Pepin, from Southborne, Dorset, placed an Ikea chest of draws and stacking cabinet outside her home, along with a sign stating they were free for anyone to take.
The chest of drawers was quickly snatched up, and after a few hours, Ms Pepin returned the stacking cabinet to her property.
She was then stunned to receive a £500 flytipping fine by council officials, who turned up at her doorstep three weeks later - even threatening her with prison.
Ms Pepin, who lives with her eight-year-old son Bear, was making his tea when the council official turned up on her doorstep and demanded to know her name and date of birth before issuing her with the fine.
She said she started to record the visit on her mobile phone because she felt 'intimidated'.
She said: 'I have lived in this property for 12 years and I see people in the area leaving things out probably every other day. I love the community factor of it.
'It's not fly-tipping, that is not what is happening here. It's recycling things people no longer want or need.'
She added: 'He then told me that the maximum penalty is £50,000 and prison time. I am usually quite a confident person but by this point I was shaking and panicking.
'He didn't show any documentation or anything in writing. He did show me an ID card but it was very basic. It was just a picture of him, his name and BCP Council.
'He said I needed to give him my name and address and I would be committing another offence if I didn't. He then printed off a ticket, saying I had 14 days to pay £500 or it would go up to £1,000.'
In Ipswich, new resident Ben Riley was also fined £500 after he put several black bin bags filled with rubbish outside his home next to his wheelie bin.
Mr Riley, who had just moved from Essex where he lived for 28 years, said: 'My wheelie bin was full. I've only recently moved to Ipswich from Essex. I lived there 28 years of my life and the council never moaned about a bag next to a wheelie bin before but here it's a big deal.
'Back home, you could happily put rubbish bags next to your bin and they would be taken by the binmen. I have never been issued with a fine or anything in the 28 years I lived there.
'I also got mixed up with which bin was being collected that week, so it was six days before bin collections.
'It's not like I've dumped a mattress or a television set in the middle of the road. It's next to my back gate.
'£500 for a first offence is a bit extreme. I have just put general waste next to my wheelie bin because it was too full.'
He added: 'It is ridiculous how extreme it is. I have been threatened with five years in prison or an unlimited fine if this goes to court.'
The council turned down an appeal by Mr Riley and said leaving bin bags on the street 'can cause public health issues and encourage anti-social behaviour.'
And in December, a north London council tried to take a five-year-old girl to court after she was accused of flytipping by Harrow Council, which said a member of their team had witnessed her drop a parcel.
It later emerged that no officer had in fact seen the five-year-old do anything of the sort, and instead proceedings had begun after the parcel, with her name on it, was found in a nearby street.
But rather than check the identity of the name, officials immediately sent a letter to the family home issuing the child with a £1,000 fine.
With Christmas just around the corner, she was advised that they were 'about to instruct the council's legal team to start court proceedings' against her. The letter also warned her that a conviction carries a maximum £2,500 fine.
After multiple appeals and requests for help from the father, the council eventually rescinded the fine and said that fining children 'is not official council policy'.
It came after Deborah and Ian Day, from Stoke, were charged £400 after one of them placed a single envelope in a public bin on her way to work.
Deborah Day, 47, who lives on Dividy Road, in Bentilee, Stoke-on-Trent, was shocked when both she and her husband were issued with £200 fines after council workers fished the envelope out of the bin.
Council investigators said this breaches sections 87 and 88 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and constitutes it as an offence of littering because household waste cannot be put in a public bin.
The hairdresser said: 'I have received a letter from the council with a fine of £200 and my husband (Ian) has received one too because apparently we're both to blame.
'It is for an empty envelope inside a bin and the council has even attached a photo of the envelope which had my address on it in their letter'.
Eamonn Turley, a legal specialist at Multi Quote Time, told MailOnline: 'A lot of individuals fall into traps without even realising they've committed an offence.
'Examples include placing an extra bag of rubbish on top of or next to your wheelie bin if it's already full—most councils, including Birmingham and Manchester, class that as fly-tipping, even if it's clearly household waste.
'Another is not flattening cardboard boxes enough and having them sticking out of a recycling bin with the lid open. Councils like Leeds or Bristol can fine householders if the bin lid is not level, as this can jam the machinery at collection.
'And then there is contamination—putting the wrong item in your recycling, like a pizza box with food on it or a plastic bag, which can lead to a whole bin being rejected and tagged. What's complicated is that many people are trying to be helpful but, not having seen what's allowed, they inadvertently fall foul of the rules.'
He added: 'To avoid these fines, the most important thing residents can do is familiarize themselves with their specific council's waste disposal regulations because there is no one-size-fits-all rule for the entire UK.
'For instance, some councils like Westminster or Camden in London have exact time frames when you can take out your bins for collection—miss them, and you'll be fined.
'Others, particularly in rural areas, may be less concerned about timing but more stringent about what you put in each bin.
'Fly-tipping, even dumping something as seemingly innocuous as a mattress or a cardboard box next to a communal bin, is a criminal offence in the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and can result in considerable fixed penalties of up to £400—or prosecution in more serious instances.
'The safest thing to do is to arrange bulky item collection through your council's own service or to personally take items to the tip or recycling centre. Councils also target hotspots with CCTV or plain-clothes officers, so it's just not worth the risk.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Spectator
8 minutes ago
- Spectator
Why Britain needs Israel to win against Iran
It's understandable that the focus of coverage of Israel's strikes on Iran, and the Iranian regime's response, has been entirely on the potential regional consequences of Israel's mission to destroy Iran's nuclear capability. But although this may seem more like a version of Neville Chamberlain's infamous 'quarrel in a faraway country between people of whom we know nothing' than an issue of immediate relevance to British national security, it is most definitely the latter. It is vital to our national security that Israel succeeds. For one thing, Iran operates hit squads in the UK with the explicit aim of assassinating British citizens it deems to be enemies. It's said that the best way to ensure something remains secret is to mention it on the floor of the House of Commons. It sometimes seems that this is exactly what happened in 2023 when the then security minister Tom Tugendhat gave MPs details of how the police and security services had detected at least 15 'credible threats' to kill or kidnap UK citizens and residents in 2022. Iran, he said, had been gathering information about Jews as a 'preparation for lethal operations'. The IRGC uses the same techniques as Isis and al-Qaeda to develop and radicalise UK-based regime supporters In his statement, he named an IRGC member Mohammad Mehdi Mozayyani, who had 'worked to conduct a lethal operation against Iranian dissidents here in the United Kingdom'. Iran International, an Iranian opposition television station, was forced to close its London office because the threat to its staff was so serious. Last month, three alleged Iranian spies appeared in court charged with targeting UK-based journalists so that 'serious violence' could be inflicted on them. The import of Mr Tugendhat's statement has been widely ignored, not least by the government in which he served and the current Labour government. Neither has proscribed the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the terror arm of the regime. In a subsequent interview with the Jewish Chronicle, one of the few outlets to cover the Iranian presence in the UK, Tugendhat said: We have very clear intelligence about the activities of hostile regimes in the UK and we keep a very close eye on what their agents and those close to them are doing. We know that the Iranians are using non-traditional sources to carry out these operations, including organised criminal gangs. They are paying criminal gangs to conduct surveillance. Basically, the Iranians are using crooks based in Britain to spy for them… We have been seeing threats and Iranian operational activity directed against them [Israeli and Jewish targets in the UK]. I do not issue these warnings lightly. The director general of MI5, Ken McCallum, has said that Iran's 'aggressive intelligence services' are actively planning terrorist attacks on British soil, calling it 'the state actor which most frequently crosses into terrorism'. Last October MI5 said it had foiled at least 20 regime-backed terror plots in the UK since 2022. But it is not just Iranian terror operations that pose a threat to UK safety. The regime is also behind an extensive network of organisations, mosques and student bodies that are a more insidious concern. There is, for example, no bar on alleged links with the IRGC, so the Islamic Centre of England (ICE) has been able to operate as a charity with impunity. This is despite being described last year by the then chair of the Commons Foreign Affairs Select Committee, Alicia Kearns, as the IRGC's 'London office'. It had an official warning by the charity commission after holding a vigil to honour the IRGC terror mastermind Qasem Soleimani after he was assassinated in 2020. It was also ordered to scrap a rule in its constitution requiring one trustee to be a representative of Iran's Supreme Leader – which the regulator said created a conflict of interest and demonstrated an 'apparent lack of independence'. The ICE says it is a: Purely religious and cultural organisation, which provides various services to the local communities… It is an independent charity regulated by British law, which is totally funded by the local beneficiaries. The majority of the trustees, donors, and attendees are British citizens. Indeed, this charity is nothing to do with politics, while we strongly believe that the politically motivated lobbies are trying to drag the charity into their political disputes. The Islamic Student Association of Britain has hosted online talks at the Kanoon Towhid Islamic centre in west London with senior IRGC commanders. One of these was Saeed Ghasemi, who said in his talk in 2021 that if Soleimani had not been killed, 'we could have taken over one after another the European countries you are studying in'. A former chair of the association has said that Islamic Students Associations have never had any direct or indirect affiliation to the IRGC or any army, government or security group anywhere in the world and neither have I… Islamic Students Associations have never held any physical gathering/seminar/conference…with any of the falsely accused individuals. Astonishingly (well, rather predictably given our repeated failure to take this form of the Iranian threat seriously) at least six charities with alleged links to Iran or the IRGC have been funded by the British taxpayer as part of the pandemic furlough scheme. One, the Islamic Centre of England, received £109,476 in 2020 and £129,556 in 2021. The key point is that the IRGC uses much the same techniques as Isis and al-Qaeda, utilising a network of mosques, charities and centres to develop and radicalise UK-based regime supporters. One such organisation was exposed for hosting online IRGC commanders who called on British students to join the IRGC to 'bring an end to the lives of Zionists and Jews across the world'. The security services do a valiant job in seeking to uncover and foil terror plots. But they have been let down – as have all of us – by a political class which has refused to proscribe the IRGC, which would make all of the above illegal. Even now, as Israel is doing the West's work for it, our PM and Foreign Secretary cannot bring themselves to offer a word of actual support. Even though, as we have seen, the threat Iran poses to UK security is real – and growing.


Sky News
9 minutes ago
- Sky News
Cole Cooper death: Grieving mum alleges 'third party' involved
The grieving mother of a Scottish teen who vanished for a month has told Sky News she believes a "third party" was involved in her son's death. Cole Cooper, 19, was discovered dead in woods near Falkirk earlier this month following a missing persons inquiry his relatives don't believe was taken seriously enough by police. He was last seen on CCTV in May after leaving a house party, but police later revealed a former school friend had spoken to Cole a few days later nearby. Speaking exclusively to Sky News, his mum Wendy Stewart, 42, has revealed her son had "various arguments" in the days and hours before he disappeared. In an emotional interview, she said: "He was only 19, he should never have been taken. I am never going to see him again. I never got a chance to give him a last cuddle and hold his hand. "Someone has taken that away from me far too soon. Whether it be intentionally or unintentionally, I do believe there has been some involvement by a third party and the result is the death of Cole." The family, who organised a local vigil in Cole's memory last weekend, have vowed to get "justice". Asked what that means, Ms Stewart told Sky News: "Finding the culprit and getting justice that way. Finding the person that is responsible for the death of my child." Police previously said 400 residents were spoken to during door-to-door enquiries and more than 2,000 hours of CCTV footage was collected. The 19-year-old's death is being treated as "unexplained". Cole's aunt Aimee Tennie, 32, revealed the family's anger over the police handling of the case as they attempt to find out what happened. She said: "We are aware of small details surrounding the weekend leading up to it with arguments. He had a few arguments over that weekend. We want the details re-examined thoroughly." Sky News put all of the family's concerns and allegations to Police Scotland. The force swerved our questions and responded saying: "Enquiries remain ongoing." Wendy Stewart claimed the probe has been handled "shockingly" with a failure to take her son's disappearance seriously. The 42-year-old said: "I have had to scream and shout from rooftops to be heard by the police. I don't think they have handled it well. "The police really need to take accountability and listen to families, they are reporting a missing child and understand the family knows their child best." Cole Cooper's loved ones still have not been told when his body will be released to allow them to lay him to rest.


BBC News
12 minutes ago
- BBC News
Serious crime involving children increases in London, report finds
An increasing proportion of children aged between 10 and 14 years old are suspected of committing violent crime in London, in comparison to other young people, a report has to Met Police figures, 7,512 children aged between 10 and 14 were suspected of violent crime, including knife offences, in 2023, a rise of 38% from this is below the 2019 figure, the report highlighted that those aged 10-14 made up a higher percentage of serious offences involving young people in 2023, compared to Peck, director of London's Violence Reduction Unit (VRU), which commissioned the study, described the findings as "disturbing". The VRU was set up by London mayor Sadiq Khan in 2019 to try to tackle the underlying causes of study, put together by crime and justice specialists Crest Advisory, analysed data between 2019 and 2023 to examine the impact and background of crime in London, and provide recommendations on how to respond to it. The figures show that serious offences affecting under 25-year-olds initially fell during the pandemic, but increased in the years 2019, there were 56,734 serious offences involving those aged 24 and under, falling to 37,616 in 2021 and rising to 41,147 by in 2019, children aged 10-14 were involved in 15.9% of those offences, this had risen to 18.3% in comparison, for those aged 15-18 the proportion fell from 47.8% in 2019 to 43.5% in 2023, and for 19-25s it rose from 36.3% to 38.3% in the same time period. Ms Peck said the report highlighted the importance of the VRU's work aimed at tackling school absences and exclusions, which were found to be key risk factors in children becoming involved in study said the number of permanent exclusions in inner London had fallen over five years, while increasing nationally, but the number of suspensions had increased across both inner and outer London. It also said that young people with special educational needs were disproportionately represented in the youth justice 2023, the VRU launched a three year, £3m project involving 70 primary schools across seven boroughs, offering targeted support to improve children's language and communication skills. "It really directly helps support young people to address things like conflict by using words not fists," Ms Peck said. Manda George, head teacher of Torridon primary in Catford, south-east London, said her school had used the funding to expand its support for children with speech language and communication needs through oracy lessons, as well as teaching children about relationships and conflict resolution. She said teachers were still seeing the impact of the pandemic, which has left an increasing number of young children struggling with language skills."We can see straight away in nursery if a child needs something extra in terms of language and communication, and similarly a child with being able to talk about their emotions, or how they're feeling, as opposed to hitting out or lashing out."Now in the second year of the programme, Ms George said the school had seen a huge improvement in behaviour. "If children are able to resolve that conflict before they get angry, before they get upset, then it doesn't escalate to a point where we are having to intervene with things like suspensions and exclusions." Sai Satyadeva, Torridon primary school's inclusion leader, said it was easy for children to become "lost or labelled" in secondary school and then disengage. She said since the expansion of the oracy programme pupils were "better able to advocate for themselves" and were showing improvements in their behaviour and forming better relationships with their peers. When we visited the school, some of the older children were discussing a book they'd been reading, using a technique called Rally Robin, which Ms Satyadeva explained encouraged them to take turns, without one person dominating the children picked up from each other using phrases such as "I would like to build on" or "I would like to challenge" the ideas put forward by their classmates. Ten-year-old Ashton said it gave them the ability to disagree with each other "but not in a rude way. We don't say, you're not correct, or shout out". He told me his friends now used a similar technique in the playground to decide which games to play."If one person says how they feel, then the other person says how they feel, then you can figure out a way to resolve the argument," added his classmate, Madison, aged 10. Eleven-year-old Isla said she liked this as it helped her to "see the other people's point of view"."If you're in a large disagreement, we don't want it to get really physical" explained 10-year-old Ethan. "We talk about our feelings." Ms Peck insisted the results within the schools the VRU had been working with had been "remarkable". "Ninety-six percent of young people who have got involved in these type of lessons narrowed the gap between their peers, and 81% narrowed it by more then 50%," she it will be some time before it's possible to evaluate whether such a programme can help lower the number of young people being stabbed on London's streets. The report points out that, as the VRU was only created five years ago, it is difficult to measure how successful its public health approach has been, while the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic had made it "difficult to see key trends in crime data". "I think we do have to acknowledge that last year, for the first time, we had the lowest level of murders for under 25 [year olds] for 23 years," Ms Peck said, when asked about the figures in the she added that it "doesn't breed any complacency."It's something Londoners are concerned about, absolutely rightly so, and we see far too may young people get caught up in violence." The report also recommended that the VRU should commission research into the exposure of children to online harm, including social media, as well as harmful relationships with peers and follows the release of hit Netflix series Adolescence earlier this year which sparked a national conversation about the impact of social media on young people."It's important that we understand what is going on the virtual space and how that relates to physical violence," said Ms Peck. The Metropolitan Police commissioner has repeatedly warned that knife crime could rise in London without more funding from the government, although following last week's Spending Review, the chancellor said she was confident that pledges on cutting crime and increasing police numbers can be kept."Everybody wants to feel safer," Ms Peck said, when asked if she was concerned about Sir Mark Rowley's comments. "What we need to be doing is really investing in that prevention that stops young people getting engaged [in crime] and being exploited in the first place." But won't some people be sceptical about the link between funding oracy programmes for young children and preventing a young teenager from picking up a knife? "I can appreciate that," said Ms Peck, "but it's entirely logical. We know the safest place for children is in school."One of the key factors of a young person being excluded, or being suspended, is very often because they're unable to articulate themselves very well, and that turns into bad behaviour." Head teacher Manda George told me she can "absolutely" see the link between supporting speech and language skills for very young children and preventing older ones becoming involved in violence. "The earlier we can support children the better. By the time they're in secondary school it's too late."