BNP's Tareque Rahman eyes Dhaka return
There is more to the recent meeting between
Bangladesh interim regime
chief adviser
Muhammad Yunus
and BNP leader
Tareque Rahman
in London than meets the eye. Rahman is looking for a return to Dhaka to realise his prime ministerial dream.
Rahman seeks to return to Dhaka from his exile in London and is understood to have conveyed to Yunus his demand for removal of all terror cases against him, according to persons familiar with the meeting. Rahman cannot contest polls unless all cases are removed against him.
Rahman had allegedly backed
anti-India terror groups
and insurgents when his mother
Begum Zia
was Bangladesh PM from 2001-06. Often dubbed as the force behind the throne, the
BNP leader
has been associated with several activities that had cast a shadow over India-Bangladesh relations.
ULFA
leader Paresh Baruah, who was based in Bangladesh till 2008, was often patronised by Rahman in the past.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Friends say Minnesota shooting suspect was deeply religious and conservative
Vance Luther Boelter, accused of assassinating a top Minnesota Democrat and her husband, held deeply conservative views. He impersonated a police officer in the shooting of former House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband. Boelter's background includes religious involvement, security work, and a brief stint in politics, with signs of financial struggles preceding the attacks. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The man accused of assassinating the top Democrat in the Minnesota House held deeply religious and politically conservative views, telling a congregation in Africa two years ago that the U.S. was in a "bad place" where most churches didn't oppose abortion. Vance Luther Boelter , 57, was captured late Sunday. The arrest was confirmed to The Associated Press by two law enforcement officials were who were not authorized to publicly discuss details of the ongoing investigation and spoke to AP on condition of say Boelter impersonated a police officer and gunned down former House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, in their home outside Minneapolis . Democratic Gov. Tim Walz described the shooting as "a politically motivated assassination." Sen. John Hoffman , also a Democrat, and his wife, Yvette, were shot earlier by the same gunman at their home nearby but and former colleagues interviewed by AP described Boelter as a devout Christian who attended an evangelical church and went to campaign rallies for President Donald Trump. Records show Boelter registered to vote as a Republican while living in Oklahoma in 2004 before moving to Minnesota where voters don't list party the scene at Hortman's home, authorities say they found an SUV made to look like those used by law enforcement. Inside they found fliers for a local anti-Trump " No Kings " rally scheduled for Saturday and a notebook with names of other lawmakers. The list also included the names of abortion rights advocates and health care officials, according to two law enforcement officials who could not discuss details of the ongoing investigation and spoke to AP on condition of Hortman and Hoffman were defenders of abortion rights at the state not believed to have made any public threats before attacks, official says Drew Evans, superintendent of the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, said at a briefing on Sunday that Boelter is not believed to have made any public threats before the attacks. Evans asked the public not to speculate on a motivation for the attacks. "We often want easy answers for complex problems," he told reporters. "Those answers will come as we complete the full picture of our investigation."Friends told the AP that they knew Boelter was religious and conservative, but that he didn't talk about politics often and didn't seem extreme."He was right-leaning politically but never fanatical, from what I saw, just strong beliefs," said Paul Schroeder, who has known Boelter for years.A glimpse of suspect's beliefs on abortion during a trip to Africa Boelter, who worked as a security contractor, gave a glimpse of his beliefs on abortion during a trip to the Democratic Republic of Congo in 2023. While there, Boelter served as an evangelical pastor, telling people he had first found Jesus as a teenager."The churches are so messed up, they don't know abortion is wrong in many churches," he said, according to an online recording of one sermon from February 2023. Still, in three lengthy sermons reviewed by the AP, he only mentioned abortion once, focusing more on his love of God and what he saw as the moral decay in his native appears to have hidden his more strident beliefs from his friends back home."He never talked to me about abortion," Schroeder said. "It seemed to be just that he was a conservative Republican who naturally followed Trump."A married father with five children, Boelter and his wife own a sprawling 3,800-square-foot house on a large rural lot about an hour from downtown Minneapolis that the couple bought in 2023 for more than a half-million to reinvent himself He worked for decades in managerial roles for food and beverage manufacturers before seeking to reinvent himself in middle age, according to resumes and a video he posted getting an undergraduate degree in international relations in his 20s, Boelter went back to school and earned a master's degree and then a doctorate in leadership studies in 2016 from Cardinal Stritch University, a private Catholic college in Wisconsin that has since shut down. While living in Wisconsin, records show Boelter and his wife Jenny founded a nonprofit corporation called Revoformation Ministries, listing themselves as the president and moving to Minnesota about a decade ago, Boelter volunteered for a position on a state workforce development board, first appointed by then-Gov. Mark Dayton, a Democrat, in 2016, and later by Democratic Gov. Tim Walz. He served through that position, he may have crossed paths with one of his alleged victims. Hoffman served on the same board, though authorities said it was not immediately clear how much the two men may have a security firm Records show Boelter and his wife started a security firm in 2018. A website for Praetorian Guard Security Services lists Boelter's wife as the president and CEO while he is listed as the director of security patrols. The company's homepage says it provides armed security for property and events and features a photo of an SUV painted in a two-tone black and silver pattern similar to a police vehicle, with a light bar across the roof and "Praetorian" painted across the doors. Another photo shows a man in black tactical gear with a military-style helmet and a ballistic vest with the company's name across the an online resume, Boelter also billed himself as a security contractor who worked oversees in the Middle East and Africa. On his trip to the Democratic Republic of Congo, he told Chris Fuller, a friend, that he had founded several companies focused on farming and fishing on the Congo River, as well as in transportation and tractor sales."It has been a very fun and rewarding experience and I only wished I had done something like this 10 years ago," he wrote in a message shared with the once he returned home in 2023, there were signs that Boelter was struggling financially. That August, he began working for a transport service for a funeral home, mostly picking up bodies of those who had died in assisted living facilities - a job he described as he needed to do to pay bills. Tim Koch, the owner of Metro First Call, said Boelter "voluntarily left" that position about four months ago."This is devastating news for all involved," Koch said, declining to elaborate on the reasons for Boelter's departure, citing the ongoing law enforcement had also started spending some nights away from his family, renting a room in a modest house in northern Minneapolis shared by friends. Heavily armed police executed a search warrant on the home Saturday.'I'm going to be gone for awhile' In the hours before Saturday's shootings, Boelter texted two roommates to tell them he loved them and that "I'm going to be gone for a while," according to Schroeder, who was forwarded the text and read it to the AP."May be dead shortly, so I just want to let you know I love you guys both and I wish it hadn't gone this way," Boelter wrote. "I don't want to say anything more and implicate you in any way because you guys don't know anything about this. But I love you guys and I'm sorry for the trouble this has caused."
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Watch- Soldiers march out of sync at Trump's birthday parade; Netizens call it defiance
The US Army's 250th anniversary celebration, which coincided with US president Donald Trump's birthday on Saturday, turned into a target of widespread online mockery after videos of the event surfaced on social media. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The military parade faced heavy criticism for the poor coordination displayed by American troops. Footage from the event showed soldiers marching out of sync. Many social media users described the marching as sloppy and unprofessional, accusing the troops of deliberately showing defiance. 'When military men and women in uniform march, they march with tight timing and in lockstep as a sign of pride. These soldiers couldn't be further from marching in lockstep. It's clear that they don't want to be a part of Trump's Dictator Parade — and are just phoning it in,' one user wrote. A US Army veteran wrote, 'We learn this every day in basic training and when we go to AIT how to march, it's an important part of training. There is no other reason for them to look like this other than defiance. Not to mention they did a practice run the day before.' Adding to it, a photo went viral showing Trump sitting with his eyes shut next to his wife, Melania, during the procession, appearing to doze off while the event continued. One user commented, 'Trump is too busy sleeping at his failure of a birthday parade to care.' While the parade was taking place in the capital, thousands of Americans also participated in anti-Trump protests across hundreds of US cities and towns. Many called the protests energetic and passionate, in contrast to the parade, which some viewers described as dull and uninspiring.
The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
India's decade of vulnerability: Modi must build consensus
Russia will remain in China's suffocating embrace as long as the Ukraine war continues, and the US, under Donald Trump's transactional, sound-byte-led politics, is deeply divided and unlikely to be a reliable friend to anybody, leave alone India. Thanks to a downward spiralling global order, India faces a decade of economic and security vulnerability. The China-Pakistan revisionist front is now a much bigger threat, and Bangladesh could join this anti-India alliance, either covertly or overtly, after the next general elections. India's vulnerabilities One, unlike post-war Europe, Japan, the Asian tigers, and China, which became economic powerhouses with the blessings of the US, India will not have any of that advantage. In fact, both the US and China will do many things to slow down India's growth and rise in global stature. Until we become a $10 trillion economy, and generate lots of quality jobs, we will be both internally and externally under pressure. However, reaching $10 trillion may take us a decade, if not more, even under the best of circumstances. Two, while our defence capabilities are improving and increasingly based on internal capabilities, high-tech war-making machines like the AMCA (advanced medium combat aircraft with stealth capabilities), may take 10 years to develop and deploy, not to speak of warships and nuclear submarines to guard the Indian Ocean Region. And that is an optimistic scenario. But China is accelerating the rearming of Pakistan with stealth fighters—leaving us vulnerable in the short-term. The purpose here is to not just emphasise the challenges, but make a broader point on how they can be overcome by sheer political will: India cannot do this without greater political consensus. Without consensus, the reforms needed to speed up growth and achieve atmanirbharta (self-reliance) in defence will remain stalled, as political parties stay busy spending taxpayer resources on freebies just to get elected. Government and opposition will be working at cross-purposes. Our 0.5 front is not only about secessionist forces, but any debilitating political opposition that could thwart forward movement on reforms. Calling the opposition anti-national serves no useful purpose. Our internal ruptures are not always the result of policy disagreements; they have an intractable edge because of political ego clashes and deep personal animosities. This is epitomised by the deep distrust Narendra Modi and Rahul Gandhi have for one another, even though they will probably end up doing the same things when in power. Under Modi, there is practically no Congress initiative—direct benefit transfers, Aadhaar, MGNREGA, etc—that the Modi government has not carried forward with minor tweaks. This is unlikely to change much even if the roles were reversed in any future election, though that seems unlikely right now. Also read: Modi vs non-BJP CMs: When most popular isn't all-powerful & why Centre-state ties will worsen How do we build a consensus? As always, the initiative lies with the Modi government, as was amply demonstrated recently when it constituted and dispatched all-party delegations to multiple countries to canvas support for India's stand on terrorism after Operation Sindoor. The only sour note was struck by the Congress party, whose members were a major part of these delegations. The Congress was distinctly uncomfortable with the government's choice of delegates, especially Thiruvananthapuram MP Shashi Tharoor. A simple phone call from the Prime Minister to Rahul Gandhi could have resolved the issue. Instead, the government chose—wisely, in the end—an articulate Tharoor, despite the Congress's objections. India needs reforms and deregulation in many areas, including defence, agriculture, land and labour laws, and in the police-legal-judicial system, which is neither capable of delivering speedy justice nor maintaining law and order without draconian laws. These non-economic reforms are what will enable us to become a $10 trillion economy faster. Even with a political consensus, these reforms will take three to five years to start delivering, and so we need a Prime Minister fully engaged with this effort—not one distracted by short-term political compulsions. The good news is that Modi has ample political capital. The big question is whether he will use it sparingly, more to win elections than to build consensus. For example, whenever all-party meetings are called, he leaves it to his lieutenants to manage, and seldom makes a personal appearance. Trying to stay so far above the battle and not be willing to spend some of his political capital to ensure consensus is not a healthy sign. Most of Modi's policies are broadly in the right direction—barring the rapid expansion of freebie culture—but given India's forthcoming decade of vulnerability, he must consider focusing primarily on meeting those threats, and devolve more power to states and local bodies. Political stalemate India's diplomatic and security challenges are great, and tackling them needs extreme political focus. How can you be building India's defence capabilities and global alliances—which require considerable attention—when you also have to deal with angry farmers landing up on Delhi's doorstep and blocking the roads? Should agriculture not be left fully to states to handle, with the Centre only focused on building national buffer stocks in crucial food grains and critical commodities like petroleum products or rare earths? How can you evolve a sensible strategy to attract manufacturing if you are busy dealing with intractable law and order issues, a dilatory judicial process, and a restive minority population—especially when land and labour laws remain unreformed? How can you manage fiscal and monetary policy effectively if states are constantly cribbing about the lack of resources, and power subsidies and other freebies are draining exchequers? How can you create good jobs if urban areas are so poorly governed, and the infrastructure needed to enable orderly growth is pathetic? The Modi government lost its reform mojo in its second term, even though it had a parliamentary majority. After he was forced by street pressure to reverse three farm laws in 2019 and put the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) in abeyance until election time in 2024, the reform agenda took a back seat. The P word—privatisation—has gone missing after Air India was handed over to the Tatas. Forget opposition obstructionism. Can Modi get even his own BJP-ruled states to deregulate, reform and make the changes needed to force competitive reforms in other states? Paradoxically, Modi's political capital may also be hindering reform, for his own partymen may think political survival only needs them to sing Modi's praises instead of doing the hard work on reforms. The opposition also believes that defeating Modi needs excessive spending on freebies. The way out is clear Modi has to use his political capital to push all kinds of reforms forward, in both BJP-ruled states and those governed by the opposition. If that needs the Centre to shed some of its excess powers, so be it. If Governors need to be reined in, jolly good. If delimitation is on the table, Modi must again step up to the plate personally. He cannot leave these jobs entirely to his ministers, who may not have the political heft to swing the deals needed to move India forward. As for China, Modi has the difficult task of both engaging Beijing for equitable trade deals and building up military muscle to deter any adventurism on its part. A tough balancing act, which would be easier if the opposition were not constantly carping about his weakness, including levelling the preposterous allegation that Modi gave in to Donald Trump's pressure during Operation Sindoor, as encapsulated in Rahul Gandhi's 'Narender, Surrender' jibe. In the short post-Pahalgam conflict with Pakistan, China's hand-holding of Islamabad's armaments was unmistakable. PM Modi must ask himself a simple question: what is the use of all my prestige and political capital if it ultimately does not get things done for the country? He has to get his politics right. This means his 56-inch chest must disclose an open heart to win over the opposition in the interests of the country. He can leave the task of winning elections to his second-in-command and state satraps, who must be allowed to grow in stature and do the job he is trying to do when he has other things to worry about. India does not need double-engine sarkars; it needs three engines firing in sync—at the central, state, and local levels—to boost growth. In short: India's decade of vulnerability needs a Prime Minister fully engaged with the threats and challenges it faces—both globally and at home. He cannot afford to be distracted by the need to pander to narrow politics. R Jagannathan is the former editorial director, Swarajya magazine. He tweets @TheJaggi. Views are personal. (Edited by Prashant)
