Maryland teen wanted for murder at Columbia mall arrested in New York City
Police announced on Thursday, May 31, that 18-year-old William Marshall III, was taken into custody for the murder of 17-year-old Angelo Little.
'I am proud of the outstanding, tireless work of everyone involved in this search, including HCPD officers, U.S. Marshals and our HCPD social media team,' said Howard County Police Chief Gregory Der. 'There was true creativity and ingenuity that resulted in this apprehension. We aren't immune from crime in Howard County, but if you commit a crime here, we will catch you and bring you to justice, no matter how long it takes.'
PREVIOUS COVERAGE | HCPD searching for 17-year-old boy wanted for murder in connection to Columbia Mall shooting
On the evening of July 27, 2024, Howard County police officers were called to The Mall in Columbia for a shooting, where they found Little, who had been shot. He died at the scene.
Throughout the investigation, detectives from the mall allegedly showing a man dressed in all black with a dark mask covering his face. As the video continues, the man is seen sitting at a table in the food court with his head down.
Once Little begins walking to the bathroom, the person follows him. According to police, he then waited for Little to leave the bathroom, and that's when he fired one shot before running through the back door.
About a month later, detectives identified Marshall, who was 17 at the time, as the suspected gunman. He was charged with first-degree murder.
Their investigation determined that Marshall, also known as 'Junior,' knew Little and targeted him.
Since 'Crime Reduction Plan', Howard County PD reports no gun-related violence near Columbia mall
For several months, authorities were unable to locate Marshall. Despite this, officials continued to conduct extensive interviews. Investigators also tracked down hundreds of tips, reviewed digital evidence, conducted hours of surveillance and traveled to multiple states.
As the search for Marshall intensified, the U.S. Marshals joined the police department's search.
The case had a break in late May of 2025, when detectives received a lead that Marshall was in New York City. During the overnight hours of May 28, authorities searched a building in Brooklyn, NY, where they apprehended Marshall.
'This was a collaborative effort with months of diligence, long nights, and communication. After a long road, our hard work has led us to the arrest of William Marshall. We remain committed to ensuring accountability and taking criminals off the street,' said Howard County Executive Calvin Ball.
As of May 29, Marshall was being held in New York and was awaiting extradition to Maryland.
The motive for the shooting remains unclear, and officials are working to determine what led up to the shooting.
Police noted that detectives are also investigating if someone helped Marshall elude the police; if so, criminal charges will be filed.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
an hour ago
Trump's expansion of steel and aluminum tariffs could raise these prices
Price increases could hit tableware, motorcycles and assorted children's products as a result of the Trump administration's expansion of 50% steel and aluminum tariffs to an additional 400 goods, analysts said. The fresh levies, which took effect on Monday, extended tariffs on the metal products that Trump initially rolled out in March. Air-conditioning units, space heaters, high chairs, knives and some furniture items are among the products newly affected by tariffs. 'Basically, if it's shiny, metallic, or remotely related to steel or aluminum, it's probably on the list,' Brian Baldwin, vice president of customs at logistics company Kuehne + Nagel International AG, said in a post on LinkedIn. In a statement on Tuesday, the U.S. Commerce Department touted the new tariffs as means of preventing importers from finding workarounds. 'Today's action expands the reach of the steel and aluminum tariffs and shuts down avenues for circumvention – supporting the continued revitalization of the American steel and aluminum industries,' Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security Jeffrey Kessler said. Importers typically offset the tax burden in the form of higher prices for shoppers, though so far tariff-induced price increases have proven marginal. The overall inflation rate stands at 2.7%, below the 3% rate in January, before Trump took office. In June, Trump ratcheted up a tax on all foreign steel and aluminum from 25% to 50%. The move this week expands those steep levies to hundreds of additional products. In all, the steel and aluminum tariffs now affect $320 billion worth of products, up from $190 billion prior to the expansion, Jason Miller, a professor of supply chain management at Michigan State University, told ABC News. In addition to consumer goods, the new levies will hit a range of imported raw materials like auto parts, construction equipment and farming machinery relied upon by domestic producers, Miller said. 'These tariffs will definitely affect U.S. manufacturers that import inputs,' Miller said, noting the added costs could filter their way into higher consumer prices. The 50% tariff will apply to the proportion of a good made up of imported steel or aluminum, Miller said. A Germany-made steak knife, for instance, would be tariffed at 50% for its steel content, while the remainder of the product's value would face a 15% universal levy for goods from the European Union, he added.
an hour ago
10 House Democrats ask NCAA about plans to protect women as ways to pay college athletes increase
Ten Democratic members of the U.S. House of Representatives have asked the NCAA if and how college sports' major governing body plans to protect the interests of female athletes as the largest portion of NIL and revenue-sharing payments continue to be directed to male athletes. The lawmakers, in a letter to NCAA President Charlie Baker dated Thursday, noted that President Donald Trump's administration rescinded Title IX guidance on name, image and likeness payments that required equitable distribution between male and female athletes. The letter requests answers by Aug. 30 to five questions about the implementation of the recent House vs. NCAA antitrust lawsuit settlement: — Will the NCAA encourage schools to allocate direct payments to male and female athletes equitably? — With male athletes likely to continue receiving the bulk of NIL payments from third parties, will the NCAA refocus its own investments in women's sport to counteract the disparity? — With 90% of the $2.8 million damages allocated to former athletes going to football and men's basketball players, how will the NCAA commit to ensuring damages are distributed in an equitable manner? — By how much does the NCAA expect additional scholarship opportunities for women to increase overall funding for women's sports at Division I schools? — What will the NCAA do to educate athletes — particularly female athletes — about the details of the settlement and the opportunities associated with it, along with the rights they may give up when signing contracts with their schools? In a statement to The Associated Press, the NCAA did not directly address the questions. Instead, the NCAA urged lawmakers to support the 'SCORE Act,' a bill introduced last month by Florida Republican Gus Bilirakis and short for Student Compensation and Opportunity through Rights and Endorsements Act. The proposed legislation would, in part, create mechanisms to protect NIL rights of athletes. The NCAA said its investment in women's sports has 'continuously and significantly increased in the last several years.' It pointed out that women's teams participating in the NCAA Tournament received shares of revenue for the first time last season and the creation of the 32-team Women's Basketball Invitation Tournament increased postseason opportunities. The NCAA also said it has continued efforts to sponsor new sports and 'expand opportunities for women to compete in and benefit from college sports.' 'Regardless, Title IX is the law, and all NCAA schools must comply fully with the law and its expectations,' the NCAA said. The NCAA has argued that it needs a limited antitrust exemption in order to set its own rules and preserve a college sports system that provides billions of dollars in scholarships and helps train future U.S. Olympians. Several athletes are suing the NCAA over its rule that athletes are eligible to play only four seasons in a five-year period, and in June a group of female athletes filed an appeal of the House settlement, saying it discriminated against women in violation of federal law.
San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
10 House Democrats ask NCAA about plans to protect women as ways to pay college athletes increase
Ten Democratic members of the U.S. House of Representatives have asked the NCAA if and how college sports' major governing body plans to protect the interests of female athletes as the largest portion of NIL and revenue-sharing payments continue to be directed to male athletes. The lawmakers, in a letter to NCAA President Charlie Baker dated Thursday, noted that President Donald Trump's administration rescinded Title IX guidance on name, image and likeness payments that required equitable distribution between male and female athletes. The letter requests answers by Aug. 30 to five questions about the implementation of the recent House vs. NCAA antitrust lawsuit settlement: — Will the NCAA encourage schools to allocate direct payments to male and female athletes equitably? — With male athletes likely to continue receiving the bulk of NIL payments from third parties, will the NCAA refocus its own investments in women's sport to counteract the disparity? — With 90% of the $2.8 million damages allocated to former athletes going to football and men's basketball players, how will the NCAA commit to ensuring damages are distributed in an equitable manner? — By how much does the NCAA expect additional scholarship opportunities for women to increase overall funding for women's sports at Division I schools? — What will the NCAA do to educate athletes — particularly female athletes — about the details of the settlement and the opportunities associated with it, along with the rights they may give up when signing contracts with their schools? In a statement to The Associated Press, the NCAA did not directly address the questions. Instead, the NCAA urged lawmakers to support the 'SCORE Act,' a bill introduced last month by Florida Republican Gus Bilirakis and short for Student Compensation and Opportunity through Rights and Endorsements Act. The proposed legislation would, in part, create mechanisms to protect NIL rights of athletes. The NCAA said its investment in women's sports has 'continuously and significantly increased in the last several years.' It pointed out that women's teams participating in the NCAA Tournament received shares of revenue for the first time last season and the creation of the 32-team Women's Basketball Invitation Tournament increased postseason opportunities. The NCAA also said it has continued efforts to sponsor new sports and 'expand opportunities for women to compete in and benefit from college sports.' 'Regardless, Title IX is the law, and all NCAA schools must comply fully with the law and its expectations,' the NCAA said. The NCAA has argued that it needs a limited antitrust exemption in order to set its own rules and preserve a college sports system that provides billions of dollars in scholarships and helps train future U.S. Olympians. Several athletes are suing the NCAA over its rule that athletes are eligible to play only four seasons in a five-year period, and in June a group of female athletes filed an appeal of the House settlement, saying it discriminated against women in violation of federal law.
