US calls off Sudan peace talks after post-war power dispute
US
has postponed a meeting of foreign ministers to discuss the war in
Sudan
because of a dispute over the wording of a proposed joint statement, according to people familiar with the matter.
US secretary of state Marco Rubio was scheduled to host the foreign ministers of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt in Washington on Wednesday. The discussions by the so-called Quad of countries were aimed at advancing peace talks between two Sudanese generals who have been at war for two years.
The failure to proceed with negotiations came after Egypt disagreed with the wording of a planned communique that stated neither the Sudanese Armed Forces nor the rival Rapid Support Forces (RSF) paramilitary group should have a leading role in a postwar transitional government, said the people, who asked not to be identified as the information isn't public.
Egypt historically has strong relations with Sudan's army-backed government, while the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has been accused of backing the RSF – an allegation it denies.
READ MORE
Further talks by the Quad may be rescheduled for the United Nations General Assembly meeting in New York in September, one of the people said.
The Egyptian foreign ministry and the US state department didn't immediately respond to requests for comment.
Conflict erupted in Sudan in April 2023, when government forces failed to agree to a power-sharing accord with the RSF. The two sides jointly carried out a coup against a civilian-led government in 2021.
At least 150,000 people have been killed since the start of the war, according to US estimates, while millions more have been forced to flee their homes in what the United Nations has called the world's biggest humanitarian crisis. Both sides have announced rival governments, raising concerns that the North African nation could split in two – similar to the situation in neighbouring Libya.
Washington's involvement in the talks forms part of a wider push by US president Donald Trump's administration to promote peace in a string of conflicts including in Ukraine, Gaza and the Democratic Republic of Congo. While the US brokered a tentative deal in eastern Congo between its government and the M23 rebel group, it has been less successful in other arenas.
Under president Joe Biden, the US failed to forge peace in Sudan through the so-called ALPS group that included Switzerland, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt, the African Union and the United Nations.
The UAE has repeatedly called for an immediate and permanent ceasefire in the North African nation, as well as the resumption of a political process that leads to a civilian government independent of military control. – Bloomberg
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Donald Trump says he plans to put a 100% tariff on computer chips
US president Donald Trump has said he will impose a 100 per cent tariff on computer chips, likely raising the cost of electronics, cars and household appliances. His announcement came as Apple chief executive Tim Cook joined him at the White House to announce a commitment by the tech company to increase its investment in US manufacturing by an additional $100 billion (€85.6 billion) over the next four years. Mr Trump said companies that make computer chips in the US would be spared the import tax. 'We'll be putting a tariff on of approximately 100 per cent on chips and semiconductors,' Mr Trump said in the Oval Office while meeting Mr Cook. READ MORE 'But if you're building in the United States of America, there's no charge.' During the Covid-19 pandemic, a shortage of computer chips increased the price of cars and contributed to an uptick in overall inflation. Referencing Apple's investment plan, Mr Trump told the press conference: 'This is a significant step toward the ultimate goal of ensuring that iPhones sold in the United States of America also are made in America. 'Today's announcement is one of the largest commitments in what has become among the greatest investment booms in our nation's history.' As part of the Apple announcement, the investments will be about bringing more of its supply chain and advanced manufacturing to the US as part of an initiative called the American Manufacturing Programme, but it is not a full commitment to build its popular iPhone device domestically. In a statement announcing the investment, Mr Cook said: 'This includes new and expanded work with 10 companies across America. They produce components – semiconductor chips included – that are used in Apple products sold all over the world, and we're grateful to the president for his support.' The new manufacturing partners include Corning, Coherent, Applied Materials, Texas Instruments and Broadcom among others. Apple had previously said it intended to invest $500 billion domestically, a figure it will now increase to $600 billion. Mr Trump in recent months has criticised the tech company and Mr Cook for efforts to shift iPhone production to India to avoid the tariffs his Republican administration had planned for China . While in Qatar earlier this year, Mr Trump said there was 'a little problem' with the Cupertino, California, company and recalled a conversation with Mr Cook in which he said he told the businessman: 'I don't want you building in India'. India has incurred Mr Trump's wrath, as the president signed an order on Wednesday to put an additional 25 per cent tariff on the world's most populous country for its use of Russian oil. The new import taxes to be imposed in 21 days could put the combined tariffs on Indian goods at 50 per cent. Apple's new pledge comes just a few weeks after it forged a $500 million deal with MP Materials, which runs the only rare earths producer in the country. That agreement will enable MP Materials to expand a factory in Texas to use recycled materials to produce magnets that make iPhones vibrate. Speaking on a recent investors call, Mr Cook emphasised that 'there's a load of different things done in the United States'. As examples, he cited some of the iPhone components made in the US such as the device's glass display and module for identifying people's faces and then indicated the company was gearing to expand its productions of other components in its home country. 'We're doing more in this country, and that's on top of having roughly 19 billion chips coming out of the US now, and we will do more,' Mr Cook told analysts last week, without elaborating. News of Apple's latest investment in the US caused the company's stock price to surge by nearly 6 per cent in Wednesday's midday trading. That gains reflect investors' relief that Mr Cook 'is extending an olive branch' to the Trump administration, said Nancy Tengler, chief executive of money manager Laffer Tengler Investments, which owns Apple stock. Despite Wednesday's upturn, Apple's shares are still down by 14 per cent this year, a reversal of fortune that has also been driven by the company's botched start in the pivotal field of artificial intelligence. – Associated Press
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Donald Trump could meet Vladimir Putin for Ukraine war talks ‘as soon as next week'
Donald Trump could meet Vladimir Putin as soon as next week to discuss the war in Ukraine, White House officials have said, although senior administration officials have warned that serious 'impediments' remain to achieving a ceasefire. White House officials briefed US media that Trump would seek a summit with Putin after the US special envoy Steve Witkoff met the Russian leader at the Kremlin on Wednesday. A White House official said that while the meeting had gone well and Moscow was eager to continue engaging with the United States, secondary sanctions that Mr Trump has threatened against countries doing business with Russia were still expected to be implemented on Friday. On Wednesday the US signalled its intentions by doubling import tariffs on goods from India to 50 per cent over New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil. READ MORE After Mr Witkoff met Putin, Mr Trump claimed 'great progress was made' during the talks on ending the war in Ukraine. Mr Trump later told European leaders he was planning to meet Putin one-on-one as soon as next week and then follow up with a meeting with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy. Marco Rubio, the US secretary of state, said he did not want to exaggerate the progress made during Mr Witkoff's talks with Putin. 'Hopefully if things continue to progress an opportunity will present itself for the president to meet with both Vladimir Putin and president Zelenskiy, hopefully in the near future,' Mr Rubio told reporters. 'But obviously a lot has to happen before that can occur.' Many 'impediments' to peace remained, he said, especially concerning territorial claims made by Russia, and there was no concrete proposal for a ceasefire on the table. 'What we have is a better understanding of the conditions under which Russia would be willing to end the war,' he said. The US would then need to compare that with 'what the Ukrainians are willing to accept'. Mr Witkoff's three-hour talks came two days before a deadline the US president set for Russia to reach a peace deal in the war or face fresh sanctions. 'My special envoy, Steve Witkoff, just had a highly productive meeting with Russian president Vladimir Putin,' Mr Trump wrote on social media. 'Great progress was made! Afterwards, I updated some of our European allies. Everyone agrees this war must come to a close, and we will work towards that in the days and weeks to come.' Mr Trump gave no further details of what was discussed, and some analysts will be wary of reading too much into the comments, after previous claims by Mr Trump that Putin was ready to negotiate resulted in little progress. Putin has given little indication he is ready to make concessions or willing to adjust Russia's core war aims. However, there have been unconfirmed reports in recent days that the Kremlin could propose a halt to long-range strikes by both sides as an offer to Mr Trump. It is not yet known if the possibility was discussed during Wednesday's Kremlin talks. On Wednesday evening, Mr Trump called Mr Zelenskiy, who was travelling back to Kyiv from a visit to frontline areas in the north-east of the country. 'Our joint position is very clear: the war has to end, and it has to be a just ending,' Mr Zelenskiy wrote on social media afterwards. 'European leaders also took part in the call and I am grateful to each of them for support. We discussed what had been said in Moscow. Ukraine has to defend its independence. We all need a long-lasting and reliable peace. Russia must finish the war that it started.' Mr Trump had promised to introduce secondary tariffs on countries that import Russian oil if no progress was made towards a peace deal by Friday. On Wednesday, he issued an executive order imposing an additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, citing India's continuing imports of Russian oil. India's external affairs ministry said it was 'extremely unfortunate that the US should choose to impose additional tariffs on India for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest'. Russia has described any attempts to target its trading partners as 'illegal'. Ukraine is also trying to secure more US support through economic co-operation, and its new prime minister Yulia Svyrydenko said the first three projects under a new US-Ukraine reconstruction investment fund should be launched within 18 months. Ms Svyrydenko signed off in April on creation of a fund that gives US firms priority access to Ukraine's rare earth minerals and other natural resources. Ukrainian officials said on Wednesday that Russian air strikes had killed at least seven civilians and injured at least 37 over the previous 24 hours, and damaged energy infrastructure in Odesa and Dnipropetrovsk regions. – Additional reporting: Reuters and The Guardian.
RTÉ News
4 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Slovenia bans imports from Israeli settlements over Gaza war
Slovenia has introduced a ban on imports of goods produced in Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories and approved an additional aid package for Palestinians in Gaza, the government said in a statement. "The government today banned the import of goods originating from settlements in the occupied territories, including a ban on circumventing the ban on these imports," the statement on the government website said. The statement did not specify whether the ban refers to all goods produced in the territories or just Israeli goods. The Slovenian government also instructed the competent ministries to consider banning the export of goods from Slovenia intended for these Israeli-occupied settlements. "Israeli government's actions, including the construction of illegal settlements, expropriations, the forced displacement of the Palestinian population, the destruction of their serious and repeated violations of international humanitarian law," Prime Minister Robert Golob said in statement quoted by the STA news agency. "These actions not only threaten the lives and dignity of the Palestinian population, but also the foundations of the international order," it added. The news agency said the volume of goods affected is extremely low at under €2,000 in 2023. A demonstration was held in the capital Ljubjana to draw attention to the worsening humanitarian situation in Gaza. Most of the international community considers the settlements illegal. The Israeli government deems settlements legal under its own laws, while some so-called "outposts" are illegal but often tolerated and sometimes later legalised. Last month, a cross-party Oireachtas foreign affairs committee report on the Occupied Territories Bill "strongly recommends" services as well as goods should be included in any Government legislation. The committee has been tasked in recent weeks with drawing up a pre-legislative scrutiny report on the long-awaited Occupied Territories Bill, which will include a series of non-binding recommendations that will subsequently be considered by Government. The question of whether the bill should be limited to goods from what it describes as the Occupied Territories or be extended to services as well has been a key subject of debate in recent weeks due to the potential economic impact such a move could cause.
