Fencer disqualified after refusing to fight trans opponent
Stephanie Turner was competing in a USA Fencing-sanctioned regional tournament at the University of Maryland on Sunday when she took a knee in protest of her transgender opponent, Redmond Sullivan, before her match. An official then showed Turner a black card, and she was disqualified from the rest of the tournament for refusing to compete.
'I told them that I was refusing to fence because this person is a man, and I'm a woman, and this is a women's tournament and I refuse to fence on principle,' Turner later told Fox News.
She has not been disqualified from other events or tournaments.
'A fencer is not permitted to refuse to fence another properly entered fencer for any reason,' USA Fencing told the Associated Press.
'Under these rules, such a refusal results in disqualification and the corresponding sanctions. This policy exists to maintain fair competition standards and preserve the sport's integrity.'
The organization also said it understood that the conversation around transgender participation is 'evolving.'
'USA Fencing will always err on the side of inclusion, and we're committed to amending the policy as more relevant evidence-based research emerges, or as policy changes take effect in the wider Olympic & Paralympic movement.'
Turner's protest comes as President Donald Trump and his administration have gone on a crusade against trans people, banning trans athletes from women's sports and even scrubbing references to them from government websites. In January, he signed an executive order declaring that there are only two sexes, male and female, and insisting that it would 'defend women's rights and protect freedom of conscience by using clear and accurate language and policies that recognize women are biologically female, and men are biologically male.'
A federal judge in March blocked the enforcement of a Trump executive order banning transgender people from the military.
In 2023, USA Fencing enacted a policy allowing transgender and non-binary athletes to compete 'in a manner consistent with their gender identity/ expression, regardless of the gender associated with the sex they were assigned at birth.'
'Within our divisions, USA Fencing will not discriminate on the basis of gender identity, regardless of sex assigned at birth, or any other form of gender expression for participation in any division,' its policy states online.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
6 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Dave Brailsford was seen as a messiah. Then came the fall from grace
His methods were lauded as being the gold standard of sports' coaching and management. The term 'marginal gains' seeped into the day-to-day lexicon across the sporting world. Sports teams not just the length-and-breadth of the UK but globally, began trying to mimic the Englishman's approach. Behemoths in the sporting world were knocking down Brailsford's door in an attempt to capture just a little bit of his magic for themselves. Brailsford became Sir Dave. Team Sky, at which Brailsford was at the helm, kick-started a revolution in cycling in this country due, in no small part, by the fact it produced, in Bradley Wiggins, Britain's first-ever winner of the Tour de France. And Team Sky, led by Brailsford, was seen as a major player in changing the face of cycling internationally. No longer was it a drug-fuelled battle of the pharmacists; instead, this was a clean, doping-free era of the sport. Brailsford could, it seemed, do no wrong. It's little wonder he was seen like this - six Tour de France titles in seven years for Team Sky riders (Chris Froome and Geraint Thomas followed Wiggins into the yellow jersey and onto the top step of the podium on the Champs Élysées) and 16 Olympic gold medals over only two Games made British cycling the toast of the sporting world. What a difference, then, a decade can make. Brailsford (l) had great success with Chris Froome (r) at the Tour de France (Image: Bryn Lennon/ Getty Images) When one flies as high as Brailsford did, there's always the risk of falling back to earth with an almighty bang. And this is exactly what's happened. Brailsford, and Team Sky, are no longer seen as 'perfect'. Indeed, the list of negative stories associated with Team Sky as a whole, and specifically surrounding Brailsford, is growing with every passing moment, and it's a list that's becoming impossible to ignore. First there's the 'jiffy bag' story, which dates all the way back to 2011. Apparently, a jiffy bag of substances was delivered from the UK to France, with the contents to be passed to Team Sky's golden boy at the time, Bradley Wiggins. All at Team Sky, including Brailsford himself, claimed the substance inside the jiffy bag was entirely legal but a decade-and-a-half on, we still don't definitively know what was in there. Then came the stories of the use of Therapeutic Use Exemption (TUE) forms for Team Sky's top riders, which gave them a medical exemption to take substances that would otherwise be prohibited. It seemed, rather than genuine medical issues, Team Sky's medical team was cynically exploiting TUEs for their own gains. It was around this time that a parliamentary select committee accused Team Sky of 'crossing an ethical line'. There's the dishing out of the pain medication Tramadol, which was subsequently banned, and there's the four-year suspension of former Team Sky and British Cycling doctor, Richard Freeman, for violating anti-doping rules. The latest revelation about Team Sky, which was rebranded Team Ineos in 2019 and is now Ineos Grenadiers, is equally unflattering. During this year's Tour de France, at which Ineos Grenadiers finished sixth in the team standings and their best rider, Thymen Arensman, was 12th overall, yet another hugely damaging story about Team Sky emerged. David Rozman, a long-time member of the team in his role as team 'carer' (which means he gives massages and carries out other support duties) was forced to leave France mid-race after allegations were made by German TV station ARD that, in 2012, he exchanged messages with the notorious German doping doctor, Mark Schmidt, who has since been convicted of leading a sophisticated doping ring involving multiple cyclists and skiers. One of the messages Rozman sent to Schmidt just weeks before the 2012 Tour said: 'Do you still have any of the stuff that Milram [Schmidt's disgraced former team] used during the races? If so, can you bring it for the boys?' Of course, this in itself isn't proof that anything nefarious was going on. But still, it's not a great look. And it's just the latest nail in the reputational coffin of Brailsford and Team Sky. Brailsford had, in recent years, gradually moved away from cycling. After Jim Ratcliffe (the founder of Ineos) invested in Manchester United, he brought Brailsford in as director of sport but the Englishman was less than convincing in that role and after an underwhelming season this year, quietly left that position just weeks ago. Which was, incidentally, just prior to it emerging that the now-disgraced Rozman worked, for a short time, at Manchester United. Brailsford alongside Jim Ratcliffe (l) It's not the departure Brailsford would have envisaged. So how has Brailsford gone from being seen as a cycling messiah to what he is now, a hugely tainted and far from universally admired figure? It seems that although Team Sky achieved many admirable things, they just might not have been quite as squeaky-clean as Brailsford would have had us all believe. We all fell hook, line and sinker for the marginal gains theory when, in fact, taking a step back, it becomes clear that bringing your own pillows to a race isn't going to make quite the difference we were led to believe it would. Brailsford isn't an instantly likeable individual, either. I never quite took to him, although he certainly had an aura. I remember seeing him walking around the Athletes' Village at the London 2012 Olympics - which came just as Brailsford was beginning to achieve superstar status - and the arrogance was almost palpable. Certainly, Brailsford's apparent cockiness was not unfounded. He was widely hailed as one of sport's great thinkers and was being treated as a celebrity in exactly the same manner the athletes were. But he also obviously revelled in being treated as a sporting superstar when it's now widely acknowledged that he is far from a cycling expert. Brailsford is 61 now. Following his departure from Manchester United - he's remains a director but has stepped back from day-to-day duties - he has reportedly returned to his first love, cycling, where he will return to a hands-on role at Ineos Grenadiers. He may well have further success now he's back in cycling, although it's hugely unlikely he ever scales the same heights either results-wise, or reputation-wise, that he managed a decade-or-so ago. Whatever happens, Brailsford's reputation is tarnished, and pretty seriously in many people's eyes. It's always the danger, isn't it, of building yourself up to being perfect. Sooner or later, you'll be found out not to be.
Metro
7 hours ago
- Metro
Here's what was in the letter from Melania handed to Putin by Trump in Alaska
When Donald Trump met Vladimir Putin for the first time in six years on Friday, he brought with him a secret weapon – a letter from his wife. Melania Trump's message to Putin appeared to urge the Russian President to end the war in Ukraine and highlighted the plight of children caught in the middle of the conflict. The note, which Donald Trump handed to his fellow leader in Alaska, did not refer directly to the war, but said 'it is time' to change things, reported Fox News. 'Every child shares the same quiet dreams in their heart,' it said. 'They dream of love, possibility, and safety from danger.' 'As parents, it is our duty to nurture the next generation's hope. As leaders, the responsibility to sustain our children extends beyond the comfort of a few.' The letter said leaders must strive for a world where 'every soul may wake to peace', adding that 'each generation's descendants begin their lives with a purity – an innocence which stands above geography, government, and ideology'. In an apparent reference to the war in Ukraine, the note continued: 'Yet in today's world, some children are forced to carry a quiet laughter, untouched by the darkness around them – a silent defiance against the forces that can potentially claim their future. 'Mr. Putin, you can singlehandedly restore their melodic laughter.' The Russian President would be able to protect these children with 'a stroke of the pen today', she wrote. Melania's so-called 'peace letter' was hand-delivered by her husband to Putin on Friday during their summit in Anchorage, Alaska. It marks the latest intervention from Slovenian-born Melania, who was raised in the former Yugoslavia. She is said to have been influential in pushing Donald Trump to try and secure peace in Ukraine. Last month, the President said: 'My conversations with him [Putin] are always very pleasant. I say, isn't that a very lovely conversation? And then the missiles go off that night. 'I go home, I tell the first lady: 'I spoke with Vladimir today. We had a wonderful conversation'. She said: 'Really? Another city was just hit.'' The high-stakes meeting on Friday was the first summit between the two countries since 2021, which was before Putin invaded Ukraine. Dear President Putin, Every child shares the same quiet dreams in their heart, whether born randomly into a nation's rustic countryside or a magnificent city-center. They dream of love, possibility, and safety from danger. As parents, it is our duty to nurture the next generation's hope. As leaders, the responsibility to sustain our children extends beyond the comfort of a few. Undeniably, we must strive to paint a dignity-filled world for all – so that every soul may wake to peace, and so that the future itself is perfectly guarded. A simple yet profound concept, Mr. Putin, as I am sure you agree, is that each generation's descendants begin their lives with a purity – an innocence which stands above geography, government, and ideology. Yet in today's world, some children are forced to carry a quiet laughter, untouched by the darkness around them – a silent defiance against the forces that can potentially claim their future. Mr. Putin, you can singlehandedly restore their melodic laughter. In protecting the innocence of these children, you will do more than serve Russia alone – you serve humanity itself. Such a bold idea transcends all human division, and you, Mr. Putin, are fit to implement this vision with a stroke of the pen today. It is time. Sincerely, Melania Trump Melania has also voiced support for Ukraine since the war began, previously encouraging her social media followers to donate to the Red Cross. A report by the United Nations earlier this year said 669 children had been killed between the start of the war and the end of 2024, though it added that the actual numbers are likely much higher. More Trending Over the same timeframe, an estimated 737,000 children had been internally displaced by the hostilities and a further 1.7 million were refugees, many separated from a parent. Since the meeting ended, Putin has said it was 'very useful'. Trump said the summit was 'extremely productive,' but that the parties were 'not there yet' on ending the war. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is expected to travel to Washington D.C. to meet with Trump on Monday. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Putin's 'shaky' legs after Trump summit reignite health conspiracy theories MORE: Revealed: What Trump said to Putin that the cameras didn't catch MORE: Shocking enemy who'd nominate Trump for Nobel Peace Prize if he ends Russia-Ukraine war
Daily Mirror
7 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Vladimir Putin names his to end Ukraine war as Zelensky prepares for Trump talks
Vladimir Putin is hoping to grab as much land as possible from Ukraine ahead of any ceasefire or peace deal with Donald Trump remaining coy over what guarantees he will offer Kyiv Russian despot Vladimir Putin has named his price to bring an end to the war in Ukraine as Volodymyr Zelensky prepares for his showdown with Donald Trump. Putin appeared willing to end the bloodshed at a steep price according to reports, namely demanding full control of Donetsk and Luhansk as a condition toward peace. In exchange for the two occupied regions of eastern Ukraine, he would surrender other territories held by his troops in the country. Several outlets have reported Trump is inclined to support the plan and will discuss Putin's price with Zelensky when they meet in the Oval Office on Monday. European leaders will wait in apprehension, hoping the meeting will avoid any confrontation like the spat between Zelensky and Vice President JD Vance earlier this year. Following the Alaska summit on Friday, Trump told Fox News it was up to the Ukrainian president to "make a deal" to bring an end to the war. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer commended Mr Trump's "pursuit of an end to the killing" following a phone call with the US President, Zelensky and Nato allies on Saturday morning. The UK leader did stress Zelensky should not be excluded from future talks to broker a peace in Ukraine. Starmer and other European leaders appear increasingly confident Trump will offer a "security guarantee" of air support to back up allied troops on the ground in Ukraine. The Prime Minister welcomed 'the openness of the United States, alongside Europe, to provide robust security guarantees to Ukraine as part of any deal. This is important progress and will be crucial in deterring Putin from coming back for more." Trump did appear to have a change of heart on what he wants to achieve from the talks, indicating that he wants a permanent peace settlement rather than a ceasefire. Posting on TruthSocial, the US president said: "It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a peace agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere ceasefire agreement, which often times do not hold up." Putin described the meeting as "timely" and "useful" after leaving Alaska. Experts warned the meeting on US soil risked legitimising the Russian leader after he has been made a pariah by the international community following his invasion of Ukraine. Dr Neil Melvin, director of international security at the Royal United Services Institute (Rusi), said: " Vladimir Putin came to the Alaska summit with the principal goal of stalling any pressure on Russia to end the war. He will consider the summit outcome as mission accomplished." Zelensky warned Russia may ramp up its strikes against his country in the coming days "in order to create more favourable political circumstances for talks with global actors." Kyiv's troops are 'defending our positions along the entire front line', he added on social media site X. The Ukrainian leader earlier insisted a ceasefire must include an end to fighting on land, in the sea and the air, as well as returning all prisoners of war and captured civilians, including children. Sanctions on Moscow "should be strengthened if there is no trilateral meeting or if Russia tries to evade an honest end to the war', Zelensky added.
