
Alberta government appeals temporary injunction of transgender health care law
A judge granted the injunction in June, ruling the provincial law raises serious Charter issues that need to be hashed out in an ongoing court challenge of the legislation.
Court of King's Bench Justice Allison Kuntz said the law is likely to cause irreparable harm to gender-diverse youth and she didn't find the contrary evidence submitted by the province to be overwhelming.
The government, in an appeal filed to the Calgary court last month, argues the injunction was premature, since it wasn't fully in effect.
It also claims the judge made a mistake and 'mixed fact and law' in deciding the legislation would cause irreparable harm.
The Decibel: The legal fight over gender-affirming health care in Alberta
Justice Minister Mickey Amery's press secretary, Heather Jenkins, said the law was passed to protect children from making potentially irreversible decisions about their bodies.
'Alberta's government will continue to vigorously defend our position in court,' she said in an email Friday.
Egale Canada, one of the groups challenging the law along with five transgender youth, says it respects the province's right to appeal but believes the judge made the right decision.
'The Court of King's Bench, relying on extensive expert testimony and evidence, affirmed what we have long argued – that denying gender-affirming care causes irreparable harm,' Egale's legal director, Bennett Jensen, said in an email.
'The context of this case remains clear: the government is interfering in the relationship between doctors and patients by seeking to ban medically necessary, evidence-based care for an already marginalized group of youth.'
The law bans doctors from providing treatment such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy to those under 16.
Opinion: The real health care wait-time scandal? Political meddling
Kuntz wrote in her decision that denying treatment could cause youth emotional and psychological harm and expose them to permanent physical changes that don't match their gender identity.
She also said the ban would reinforce the discrimination and prejudice they already experience.
'Intentionally or not, the ban will signal that there is something wrong with or suspect about having a gender identity that is different than the sex you were assigned at birth,' the judge wrote.
The province had argued against the injunction, saying claims the law would harm youth were speculative because the ban hadn't been enforced yet.
The government also said any psychological harm would be a result of puberty, though the judge largely rebuffed that argument.
The Canadian Medical Association and three Alberta-based doctors are also challenging the law's constitutionality in a separate case. The doctors argue the law violates their Charter right to freedom of conscience.
MHCare demands AHS investigation results
The law came from a trio of bills affecting transgender people that Premier Danielle Smith's United Conservative Party government passed last year.
The other pieces of legislation ban transgender women from competing in women's sports and require children under 16 have parental consent to change their names or pronouns at school.
Parents are also required to opt in their children for school lessons on sexuality, sexual orientation and gender identity.
Alberta's law followed Saskatchewan, which passed its own law in 2023 that requires parental consent for students under 16 who want to change their names or pronouns. That government invoked the Charter's notwithstanding clause in response to a court challenge launched in part by Egale Canada as well.
Despite Saskatchewan's use of the notwithstanding clause, a judge ruled that a challenge could continue on the legislation, though that decision was appealed by the province.
A decision on Saskatchewan's appeal is expected Monday.
Smith has said invoking the notwithstanding clause isn't off the table to ensure Alberta's gender-affirming care ban is enforced.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Air Canada flight attendants at the bargaining table
Vancouver Watch Flight attendants at Air Canada are advocating for better rights and could walk off the job next week if an agreement isn't reached.


CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Island Lake First Nations demand fire prevention overhaul
First Nations leaders are speaking out and calling for a comprehensive plan to address wildfires and evacuations. CTV's Harrison Shin reports. The Chiefs of the Island Lake First Nations are demanding solutions from the perspective of fire prevention, not reactiveness. On Friday, leadership members of the Island Lake First Nations held a press conference in Winnipeg, demanding five solutions. 'This is not an emergency system; this is a cycle of failure. Our Chiefs and Anisininew Nations are saying to Canada, 'The cycle ends now,'' Grand Chief Alex McDougall of Anisininew Okimawin said. 'Leaders called for a national Indigenous fire strategy because of chronic lack of firefighting, fire prevention and emergency services in First Nations was a recipe for disaster,' McDougall added. In a media release, the Anisininew Okimawin leadership is demanding five action items, addressing future-proof measures and the current wildfire situation. 'We don't need to fund more evacuations—we need fund on staying home,' Chief Raymond Flett of St. Theresa Point Anisininew Nation said. Six leaders of the First Nations drew their statements based on a 2022 Auditor General of Canada report. '$646 million in response, and $182 million on prevention. That's unacceptable—this should be the other way around,' Chief Willie Moore of the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs said. The Canadian Red Cross said the organization is working extremely hard to provide support, in an email statement. 'As of August 6, the Red Cross has registered more than 31,000 people from more than 12,000 households evacuated due to wildfires in Manitoba. This includes people from more than 7,000 households on behalf of Indigenous Services Canada, and more than 5,000 households on behalf of the Province of Manitoba. 'This is a fast-moving and evolving response and the Red Cross is working with community leadership, the Government of Manitoba and Indigenous Services Canada to provide support to people impacted, as requested and directed by the community,' the statement said. Indigenous Services Canada (ISC) said the department operates multiple programs to support First Nations, in an email response. 'Since April 1st, 2025, ISC has also provided $58.9 million in advance payments to support immediate response to First Nations in Manitoba experiencing displacements due to wildland fires. 'We are actively engaging with First Nations and Manitoba to discuss improvements based on lessons learned from the current wildfire season, particularly through the development of multilateral emergency management service agreements that include First Nations as full and equal partners in governance, planning, and delivery.' The federal department said it's open to working closely on long-term plans with communities and provincial governments that wish to build all-season roads. 'While the building and maintaining of permanent off-reserve roads falls under provincial jurisdiction, ISC will continue to engage the provinces and impacted First Nations on longer-term transportation plans.' For the First Nations affected, they said their future is at stake. 'We can't live like this for another 60—maybe 50—years,' Chief Walter Harper of Wasagamack Anisininew Nation said.


CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
Lawyers seek court injunction ahead of Kitchener encampment eviction
Lawyers representing people living at a Kitchener encampment were in court to seek an injunction. CTV's Spencer Turcotte explains what's on the line. An error has occurred. Please ensure your web browser is up to date before trying again. If applicable, disable any virtual private network (VPN) and ad blocker. [3003/4032] Lawyers are seeking a court injunction to delay a bylaw that would force residents out of a downtown Kitchener encampment so construction can begin on the Region of Waterloo's new transit hub. They made their case at a hearing on Friday, arguing the site-specific bylaw should be put on hold until the court makes a decision on its constitutionality. Those proceedings aren't expected to begin until November. Regional councillors approved the bylaw back in April with the goal of clearing the long-standing encampment at 100 Victoria Street by Dec. 1. The bylaw allows staff to begin work to prepare the site for construction and transition residents who live at the encampment to alternative housing options. Lawyers representing the encampment residents told the court capacity at local shelters is inadequate to handle those displaced by the bylaw. The current system, they argued, falls short by approximately 80 per cent of what is needed. They cited threats such as frostbite, hunger, or even rape, if residents were left to fend for themselves. 'Encampment residents face potential death as a result of the site-specific bylaw,' stated Shannon Down, a lawyer with Waterloo Region Community Legal Services. Meanwhile, lawyers for the Region of Waterloo asked the court to dismiss the motion for an injunction. 'Some places are just not suitable for encampments,' Andrew Lokan, a lawyer representing the region, argued. 'There is a public interest in the region being able to use public property to benefit the public.' Lawyers for the region also said municipal staff continue to work with the encampment residents to find alternative living arrangements. Only 13 of the original 40 residents, who were at the encampment when regional council passed the bylaw, are still at the site as of Aug. 8 according to the region's legal team. They also argued no court intervention is required as they believe the Dec. 1 deadline will give staff enough time to prepare residents for the move. Lawyers for the Attorney General echoed those sentiments, suggesting the motion for an injunction should be dismissed. The judge decided to reserve his decision given the complexities of the case. Down told CTV News in an email on Friday, they may not know the judge's decision on the injunction motion for 'at least a couple of weeks.'