State lawmakers dip into debate over Flathead Lake summer water level
"The 69th Montana Legislature requests all decision-making bodies with an influence on the usability of Flathead Lake ensure that recreation needs be measured fairly compared to hydropower, fish and irrigation demands; and that Flathead Lake recreation needs be expressly reflected in the next iteration of the Columbia River Treaty and in the next round of the Columbia River System Operations planning," reads Senate Joint Resolution 18.
In his testimony before the Senate Natural Resources Committee on March 26, Regier argued that the low water level during the summer of 2023 caused significant harm to Flathead Valley residents and businesses.
"It's a lake I grew up water skiing on, and so many people did. To not be able to use it like that needs to be in the conversation with hydro and fish and everything," said Regier.
Dam managers cited abnormal weather conditions as the primary reason for the low level; high spring temperatures caused an early snowmelt, reducing the availability of water during the summer months.
Despite the low water level, the SKQ Dam continued some outflows from the lake to meet federal energy quotas and ensure healthy downstream conditions. While that decision drew sharp criticisms from many lakeshore residents, allegations of mismanagement were later dismissed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
Regier noted that the resolution does not actually change any laws or policies. If passed, a copy of the resolution would be sent to key stakeholders in the lake's management as a show of the Legislature's position.
Regier said that he originally considered sponsoring legislation that would enact new state mandates, but he reconsidered his approach after learning how complex water management decisions are.
Earlier this year, Republican Congressman Ryan Zinke reintroduced federal legislation mandating that the Interior Department maintain certain water levels on the lake. The bill has not yet been scheduled for a hearing.
Reporter Hailey Smalley can be reached at hsmalley@dailyinterlake.com or 758-4433.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
26 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
House committee launches investigation into California's high-speed rail project
A bipartisan congressional committee is investigating whether California's High-Speed Rail Authority knowingly misrepresented ridership projections and financial outlooks, as alleged by the Trump administration, to secure federal funding. In a letter sent to Department of Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy on Tuesday, House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform chair James Comer (R-KY) requested a staff briefing and all communications and records about federal funding for the high-speed rail project and any analysis over the train's viability. 'The Authority's apparent repeated use of misleading ridership projections, despite longstanding warnings from experts, raises serious questions about whether funds were allocated under false pretenses,' Comer wrote. Comer's letter copied Congressman Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the committee who has also voiced skepticism about the project. Garcia, whose districts represent communities in Southern California, was not immediately available for comment. An authority spokesperson called the House committee's investigation 'another baseless attempt to manufacture controversy around America's largest and most complex infrastructure project,' and added that the project's chief executive Ian Choudri previously addressed the claims and called them 'cherrypicked and out-of-date, and therefore misleading.' Last month, the Trump administration pulled $4 billion in federal funding from the project meant for construction in the Central Valley. After a months-long review, prompted by calls from Republican lawmakers, the administration found 'no viable path' forward for the fast train, which is billions of dollars over budget and years behind schedule. The administration also questioned whether the authority's projected ridership counts were intentionally misrepresented. California leaders called the move 'illegal' and sued the Trump administration for declaratory and injunctive relief. Gov. Gavin Newsom said it was 'a political stunt' and a 'heartless attack on the Central Valley.' The bullet train was proposed decades ago as a way to connect Los Angeles and San Francisco in less than three hours by 2020. While the entire line has cleared environmental reviews, no stretch of the route has been completed. Construction has been limited to the Central Valley, where authority leaders have said a segment between Merced and Bakersfield will open by 2033. The project is also about $100 billion over its original budget of $33 billion. Even before the White House pulled federal funding, authority leaders and advisers repeatedly raised concerns over the project's long-term financial sustainability. Roughly $13 billion has been spent so far — the bulk of which was supplied by the state, which has proposed $1 billion per year towards the project. But Choudri, who started at the authority last year, has said the project needs to find new sources of funding and has turned focus toward establishing public-private partnerships to supplement costs.
Bloomberg
28 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Argentine Bonds Drop As Milei's Veto Suffers Setback in Congress
By and Nicolle Yapur Save Argentine sovereign bonds fell Wednesday after lawmakers dealt a blow to one of President Javier Milei's vetoes as congressional opponents pushed back against his austerity campaign before October midterm elections. Argentina's Lower House rejected the libertarian leader's veto of a bill that seeks to expand public spending on disability aid in a landslide 172-73 vote, achieving the two-thirds majority to send the legislation back to the Senate where Milei has even less support.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US attorney will no longer bring felony charges against people for carrying rifles or shotguns in DC
WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal prosecutors in the nation's capital will no longer bring felony charges against people for possessing rifles or shotguns in the District of Columbia, according to a new policy adopted by the leader of the nation's largest U.S. attorney's office. That office will continue to pursue charges when someone is accused of using a shotgun or rifle in a violent crime or has a criminal record that makes it illegal to have a firearm. Local authorities in Washington can prosecute people for illegally possessing unregistered rifles and shotguns. U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro said in a statement that the change is based on guidance from the Justice Department and the Office of Solicitor General and conforms with two Supreme Court decisions on gun rights. Pirro, a former Fox News host, has been a vocal critic of local officials' crime-fighting efforts since Republican President Donald Trump installed her in office in May. Her policy shift means federal prosecutors will not purse charges under the D.C. law that made it illegal to carry rifles or shotguns, except in limited cases involving permit holders. The change also overlaps with Trump's declaration of a crime emergency in the city, flooding the streets of Washington with patrols of hundreds of federal agents and National Guard members. The White House says 76 firearms have been seized since the crackdown started this month. The new policy also coves large-capacity magazines, but it does not apply to handguns. 'We will continue to seize all illegal and unlicensed firearms, and to vigorously prosecute all crimes connected with them,' Pirro said, adding that she and Trump "are committed to prosecuting gun crime.' Pirro said a blanket ban on possessing shotguns and rifles violates the Supreme Court's ruling in 2022 that struck down a New York gun law and held that Americans have a right to carry firearms in public for self-defense. She also pointed to the high court's 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. Heller striking down the city's ban on handguns in the home.
