logo
‘Insanity': Wild restaurant fee shocks the internet

‘Insanity': Wild restaurant fee shocks the internet

News.com.au19-06-2025
A disgruntled patron posted a receipt from a recent trip to a restaurant that charged its guests a mandatory 'living wage fee' on Instagram threads — and the internet was incensed.
Tipping culture has long been a point of contention for Americans, and as prices continue to rise, the practice has become an even more controversial topic.
But now it seems that businesses are taking things too far by tacking on extra fees such as this one — and people aren't happy about it.
'Price increase without having to update the menu,' claimed one reply on the post.
'[This] means I'm never eating at that restaurant again,' said another.
Meanwhile, another commenter proposed an entirely separate issue of debate: the pooling of tips. 'If I wanna tip a person, I wanna tip that individual, not the entire team. This is unfair to the server and to me.'
However, a few lonely restaurantgoers cut the restaurant, which remained unnamed in the post — and the growing industry trend — some slack, and fired back at fellow commenters.
'Y'all have been asking for no tipping, this is what it looks like. It could reflect in drink/food prices, but then you all would say the place was too expensive.
No one is trying to trick you — if they were transparent about the service fee, STFU,' one impassioned viewer responded.
'Just include [the fee] in the cost of the food and drinks, like the rest of the world is doing, and pay the workers properly. Sincerely, a guy from Europe,' one aggrieved commenter suggested under the post.
This response was the sole sentiment that united incensed restaurant patrons on both sides of the debate. 'Mind your European business,' advised one reply, while another said:
'Hey, stay out of our insanity!'
For some small, family-owned restaurants, implementing charges like this living wage fee might allow the business to stay afloat and support their employees — especially amid a cost-of-living crisis.
Durham, North Carolina-based Lula & Sadie's is one spot that charges a living wage fee to combat 'rising overhead costs, slim industry profit margins and a minimum wage that won't budge,' per the family-operated restaurant's website.
'The fee is transparently listed on our menus, website and posted around the restaurant.'
Though local laws vary greatly in terms of tipping and charging policies in restaurants, New York City Consumer and Worker Protection rules, state that 'restaurants cannot charge a surcharge or other fee in addition to listed food or beverage prices,' but they can 'charge a bona fide service charge, but only if the charge is conspicuously disclosed to consumers before food is ordered.'
Examples of 'bona fide service charges' include splitting a meal on multiple plates, minimums per person and mandatory gratuity for large dining parties.
That being said, 'living wage fees' are often considered service charges, depending on how they're disclosed and absorbed by the business.
'There is no law in New York State that specifically prohibits automatic gratuities. However, it is incumbent upon any restaurant including an automatic gratuity charge to provide — in advance — clear and conspicuous notice that an automatic gratuity charge will be levied and all terms associated with the automatic charge.
If consumers are not provided advanced notice, [they] may have a claim under the NYS Deceptive Acts & Practices law,' New York State's Division of Consumer Protection told News10NBC.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump hails 'total victory' as US court quashes $464 mn civil penalty
Trump hails 'total victory' as US court quashes $464 mn civil penalty

News.com.au

time3 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Trump hails 'total victory' as US court quashes $464 mn civil penalty

A US court threw out Thursday a $464 million civil penalty against President Donald Trump imposed by a judge who found he fraudulently inflated his personal worth, calling the sum "excessive" but upholding the judgment against him. Judge Arthur Engoron ruled against Trump in February 2024 at the height of his campaign to retake the White House, which coincided with several active criminal prosecutions that the Republican slammed as "lawfare." "It was a Political Witch Hunt, in a business sense, the likes of which no one has ever seen before," Trump said on his Truth Social platform Thursday, adding that "everything I did was absolutely CORRECT and, even, PERFECT." When Engoron originally ruled against Trump, he ordered the mogul-turned-politician to pay $464 million, including interest, while his sons Eric and Don Jr. were told to hand over more than $4 million each. The judge found that Trump and his company had unlawfully inflated his wealth and manipulated the value of properties to obtain favorable bank loans or insurance terms. Alongside the financial hit to Trump, the judge also banned him from running businesses for three years, which the president repeatedly referred to as a "corporate death penalty." On Thursday, five judges of the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court upheld the verdict, but ruled that the size of the fine was "excessive" and that it "violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution." The Eighth Amendment prohibits excessive or cruel punishments and penalties. - 'Massive win! - State Attorney General Letitia James, who brought the initial case, vowed to take Thursday's ruling to the state's highest court, the New York Court of Appeals. Thursday's appeals court ruling "affirmed the well-supported finding of the trial court: Donald Trump, his company, and two of his children are liable for fraud," James added. Following the initial verdict, Trump subsequently sought to challenge the civil ruling as well as the scale and terms of the penalty, which has continued to accrue interest while he appeals. He repeatedly condemned the case and the penalty as politically motivated. His son Don Jr. termed the appellate court ruling a "massive win!!!" "New York Appeals Court has just THROWN OUT President Trump's $500+ Million civil fraud penalty! It was always a witch hunt, election interference, and a total miscarriage of justice... and even a left leaning NY appeals court agrees! NO MORE LAWFARE!" he wrote on X. During hearings, conducted without a jury under state law, Trump accused then-president Joe Biden of driving the case, calling it "weaponization against a political opponent who's up a lot in the polls." As the case was civil, not criminal, there was no threat of imprisonment. Trump's economic advisor Peter Navarro said at the White House Thursday that "James is another one that belongs in jail," referring to the New York attorney general. "The Democrats really overplayed their hand on this because they thought they could take Donald Trump out," he said.

Aussies sending goods to the US to be hit by a tariff rule this month
Aussies sending goods to the US to be hit by a tariff rule this month

News.com.au

time10 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Aussies sending goods to the US to be hit by a tariff rule this month

Australians, e-retailers and businesses exporting items to the US are about to be hit with a new tariff after the Trump administration overturned an exemption on imports valued less than $US800. Australia Post warned on its website that US President Donald Trump's import tariff changes take effect from August 29 and will affect Australians sending items to the States. 'We are actively monitoring for any developments and will continue to provide timely updates as more information becomes available,' the Australia Post notice read. NewsWire understands the new tariff needs to be collected from the country of origin and Australia Post is working to find a solution. An Australia Post spokesman said they were focused on providing a reliable and competitive postal service for customers sending parcels internationally. 'The United States government recently announced significant changes to its import tariff rules that will impact customers sending items from Australia to the US,' a spokesman said. 'Our priority is to keep our customers updated on the changes and what they mean for them.' Items sent to the USA worth less than $US800 have been free from paying any tariffs, but last month President Trump signed an executive order to suspend the duty-free 'de minimus' tariff exemption for low-value shipments from all countries. The change is expected to impact e-retailers around the globe and has already seen some countries suspend shipments to the United States. The order empowers Homeland Security to close a loophole which was used to avoid tariffs and exploited by organised criminals to smuggle drugs into the United States. A Homeland Security spokesman said under the de minimus exemption, countries exploited the system to flood the American market with cheap goods (such as e-commerce retailers Temu and Shein) that undercut American manufacturers and cost jobs. 'Over the past decade the volume of de minimus shipments to the United States exploded, growing from 134 million shipments in 2015 to over 1.36 billion shipments in 2024,' a statement read. 'De minimus shipments accounted for 90 per cent of all cargo seizures in FY 24.' Some European postal services have already paused shipments to the USA following the new tariff rules. Sweden's PostNord said in a statement that the de minimus rule change would considerably impact international postal services and e-retailers. The company halted shipments to the United States and Puerto Rico until a compliant solution was developed and implemented.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store