At-risk Invercargill prisoners still being placed in dry cells, despite warnings
Photo:
RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly
Corrections has continued locking suicidal Invercargill prisoners in rooms with no toilet or drinking water, despite being reprimanded for the practice six years ago.
In 2019, then-Chief Ombudsman Peter Boshier found it breached United Nations standards meant to prevent the torture of prisoners and to ensure their dignity.
Since then prisoners identified as at-risk were placed in so-called dry cells at least 14 times, data obtained under Official Information Act showed.
Dry cells, located in the prison's Intervention and Support Unit (ISU), were designed for monitoring prisoners suspected of hiding contraband.
Corrections said at-risk prisoners were typically put in a different area of the unit, known as the 'safer cells' - rooms with no ligature points which allowed for close monitoring and access to specialist care.
On 13 of the 14 occasions at-risk prisoners were placed in the dry cells since 2019, Corrections said the safer cells were full.
Most of the instances occurred in 2023, and the most recent was in November 2024.
Deputy Commissioner for Men's Prisons Neil Beales said staff were left with little choice.
"We still have a responsibility to make sure that that person is properly looked after and we can't put them in a cell where there may be ligature points. It appears that what they've done there is they've used what was available to them," he said.
"Nobody is saying that is optimal and preferable, but unfortunately it's unavoidable in those circumstances."
When at-risk Invercargill prisoners were put in dry cells, they were still closely monitored and had access to specialised care, Corrections said.
Beales said the duration of the stays varied - sometimes overnight and sometimes a few hours.
Multiple watchdogs had warned Corrections about the use of dry cells for at-risk prisoners.
The
Ombudsman highlighted the issue in 2019
after an unannounced visit to Invercargill Prison.
At the time Boshier visited, he said Invercargill Prison's three ISU safer cells were full, and two at-risk prisoners were being held in dry cells.
They had been given cardboard receptacles instead of a toilet, he said.
Boshier found that contravened Rule 15 of the UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners which stated "sanitary installations shall be adequate to enable every prisoner to comply with the needs of nature when necessary, in a clean and decent manner".
In 2021, Boshier also
warned against the use of dry cells for at-risk prisoners
at Christchurch Men's and Whanganui Prisons.
"Dry cells are a desolate and barren environment for prisoners who are already vulnerable. I do not consider it is ever appropriate to put at-risk people into cells with no toilets or drinking water," he said.
In 2023, the Office of the Inspectorate also warned Corrections against the practice.
Chief Inspector of Corrections Janis Adair spelled out her concerns in a
report on Separation and Isolation
across the country's prison system.
"We observed that the dry cells were sometimes being used outside their intended purpose, for example because there were insufficient at-risk cells. This is not appropriate as the dry cells are especially restrictive," she said.
"Dry cells also have no furniture, and the mattress is placed either directly on the floor, or on a low concrete base."
Amnesty International New Zealand advocacy and movement building director Lisa Woods said the continued use of dry cells for at-risk Invercargill prisoners was an utter failure.
"People being placed in such conditions, especially after the Ombudsman has made it clear it goes against international human rights standards - it's beyond appalling," she said.
"This ... shows the system is utterly broken."
A breach of the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, also known as the Nelson Mandela Rules, should be treated seriously, Woods said.
"Over and over again, the criminal justice system is failing to treat people in its care with dignity, and this is unacceptable," she said.
"Everyone has the right to dignity. That's inherent and important."
Howard League for Penal Reform spokesperson Cosmo Jeffery, who was placed in a dry cell himself in the early 2000s, said he would not wish it on anyone, let alone someone in a vulnerable mental state.
"It's totally inhumane. It's going back to the dark ages," he said.
He questioned the lack of action to prevent the use of dry cells for at-risk prisoners.
"There doesn't seem to be any resolution. There's no appetite for change," Jeffery said.
Since 2019, the population of Invercargill prison had fluctuated between 110 and 182 inmates, including people on remand.
Beales said there had been a notable rise in the number of arrivals with significant mental health, drug and alcohol issues.
"I know that our managers at those sites will do everything in their power not to use those cells. But when you're stuck with nowhere else to put them that is safe - we can't put people who are at risk on a bus and send them up the road, because that can be equally as damaging, as dangerous," he said.
"They have to make the best decisions for safety of the people that we're managing and also the safety of our staff."
RNZ asked Beales why Corrections had not increased the number of ISU safer cells in Invercargill Prison.
He said given the nature and age of the building, Corrections had decided to invest its money elsewhere in the prison network.
"What we've done is focus resources where they're going to give us better bang for buck."
Corrections opened 500 new high-security beds at Waikeria Prison last month, and 96 dedicated mental health and addiction beds, he said.
"If we utilise those facilities better, we take the pressure off the rest of the network," Beales said.
Asked if dry cells would continue to be used for at-risk prisoners at Invercargill Prison, Beales said that would come down to capacity.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
At-risk Invercargill prisoners still being placed in dry cells
By Katie Todd of RNZ Corrections has continued locking suicidal Invercargill prisoners in rooms with no toilet or drinking water, despite being reprimanded for the practice six years ago. In 2019, then-Chief Ombudsman Peter Boshier found it breached United Nations standards meant to prevent the torture of prisoners and to ensure their dignity. Since then prisoners identified as at-risk were placed in so-called dry cells at least 14 times, data obtained under Official Information Act showed. Dry cells, located in the prison's Intervention and Support Unit (ISU), were designed for monitoring prisoners suspected of hiding contraband. Corrections said at-risk prisoners were typically put in a different area of the unit, known as the 'safer cells' - rooms with no ligature points which allowed for close monitoring and access to specialist care. On 13 of the 14 occasions at-risk prisoners were placed in the dry cells since 2019, Corrections said the safer cells were full. Most of the instances occurred in 2023, and the most recent was in November 2024. Deputy Commissioner for Men's Prisons Neil Beales said staff were left with little choice. "We still have a responsibility to make sure that that person is properly looked after and we can't put them in a cell where there may be ligature points. It appears that what they've done there is they've used what was available to them," he said. "Nobody is saying that is optimal and preferable, but unfortunately it's unavoidable in those circumstances." When at-risk Invercargill prisoners were put in dry cells, they were still closely monitored and had access to specialised care, Corrections said. Beales said the duration of the stays varied - sometimes overnight and sometimes a few hours. Watchdogs repeatedly raised red flags Multiple watchdogs had warned Corrections about the use of dry cells for at-risk prisoners. The Ombudsman highlighted the issue in 2019 after an unannounced visit to Invercargill Prison. At the time Boshier visited, he said Invercargill Prison's three ISU safer cells were full, and two at-risk prisoners were being held in dry cells. They had been given cardboard receptacles instead of a toilet, he said. Boshier found that contravened Rule 15 of the UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners which stated "sanitary installations shall be adequate to enable every prisoner to comply with the needs of nature when necessary, in a clean and decent manner". In 2021, Boshier also warned against the use of dry cells for at-risk prisoners at Christchurch Men's and Whanganui Prisons. "Dry cells are a desolate and barren environment for prisoners who are already vulnerable. I do not consider it is ever appropriate to put at-risk people into cells with no toilets or drinking water," he said. In 2023, the Office of the Inspectorate also warned Corrections against the practice. Chief Inspector of Corrections Janis Adair spelled out her concerns in a report on Separation and Isolation across the country's prison system. "We observed that the dry cells were sometimes being used outside their intended purpose, for example because there were insufficient at-risk cells. This is not appropriate as the dry cells are especially restrictive," she said. "Dry cells also have no furniture, and the mattress is placed either directly on the floor, or on a low concrete base." 'Inhumane', 'appalling' and an 'utter failure' - advocacy groups call for accountability Amnesty International New Zealand advocacy and movement building director Lisa Woods said the continued use of dry cells for at-risk Invercargill prisoners was an utter failure. "People being placed in such conditions, especially after the Ombudsman has made it clear it goes against international human rights standards - it's beyond appalling," she said. "This ... shows the system is utterly broken." A breach of the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, also known as the Nelson Mandela Rules, should be treated seriously, Woods said. "Over and over again, the criminal justice system is failing to treat people in its care with dignity, and this is unacceptable," she said. "Everyone has the right to dignity. That's inherent and important." Howard League for Penal Reform spokesperson Cosmo Jeffery, who was placed in a dry cell himself in the early 2000s, said he would not wish it on anyone, let alone someone in a vulnerable mental state. "It's totally inhumane. It's going back to the dark ages," he said. He questioned the lack of action to prevent the use of dry cells for at-risk prisoners. "There doesn't seem to be any resolution. There's no appetite for change," Jeffery said. Pressure on mental health care and cell space Since 2019, the population of Invercargill prison had fluctuated between 110 and 182 inmates, including people on remand. Beales said there had been a notable rise in the number of arrivals with significant mental health, drug and alcohol issues. "I know that our managers at those sites will do everything in their power not to use those cells. But when you're stuck with nowhere else to put them that is safe - we can't put people who are at risk on a bus and send them up the road, because that can be equally as damaging, as dangerous," he said. "They have to make the best decisions for safety of the people that we're managing and also the safety of our staff." RNZ asked Beales why Corrections had not increased the number of ISU safer cells in Invercargill Prison. He said given the nature and age of the building, Corrections had decided to invest its money elsewhere in the prison network. "What we've done is focus resources where they're going to give us better bang for buck." Corrections opened 500 new high-security beds at Waikeria Prison last month, and 96 dedicated mental health and addiction beds, he said. "If we utilise those facilities better, we take the pressure off the rest of the network," Beales said. Asked if dry cells would continue to be used for at-risk prisoners at Invercargill Prison, Beales said that would come down to capacity.

RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
One seriously injured after assault in Manukau city centre
Police at the scene of Monday's night incident. Photo: RNZ / Kim Baker Wilson One person has been seriously injured in an assault in the Manukau city centre. Emergency services are responding on Manukau Station Road after being alerted about 8.15pm this evening. The injured person has been taken to Middlemore Hospital. Police are working to locate those involved.

RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Ōmokoroa pub confrontation ends with couple followed home, and a ‘trail of blood'
By Hannah Bartlett of File photo. Photo: SunLive Terse words outside a pub on a Saturday afternoon ended with a "trail of blood" at a Bay of Plenty property, after three men followed a couple home and beat them up. Two men have been sentenced in the Tauranga District Court over the incident. The assault began when victim Beau-Derek Toi Toi thought one of the defendants was staring at him, as Toi Toi drove past The Village Green pub on his way to the Ōmokoroa shops last July. He yelled: "What's your f***ing problem?" before getting out of his car and confronting Fletcher Shane Laurence, who was at the pub having a drink with a woman. Toi Toi believed Laurence and the woman were "staring at him". The two men exchanged words, with Laurence suggesting they "meet at the top of the hill in 20 minutes". But Toi Toi left. According to the Crown summary of facts he "did not want the verbal exchange to escalate into a fight", so he and his partner went to the laundromat and, about 20 minutes later, headed home. However, Laurence enlisted the help of two friends, and the trio followed Toi Toi and his partner Pania Pettifer home, pulling into their driveway behind them. There they began an "ongoing" attack on the couple, for which two of the three were today sentenced in the Tauranga District Court. According to the summary of facts, Samuel Sparham was wearing "black gloves with padded knuckles" as he got out of the car, driven by a man who can not be named for legal reasons, and accused Toi Toi of threatening his family. The driver and Sparham punched Toi Toi about 20 times, hitting his face and body as he was pushed up against the car. Toi Toi managed to punch Sparham once, then made his way around to the side of the house. Pettifer approached Laurence and asked him: "Are you going to f***ing hit me?" He pushed her to the ground and kept walking around the house to find Toi Toi, who was now being held by his arms by the other two men. Pettifer had followed, and Laurence again pushed her to the ground before kicking Toi Toi in the chest. As Pettifer got up and ran towards Toi Toi, Sparham pushed her over, and the three men returned to their Subaru. After getting free, Toi Toi wedged himself in a gap between the top and bottom part of the house. Laurence said to Toi Toi: "There's no problem now, eh, it's all sorted... you can't call the police because we know where you live and we're gangsters." The summary of facts stated after the attack, there was a "trail of blood" along the victims' property. An ambulance took Toi Toi to hospital where he was found to have fractures to his ribs and face, as well as swelling on his forehead. Reparation was sought by the victims for the "security cameras and dog" they'd acquired, due to feeling unsafe after the attack. The pair's victim impact statements spoke of the continued anxiety they both suffer, and are on medication for, as well as the impact it's had on their ability to sleep. They now own four dogs, and Toi Toi still has breathing difficulties because of the injuries to his nose and sinuses. They both fear bumping into the trio again, and are reluctant to go out in public. The three faced charges of injuring with intent to injure and common assault, and the driver also faced a charge of driving while disqualified. Laurence sought a sentence indication by Judge Melinda Mason, which all three accepted, in which the judge noted the aggravating factors were the multiple attackers, attacks to the head, and the extensive injuries. She did not accept the Crown's submission of victim vulnerability, or that it was an unprovoked attack. "In my view... it was not an unprovoked attack, nor was it pre-mediated, although it was ongoing," said Judge Mason. "I do not consider that to be an aggravating factor, particularly when the complainant was the initial aggressor and he was followed back." Judge Mason adopted a starting point of 26 months' imprisonment, and the defendants were allowed a 20% discount for pleading guilty. Reparation of $1152 was sought and was to be shared across the three defendants. Laurence was sentenced to 10 months' home detention, with six months' post-detention conditions. Sparham was sentenced to 17 months' imprisonment, after an uplift for offending while parole was applied, but was also given discounts for his background, prospects of rehabilitation, and remorse. He offered to pay $2500 emotional harm reparation, and the judge ordered that to be paid within 48 hours. He was currently serving another term of imprisonment, on unrelated matters, and was granted leave to apply for home detention once that sentence was complete. The third defendant's sentencing was adjourned until Friday at 11am, for reasons that can not be reported. - This story was originally published by the NZ Herald