Missouri school accreditation bill passes Senate for first time after three years
Sen. Jill Carter, a Republican from Granby, sits at her desk on the Senate floor. Carter has filed a bill for three consecutive years on school accreditation and accountability (Annelise Hanshaw/Missouri Independent).
The Missouri Senate sent a bill to the House Thursday that would overhaul the state's accreditation and accountability system in order to give local school districts more control.
State Sen. Jill Carter, a Republican from Granby, has filed the bill for three consecutive years and garnered approval for public-school advocates in committee. But each year it has been passed over for other priorities when it reached the full Senate.
Skepticism from state Sen. Curtis Trent, a Republican from Springfield, slowed the bill's passage this year and inspired a lengthy debate about accountability earlier this month.
But Monday, he applauded Carter for 'helping work through the concerns that I had.'
Carter tweaked the legislation Monday to clarify sections and add an expiration date to a provision limiting the State Board of Education's authority to classify districts.
It was approved by the Senate Thursday on a 32 to one vote, with Republican state Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman as the only opponent.
If the bill passes the House, school districts will be able to seek accreditation from national accreditation agencies in addition to the State Board of Education. The board can classify districts without outside accreditation as provisionally accredited or unaccredited only for the purpose of determining whether a charter school can open within a district's boundaries. State law allows charters to open the area of unaccredited districts and those that have been provisionally accredited for at least three years.
Carter's legislation also requires schools to post performance data on their websites. Previous versions of the bill specified the data would be sent to 'media outlets serving the district.'
It also changes a requirement for 'interim assessments' at the beginning and end of the school year to 'local assessments' without specified times.
Carter believes the legislation would give school boards and parents more power over curriculum and personalize learning to a district's needs.
'I think this is a first step in trying to mitigate a lot of the concerns that we've had and educators have had in our public schools,' she said Monday.
There is just under a month remaining in the current legislative session. If Carter's bill doesn't pass the House in coming weeks, she will have to start over in the process next year.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
6 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump EPA moves to repeal climate rules that limit greenhouse gas emissions from US power plants
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday proposed repealing rules that limit planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions from power plants fueled by coal and natural gas, an action that Administrator Lee Zeldin said would remove billions of dollars in costs for industry and help 'unleash' American energy. The EPA also proposed weakening a regulation that requires power plants to reduce emissions of mercury and other toxic pollutants that can harm brain development of young children and contribute to heart attacks and other health problems in adults. The rollbacks are meant to fulfill Republican President Donald Trump's repeated pledge to 'unleash American energy' and make it more affordable for Americans to power their homes and operate businesses. If approved and made final, the plans would reverse efforts by Democratic President Joe Biden's administration to address climate change and improve conditions in areas heavily burdened by industrial pollution, mostly in low-income and majority Black or Hispanic communities. The power plant rules are among about 30 environmental regulations that Zeldin targeted in March when he announced what he called the 'most consequential day of deregulation in American history.' Zeldin said Wednesday the new rules would help end what he called the Biden and Obama administration's 'war on so much of our U.S. domestic energy supply.' 'The American public spoke loudly and clearly last November,' he added in a speech at EPA headquarters. 'They wanted to make sure that … no matter what agency anybody might be confirmed to lead, we are finding opportunities to pursue common-sense, pragmatic solutions that will help reduce the cost of living … create jobs and usher in a golden era of American prosperity.' Environmental and public health groups called the rollbacks dangerous and vowed to challenge the rules in court. Dr. Lisa Patel, a pediatrician and executive director of the Medical Society Consortium on Climate & Health, called the proposals 'yet another in a series of attacks' by the Trump administration on the nation's 'health, our children, our climate and the basic idea of clean air and water.' She called it 'unconscionable to think that our country would move backwards on something as common sense as protecting children from mercury and our planet from worsening hurricanes, wildfires, floods and poor air quality driven by climate change.' 'Ignoring the immense harm to public health from power plant pollution is a clear violation of the law,' added Manish Bapna, president and CEO of the Natural Resources Defense Council. 'If EPA finalizes a slapdash effort to repeal those rules, we'll see them in court.' The EPA-targeted rules could prevent an estimated 30,000 deaths and save $275 billion each year they are in effect, according to an Associated Press examination that included the agency's own prior assessments and a wide range of other research. It's by no means guaranteed that the rules will be entirely eliminated — they can't be changed without going through a federal rulemaking process that can take years and requires public comment and scientific justification. Even a partial dismantling of the rules would mean more pollutants such as smog, mercury and lead — and especially more tiny airborne particles that can lodge in lungs and cause health problems, the AP analysis found. It would also mean higher emissions of the greenhouse gases driving Earth's warming to deadlier levels. Biden, a Democrat, had made fighting climate change a hallmark of his presidency. Coal-fired power plants would be forced to capture smokestack emissions or shut down under a strict EPA rule issued last year. Then-EPA head Michael Regan said the power plant rules would reduce pollution and improve public health while supporting a reliable, long-term supply of electricity. The power sector is the nation's second-largest contributor to climate change, after transportation. In its proposed regulation, the Trump EPA argues that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases from fossil fuel-fired power plants 'do not contribute significantly to dangerous pollution' or climate change and therefore do not meet a threshold under the Clean Air Act for regulatory action. Greenhouse gas emissions from coal and gas-fired plants 'are a small and decreasing part of global emissions,' the EPA said, adding: 'this Administration's priority is to promote the public health or welfare through energy dominance and independence secured by using fossil fuels to generate power.' The Clean Air Act allows the EPA to limit emissions from power plants and other industrial sources if those emissions significantly contribute to air pollution that endangers public health. If fossil fuel plants no longer meet the EPA's threshold, the Trump administration may later argue that other pollutants from other industrial sectors don't either and therefore shouldn't be regulated, said Meghan Greenfield, a former EPA and Justice Department lawyer now in private practice. The EPA proposal 'has the potential to have much, much broader implications,' she said. Zeldin, a former New York congressman, said the Biden-era rules were designed to 'suffocate our economy in order to protect the environment,' with the intent to regulate the coal industry 'out of existence' and make it 'disappear.' National Mining Association president and CEO Rich Nolan applauded the new rules, saying they remove 'deliberately unattainable standards' for clean air while 'leveling the playing field for reliable power sources, instead of stacking the deck against them.' But Dr. Howard Frumkin, a former director of the National Center for Environmental Health and professor emeritus at the University of Washington School of Public Health, said Zeldin and Trump were trying to deny reality. 'The world is round, the sun rises in the east, coal-and gas-fired power plants contribute significantly to climate change, and climate change increases the risk of heat waves, catastrophic storms and many other health threats,' Frumkin said. 'These are indisputable facts. If you torpedo regulations on power plant greenhouse gas emissions, you torpedo the health and well-being of the American public and contribute to leaving a world of risk and suffering to our children and grandchildren.' A paper published earlier this year in the journal Science found the Biden-era rules could reduce U.S. power sector carbon emissions by 73% to 86% below 2005 levels by 2040, compared with a reduction of 60% to 83% without the rules. 'Carbon emissions in the power sector drop at a faster rate with the (Biden-era) rules in place than without them,' said Aaron Bergman, a fellow at Resources for the Future, a nonprofit research institution and a co-author of the Science paper. The Biden rule also would result in 'significant reductions in sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, pollutants that harm human health,' he said.
CBS News
13 minutes ago
- CBS News
Keller: Poll finds strong disapproval of how ICE handled arrest of Tufts student
The opinions expressed below are Jon Keller's, not those of WBZ, CBS News or Paramount Global. A new poll of three New England states including Massachusetts finds strong disapproval of how ICE is handling immigrant arrests. "Thank you everyone for all the support and love," said Tufts University graduate student Rumeysa Ozturk last month as she was freed after 45 days in ICE detention. But some supporters of Ozturk were in a less cheery mood after weeks spent working for the release of the student, hauled off the street by masked ICE agents for the offense of co-authoring an op-ed article in the Tufts student newspaper calling for an end to hostilities in Gaza. "She was never charged with any crime," noted ACLU Executive Director Carol Rose. "The government never produced any evidence that she had done anything wrong." The polls show continued support for President Trump's overall handling of immigration. But not for sending armed troops to the streets of Los Angeles, and definitely not for siccing ICE on the likes of Ozturk, whose arrest video made news all over the world. Poll shows disapproval Ozturk case A new Suffolk University/Boston Globe poll of voters in Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Rhode Island finds a whopping 70% disapproved of the way her case was handled, with 58% strongly objecting. Just 16% approved. Surveillance video shows Tufts University student Rumeysa Ozturk apprehended in Somerville, MA, on March 25. CBS Boston "They like the intent, but they don't like the methodology," said Suffolk pollster Dave Paleologos. "She didn't creep over the border in the back of a van and meet up with some seedy characters to plot to protest and overthrow the government. It could be your niece, your nephew, your grandchild and that's troubling." It's an overreach even the most hardline backers of the president's immigrant crackdown find hard to swallow. "Even within the Republican party there's compassion and empathy and pushback in terms of how ICE is treating these cases," notes Paleologos. It's pretty clear that voters wanted something done about dangerous criminals here illegally. And now they're making it clear that a mild-mannered college student who co-wrote a benign op-ed piece isn't what they had in mind. But Paleologos suggests the proof will be in the crime statistics. If they take a nosedive, Trump will be widely applauded for his policies despite its mistakes. If they don't, more than a few will wonder -- what on earth was this all about?
CBS News
17 minutes ago
- CBS News
It's Sherrill vs. Ciattarelli for New Jersey governor. Experts weigh in on how each candidate wins the race.
The stage is set for November when New Jersey voters will select the Garden State's next governor. Republican Jack Ciattarelli and Democrat Rep. Mikie Sherrill both secured their party's nomination in Tuesday night's primary elections. And in perhaps a sign of a contentious campaign ahead, both candidates wasted little time turning their attention from crowded primary fields to each other. "Make no mistake, Mikie Sherrill is Phil Murphy 2.0," Ciattarelli told a crowd of supporters at his election night headquarters in Monmouth County. "He's not change, he's a rerun. He's a ghost of elections past," said Sherrill, referring to Ciattarelli's previous two runs for the governor's seat. As Jeanette Hoffman, a longtime Republican strategist and president of Marathon Public Affairs put it: "The gloves are already off." Hoffman believes, with these two leading their parties, New Jersey is in for a tight race come November. "I think it's going to be a very competitive race here," Hoffman said. Republicans "united" around Ciattarelli It was a relatively quick night for Ciattarelli, the 2021 Republican nominee and former state assemblyman. CBS News projected him the winner of the GOP race about 20 minutes after polls closed at 8 p.m. As of Wednesday afternoon, Ciattarelli had secured just shy of 68% of the Republican vote. His next closest competitor, Bill Spadea, was closing in on 22%. "It shows that the Republican party is motivated, united around Jack Ciattarelli, for him to win in November," Hoffman said. Ciattarelli had, for some time, been considered the frontrunner in the GOP race that featured four other candidates, especially after receiving President Trump's endorsement in May. What remains to be seen is how Trump's backing will translate to the general election. The president remains highly popular with Republicans, but CBS News polling shows he is still under water with those who identify as independents. Hoffman says courting those independent voters will be key for Ciattarelli to win in November. "Sometimes [they] care about things on the right, sometimes care about things on the left, but mostly care about things that aren't truly partisan," Hoffman said. "It's more about every day, kitchen table, affordability issues." "Wasn't surprised at all" that Sherrill topped Dems race Sherrill emerged from a crowded and competitive Democratic field that saw six candidates vying for the nomination. As of Wednesday afternoon, Sherrill sat with 34% of the Democratic vote, leading second place Newark Mayor Ras Baraka by more than 100,000 votes. Sherrill was also ahead in 15 New Jersey counties. Heading into Tuesday's primary, experts contended there was no clear frontrunner in what was expected to be a tight Democratic contest. But political strategist and former Democratic Linden Councilman Peter Brown says he wasn't surprised "at all" that Sherrill was the pick. "Her background and her experience is one, but also her focus on what she's trying to accomplish. And also voters wanting some new blood," Brown said. Like Ciattarelli, Brown said, Sherrill will now have to turn her attention to courting those key independent voters. But Sherrill also has to pull together the roughly 66% of Democratic voters who didn't back her on Tuesday. Brown also pointed to Republican gains in New Jersey over the last few elections. In 2021, Ciattarelli came within 3.5% of incumbent Gov. Phil Murphy. And while Mr. Trump didn't win New Jersey in 2024, he came as close as any Republican has in decades. "Can she now focus on more on getting those moderates and those Democrats who left and went to the Republican party and bring them back in?" Brown said. Brown's advice: Make communities of color a priority. "Rather than tell us what we need to do, come and talk to us, and we'll be able to provide you with some of those answers," Brown said. "That, in turn, will translate into votes." The Trump factor National pundits will be watching the New Jersey race closely come November. New Jersey and Virginia, are the only states that will hold gubernatorial elections in 2025. The races coming the year after a presidential election, some may look at Jersey to gauge how voters are feeling about national politics, and by extension, President Trump. Trump has already played a role in this campaign. The president endorsed Ciattarelli, and every Democrat running in the primary made comments on how they'd counter the administration. On Tuesday night, both nominees mentioned the president in their victory speeches, with Ciattarelli thanking Trump for his backing and Sherrill referring to her November opponent as a "Trump lackey." But both strategists we spoke with warned that making Trump the center of a campaign on either side, likely isn't a winning formula. "This campaign is going to be about Statehouse issues, not White House issues. It's about property taxes, schools, and keeping communities safe," Hoffman said. "Talking about Trump is about Trump. And what people want is, let's talk about those issues at the kitchen room table, as we say," Brown said. The general election in New Jersey is set for Nov. 4.
