
Will low reserves be the new normal?
EDITORIAL: That the economy is stuck in a low-growth trap is a fact. Imports are already inching up without being accompanied by a robust growth momentum. Traditionally, import pressure has been felt when growth reached over four percent; however, now after two years of stabilisation at 2-3 percent growth, a stress is already visible in the interbank market.
The issue is that the economy's size is growing, as nominal GDP has increased from US$ 311 billion in FY16 to US$ 410 billion in FY25.
However, SBP forex reserves today stand at US$10-12 billion compared to US$18 billion in FY16. Commodity prices, even after declining from their super cycle peak, remain higher than their FY16-18 levels. Low reserves combined with relatively higher commodity prices have created a new normal that coupled with a rising consumption demand from a young and growing population traps the economy in a cycle of low growth.
The key question is why reserves are not increasing and why external funding has dried up, despite the country continuously being in IMF programmes and receiving praise from the Fund for its progress and reform commitments. Moreover, why are bilateral and market-based inflows scarce, even though international rating agencies have upgraded the country's ratings? Why is the country stuck in repeated rollovers?
Recently, China approved only half of its committed funding. Other bilateral partners are merely rolling over existing loans. Commercial loans remain expensive, despite improved ratings. The finance minister has yet to start attracting capital from Chinese markets via panda bonds, and there are no discussions about issuing new Eurobonds or sukuk. No fresh loans appear imminent.
Currently, the government has only empty promises for investment. At best, it can secure sovereign loans by improving perceived sovereignty internationally. Investment should ideally come from the private sector, but when local investors themselves are looking to take capital out of the country, it is unrealistic to expect foreign investors to show interest.
The drain on the financial account continues, and some loans might not roll over, while capital account inflows (FDI) remain insufficient to bridge the gap. Consequently, the current account must remain balanced — if not in surplus — during FY26. Remittances cannot grow significantly, given their large existing base, and exports have limited upside potential.
Conversely, import pressure is building. At current growth levels of 2-3 percent, imports are already difficult to manage. With the national tariff rationalisation policy in action, reductions in import duties are likely to drive even higher imports, thus making demand management critical.
The currency is the first line of defence. The SBP has accelerated currency depreciation from five paisas a day to 15 paisas a day, with PKR/USD currently hovering around 284. The currency needs to adjust further until imports are brought under control, which implies little room remains for additional interest rate cuts.
Another concern is that currency depreciation will reignite inflation expectations because fuel and energy costs are pegged to the US dollar and the interest payments on government's external debt would increase. Any corresponding increase in exports as a result of currency depreciation would at best be marginal to begin with. Thus the fragile macroeconomic recovery faces premature challenges as these trends likely to persist in FY26 as well.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
China to resume some Japanese seafood imports after Fukushima ban
BEIJING: China has lifted a ban on seafood imports from most regions of Japan, partially mending a years-long dispute over Tokyo's handling of nuclear wastewater. China and Japan are key trading partners, but increased friction over territorial rivalries and military spending has frayed ties in recent years. Japan's brutal occupation of parts of China before and during World War II remains a sore point, with Beijing accusing Tokyo of failing to atone for its past. Japan began gradually releasing treated wastewater from the stricken Fukushima nuclear plant into the Pacific Ocean in 2023. The move was backed by the International Atomic Energy Agency and the plant operator TEPCO says all radioactive elements have been filtered out except for tritium, levels of which are within safe limits. But it drew sharp criticism from Beijing, which banned imports of Japanese seafood as a result. Russia later followed suit. Samples from long-term monitoring of nuclear-contaminated water from Fukushima had 'not shown abnormalities', China's General Administration of Customs said in a statement Sunday. As a result, China 'decided to conditionally resume' seafood imports from Japan, except imports from 10 of the country's 47 prefectures, including Fukushima and Tokyo, which remain banned. The Japanese government received the decision 'positively', Kazuhiko Aoki, deputy chief cabinet secretary, told reporters in Tokyo. China, Japan close to resuming seafood imports after Fukushima ban But Japan 'will strongly demand the Chinese side lift remaining import regulations on seafood from 10 prefectures', he added. Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning confirmed Monday that Beijing was resuming seafood imports from regions 'that meet China's standards'. But she warned that China would take measures to restrict imports 'should any risks be identified'. In 2011, a huge earthquake triggered a deadly tsunami that swamped the Fukushima nuclear facility and pushed three of its six reactors into meltdown. China vociferously opposed the release of the treated wastewater, casting it as environmentally irresponsible. But in September last year, it said it would 'gradually resume' importing the seafood. Production companies that had suspended trade must reapply for registration in China and would be 'strictly' supervised, Beijing's customs administration said Sunday.


Express Tribune
5 hours ago
- Express Tribune
PBA refutes misleading claims on remittance subsidies
Listen to article The Pakistan Banks Association (PBA) rejected on Monday misleading assertions in recent press coverage suggesting that government subsidies to banks under remittance incentive schemes serve no economic purpose. In a detailed statement, the PBA cautioned that such narratives risk undermining public confidence in formal remittance channels at a time when financial stability relies on documented foreign inflows. "When the Pakistan Remittance Initiative (PRI) was conceptualised in 2008, formal remittances stood at only $6.5 billion, while an estimated $20b flowed through undocumented hawala/hundi channels, exacerbating balance of payments pressures," read the statement. The PRI, launched in 2009, was a homegrown solution to shift flows to formal banking channels, offering an initial incentive of SAR 20 per transaction, approximately 2.25% of the average $500 transaction, which was far more viable than foreign borrowings carrying interest rates above 3.5% plus long-term repayment obligations and exchange rate risks, it added. "In contrast, PRI incentives are one-time PKR payments with no repayment liability, making them a strategic win-win for Pakistan's economy. Banks do not profit from these incentives." In reality, they bear enormous costs to remain competitive, offering higher rebates and FX premiums to Money Transfer Operators (MTOs) and remitters abroad, according to the statement. These costs are only partially offset by government incentives, with the remainder absorbed by banks to maintain essential liquidity for import payments and economic stability. "For example, banks often pay Rs3-5 per USD premium over interbank rates to attract flows that would otherwise revert to hawala, incurring direct losses in the national interest," explained PBA. "Contrary to claims, banks invest heavily in compliance systems, international correspondent banking relationships, technology platforms, and customer outreach to process remittances securely and efficiently," it added. Approximately 90% of rebates before FY25 and over 100% under FY25 schemes are passed directly to international partners, leaving no direct profit for banks, according to PBA. Furthermore, banks pay their partners upfront while government reimbursements are delayed by months, imposing significant working capital costs. Banks submit monthly data of PRI remittances to SBP, duly reviewed and certified by Internal Audits of the Banks. SBP also conducts review of this certified data before making payment of incentive under the scheme. Allegations that banks manipulate remittance data, launder undeclared funds, or facilitate tax evasion are baseless, read the statement. Banks operate under strict SBP regulations, AML/CFT frameworks, and independent audits. The classification of freelancer and IT exporter earnings as remittances is a policy classification issue needing regulatory clarity, not bank misconduct. It is telling that such narratives are often promoted by vested interests seeking to dismantle the formal banking remittance ecosystem to divert flows back into their networks, maintained PBA. "These banking-led initiatives have been instrumental in ensuring Pakistan's compliance with global AML/CFT standards, preventing potential blacklisting that would cripple the economy. Pakistan's banks continue to offer competitive FX rates despite incurring losses, solely to preserve formal flows. Without these incentives, remittances would revert to undocumented channels, undermining fiscal sustainability and increasing dependence on costly foreign borrowing. The suggestion that banks are subsidised ignores the economic reality that these incentives ensure secure, documented, and traceable remittance flows critical for Pakistan's economy." Banks remain among the country's largest taxpayers and employers, paying over Rs 850b in taxes annually, while financing every facet of national economic activity. Mischaracterising their role only weakens public trust at a time when economic unity and realism are paramount, according to PBA. While modalities can be improved over time, PRI remains a strategic success story. "The PBA remains committed to working with policymakers to strengthen Pakistan's economy, maintain global compliance, and safeguard financial stability, but rejects in the strongest terms any narrative driven by vested interests that undermines the banking sector's contributions and national economic security," read the statement. PRI is an essential driver striving for Pakistan's financial independence and diversion from reliance on international debt and forex assistance.


Business Recorder
6 hours ago
- Business Recorder
China's Ant Group invested $3.26 billion in R&D in 2024
SHANGHAI: Chinese financial technology firm Ant Group said on Monday that it has increased investment in research and development (R&D) for four consecutive years since 2021, reaching a record high of 23.45 billion yuan ($3.26 billion) in 2024. China's Ant Group to sell 4% stake in India's Paytm for $242mn, term sheet shows The company made the disclosure in its 2024 sustainability report.