Alabama bill would give law enforcement additional protection from lawsuits
An Alabama lawmaker has filed a bill that could enhance immunity for law enforcement officers against civil litigation or criminal prosecution by establishing an additional court proceeding to determine immunity.
HB 202, sponsored by Rep. Rex Reynolds, R-Huntsville, chair of the Ways and Means General Fund Committee, allows police, sheriffs' deputies and detention officers to have immunity from civil and criminal litigation if they were acting within the scope of their authority as law enforcement.
A message was left with Reynolds Monday seeking comment.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Under current statute, law enforcement officers are protected from tort litigation if their conduct aligns with the job but not if they act 'willfully, maliciously, fraudulently, in bad faith, beyond his or her authority, or under a mistaken interpretation of the law.'
Reynolds' bill would give law enforcement officers immunity while working at their jobs unless they behave recklessly or violate a person's constitutional rights, an additional layer of protection than what is currently allowed in state law.
The bill would require a court to offer a law enforcement officer a pretrial hearing to determine whether the use of force was justified. It would also allow law enforcement to argue at the hearing that they are immune from prosecution.
'The case shall not proceed to trial until the court enters a written order setting forth reasons that the defendant lacks immunity from criminal prosecution under this section,' the bill states.
Should a court rule that the officer does not have immunity, law enforcement can appeal the decision to the Alabama Supreme Court.
The legislation is part of a package of bills dealing with law enforcement in the current legislative session. House members and the Senate will also discuss legislation related to Glock switches to help address homicide rates, as well as scholarships for dependents of law enforcement to help with recruitment efforts.
'Bolstering public safety is my number one priority this session, and I am proud to partner with Speaker Ledbetter and a bipartisan group of legislators in putting forward a package of bills that will back the blue and combat inner city gun violence,' said Gov. Kay Ivey during her State of the State address last week. 'Working together, we will create a safer Alabama.'
Under Reynolds' legislation, people pursuing a civil or criminal lawsuit against a law enforcement officer must prove wrongdoing and that law enforcement officers were acting outside their authority.
'The court must determine whether, if done for a proper purpose, the conduct was within, or reasonably related to, the outer perimeter of a law enforcement officer's governmental discretion in performing his or her official duties,' the bill states.
According to language in the legislation, to file a civil lawsuit against law enforcement, the plaintiff must first cite the 'legal authority' that creates the claims along with the factual allegations. Law enforcement can also refuse to comply with discovery in civil cases unless the motion to dismiss the alleged misconduct is frivolous, to preserve evidence, or to prevent undue prejudice or avoid justice.
Reynolds' legislation allows law enforcement officers to ask a court to dismiss the suit or give summary judgment on the grounds that they have immunity and 'shall entitle a law enforcement officer to mandamus relief from the Alabama Supreme Court.'
Russell Gold, a law professor at the University of Alabama, said the bill would likely 'make bringing lawsuits against police officers even less likely,' citing qualified immunity, which protects not only law enforcement, but most government officials from liability when performing a job.
'I don't have any reason to be concerned with frivolous lawsuits,' he said. 'It is a tall order for someone to recover against a police officer. It is just a hard case to win.'
The bill would not have any effect on claims against law enforcement officers filed in federal court, the jurisdiction of many lawsuits filed against police.
Civil rights groups had some reservations about the bill.
'I am hopeful that legislators will thoughtfully consider the appropriate balance between the ability of law enforcement to keep our communities safe while ensuring that meaningful safeguards remain in place to hold those within the system accountable when they violate the trust placed in them,' said Jerome Dees, Alabama policy director for the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Rep. Juandalynn Givan, D-Birmingham, had concerns that offering immunity for individuals could make them less accountable when they engaged in misconduct.
'I believe everyone should have the right to seek judicial relief within the courts without the doors getting slammed in their faces,' she said. 'Regardless of whether it is my profession or occupation, or another. We are continuing to further expand immunity.'
Law enforcement groups, including the Alabama Sheriffs Association, said they support the bill. Hoss Mack, executive director of the Sheriff's Association, said some lawsuits go on for years, 'even though the officer may be right.'
'Basically, you have someone out there waiting for something to handle over a period of years,' he said. 'This could affect their careers or things of that nature.'
He also said it further defines the people who are covered by the legislation, such as tactical officers hired by police and sheriffs.
'If they do something wrong, they are still going to be prosecuted or they are still going to be sued,' Mack said. 'It does not eliminate someone's rights if that was to happen. This is just about those cases where there can be a predetermination as to whether they did or not.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Former Department of Administrative Services chief Adam Steen joins Iowa governor's race
Iowa Republican and former Department of Administrative Services Director Adam Steen announced he will run for governor in 2026, pitching himself as a 'faith guy' and a 'Make America Great Again guy.' Steen, a 45-year-old Runnells resident and credentialed minister, launched his campaign with an event at Berean Church in Pleasant Hill Tuesday, Aug. 19. It kicked off with worship music and prayer as Steen introduced himself, his wife and their two sons to the crowd. 'I am the faith guy,' he said. 'I'm a Jesus guy. I'm a 'Make America Great Again' guy. I'm a commonsense policy, 'America First,' people first guy. I'm the guy that's excited to work alongside President Trump to build our country and usher in a golden age of prosperity. I'm a guy that's honored to have worked with the amazing Gov. Kim Reynolds.' Steen said he tendered his resignation to Reynolds earlier in the day after serving as DAS director since 2021. He said the two had a 'wonderful conversation' about the opportunity, but he did not ask her for her endorsement. Reynolds, who announced in April she would not seek reelection, has previously said she does not intend to endorse anyone in the race to succeed her. Steen called her 'the greatest governor in the history of Iowa' and said he wants to carry on that legacy. While serving as DAS director, Steen handled the state's response to a controversy surrounding the Satanic Temple of Iowa. The department canceled the group's holiday event at the Iowa Capitol in December 2024. In a statement to the Des Moines Register at the time, Steen said he denied the event after determining it would include elements harmful to minors. In June, the American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa filed a complaint accusing DAS and Reynolds of discrimination. 'I'm the guy that stood in front of the Satanists,' Steen said. 'They blatantly targeted our children, and I'm the guy getting sued by the Satanists for protecting our children.' Steen said he also denied a request for an all-ages family friendly drag show at the Capitol. 'You never heard about that, did you?' he said. 'You didn't hear about it, because I risked being sued again. But I don't care, because I'll never stop fighting for our children.' Before taking over as head of DAS, Steen was the director of business development at the financial services firm Syverson Strege, and he previously owned a senior level management consulting firm called 25 Connections. Steen also was drafted as a minor league baseball relief pitcher, and he played for the Philadelphia Phillies and Batavia Muckdogs. Steen joins a growing crop of Republican contenders seeking their party's nomination for governor. Two Republicans have already formed gubernatorial campaigns: state Rep. Eddie Andrews and former state legislator Brad Sherman. 2026 Iowa governor's race: Who's in, who's out and who's on the fence And U.S. Rep. Randy Feenstra and state Sen. Mike Bousselot have mounted exploratory committees and have been active in the state. Feenstra has moved aggressively toward a formal launch, including launching statewide television ads. And Bousselot has campaigned at Republican events in recent weeks. The race opened up after Republican Reynolds made a surprise announcement in April that she would not seek reelection. But the race is not as crowded as some predicted. U.S. Rep. Zach Nunn and Attorney General Brenna Bird both decided against running. On the Democratic side, state Auditor Rob Sand and political operative Julie Stauch have launched campaigns. Brianne Pfannenstiel is the chief politics reporter for the Des Moines Register. Reach her at bpfann@ or 515-284-8244. Follow her on X at @brianneDMR. This article originally appeared on Des Moines Register: Republican Adam Steen announces 2026 campaign for Iowa governor
USA Today
19 hours ago
- USA Today
Guns or weed? Trump administration says you can't use both.
The Justice Department wants the Supreme Court to make clear that regular pot smokers, and other users of illegal drugs, cannot own guns. WASHINGTON – The Trump administration's aggressive defense of gun rights has at least one exception. The government's lawyers want the Supreme Court to make clear that regular pot smokers – and other drug users − shouldn't be allowed to own firearms. An appeals court has said a federal law making it a crime for drug users to have a gun can't be used against someone based solely on their past drug use. Limiting the law to blocking the use of guns while a person is high effectively guts the statute that reduces gun violence, the Justice Department told the Supreme Court. They're asking the justices to overturn the appeals court's decision. Trump's Justice Department has sided with gun owners in other cases The department's defense of the law is particularly notable as the Trump administration has sided with gun rights advocates in other cases – including one in which they declined to appeal a lower court's ruling against a federal law setting 21 as the minimum age to own a handgun. More: Trump DOJ wants Supreme Court to bring down hammer on gun rules But on the issue of drug use, the government is appealing four cases to the Supreme Court, asking the justices to focus on one involving a dual citizen of the United States and Pakistan who was charged with unlawfully owning a Glock pistol because he regularly smoked marijuana. The FBI had been monitoring Ali Danial Hemani because of his alleged connection to Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, which the government has designated a global terrorist group, according to filings. The government also alleges Hemani used and sold promethazine, an antihistamine used to treat allergies and motion sickness that can boost an opioid high, and used cocaine, although he was prosecuted based on his marijuana use. Hemani's attorneys said the government is trying to 'inflame and disparage' Hemani's character and the only facts that matter are that he was not high when the FBI found the Glock 19 in his Texas home. Hemani was charged with violating the federal law that prohibits the possession of firearms by a person who 'is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance.' More: Supreme Court sides with Biden and upholds regulations of ghost guns to make them traceable Appeals court ruled past drug use not enough to stop gun ownership The New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said that the law can't be applied to Hamani under the Supreme Court's landmark 2022 decision that gun prohibitions must be grounded in history that is "consistent with our tradition of gun regulation." While history and tradition support 'some limits on a presently intoxicated person's right to carry a weapon,' the appeals court said, 'they do not support disarming a sober person based solely on past substance usage.' The Justice Department said the appeals court got it wrong. Laws that existed at the time the country was founded restricted the rights of habitual drinkers, even when they were sober, they argued. 'And for about as long as legislatures have regulated drugs, they have prohibited the possession of arms by drug users and addicts – not just by persons under the influence of drugs,' they wrote. Law used in hundreds of prosecutions, including Hunter Biden's Since the federal government created its background-check system for firearms in 1998, the federal restriction on drug users has stopped more gun sales than any requirement other than the ban on felons and fugitives owning weapons, according to the filing. And it's used in hundreds of prosecutions each year, they said. (Hunter Biden, who was later pardoned by his father during President Joe Biden's final weeks in office, was convicted in 2024 of violating the law by purchasing a gun despite having a known drug addiction.) Hunter Biden trial recap Joe Biden's son guilty on all charges in historic gun case Hemani's lawyers argue that the government's interpretation of the law makes no sense when an estimated 19% of Americans have used marijuana and about 32% own a firearm. That means millions of Americans are violating the law that could put them behind bars for up to 15 years, they said in a filing. The appeals court, Hemani's lawyers said, correctly applied the Supreme Court's past decisions and 'common sense' to rule that 'history and tradition only supports a ban on carrying firearms while intoxicated.' In addition to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, two other appeals courts have issued rulings that restrict use of the federal ban: both courts ruled there should be individualized assessments of defendants' drug use to determine if their rights could be restricted. Trump administration touts program to restore gun rights The Justice Department argues that 'marginal' cases are better addressed on a case-by-case basis, through a federal program the Trump administration restarted that lets individuals petition to have their gun rights restored. The administration's championship of that program makes it less surprising that the Justice Department is vigorously defending the ban on drug users having guns, said Andrew Willinger, executive director of the Duke Center for Firearms Law, a research center. In addition, the administration has shown a broad desire to crack down on illegal drug use. 'In some sense, when those two areas are colliding – gun rights and anti-drug policies – it looks like anti-drug policies are going to win out,' he said. More: Supreme Court rules Mexico can't sue US gunmakers over cartel violence Willinger said there's a relatively strong chance the Supreme Court will get involved, which the justices tend to do when a lower court strikes down or restricts the application of a federal criminal law – especially if the government asks them to intervene. But the high court could also wait to see how other appeals courts handle similar cases and how well the Justice Department's program for restoring gun rights addresses these concerns, he said. The court could announce whether it will take up the issue this fall.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Attorney for father of Abundant Life school shooter asks to dismiss case, citing 'disregard of truth'
MADISON – The father of the Abundant Life Christian School student who shot and killed two people at the school is asking a Dane County judge to dismiss the charges against him, citing a "reckless disregard of the truth" in the complaint filed against him. Jeffrey Rupnow and his attorney, Lisa Goldman, in an Aug. 18 motion, argued that the fact his daughter, Natalie Rupnow, was able to access the family's gun safe didn't mean her father allowed her to. The motion acknowledged that Jeffrey Rupnow told his daughter the combination to the safe was his Social Security number in reverse, but argued he never gave her the numbers or any other clues. More: Father of Abundant Life school shooter will stand trial for providing guns used in attack The document also points to text messages sent by Rupnow in the days before the shooting, in which he tells friends that "my kid would shoot me" if he left the safe open, which alluded to him believing that Natalie could not access the guns inside. "There are no facts in the Complaint or elicited at the Preliminary Hearing that assert Rupnow thought or knew his daughter could access the gun safe on December 16, 2024," the document says. By alleging that Rupnow owning guns led to his daughter's actions at the school, the state is violating his Second Amendment rights to bear arms, the motion says. The motion also argues that Rupnow did not know how his daughter was planning a school shooting online with older friends. The documents says Rupnow was not allowed access to Natalie's laptop or her room, which she had deemed a "safe space." It also states that Rupnow did not know his daughter to be suicidal or a danger to others. "The State's inference that Rupnow knew (Natalie Rupnow) was suicidal and contributed to her delinquency by joining a gun club, facilitating her participation in a gun class which she passed, encouraging her to participate in Rimfire at the gun club, is an impermissible inference given nobody believed N.R. was suicidal or homicidal since October 2021," the document says. More: Mother of Abundant Life Christian School shooter dies by apparent suicide Natalie Rupnow died by suicide after opening fire inside a study hall at Abundant Life in December, killing Teacher Erin West, 42, and freshman Rubi Vergara, 14. That morning, she arrived at the school carrying a .22-caliber Sig Sauer and a Glock handgun, both of which had been purchased by Jeffrey Rupnow and stored in a gun safe at his home. In an interview with authorities cited in the criminal complaint, Jeffrey Rupnow said the day before the shooting, he had retrieved his daughter's handgun from his gun safe for cleaning. He was uncertain whether she returned it to the safe. That gun and another handgun were used in the shooting. Her father told police she must have retrieved the second gun from the safe. Documents found in Natalie Rupnow's room after her death include statements describing humanity as "filth" and saying she lived in a "population of scum." She used a racial slur before saying, "Some of you guys deserve to be dead." She believed, according to the court record, that humanity had forced her into a hole. She also appeared to idolize mass shooters, according to the complaint. She also wrote she was able to obtain the firearms she would use in the Abundant Life shooting as a result of "lies and manipulation, and my father's stupidity," according to the complaint. Other notebooks showed maps of the school, how to best damage a body with a bullet and apparent timelines for when she would begin her attack, according to the complaint. Authorities also found a cardboard model that resembled the school in her room. Rupnow is scheduled to appear in court later this month for a bail hearing, and a pre-trial conference is scheduled for late September. No hearings have yet been scheduled on the motion to dismiss. If you or someone you know is dealing with suicidal thoughts, call the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 988 or text "Hopeline" to the National Crisis Text Line at 741-741 Laura Schulte can be reached at leschulte@ and on X @SchulteLaura. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Lawyer for father of Abundant Life school shooter asks to dismiss case
