logo
Brands Must Step Outside Of Algorithms To Reconnect With People

Brands Must Step Outside Of Algorithms To Reconnect With People

Forbes5 days ago
Tim Wragg is the Chief Executive Officer at Human8.
The man whose name is synonymous with halting the inexorable march of technology never existed. Over 200 years ago, Ned Ludd was "fake news," his invented name a signature on threatening letters sent to factory owners intent on replacing workers with machines.
As modern marketers, advertisers and brand professionals, we cannot be opposed to new ways of working. Yet technology—for all its wonderful gifts—strips us of a unique asset that makes us indispensable: our humanness.
A shift is already happening as people push back against tech's overreach, reclaiming what it means to be human. Governments are restricting minors' use of social media, and consumers are rejecting surveillance and manipulation. Concerns about AI's factual errors, copyright issues, environmental impact and mental health effects are growing. One new study revealed that volunteers who used ChatGPT to write essays saw a reduction in brain activity.
The Human Disconnect In An AI-Driven World
Brands sit in the middle of this uncertainty. While technology enables them to be with consumers 24/7, many of them are becoming disconnected from audiences' cultural realities.
When news emerged that Duolingo was making the switch to become an 'AI-first' company, replacing contractors with generative AI, public perception of the brand soured. Meanwhile, Marc Benioff, the CEO of Salesforce, recently informed the world that AI "does not love, does not feel loss, does not suffer. And because of that, it is incapable of expressing true compassion or understanding human connection. We do. And that is our superpower."
It's a sentiment we at Human8 share. Our superpower is in making those connections, but we see that brands' enthusiasm for AI is weakening their connection to people's realities. We've lost something in the declining status of planners and creatives.
Thirty years ago, we marveled at the first clickable ad. Today, analytics optimize targeting, content and bidding in real time. Emerging immersive and automated technology will further enhance brand reach and shopping experiences. Meanwhile, short-form TikTok and Instagram videos and micro-influencers are driving more authentic brand engagement.
But do these algorithmic gifts really build more connection? We gain much from frictionless brand experiences, but what are we losing? Should we mirror the doubts of a society that wants to escape algorithms?
Why Human Connection Still Matters
Organizations are building huge data lakes and assets to capture first-party data through machine learning, with a hyper-rationalist desire to build more data points to improve targeting. I believe that's crowding out our innate abilities to understand the customer on emotive, intuitive and visceral levels—understanding that comes from constant exposure to people and their cultures.
For senior brand leaders, that understanding comes from walking the floor, having conversations with customers, responding to verbal and nonverbal cues, and embracing the messiness of reality, not from data or instant AI summaries.
A project with one of our clients, a major beauty brand, perfectly encapsulates this desire for increased humanness. We're enabling more experiences that provide leaders with serendipitous insights that can only come from the frictional "messiness" of true engagement.
Through a program we created, we've onboarded and trained over 3,000 people, connecting staff with consumers and professionals (salons and the like). The brand can keep its finger on the pulse of how customers are thinking and feeling in highly dynamic categories, as well as sensing and developing empathy with its customers to blend with data.
Action Steps For Reclaiming Connection In The Age Of AI
So, what can brands do to surf the technological wave while remaining grounded in the humanness that is our superpower?
• Rebalance your decision making. The left side of our brains is target-driven, analytical, detailed and logical. The right side sees the whole picture, the contours and complexity. It's the home of empathy and intuition, and it should guide decision making, but many of us put too much stock in left-brain thinking. We must engineer a rebalance because that interconnectedness gets us closer. Apple didn't develop intuitive technologies purely in a lab. Cofounder Steve Jobs believed in getting "closer than ever to your customers. So close that you tell them what they need well before they realize it themselves."
• Focus on cultures. Whether it's shop-a-longs, video conversations or one-to-ones, senior marketers need to reconnect with their customers by getting back on the shop floor, listening, observing, feeling, empathizing and measuring. Qualitative and quantitative should be in harmony. Cultures are incredibly complex, and they have constantly shifting patterns and networks that can't be mapped by data alone. Understanding those cultures is crucial if brands want to be more influential and persuasive.
• Embrace messiness. There's discomfort in these engagements, but that's where serendipity happens. We've become too comfortable with the clean lines of AI-engineered data collection and dissemination, and we need to pursue a systematically messier approach to extract truly impactful insights. It's a mindset shift that many marketers say they want. But if this is so, why aren't they doing so already? By avoiding uncomfortable situations, we miss the realities of people's lives that they don't always articulate—their frustrations, anger and joyfulness.
• Invest in people. Don't just hire them; invest in them. Bring their human skills of creativity, critical thinking and storytelling to the forefront. If an algorithm intermediates everything, human dignity suffers. Many in the industry believe that we as humans are organic algorithms, taking stimuli and processing it the same way machines do. I don't buy that. Humans want greater control over their destinies, and we should help them.
The greatest risk for brands is losing human connection. This isn't a rejection of technology, but a call to refocus on our humanity. We must reclaim our marketing strengths, regain control and reconnect with consumers and each other.
Forbes Agency Council is an invitation-only community for executives in successful public relations, media strategy, creative and advertising agencies. Do I qualify?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Most Effective, Highest ROI Tool To Get Customers Into Stores
The Most Effective, Highest ROI Tool To Get Customers Into Stores

Forbes

time3 minutes ago

  • Forbes

The Most Effective, Highest ROI Tool To Get Customers Into Stores

For years I've wanted to write a story about street signboards, the least costly, lowest tech form of marketing. I've accumulated an entire library of images of the most engaging, arresting, and strategic signboards from walks through cities. Signboards are incredibly effective because they literally stop people in their tracks. They're hard to miss even if only to navigate walking around them, in contrast to most window displays which are easier to ignore. Since signboards face you as you pass, you almost have to read them. Often personalized and hand drawn with chalk, they can come across as authentic, sincere, creative, whimsical, and charming, which make them register all the more. If the images are engaging and the text is simple, relevant or funny, and has a compelling call to action, they jar you into paying attention and even action. Because they can reflect a store's personality, and are often clever and funny with double entendres, they can make you smile and walk into a store or café you hadn't planned on visiting. Signboards can speak to their targets knowingly, as O Café, on 6th Ave. and 12th St. in Manhattan does with the free babyccino warm milk drink offer for moms and dads coming in for a cappuccino for themselves. The above signboard for the NYC East Village Now You're Clean pet grooming shop's unlimited self-service dog washes, warms hearts of dog owners who want to be good pet parents. The bronze street sculpture and story behind the hand pulled noodles restaurant 1915 Lanzhou Hand Pulled Noodles in New York's Chinatown entices you to look through the window to see if you can watch the noodles being made. Street signs are a chance for stores to speak to customers in the moment, combining insights with just the right touch of creativity. They best signs don't just sell – they connect. And they don't just work offline. The most clever and engaging street signs are posted on Instagram, TikTok, and Yelp, significantly expanding reach at no extra cost. Signboards can be very strategic. The shop +BKLYN on Manhattan Ave. in Brooklyn overcomes consumer preconceptions that plus size clothes can be dumpy looking and unattractive, and encourages their target to come in and see for themselves. Sundays Studio, an East Village NYC nail salon, introduces passersby to a new service through a curiosity inducing signboard analogizing their 'feet-cial' foot treatments to a luxurious, indulgent facial. They're not just utilized by small businesses. Many large chains use them as well. Luckin Coffee, the newly arrived outpost of the large Chinese coffee shop chain's outdoor signboard on Broadway and 8th St. in Manhattan, beckons people to download their app and try one of their drinks at an irresistible $1.99 price, a steal by New York City coffee price standards. Signboards can communicate the business's competitive point of difference. Teddy's restaurant and bar in Williamsburg, Brooklyn wants passersby to know their wine pour is bigger than elsewhere. They can announce new products with appealing graphics liked the Juiced chain's new mouthwatering gelato, and they can communicate all the reasons you should order wine and booze on a shop's website, vs. in-store as the Bedford Spirits wine shop in Williamsburg, Brooklyn does. Signboards can challenge customers to come in, like this bra shop that plays on the insight that many women wonder if they've optimized the fit of their bra, by asking people if they really know their proper size and raising doubts. They can incentivize brand advocacy asking for Instagram and Google reviews like this Mexican restaurant with its free chicken empanada offer in exchange for follows and reviews. They can effectively communicate with nothing more than engaging images without the need for text, like the Norman Restaurant in Brooklyn, that showed the freshness, purity, and seasonality of its food menu with simple chalk-drawn illustrations. Because signboards messages are so single minded, they register immediately. Signboards are old-school, physical, immediate, and they work. In a world where brands are busy chasing impressions, likes, views, influencers, and digital analytics dashboards, there's something deeply refreshing about marketing that shows up right in front of someone, in a totally uncluttered environment, when they may be in a shopping mood, and where impulse decisions can be made. Placement is strategy. Promotional offers communicated through coupons or social media and not appearing directly next to products, are often forgotten or hard to find when you want them. Special offers communicated on signboards right next to the point of purchase, are more likely to be acted on. According to the often quoted Shopper Engagement Study by POPAI (The Point of Purchase Advertising International Association), 76% of purchase decisions are made in-store. Careful thought should be given to who the audience is and what graphics, messages or offers will make them stop, smile, think, or have their curiosity piqued enough that they will come in and check you out. Done right, signage delivers one of the highest returns on investment in marketing, influencing decisions right at the point of purchase, and frequently converting passersby into paying customers. They're also very quick and easy to test and optimize.

‘An existential threat': For Silicon Valley, falling behind in AI is a bigger threat than tariffs
‘An existential threat': For Silicon Valley, falling behind in AI is a bigger threat than tariffs

CNN

time31 minutes ago

  • CNN

‘An existential threat': For Silicon Valley, falling behind in AI is a bigger threat than tariffs

If there's one thing the White House, Wall Street and Silicon Valley can agree on, it's that artificial intelligence is a top priority. Tech giants are pouring billions into new data centers and infrastructure to support the technology. The White House came out with an AI action plan in July to boost America's leadership in the space, underscoring the tech's importance to the administration. Wall Street keeps pushing AI-related stocks like Nvidia (NVDA) to new records. But President Donald Trump's trade war has raised questions about whether the administration's policies could work against its big AI push. Certain tariffs could raise the costs of materials and components necessary to support those AI models. For example, the president said on August 6 that he would issue a 100% tariff on semiconductors imports, although he added that companies that have committed to expanding their manufacturing operations in the US would be exempt. (He did not give an exact timeline for when those tariffs would start.) And in late July, he imposed a 50% tariff on copper, which is used in electronic components such as printed circuit boards and chips. But while tariffs could stoke uncertainty around costs, experts say they won't slow technological advancements, primarily because the stakes are simply too high to fall behind in the global AI race. For large tech companies like Meta and Microsoft, losing in AI would be a higher price to pay than any additional costs from tariffs. Dallas Dolen, the US technology, media and telecommunications lead for PricewaterhouseCoopers, said these types of companies likely view the AI boom as an 'existential moment' for their businesses. 'Cost, if you have enough money, is not the most important variable that you take into account when you're told it's an existential threat,' he said to CNN. When Meta, Microsoft and Google reported earnings in late July, one message rang loud and clear: Big Tech is spending big on AI, and it's starting to pay off. Meta spent $17 billion in capital expenditures for the quarter that ended in June, and it saw its earnings per share go up 38% compared to a year ago. Capital expenditures typically refer to money spent on things like data centers and infrastructure, likely a sign that Meta is investing more in the servers needed to power its burgeoning AI services. Wall Street cheered the results; Meta shares (META) rose 9% in after-hours trading when it posted the results on July 30, and shares are up roughly 30% year to date. Microsoft (MSFT) also posted strong results thanks to its cloud computing business. It spent $24.2 billion in capital expenditures during its most recent quarter, and it plans to spend another $30 billion in the coming months, the company said in late July. Microsoft became the second company to reach a $4 trillion valuation last month, following Nvidia, and its shares are up about 26% so far this year. And Google parent Alphabet increased its capital expenditures for 2025 to $85 billion because of demand for its cloud products. The company said its cloud services are used by 'nearly all gen AI unicorns,' referring to privately held companies worth $1 billion or more in the generative artificial intelligence space. Alphabet shares (GOOG) are up nearly 7% year to date. That additional infrastructure may be essential; Goldman Sachs estimates that global power demand from data centers will surge 50% by 2027 and 165% by 2030 compared to 2023 because of AI. 'We have barely scratched the surface of this 4th Industrial Revolution now playing out around the world led by the Big Tech stalwarts such as Nvidia, Microsoft, Palantir, Meta, Alphabet, and Amazon,' Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives said in a research note following the companies' earnings results. Trump's rapidly changing tariff policies have made it difficult to estimate how exactly the levies could impact the cost of building and operating data centers. But PwC's Dolen said he's seen estimates indicating that tariffs could increase construction costs by 5% to 7%. The National Association of Manufacturers' outlook survey also found that trade uncertainties and increased costs of raw materials were the top business challenges for manufacturers in the first quarter of 2025. However, big tech companies are likely to eat any additional costs related to AI infrastructure because 'demand is so strong,' said Michelle Brophy, director of research for tech, media and telecom at market intelligence firm AlphaSense. It's a different story for smaller companies that don't have billions to spend each quarter. They also typically have private investors demanding a fast return on investment, and data centers are long-term bets that could take years to show value in a meaningful way. Between 2015 and 2020, it took one to three years on average to construct a data center, according to commercial real estate services firm CBRE. And a data center is useful for 25 years to 30 years on average, McKinsey & Company senior partner Pankaj Sachdeva said in October 2024. Because data centers are long-term projects, 'the degree of uncertainty will have a larger impact in terms of, you know, committing to something that will take multiple years to execute,' said Laurence Ales, a professor of economics at Carnegie Mellon University. It's also unclear whether Trump's semiconductor tariffs will raise the cost of future data centers. The president said companies that have 'committed' to building in the US won't have to pay a levy on semiconductors. 'But the good news for companies like Apple is, if you're building in the United States, or have committed to build, without question, committed to build in the United States, there will be no charge,' he said on August 6 during an event announcing Apple's $100 billion initiative to produce iPhone parts in the US. Trump didn't specify which companies would be exempt, but chipmaking giants Nvidia and TSMC have both said they would expand their US operations. Experts believe more collaboration between the White House and Silicon Valley is likely to come, possibly easing any potential tariff-induced costs for tech giants. Trump showed his willingness to negotiate with tech leaders earlier this week: He allowed Nvidia and AMD to sell their AI chips to China as long as they provide a 15% cut to the US government in exchange for export licenses. And the White House is reportedly discussing taking a stake in chipmaker Intel. Building AI infrastructure is a key part of the White House's AI action plan, which includes policy recommendations for streamlining permits for facilities like data centers and semiconductor manufacturing facilities. The United States already has more data centers than any other country, according to data from Cloudscene, a platform that connects businesses with cloud services, compiled by Statista. Many of the world's largest cloud providers, like Microsoft and Amazon, are American companies. 'We need to be mindful that this is an area in which we have an advantage,' Matt Pearl, director of the strategic technologies program at the Center for International and Strategic Studies, said to CNN. 'And we don't want to give that up.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store