Four men, one woman charged over offences linked to illegal brothels
Four men and one woman are accused of crimes related to illegal brothels, including deceiving landlords in Geylang about the true use of their premises.
The alleged offenders, who are all Singapore citizens, were handed between one and five charges each in a district court on May 6.
Police said on May 5 that the individuals were among those arrested after officers conducted raids across Singapore on Oct 21, 2024.
Ho Seng Wee, 40, who faces four charges, had allegedly managed illegal brothels and lived off prostitutes' earnings between April and October 2024.
According to charge sheets, Ho - together with Ong Zhihe Philip and Liew Yaojie - also posted advertisements of at least nine women offering sexual services on the website Sammyboyforum.
Lim Shi Wei, 36, was handed four counts of cheating for allegedly instigating others to rent four premises in the Geylang area, which were later misused as brothels.
Lim also faces one count of using a bank account belonging to his spouse to receive prostitution payments.
The remaining three people - Khah Tee Meng, 61; Lee Teck Li, 44; and the only woman, Loo Lay Kuan, 56 - were purportedly occupiers of the Geylang premises listed in Lim's charges.
They allegedly cheated the landlords into thinking they were the rightful tenants, while using the units as brothels. For this, they each face one offence of cheating.
Loo and Khah were also given one, and four additional charges respectively, for gambling-related offences.
All five individuals are out on $15,000 bail. Four of them, except Khah, will be pleading guilty in June.
The October 2024 raids were conducted by police officers from the Specialised Crime Branch and Criminal Investigation Department.
Police seized more than $6,000 in cash, vice-related paraphernalia and controlled drugs.
Twenty people were arrested in total from the raids and follow-up investigations, said the police.
Of the group, eight - including those charged on May 6 - have been hauled to court, while one woman received a warning and another man was investigated for drug-related offences.
Police investigations on the other individuals are ongoing.
The offence of managing a brothel carries a maximum punishment of up to $100,000 fine and jail for up to five years.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
a day ago
- Straits Times
16 arrested, 41 under investigation for illegal horse betting activities after operation by S'pore and M'sia police
16 arrested, 41 under investigation for illegal horse betting activities after operation by S'pore and M'sia police Sixteen people were arrested for illegal horse betting activities following a joint operation by the Singapore Police Force (SPF) and Royal Malaysia Police (RMP) on June 11. SPF said those arrested, aged between 50 and 78, were suspected of being involved with a criminal syndicate responsible for illegal horse betting activities. During the joint operation, officers from SPF's Criminal Investigation Department and Special Operations Command conducted simultaneous raids at multiple locations island-wide, leading to the arrest of 14 men and one woman. A 53-year-old Singaporean man was arrested by RMP's Criminal Investigations Department after a concurrent raid in Malaysia. SPF seized cash and three bank accounts with a total estimated value of $200,000 that were believed to constitute criminal proceeds, as well as electronic devices such as mobile phones and gambling-related items. The 53-year-old Singaporean man will be charged in court on June 13 for offences under the Gambling Control Act. Investigations against the other subjects are ongoing. On June 11, officers from the SPF Criminal Investigation Department and the Land Divisions also conducted checks at multiple locations across Singapore, including King George's Avenue, Jurong Street 24, Ang Mo Kio Street 22, New Upper Changi Road, Yung Sheng Road, Bukit Batok Street 31 and Marsiling Road. Forty men and a woman, aged between 47 and 84, are being investigated for their suspected involvement in illegal horse betting activities. They are believed to have had roles such as illegal bookmakers, runners and punters. The police also seized more than $17,000 in cash, mobile phones and horse betting items. Under the Gambling Control Act, anyone who gambles with an unlawful gambling service provider can be fined up to $10,000, or jailed for a term not exceeding six months, or both. Under the same Act, anyone involved in conducting an unlawful betting operation as an operator can be fined up to $500,000 and jailed for up to seven years. Deputy Commissioner of Police (Investigation and Intelligence) Zhang Weihan, who is also the Director of the Criminal Investigation Department, said: "The police take a serious view of all forms of illegal betting activities. We will seek out those involved and prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law. This includes working with foreign counterparts like the RMP to detect and deter these syndicates." He thanked the Director Criminal Investigation Department of RMP, Commissioner Datuk Seri Mohd Shuhaily Mohd Zain, and his officers for their "strong support and commitment in tackling transnational organised criminal groups." Click here to contribute a story or submit it to our WhatsApp Get more of Stomp's latest updates by following us on:
International Business Times
3 days ago
- International Business Times
Singapore: 46-Year-Old Man Arrested for Online Sale of Counterfeit Goods Worth S$141K
A 46-year-old man was arrested on for his suspected involvement in the online sale of counterfeit goods. In a press release, the Singapore Police Force (SPF) revealed on Tuesday, June 10, that the officers from the Criminal Investigation Department conducted raids in the vicinity of Bukit Merah and Delta Avenue on June 6. The statement read, "During the operation, more than 4,700 purported trademark-infringing items comprising bags, accessories, pouches, cosmetics, household items, and stationeries with an estimated street value of more than S$141,000 were seized." The police investigations are still ongoing. "Under the Trademarks Act 1998, the offence of possession of goods with falsely applied trademarks for the purpose of trade carries a fine up to S$100,000, an imprisonment term of up to five years, or both," said SPF. Singapore police take intellectual property rights infringement very seriously and warned the public that distributing and selling counterfeit items are serious crimes. The police said that they will not hesitate to take strong action against those who benefit at the cost of genuine businesses and customers.
Straits Times
4 days ago
- Straits Times
Inside an animal abuser's mind: What drives such cruelty and why some say penalties aren't enough
In Your Opinion Podcast Inside an animal abuser's mind: What drives such cruelty and why some say penalties aren't enough SINGAPORE – In May, four gruesome cat deaths in the neighbourhoods of Yishun, Punggol and Tampines occurred within a month, stoking fears that a killer was on the loose. While the authorities have since attributed three of these deaths to road accidents instead of deliberate acts of cruelty, the string of cases re-ignited calls for Singapore to toughen its laws and enforcement against animal abuse. Some have even suggested heavier penalties like mandatory jail time and caning. But can such stiff punishment deter a person bent on hurting animals? On May 27, I sat down with psychiatrist Lim Boon Leng and criminal lawyer Josephus Tan to unpack these dark impulses and how society can help to curb them. Here are edited excerpts from our conversation. Why would anyone want to harm animals? Dr Lim: It's quite important to understand that not everyone who is an animal abuser has a mental illness. A lot of people do it out of malice, anger or boredom, or they are just thrill-seeking. This can come from a place of unresolved trauma or they are displacing their anger. There are three categories of people: The first are impulse abusers who lash out because of their poor ability to regulate emotions. The second are neglectful abusers. I suspect that most animal abusers fall within this group. They fail to care for pets due to ignorance and indifference. The last group is the sadistic abuser, which I think accounts for a minority of cases. This is the group that we tend to worry about because they really derive pleasure or a sense of control from inflicting pain. Individuals with antisocial personality disorder, commonly known as psychopaths, are more likely to resort to animal cruelty. They are typically quite deceitful. They are also quite emotionally distant. Therefore, if they inflict pain on animals or other people, they do not have empathy. Are there any red flags that indicate a person is more likely to abuse animals? Dr Lim: History is the best way to predict the future. So when children or adolescents harm pets, stray animals or even insects, when there are repeated incidents – these are very big warning signs. Then there are people who show very little empathy towards other human beings and animals. They have this indifference, and fail to recognise animals as sentient beings. They could feel that animals are objects and treat them as such. Another red flag is someone who finds violence fascinating. Most of us will cringe when watching violent videos, but these people actually enjoy them and sometimes even seek them out. There is the risk that they will re-enact these acts, which I think can be quite dangerous. Many times when you talk to them, they may lack remorse. Mr Tan: Legally speaking, based on cases that I have handled and heard about, there can be no tell-tale signs. A person can look really normal and yet have an antisocial personality disorder. You would not be able to tell until something triggers it, and this probably occurs in a private setting. You would not know unless you are living with that person – that's when you can pick up certain habits that can appear different from others. Where do you think the gaps are in how Singapore tackles cases of alleged animal cruelty? Mr Tan: If you have a designated community space for feeding, then maybe that's where surveillance cameras can be targeted at so you know who is in that area. If you understand cats, they are quite skittish in nature. So I think, within calculated speculation, that a killer or a group of killers probably have to lower a cat's guard with food and toys before committing a cruel act, or torture or kill them. There are police community cameras everywhere, but they do not cover every corner. There are blind spots. So that is where, when I read about all these cases over the years, I think more can be done by having surveillance cameras at designated feeding areas. Dr Lim: My concern as a psychiatrist is that as our society progresses, if we are better educated as a whole, why are numbers not coming down? Why is it that such acts continue to be prevalent? A lot of times we have to question if this is the tip of the iceberg. Is our society too stressed out? Are people venting their anger on animals? What are we teaching our children? They may be top mathematicians and scientists, but are they taught empathy? Are they top in values? Mr Tan: If people want to own a pet, we should make sure that they are serious about it. In countries where the rights of animals are heavily protected, there are many hurdles to cross to buy a puppy or a kitten. But in Singapore, I can just walk into the shop right now and pay a few hundred dollars, and I can just get a young life. So I think that is something which only legislation can overcome. Apart from increasing punishment against animal abuse, I think we should go a step further to do away with selling live animals at pet shops in the shopping mall. Do you think the law needs to be tougher? Dr Lim: Laws are actually quite a good way of education as well. It defines what we think is right and wrong in society. Laws are just one aspect of it. So I think there are those who can be rehabilitated and do better. For young children and youth, there's a greater propensity for them to be rehabilitated. I suppose we have to look at animal abuse in a more holistic way. So basically, animal abuse is basically just a gateway behaviour. I think there's a deeper symbolic meaning to it for the whole of society. Are people becoming more cruel and non-empathetic as a whole? And how much of this empathy education are we having? We do not have to teach people how to be kind to animals. We just have to teach people how to be kind. Mr Tan: I feel that it's timely to introduce caning. The whole idea about caning is to instil pain. We inflict pain on you so that you can register the lesson. Right? This is really the long and short of it. Dr Lim: I think in terms of cognition, if you are going to commit an act, and you know that the consequences are severe, you will have a second thought. Highlights (click/tap above): 1:45 Inside an animal abuser's mind 5:29 Understanding psychopathy and spotting red flags 10:19 Gaps in enforcement and how criminals exploit them 15:30 Do some abusers have a sadistic desire to get caught? 18:58 What animal abuse says about Singapore and its people 24:06 Can tougher laws and caning make a difference? 32:59 What the ordinary citizen should or shouldn't do Read ST's Opinion section: Follow Ang Qing on LinkedIn: Read her articles: Host: Ang Qing (aqing@ Produced and edited by: Hadyu Rahim Executive producer: Ernest Luis & Lynda Hong Follow In Your Opinion Podcast here and get notified for new episode drops: Channel: Apple Podcasts: Spotify: Feedback to: podcast@ Follow The Straits Times Podcasts on YouTube: Turn on notifications 🔔 to stay updated. -------------------- Discover more ST podcast channels: All-in-one ST Podcasts channel ➤ Get The Straits Times' app, which has a dedicated podcast player section: The App Store ➤ Google Play ➤ Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
