Brazil police place former President Bolsonaro under house arrest
Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes issued the arrest order, saying in his decision that the right-wing firebrand did not comply with judicial restraining orders imposed on him last month.
Bolsonaro is facing charges that he conspired with dozens of his allies to overturn his 2022 electoral loss to leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.
Moraes also banned Bolsonaro from receiving visits, with exceptions for lawyers and people authorized by the court, and use of a cell phone either directly or through third parties.
A press representative for Bolsonaro confirmed that he was placed under house arrest late afternoon on Monday and that a cell phone had been seized.
In a statement, Brazil's federal police said it had complied with the Supreme Court's orders for house arrest and to seize cell phones, though it did not name the target of the operation.
The restrictions on Bolsonaro had been imposed over allegations that he courted the interference of Trump, who recently tied steep new tariffs on Brazilian goods to what he called a "witch hunt" against Bolsonaro, his ideological ally.
The house arrest order follows over two years of investigations into Bolsonaro's role in an election-denying movement that culminated in riots by his supporters that rocked Brasilia in January 2023. The unrest drew comparisons to the riots at the U.S. Capitol after Trump's electoral defeat in 2020.
In contrast with the tangle of criminal cases which mostly stalled against Trump, Brazilian courts and investigators moved swiftly against Bolsonaro, threatening to end his political career and fracture his right-wing movement.
Bolsonaro's son Eduardo Bolsonaro, a Brazilian congressman, moved to the U.S. around the same time the former president's trial kicked off to drum up support for his father in Washington. The younger Bolsonaro said the move had influenced Trump's decision to impose new tariffs on Brazil.
Trump last month shared a letter he had sent to Bolsonaro. "I have seen the terrible treatment you are receiving at the hands of an unjust system turned against you," he wrote. "This trial should end immediately!"
Washington late in July hit Moraes with sanctions, accusing the judge of authorizing arbitrary pre-trial detentions and suppressing freedom of expression.
The State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Bolsonaro's house arrest.
However, Trump's tactics may be backfiring in Brazil, compounding trouble for Bolsonaro and rallying public support behind Lula's leftist government.
In an interview with Reuters last month, Bolsonaro called Moraes a "dictator" and said the restrictive measures against him were acts of "cowardice."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Pauline Hanson makes explosive claim about Anthony Albanese's election win - as she warns her prediction about Australia has come true
Pauline Hanson has launched a scathing attack on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, claiming Labor lacks a genuine mandate to pursue its net zero emissions agenda - because the majority of Australians didn't give the party their first preference at the election. In a fiery exchange with 10 News political reporter Ashleigh Raper, the One Nation leader dismissed the government's legitimacy on climate reform, arguing: that '65 per cent of Australians didn't give Labor their first preference'. 'Doesn't the science and the election results tell us that people don't want us to have this debate anymore,' Raper asked, suggesting Hanson's motion to scrap net zero was not supported by the majority. But Hanson hit back. 'No, you're wrong. When I put up the notice motion on my Facebook page, in less than a day it got 90,000 likes, 9,000 comments and 9,000 shares - and people are interested in it.' Raper then said: 'But does not the election result suggest something different? Labor were put in place with an overwhelming mandate - it was very clear what they would put in force.' But Hanson questioned this. 'Sorry, a mandate - of what? 35 per cent? 65 per cent of Australians did not vote their number one vote to Labor. Are you saying Labor has a mandate? No, they have not.' Labor received 34.56 per cent of first-preference votes in the House of Representatives. However, Australia uses preferential voting, not first-past-the-post, meaning a party can win government even without a majority of first-choice votes, as long as they win enough seats through preferences. In the May 2025 election, Labor achieved a landslide victory, winning 94 of 150 seats in the House of Representatives - far surpassing the 76‑seat threshold needed for majority control. For nearly 30 years, Hanson has built her political brand on a tough stance against immigration. Now, as Australia faces a worsening housing crisis amid record-high migration, she says the nation is finally realising she was right all along. Fresh from doubling One Nation's Senate numbers at the May election, Hanson claims more Australians are aligning with her long-held views. In an interview with 10 News First, the One Nation leader said she feels vindicated in her warnings about the impacts of mass migration, arguing the system is now clearly broken and hurting everyday Australians. 'A lot of people say we should've listened to her years ago,' she said. 'But Australians have now come on board, because now it's impacting them. 'They know the generations coming through possibly will never own their own home.' Ms Hanson said she isn't against immigration, but it has to be done in 'managed way.' 'If we don't wake up to ourselves, we're going to be a third world country, and that's exactly where we're going,' she said. In her controversial 1996 maiden speech to Parliament, Pauline Hanson warned that Australia was in 'danger of being swamped by Asians,' and claimed most Australians wanted the nation's immigration policy radically reviewed. Two decades later, in her first Senate speech in 2016, she argued the country was now at risk of being 'swamped by Muslims who bear a culture and ideology that is incompatible with our own.' The latest federal data shows net overseas migration reached historic highs in 2024, with more than 500,000 arrivals - numbers economists say have intensified pressure on rental markets and home prices. Next year, Australia will increase its near-record number of international student places by 25,000 to 295,000, despite a Reserve Bank report finding that the soaring number of international students is putting pressure on the housing market during a time of high construction costs. In cities absorbing the bulk of new arrivals, such as Sydney, Melbourne, Perth, and increasingly Brisbane, competition for rentals is fierce, sending rents and house prices soaring. While the Albanese government defends migration as critical to economic growth and filling workforce gaps, Hanson argues it's creating deeper divides and resentment. But it's unlikely Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will listen, with Hanson stating her relationship with him is non-existent. She argued policies like Net Zero and high immigration don't reflect the will of the majority. 'I'm not anti-renewables. I put some solar panels on my roof at home this year,' she said. But what she is opposed to is putting 'millions' of solar panels on agricultural land. She has also been vocal in her support of keeping coal-fired power stations open and is pro-nuclear. While critics say Hanson's rhetoric remains inflammatory, she said her party has evolved past being anti-immigration - despite calls to cut immigration by more than 570,000 people from current Labor levels to ease pressure on housing. She credits her expanding reach with younger voters to her animated video series Please Explain, which, among other things, satirises what Hanson portrays as Australia's 'addiction' to rising migration, linking it to housing stress. Many episodes underscore Hanson's core message that unchecked immigration is incompatible with social cohesion and national values. But Hanson said she won't back down, and believes her legacy lies in her conviction to stand up without fear or favour in her quest to deliver a fair go for all Australians. 'People want that from their politicians,' she said.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Labor was in a climate crouch. It now has the chance to stand up to News Corp and put the national interest first
In 2021, the Labor party was in a bit of a climate crouch. It needed policies that could be presented at the 2022 election as credible steps towards addressing the century's greatest social and economic challenge after nine years of the Coalition doing next-to-nothing, or less. It also felt it needed to not leave itself exposed to another round of damaging climate scare campaigns from its opponents in the Morrison government, industry lobby groups and the media, particularly at News Corp. It had experienced too many of those, from claims that a lamb roast would cost more than $100 and Whyalla would be wiped from the map, to baseless attacks in 2019 that its policies would cost an economy wrecking $60bn and, ludicrously, stop people enjoying weekends. Labor's response was to make like a three-banded armadillo and, should danger arise, prepare to roll itself into a ball with few potentially sensitive areas left exposed. In policy terms, that meant offering just two firm emissions reduction commitments – introducing a $20bn off-budget fund to 'rewire the nation' to allow for more renewable energy, and adopting and revamping a failed Coalition policy to cut industrial pollution. Its position was backed by a report that suggested electricity prices and emissions would be much lower under Labor than under the Coalition. It worked. These policies may not have won Labor the 2022 election, but they helped ensure it didn't lose it. The campaign was defined by Scott Morrison's failures, including on global heating. Climate-focused independents slayed Liberal MPs in previously safe seats and Anthony Albanese became prime minister. Once in power, the climate change minister, Chris Bowen, and the treasurer, Jim Chalmers, oversaw additional policies to support large-scale clean energy and cleaner cars and provide tax credits for new green industries. While some would take a while to take effect, they could make a meaningful difference. It was a start. But Russia invaded Ukraine, sending global fossil fuel prices skyward, and household electricity bills in Australia went up, not down. Inflation – a global phenomenon – made governing challenging. At the start of this year, Labor was under siege, with public and private polling suggesting it was headed for a historic first-term loss. The party once again took a defensive approach on climate before an election. It released just one policy: a battery subsidy scheme. And then the world turned again. Donald Trump moved into the White House, interest rates eased and the Liberal party under Peter Dutton ran a disastrous election campaign not helped by an unbelievable nuclear energy plan. Albanese won in a landslide. Three months on, Australia's climate political landscape is barely recognisable from four years ago. The power dynamic is reversed. Where Labor once feared being attacked, it is now the aggressor, mocking the Coalition as it toys with tearing itself apart over whether its lesson from the loss will be to drop its support for Australia cutting emissions to net zero by 2050. Nearly everything about the opposition's climate debate is a charade. It went to the election planning to increase climate pollution by abolishing Labor's climate policies and introducing none of its own for at least a decade. It opposed net zero but just didn't own up to it. And the election result makes it largely irrelevant for the next 2 ½ years anyway. With Barnaby Joyce as its most vocal climate policy advocate, its internal fight is being held miles away from where most Australians live or how they think. Meanwhile, parties and candidates that openly back the case for deep cuts in emissions – Labor, 'teal' independents and the Greens – share a clear majority of the primary vote. It doesn't mean everyone who voted for one of these groups wants the same thing, or that political support for their policies will necessarily be endless. But it does suggest there is an opportunity here – that most people are open to Australia being much more aggressive on climate if the case that it is good for the country and its people is well made. The timing couldn't be better. Big decisions are looming, including on Australia's emissions reduction target for 2035 and the policies that will be needed to back it up. Labor backbenchers are arguing it should be ambitious. The evidence of the past couple of weeks is that, wherever it lands, the government should expect fierce resistance. Take News Corp's national flagship, The Australian. Since parliament returned late last month, it has dedicated significant space to what is basically a campaign against climate action dressed up as news coverage. Its approach is not new. The costs of acting and the challenges that come with renewable energy are over-emphasised and exaggerated. The costs of not acting, including the opportunity cost of continuing to back fossil fuels over clean alternatives, are ignored. The level of international action – a valid area for sceptical scrutiny – is painted in the worst possible light. The global climate science consensus is rejected, downplayed or not mentioned. The implicit message is that cutting greenhouse gas emissions is a weird, leftwing pursuit, rather than a serious and inevitable challenge that needs to be addressed. Who needs solutions when you have kneejerk ideological certainty? Privately, members of the government are scathing of how the country's biggest newspaper publisher reports on the climate crisis. They also acknowledge the company is less influential than it used to be. But Canberra is a small place, Australia a limited media market, and old habits are hard to shake. A key question for Albanese and his cabinet colleagues will be whether they are willing to just ignore the company's one-sided framing and avoid being fooled into believing it represents a mainstream public that it needs to factor in. Put another way: Labor will need to decide if it has ditched the crouch. The government is about to receive long-awaited advice from the Climate Change Authority on the 2035 target. It is likely to include a target range, based on what the authority's board considers ambitious and achievable. It's been consulting on a cut of 65% to 75% below 2005 levels. Given where the electorate and future economy sit, there is a strong case for Labor to set a target at the ambitious end of that range and stretch to get there. Some emissions cuts – through better energy efficiency and reducing potent methane leaks at fossil fuel sites – are cost effective and just waiting to be made. Others would be tougher, requiring the government to acknowledge that local emissions from expanding export coal and gas industries are substantial and can't be written off forever as someone else's problem – and that new green industries in hydrogen, steel and other commodities are likely to struggle to flourish until their polluting competitors decline. An ambitious climate goal would be demanding. But it could also trigger a range of positives. Who knows? If well-handled, they might even include the government being rewarded by the bulk of the population, who have now hinted more than once it is what they want.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Mary Sheffield advances in Detroit mayor's race, opponent not yet decided
Mary Sheffield, Detroit's City Council president, has advanced to the November election that will decide who will succeed popular three-term Mayor Mike Duggan, who is not seeking reelection. A field of eight other candidates are still vying to become the second person advancing from Tuesday's primary to the general election. If elected, Sheffield would be the first woman and the first Black woman to hold the role of Detroit mayor. She was first elected to City Council in 2013 at age 26 and has been president since 2022. Duggan is running for Michigan's governor in 2026 as an independent. The continued growth of the city could be at stake since Duggan has helmed Detroit as it exited the largest municipal bankruptcy in U.S. history and surged back to respectability following decades of mediocrity. The former prosecutor and medical center chief has overseen a massive anti-blight campaign and pushed affordable housing developments across the city. A long list of candidates The field of eight other candidates include a current council member, former council member, pastor of a megachurch and a popular ex-police chief. Saunteel Jenkins was elected in 2009 to the City Council where she spent one four-year term. Jenkins later became chief executive of a nonprofit, which provides utility assistance for families. Current council member Fred Durhal III also is on the primary ballot. He has been on the City Council since 2021 and was a Michigan state representative from 2014 to 2019. The Rev. Solomon Kinloch Jr. has been senior pastor at Triumph Church for about 27 years. The Detroit-based church has more than 40,000 members across a number of campuses. Kinloch also was an autoworker and member of the United Auto Workers union. Former police Chief James Craig came to Detroit in 2013 amid the city's bankruptcy crisis and remained in charge of the police department until retiring in 2021. Craig failed to make the Republican ballot for Michigan governor in 2022 due to fraudulent signatures on campaign petitions. In 2024, he dropped a Republican bid for an open U.S. Senate seat. Other candidates include attorney Todd Perkins, digital creator DaNetta Simpson, business owner Joel Haashiim and entrepreneur John Barlow. The stakes for Detroit The next mayor will inherit a city on much firmer footing than the one Duggan was elected to lead in 2013 when an emergency manager installed by the state to oversee the city's flailing finances filed for bankruptcy on its behalf. Detroit shed or restructured about $7 billion in debt and exited bankruptcy in December 2014. A state-appointed board managed the city's finances for several years. Detroit has had 12 consecutive years of balanced budgets. Developers have built hundreds of affordable housing units in the city, and more than 25,000 vacant and derelict homes and buildings have been demolished. The next mayor, though, will be under pressure to maintain that progress and continuing to keep the city's growth — financially and in people — going. In 2023, the census estimated that Detroit's population rose to 633,218 from 631,366 the previous year. It was the first time the city had shown population growth in decades. Detroit also is becoming a destination for visitors. The 2024 NFL draft held downtown set a record with more than 775,000 in attendance. New hotels are popping up in and around downtown. But perhaps the most visual example of the city's turnaround has been the renovation of the once-blighted monolithic Michigan Central train station. For decades, the massive building just west of downtown symbolized all that was wrong with Detroit. That's before Dearborn, Michigan-based Ford Motor Co. stepped in and bought the old Michigan Central and adjacent properties. It reopened in 2024 following a six-year, multimillion-dollar renovation that created a hub for mobility projects. While no longer a manufacturing powerhouse, Detroit's economy still is intertwined with the auto industry which currently faces uncertainties due to tariffs threatened and imposed by the Trump administration. Stellantis, the maker of Jeep and Ram vehicles, has two facilities in Detroit. The automaker said last month that its preliminary estimates show a $2.68 billion net loss in the first half of the year due to U.S. tariffs and some hefty charges.
