Data experts race to preserve US government statistics amid quiet purges
The data nerds are fighting back. After watching data sets be altered or disappear from U.S. government websites in unprecedented ways after President Donald Trump began his second term, an army of outside statisticians, demographers and computer scientists have joined forces to capture, preserve and share data sets, sometimes clandestinely. Their goal is to make sure they are available in the future, believing that democracy suffers when policymakers don't have reliable data and that national statistics should be above partisan politics. "There are such smart, passionate people who care deeply about not only the Census Bureau, but all the statistical agencies, and ensuring the integrity of the statistical system. And that gives me hope, even during these challenging times," Mary Jo Mitchell, director of government and public affairs for the research nonprofit the Population Association of America, said this week during an online public data-users conference. The threats to the U.S. data infrastructure since January have come not only from the disappearance or modification of data related to gender, sexual orientation, health, climate change and diversity, among other topics, but also from job cuts of workers and contractors who had been guardians of restricted-access data at statistical agencies, the data experts said.
"There are trillions of bytes of data files, and I can't even imagine how many public dollars were spent to collect those data. ... But right now, they're sitting someplace that is inaccessible because there are no staff to appropriately manage those data," Jennifer Park, a study director for the Committee on National Statistics, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, said during the conference hosted by the Association of Public Data Users (APDU). 'Gender' switched to 'sex' In February, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's official public portal for health data, data.cdc.gov, was taken down entirely but subsequently went back up. Around the same time, when a query was made to access certain public data from the U.S. Census Bureau's most comprehensive survey of American life, users for several days got a response that said the area was "unavailable due to maintenance" before access was restored. Researchers Janet Freilich and Aaron Kesselheim examined 232 federal public health data sets that had been modified in the first quarter of this year and found that almost half had been "substantially altered," with the majority having the word "gender" switched to "sex," they wrote this month in The Lancet medical journal. One of the most difficult tasks has been figuring out what's been changed since many of the alterations weren't recorded in documentation. Beth Jarosz, senior program director at the Population Reference Bureau, thought she was in good shape since she had previously downloaded data she needed from the National Survey of Children's Health for a February conference where she was speaking, even though the data had become unavailable. But then she realized she had failed to download the questionnaire and later discovered that a question about discrimination based on gender or sexual identity had been removed. "It's the one thing my team didn't have," Jarosz said at this week's APDU conference. "And they edited the questionnaire document, which should have been a historical record."
Among the groups that have formed this year to collect and preserve the federal data are the Federation of American Scientists' dataindex.com, which monitors changes to federal data sets; the University of Chicago Library's Data Mirror website, which backs up and hosts at-risk data sets; the Data Rescue Project, which serves as a clearinghouse for data rescue-related efforts; and the Federal Data Forum, which shares information about what federal statistics have gone missing or been modified - a job also being done by the American Statistical Association. The outside data warriors also are quietly reaching out to workers at statistical agencies and urging them to back up any data that is restricted from the public. "You can't trust that this data is going to be here tomorrow," said Lena Bohman, a founding member of the Data Rescue Project. Experts' committee unofficially revived Separately, a group of outside experts has unofficially revived a long-running U.S. Census Bureau advisory committee that was killed by the Trump administration in March. Census Bureau officials won't be attending the Census Scientific Advisory Committee meeting in September, since the Commerce Department, which oversees the agency, eliminated it. But the advisory committee will forward its recommendations to the bureau, and demographer Allison Plyer said she has heard that some agency officials are excited by the committee's re-emergence, even if it's outside official channels. "We will send them recommendations but we don't expect them to respond since that would be frowned upon," said Plyer, chief demographer at The Data Center in New Orleans. "They just aren't getting any outside expertise ... and they want expertise, which is understandable from nerds."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
First Post
13 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump Imposes 25% Tariff on "Friend" India, Slaps 35% Tariffs on Canada Firstpost America
Trump Imposes 25% Tariff on "Friend" India, Slaps 35% Tariffs on Canada | Firstpost America | N18G US President Donald Trump has signed a sweeping executive order imposing reciprocal tariffs ranging from 10% to 41% on over 70 countries, including India, Canada, Brazil and Taiwan. India faces a steep 25% tariff following stalled trade talks and tensions over its agriculture sector and Russian oil imports. Canada was hit with an immediate 35% tariff over fentanyl concerns, while Mexico received a 90-day reprieve. Trump invoked emergency powers to justify the tariffs, citing national security and unfair trade practices. The new rates take effect seven days from signing, with some exemptions. The move has triggered price hikes and legal challenges, as China faces an August 12 deadline for a separate deal. See More
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
13 minutes ago
- First Post
Diplomacy over drama: India's ties with America go beyond Trump
India and the United States are bound not merely by trade statistics or transient political postures. They are linked, at a deeper level, by a civilisational affinity that transcends regimes, rhetoric, and rogue leaders read more I am going to begin this column with a joke. A man was being beaten in the public square of a town, but the more he was beaten, the more he kept laughing. Finally, someone watching the proceedings asked him why he was laughing. The man answered: 'These people are beating me because they think I am Dhiru. But I am actually Viru.' The joke may sound facetious, but it is both an illustration of the essence of Vedantic wisdom—that you are not what you (or others) think you are, Tat tvam asi—and of the principle that it is futile to beat the wrong person! STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD My worry is that, in our reaction to Donald Trump's (DT) tantrums, we may lose sight of the fact that India has diplomatic relations with the United States of America, and not with a transient individual who will, within the next two years hopefully, become part of a short chapter of history that both Indians and Americans may wish to forget. I accept that it is tempting in today's age of 24-hour news cycles and Twitter-driven diplomacy to see history through the narrow prism of personality. But to reduce Indo-American ties to the temperament of one man is to profoundly misread both the long arc of history and the deeper convergences that bind the world's oldest democracy with its largest. India and the United States are bound not merely by trade statistics or transient political postures. They are linked, at a deeper level, by a civilisational affinity that transcends regimes, rhetoric, and rogue leaders. This is not to deny the reality of immediate irritants—especially around trade imbalances, technology transfer, and intellectual property disputes—but to place them in their proper context: as negotiable issues within a long-term, strategic relationship. Trump, in the grand sweep of India–US relations, is, in my view, a transient nuisance, a temporary disruptor, not a permanent roadblock; an aberration, not an irrevocable defining force for all time. His leadership style is at odds with the strategic patience that true diplomacy demands. He has reduced alliances to balance sheets, and friends to negotiable assets. Yet, despite his provocations, the structural foundations of the India–US partnership remain intact. Defence cooperation expanded, foundational agreements like BECA and COMCASA were signed, and strategic dialogues deepened. That such progress occurred even during Trump's erratic presidency is testimony to the resilience of the relationship. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The goal of our diplomacy then must be not to throw the baby—which is the long-term perspective of Indo–American relations—out with the bathwater of a notoriously eccentric and unstable individual. How we do this will be the real test of our diplomacy. There are two aspects to this. First, our reaction to his unpredictable and often obnoxious behaviour. This should be responded to not with emotionalism but with a firmness infused with dignity, self-esteem and strategic autonomy. Dignity, because that befits our civilisational ethos; self-esteem, because we are not a pushover, nor are we at his mercy; and, above all, strategic autonomy because, as a sovereign nation, we shall not be dictated to by anyone—however powerful he may think he is—in deciding how we conduct our foreign policy and the choices we make in our national interest. Second, we should, through this temporary squall, continue to focus on the long-term convergences and mutually beneficial dividends that are the foundation of Indo–American relations. A substantive India–US trade agreement has long been awaited. Both countries have much to gain. The US is India's largest trading partner in goods and services, and India is a rising economic power with a rapidly growing consumer base and a sophisticated IT and pharma sector. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A comprehensive agreement could address tariff barriers, ease investment flows, unlock supply chains, and enhance collaboration in sectors such as defence, hi-tech, clean energy, digital services, and healthcare. There may be Trump-engineered setbacks to such an agreement—including news even as I write this of even higher tariffs—but the conclusion of a trade deal must remain one of our pivotal goals. We should also focus on our strengths within the US. In contemporary times, the Indian-American diaspora—now over 4.5 million strong—serves as a living bridge. It is a community that excels in business, medicine, technology, and politics. From Silicon Valley boardrooms to Capitol Hill chambers, the Indian-American presence affirms the compatibility—and complementarity—of our two democracies. There are geopolitical synergies as well, given the relentless Chinese pursuit of hegemony in the Pacific region and elsewhere. Perhaps the senseless arbitrariness of Trump should make us smell the coffee, and put our own house in order. We need to diversify our trade markets, negotiate new destinations for our goods, and reduce dependence on any one country for our critical needs. We also need to do far more on the Ease of Doing Business arena, and make our economy more competitive, while continuing to upgrade our military infrastructure. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump will come and go, but India must emerge stronger and more dynamic at the end of it. The writer is a former diplomat, an author, and a politician. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Mint
13 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump says tariffs are flowing into US at ‘not thought' levels – but what will he do with all that money?
A jubilant President Donald Trump declared on Thursday that tariffs are 'flowing into the USA at levels not thought even possible,' as his sweeping import duties on 90 countries came into force. The post, made on social media platform Truth Social, marked a bold moment in President Trump's trade crusade, with new figures showing that US tariff revenue has surged to record highs. But while the White House boasts about the billions pouring in, key questions remain: Where is this money actually going? And what impact will it have on the American economy? How Much Tariff Revenue Is the US Collecting? According to the latest figures from the US Treasury Department, the government collected nearly $30 billion in tariffs in July 2025 alone, representing a 242% increase from July 2024. Since April 2025, when Trump began imposing a 10% blanket tariff on nearly all imported goods — along with several steeper levies — total collections have surpassed $100 billion. Trump has repeatedly touted this windfall as a vindication of his 'America First' trade policy. 'We have a lot of money coming in, much more money than the country's ever seen,' he said in a recent speech, adding that tariff revenue is now a core pillar of his economic agenda. Also Read | Trump Tariffs India LIVE: PM Modi responds strongly as US slaps new tariffs What's the US Government Doing With the Money? Despite Donald Trump's grand claims of debt reduction and potential 'dividend' payments to American citizens, neither has yet materialised. In reality, all tariff revenue flows into the US Treasury's general fund, which acts as the government's master account — essentially America's national chequebook. This pool of funds is used to pay for everything from Social Security and military salaries to infrastructure and interest on government debt. While the tariff windfall has helped slightly narrow the current $1.4 trillion budget deficit, it remains insufficient to materially reduce the $36 trillion national debt. Experts say the money is, for now, helping the government borrow less than it otherwise would — a temporary reprieve rather than a game-changer. What About 'Tariff Rebate Cheques' for Americans? Trump has floated the idea of redistributing tariff income to ordinary Americans through 'tariff rebate cheques.' Republican Senator Josh Hawley even introduced draft legislation to that effect last week. However, economists are sceptical. Ernie Tedeschi, director at Yale's Budget Lab and a former White House adviser, warned that such a scheme would widen the deficit and risk fuelling inflation. 'They're the wrong policy to pursue right now,' Tedeschi said, adding that the US economy remains vulnerable to cost-push inflation, particularly in sectors already hit by tariff-related price increases. Who's Really Paying These Tariffs? While Trump claims foreign exporters are footing the bill, the reality is more nuanced. US businesses are the ones initially paying the tariffs when goods arrive at American ports — and many are quietly absorbing the costs. However, some are starting to pass them on to consumers. Products like home appliances, toys, and consumer electronics have already seen price rises in government inflation reports. Retail giants such as Walmart and Procter & Gamble have warned that more price hikes are imminent. The uncertainty has also had a chilling effect on hiring, with recent surveys suggesting that companies are holding off on job creation and investment due to the unpredictable trade climate. Will Trump's Tariffs Boost or Hurt US Economy? The Trump administration remains adamant that tariffs, combined with recent tax cuts and fiscal stimulus, will supercharge the American economy. But independent analysts say the opposite may be true. The Yale Budget Lab estimates that tariffs will shave 0.5 percentage points off GDP growth in both 2025 and 2026. That, in turn, could dent income and payroll tax receipts, partially offsetting the revenue gained from tariffs. 'Tariffs are going to have a negative economic effect on the American economy,' Tedeschi noted. Trump's Tariffs: The Bottom Line While Trump may be basking in record-breaking tariff revenue, the long-term picture is far murkier. The billions collected are currently keeping the deficit from ballooning even further — but they're not delivering on his more ambitious promises, at least not yet. And as more Americans begin to feel the pinch at the checkout counter, the question of who's really winning this trade war will become harder to ignore.
