logo
Austin-area experts, lawmakers weigh in on impact of looming semiconductor tariffs

Austin-area experts, lawmakers weigh in on impact of looming semiconductor tariffs

Yahoo22-04-2025

Tech and manufacturing companies are bracing for looming semiconductor tariffs after President Donald Trump launched an investigation last week into the effects on national security of importing semiconductor technology.
The investigation came just a day after Trump hinted at imposing tariffs on chips and pharmaceuticals amid a broader trade war.
"The number one word is uncertainty," Austin Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Jeremy Martin told the American-Statesman.
In Texas and in the Austin area, companies are currently in a waiting game, looking for how to cope with imposing tariffs, likely retaliatory ones from other countries and a broader trade war that is putting artificial intelligence and chips in the national spotlight once again.
Semiconductors are chips that enable technologies like those found in smartphones and computers to function.
Over the past several years, lawmakers have pushed for greater investment in the manufacturing and workforce training in the U.S. related to semiconductors. Such efforts, like the $280 billion CHIPS and Science Act signed into law by former President Joe Biden in 2022 and the Texas CHIPS Act signed into law by Gov. Greg Abbott in 2023, aim to encourage manufacturing of the essential technology on American soil.
Trump has initiated tariffs across industries over the past several weeks, taking aim at China, Canada, Mexico and even uninhabited islands home to only penguins and seals. A broader trade war is rattling companies and consumers around the world, but initially, semiconductors were left exempt.
That is until last week when the Trump administration took action that will likely result in new tariffs on semiconductors, as well as pharmaceutical products, in a greater effort to onshore manufacturing as a matter of national and economic security.
According to federal notices, the administration initiated national security investigations into imports of chips and pharmaceuticals, likely setting the stage for tariffs on both. The tariffs would be issued under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which allows the president to impose tariffs to protect U.S. national security.
Prior to the CHIPS and Science Act, the U.S. lacked any leading-edge semiconductor fabs capable of producing the chips crucial for artificial intelligence or at the scale comparable to other countries. The U.S. relied, and still does, on foreign companies for these advanced chips.
Nearly three years after Biden signed the act, semiconductor manufacturing is still largely outside of the U.S., with the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company's facility in Arizona, which will eventually produce 30% of the company's most advanced chips when its plants are operational, being one of the only U.S.-based facilities capable of producing these chips.
"It's not just going to happen overnight," Scott Almassy, who is a partner at global accounting firm PwC, told the American-Statesman. "It takes a while for supply chains to evolve. It took (about) 40 years for the industry to get to where it is today in terms of the whole interconnected, complex global environment.
With the Section 232 investigation pending, companies are looking for short-, medium- and long-term solutions to address the looming tariffs, but most of them are in a waiting game, according to Almassy, who leads PwC's semiconductor practice and works directly with industry leaders.
The results of the investigation, Almassy said, will drive a lot of behaviors.
These possible solutions range from moving supply chains and source from countries with lower tariffs, changing costs of products, looking for manufacturing partners or vendors already in the U.S. or looking into investing in facilities in the U.S.
Almassy said the largest hinderances, beyond time, are education and costs.
"That's just how the economy has been constructed over time. ... So, one is cost, that's the longer-term reason why there's less of (semiconductor manufacturing) in the U.S. Because the U.S. is focused a lot more on research and development. There's a push for that. The second thing, though, is do we have the skill set and the knowledge and the employee base in the U.S. to manufacture these semiconductors. Cost plus labor or education, those are the things that you can't fix those overnight, right?"
U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Austin, said tariffs on semiconductors, and the likely retaliatory ones from other countries, will drastically increase costs and risk businesses and jobs.
According to Doggett, some Austin-area companies are already expecting layoffs and consumers will carry the majority of the costs related to the tariffs. The tariffs are already expected to cost chip equipment makers more than $1 billion.
"After proclaiming that 'tariff' is the most beautiful word in the dictionary, Trump's erratic actions have created a climate of chaos and uncertainty that discourages business investment. ... The Trump approach penalizes Austin area manufacturers, who design cutting-edge chips that are manufactured abroad," Doggett told the American-Statesman. "Trump's tariff tax on raw wafers, chemicals and other critical supplies needed to make chips here will have the opposite effect by making it significantly more expensive to produce semiconductors and the many critical technologies they enable, like artificial intelligence. And retaliation from other countries may also limit access to essential materials. Trump is endangering the economic and national security interests we have in U.S. companies maintaining cost-competitive access to these materials."
According to Almassy, semiconductor tariffs will raise the price of virtually everything.
More: Trump's tariffs could raise the price of your next iPhone. Here's by how much
Almassy's belief, he said, is that the Trump administration is taking special considering for the semiconductor and health care industries with the Section 232 investigation due to how essential they are for everyday life.
Semiconductors power everything from phones and computers to refridgerators, cars, televisions, lightbulbs, medical devices and more, and Almassy thinks that is why Trump is especially concerned with tariffs on the essential technology.
Almassy expressed concern about how the tariffs would be implemented. He noted that many devices and everyday appliances contain multiple semiconductors. If tariffs are applied to each semiconductor in an import, he worries that costs could escalate rapidly.
"Semiconductors, they power everything. ... It could very much impact the cost of things that maybe were not quite that significant, but it escalates very quickly," Almassy said.
Some manufacturers and lawmakers, however, believe tariffs are needed to spur U.S. semiconductor manufacturing.
Martin said some of the chamber's members are optimistic about increased foreign direct investment and the possibility for more manufacturing dollars to pour into Texas.
Kevin Fincher, CEO of Austin Regional Manufacturers Association, said the tariffs are a matter of national security and therefore are essential to decouple from China.
"Manufacturers who have supply chain in China are going to feel it the most," Fincher told the American-Statesman. "So, when you look at global tariff policy, and again, what I'll go back to is the U.S.'s intent is to decouple from China, and it is working the tariff policy to get other countries, like the (European Union), to also decouple from China. ... China is an adversary. People need to understand that China is an adversary, and you cannot have your industrial-based manufacturing in an adversarial country. That is the national security issue that is being addressed right now."
Still, Fincher said, global supply chains and workforces cannot be moved or generated overnight. There are going to be growing pains, he said, and consumers and companies alike will feel the costs.
U.S. Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Austin, echoed those sentiments to the American-Statesman in a statement, saying while onshoring manufacturing is necessary, manufacturing capacity cannot increase overnight.
"It won't happen overnight," McCaul said. "In the meantime, I urge the administration to maintain U.S. access to the semiconductor chips we need from other nations as we work to re-shore these crucial national security assets and put America first.'
More: What is a reciprocal tariff? What Texas lawmakers had to say about Trump's new tariff plan
While the Austin-area has certainly grown to be a leader in the semiconductor industry in the U.S., large-scale manufacturing in the Lone Star State is still nascent.
Samsung Electronics' manufacturing facility in Taylor, Samsung Austin Semiconductor, is not expected to come online until, at the earliest, 2026. Texas Instruments is still in the early stages for its $30 billion 300-millimeter semiconductor wafer fabrication plants in Sherman. Other semiconductor companies have headquarters or offices in Texas, like Tokyo Electron Ltd., or TELL, a global leader in semiconductor manufacturing that opened its new U.S. headquarters in Austin last week.
At the TEL ribbon-cutting last week, Zentaro Naganuma, the Consul-General of Japan in Houston, told the audience that America and Japan need greater cooperation to support semiconductor manufacturing. He emphasized that semiconductors are essential to the global economy and supply chain, and that partnerships are even more important in times of tariffs
Mark Dougherty, Tokyo Electron America & TEL Manufacturing and Engineering America president, told reporters at the ribbon-cutting that more and more people are becoming aware of semiconductors and their necessary presence in everyday lives. Outside of Japan, U.S. is home to TEL's only other manufacturing footprint and largest research and development footprint. Dougherty described the new headquarters opening was "great timing" in terms of the greater global economy.
"The populace at large is becoming more and more aware of 'what are semiconductors? Why do they matter? How do we make them?' And certainly, at the state and federal level, of course, this is much more in the daily dialog," Dougherty said. "We have not just what I would call a narrative, but really a core set of, here is how we are building our business that, in large measure, is intended to be able to support the regrowth or return or expansion of the semiconductor industry here in the United States."
At the end of the day, Almassy said the semiconductor industry is left with a level of uncertainty over what happens next.
"The lack of certainty about where things are headed, it's causing some consternation with regard to decision making. I wouldn't say any companies are just sitting on their hands, hoping things go away. Obviously, everybody's scenario planning and trying to figure out what they can do. Maybe the 232 investigation will add some clarity to it? But then again, you've also got 70+ countries that have to negotiate trade deals. What's that interplay look like?"
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Semiconductor industry waits to see impacts of potential tariffs

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The White House Is Delighted With Events in Los Angeles
The White House Is Delighted With Events in Los Angeles

Atlantic

time23 minutes ago

  • Atlantic

The White House Is Delighted With Events in Los Angeles

The last time President Donald Trump tried to send military forces into American streets to put down civil unrest, in June 2020, Pete Hegseth was positioned outside the White House with a Kevlar helmet and riot shield. Major Hegseth's mobilization as part of a District of Columbia National Guard unit summoned to restore order in the nation's capital, where protests had erupted following the police murder of George Floyd, occurred as Pentagon leaders scrambled to avert what they feared could be a confrontation between active-duty U.S. forces and their fellow Americans. Today, Hegseth is second only to the president in directing the administration's use of the National Guard and active-duty Marines to respond to unrest over immigration raids in Los Angeles. And this time, the military's civilian leadership isn't acting as a brake on Trump's impulse to escalate the confrontation. The Hegseth-led Pentagon is an accelerant. The administration's decision to federalize 4,000 California National Guard forces, contrary to Governor Gavin Newsom's wishes, and to dispatch 700 active-duty Marines to the Los Angeles area, marks a break with decades of tradition under which presidents have limited their use of the military on American soil. If there are any internal misgivings about busting through yet another democratic norm, they haven't surfaced publicly. Indeed, officials at the White House told us they are satisfied with the way the L.A. confrontation has unfolded. They believe that it highlights their focus on immigration and law and order, and places Democrats on the wrong side of both. One widely circulated photo—showing a masked protester standing in front of a burning car, waving a Mexican flag—has been embraced by Trump supporters as a distillation of the conflict: a president unafraid to use force to defend an American city from those he deems foreign invaders. 'We couldn't have scripted this better,' said a senior White House aide granted anonymity to discuss internal conversations. 'It's like the 2024 election never ended: Trump is strong while Democrats are weak and defending the indefensible.' Democrats, of course, take a different view, and say the administration's actions have only risked triggering further violence. Retired officers who study how the armed forces have been used in democracies told us they share those concerns. They point to the damage that Trump's orders could do to the military's relationship with the citizens it serves. 'We should be very careful, cautious, and even reluctant to use the military inside our country,' Bradley Bowman, a former Army officer who heads the defense program at the Foundation for Defense of Democracy, told us. Conor Friedersdorf: Averting a worst-case scenario in Los Angeles State and local authorities typically use law-enforcement personnel as a first response to civil disturbances or riots, followed by National Guard forces if needed. Retired Major General Randy Manner, who served as acting vice chief of the National Guard Bureau during the Obama administration, said the federalizing of California Guard forces—putting them under presidential rather than state control, a move allowed with certain limits—pulls those service members away from their civilian jobs and makes it harder to complete planned training or exercises. 'Basically, the risk does not justify the investment of these forces, and it will negatively impact on readiness,' Manner told us. Retired officers we spoke with also drew a distinction between the involvement of National Guard and active-duty forces. Whereas National Guard troops assist citizens after natural disasters and have the advantage of knowing the communities they serve, active-duty forces are primarily trained to 'see the enemy and neutralize the enemy,' said Mark Cancian, a retired Marine colonel now at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 'When you're dealing with U.S. citizens, no matter what they're doing, that's not the right mindset.' 'This is not Fallujah,' Bowman added. 'This is Los Angeles.' Juliette Kayyem: Trump's gross misuse of the National Guard This morning, Hegseth made his first congressional appearance since his bruising confirmation process, appearing before a House committee. His tone with Democrats was at times combative. When Representative Betty McCollum, a Minnesota Democrat, asked the defense secretary what the cost of the California deployment would be, he declined to provide a figure and instead pivoted to criticism of Minnesota Governor Tim Walz for the state's response to the violence that followed Floyd's killing in 2020. (Military officials said later they expected the Los Angeles deployment, as envisioned, to cost roughly $134 million.) 'If you've got millions of illegals, you don't know where they're coming from, they're waving flags from foreign countries and assaulting police officers, that's a problem,' Hegseth told lawmakers. Trump, for his part, told reporters that anyone who tries to protest at the Saturday parade celebrating the 250th birthday of the U.S. Army will 'be met with very big force.' He also said that he wouldn't hesitate to invoke the Insurrection Act, which would permit him to employ the military for law enforcement or to suppress a rebellion, if he believed that circumstances required. Speaking to troops at Fort Bragg in North Carolina later in the day, the president promised to stop the 'anarchy' in California. ' We will liberate Los Angeles and make it free, clean, and safe again,' he said. 'We will not allow an American city to be invaded and conquered by a foreign enemy.' Some Republicans have privately expressed worry that Trump may overplay a winning hand. Even in the West Wing, two people we spoke with tried to downplay the incendiary rhetoric from Trump and Hegseth. They stressed that, to this point, National Guard forces have been in a defensive posture, protecting federal buildings. Although they believe that Trump has the political advantage at the moment, they acknowledged there would be real risks if U.S. troops got involved in violence. 'We don't know who would get blamed but no one wins if that happens,' one senior aide told us. 'No one wants to see that.' Hegseth's support for using active-duty troops in Los Angeles stands in contrast to what his predecessor did in 2020. At that time, Defense Secretary Mark Esper, along with Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Mark Milley, scrambled to block Trump's desire to employ active-duty forces against the demonstrators protesting racial violence. The president had mused about shooting protesters in the legs, Esper wrote later. To satisfy his boss while also avoiding a dangerous confrontation, the defense chief called active-duty forces from Fort Bragg to Northern Virginia but sought to keep them out of the fray. Tom Nichols: Trump is using the National Guard as bait In his 2024 book The War on Warrior s, Hegseth described how his experience as a D.C. Guardsman in 2020 crystallized his views about the divide between military personnel and what he saw as the degenerate protesters who were lobbing bricks and bottles of urine at the citizen soldiers. When the D.C. Guard was again summoned seven months later, to help secure the 2021 inauguration following the January 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol, Hegseth was told to stand down because fellow Guardsmen suspected that one of his tattoos was a sign of extremism. (Hegseth has maintained it is part of his Christian faith.) Hegseth was angered by his exclusion and resigned from the Guard. That experience remains with him as he attempts to reshape the military, and its role in society, in line with Trump's worldview. As he has written: 'My trust for this Army is irrevocably broken.'

Protesters gather at Santa Ana federal building: ‘This is the healthiest thing to do'
Protesters gather at Santa Ana federal building: ‘This is the healthiest thing to do'

Los Angeles Times

time24 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Protesters gather at Santa Ana federal building: ‘This is the healthiest thing to do'

In Santa Ana, about 120 protesters gathered outside a federal building near City Hall on Monday afternoon. Multiple raids had been conducted across Santa Ana that morning, including at Home Depots and restaurants and in industrial areas of the city. 'I feel enraged,' said Councilmember Jessie Lopez, standing with the crowd. 'If [U.S. Atty.] Bill Essayli cares about criminals, he should start at the White house.' Essayli last week sent a letter to Santa Ana, warning the sanctuary city about its proposal to pass a resolution that would require the Santa Ana Police Department to inform residents whenever they received a courtesy call from Immigration and Customs Enforcement alerting them about upcoming raids. Bethany Anderson was with a group of friends from Fullerton, where they had been receiving calls Monday. They were standing in front of a driveway that led to a small gated garage where unmarked white vans had been driving in and out all day. 'I knew they would bring people here' to the federal building, said Anderson, who is accredited by the Department of Justice as a legal representative. 'This is not a jail, so we have no idea about the quality of conditions inside, so that's very worrisome. Suddenly, she saw movement in the driveway and grabbed the bullhorn hanging from her shoulder. 'We see you!' Anderson shouted as protesters screamed, 'Shame!' and rushed to see what was going on. 'We see you, private security guards! You don't have to do this!' The Orange County Rapid Response Network posted addresses and photos of locations where ICE had conducted raids in Fountain Valley. The group's co-director, Casey Conway, said he was happy to see so many people show up in Santa Ana. 'But this isn't just today. This has been every day for three weeks. We're super overwhelmed right now.' The crowd held pro-immigrant and anti-Trump signs and waved Mexican flags. Someone passed around bottled waters and masks as a young woman chanted on a bullhorn, 'Move ICE, get out the way!' to artist Ludacris' song 'Move.' Federal police stood by the building's entrance, where some took photos of the crowd. When they went back inside, the crowd started chanting, '¡Quiere llorar!' — 'He wants to cry,' a common insult among Mexican soccer and rock fans. Alicia Rojas looked on from the edge of a sidewalk. The Colombian native had her amnesty application denied in the federal building as a child. 'This is all triggering,' said the 48-year-old artist. Now a U.S. citizen, Rojas grew up in Mission Viejo during the era of Prop. 187 and remembered all the racism against people like her at the time. Seeing so many young people out to protest made her 'hopeful, but I'm also worried. I've seen how the response has been to these peaceful protests. This administration has no capacity to be American.' She looked on. 'I feel rage inside, but this is the healthiest thing to do. More than anything. I'm here to look after the kids.' As the vans came in and out throughout the afternoon, activists at first blocked them but later backed down when federal agents shot pepper balls into the ground. Among those hit was Conway, who rushed to the side to have their reddened eyes washed out with water. 'I need someone to be on deescalation,' Conway gasped. The task fell to Tui Dashark. Dressed in neon green Doc Martens, an olive hat and a Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles T-shirt, he led the crowd through chants including 'No firman nada' (Don't sign anything). 'Please stop throwing water bottles,' Dashark said at one point. 'They're just water bottles to us. But to them, it's assault with a deadly weapon.' The crowd calmed down. 'I'm proud of you guys for not escalating,' Dashark said. 'You're the f— real ones.' He turned to the gate driveway, where federal agents had quietly returned. 'You're so cool man,' Dashark said in a sarcastic voice as the crowd laughed. ' I wonder, what kind of person is up thinking, 'I want to lock up kids as a career?' As the day continued, the situation eventually evolved into the old children's game of Red Rover: Protesters would get too close and throw water bottles, federal agents would shoot pepper balls and eventually escalate to flash-bang grenades and tear gas. After a couple of hours, the crowd moved a couple of hundred feet to the east to Sasscer Park, named after a Santa Ana police officer killed in the 1960s by a member of the Black Panther Party. Local activists call it Black Panther Park. By 5 p.m., the protesters numbered at least 500. T-shirts emblazoned with logos of beloved Santa Ana Chicano institutions colored the scene: Suavecito. Gunthers. Funk Freaks. Santa Ana High. El Centro Cultural de México. People took turns on bullhorns to urge calm and to unite. But then another protester saw federal agents gathering at the federal building again. 'We gotta make them work overtime!' a young woman proclaimed on a bullhorn. 'They don't make enough money. let's go back!' The crowd rushed back to the federal building. Eventually, Santa Ana police officers arrived to create a line and declare an unlawful assembly. For the next four hours, the scene was akin to a party broken up occasionally by tear gas and less-than-lethal projectiles. Cars cruised on nearby streets blasting Rage against the Machine, sierreño music and the tunes of Panteón Rococó, a socialism-tinged Mexican ska group. Someone used AutoTune to shout profanities against the police, drawing giggles from the overwhelmingly Gen Z crowd. A Latina woman who gave her name only as Flor arrived with her teenage daughter. It was their first protest. 'We live in a MAGA-ass town and saw this on television,' Flor said. 'I grew up just down the street from here. No way can we let this happen here.' Nearby, Giovanni Lopez blew on a loud plastic horn. It was his first protest as well. 'I'm all for them deporting the criminals,' said the Santa Ana resident. He wore a white poncho bearing the Aztec god Quetzalcoatl. 'But that's not what they're doing. My wife is Honduran and she's not a citizen. She's scared to go to her work now even though she's legal. I told her not to be afraid.' The Santa Ana police slowly pushed the protesters out of Sasscer Park. Some, like Brayn Nestor, bore bloody welts from the rubber bullets that had hit them. 'Does someone have a cigarette?' he asked out loud in Spanish. The Mexico City native said he was there to 'support the raza, güey.' He was in obvious pain, but the trademarks arachidonic humor of his native city still bubbled through. 'It's chido [cool] that they hit me,' he proclaimed to anyone who would listen. 'Es perro, güey [it's cool, dog]. So the world knows what jerks those pigs are.'

Democrat Mikie Sherrill and Republican Jack Ciattarelli to face off in race for New Jersey governor
Democrat Mikie Sherrill and Republican Jack Ciattarelli to face off in race for New Jersey governor

Washington Post

time26 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Democrat Mikie Sherrill and Republican Jack Ciattarelli to face off in race for New Jersey governor

TRENTON, N.J. — Democratic Rep. Mikie Sherrill and Republican Jack Ciattarelli, who had President Donald Trump's endorsement, won their primary elections in New Jersey's race for governor, setting the stage for a November election, poised to be fought in part over affordability and the president's policies. Sherrill emerged from a crowded field of five experienced rivals on the strength of her biography as a Navy pilot and former prosecutor who has been a vocal critic of President Donald Trump.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store