logo
Budget 2025–2026: A hope for progress or a storm of inflation?

Budget 2025–2026: A hope for progress or a storm of inflation?

In Pakistan, the annual budget is seen as an opportunity for the government to express its economic priorities and development strategies. The current government has presented the fiscal year 2025–2026 budget at a critical juncture when the country is facing an economic crisis, rising debt, inflation, and a water emergency.
This budget will not only impact the daily lives of the people but also determine the future direction of Pakistan. In this column, we compare the current budget with the previous two budgets (2023–2024 and 2024–2025), while also analyzing its potential effects on various social and economic classes.
Comparative Analysis of Budgets 2023–2024, 2024–2025, and 2025–2026:
In the 2023–2024 budget, the total size was PKR 14.5 trillion, with a revenue target of PKR 9.2 trillion. This increased to PKR 16 trillion in 2024–2025, with a revenue target of PKR 10.2 trillion. The 2025–2026 budget now stands at PKR 18.5 trillion, with a tax collection target of PKR 12 trillion.
The fiscal deficit was 7.6 percent of GDP in 2023–2024, reduced to 6.9 percent in 2024–2025, but is expected to rise again to 7.2 percent in 2025–2026, which is an alarming indicator. The current account deficit stood at $2.8 billion in 2023–2024, which improved to USD 1.9 billion in 2024–2025. However, due to an expected increase in imports and a decline in exports, it is projected to reach USD 3.1 billion again in 2025–2026.
Impacts on Different Social Classes:
Lower-income Class: This year, PKR 400 billion has been allocated for the Ehsaas Program, up from PKR 360 billion last year. However, subsidies have been cut by 18 percent. The increase in electricity and gas prices will hit this class the hardest.
Middle Class: New income tax slabs have been introduced for salaried individuals, increasing the burden on those earning over PKR 80,000 per month. There is no significant relief in educational expenses.
Upper Class: Tax has been increased on purchase of luxury items, large houses, and expensive cars. However, no significant increase has been made in capital gains tax, keeping the investor class largely unaffected.
New taxes and their impact:
Federal Excise Duty (FED) increased on cigarettes, sugar, and soft drinks. A 2 percent rise in income tax on annual incomes above PKR 1.5 million. The 35 percent withholding tax on non-filers. A fixed tax scheme introduced for small traders. These tax measures will indirectly burden the poor and middle class, while the lack of expansion in direct taxation limits the pressure on the elite class.
Trade deficit:
The government expects the trade deficit to reach $28 billion in 2025–2026, higher than $25 billion in 2024–2025. The deficit is widening due to limited export growth and rising imports. Increased taxation instead of relief on industrial raw materials may worsen the situation.
IMF pressure:
Under the $3 billion IMF program, several tough measures have been adopted in the current budget, including: Cuts in energy subsidies, Increase in electricity tariffs, Implementation of an automated revenue collection system. Around 80% of the budget decisions align with IMF recommendations, drawing criticism that such moves could harm local industries and public welfare projects.
Poverty and unemployment:
The proportion of people living below the poverty line is expected to rise to 39 percent this fiscal year, up from 36 percent in 2024. Decreased job opportunities, additional burden on SMEs, and rising inflation may increase unemployment.
Fuel, electricity, and water bills:
A PKR 20 per liter increase in petroleum levy is expected after the budget. A 15 percent increase in electricity base tariffs has been proposed. PKR 85 billion has been allocated to tackle the water emergency, including the construction of dams, rainwater storage, and water recycling projects.
Development vs. non-development expenditures:
Development Budget: PKR 1.4 trillion (PKR 1.15 trillion in 2024–2025). Non-Development expenditures: PKR 6.5 trillion. 60 percent of the development budget is allocated at the federal level, while 40% is for the provinces. However, weak monitoring mechanisms limit its impact at the grassroots level.
Foreign investment:
The government has attempted to attract foreign investment through special economic zones and relaxed digital taxes. However, political instability and judicial uncertainty remain major hurdles for investors.
Other key aspects of the budget:
PKR 60 billion allocated for combating climate change. Extension of tax exemptions for the IT sector andPKR 50 billion allocated for youth skills development programs.
Conclusion and recommendations:
While the budget sets a direction for the economy, it reveals several gaps when matched against ground realities: Limited expansion of direct taxes leaves the wealthy class largely unaffected. The poor and middle class are likely to face more hardships. Greater transparency and monitoring are essential for effective development spending. The government must expand the tax net, curb corruption, and promote local industry and agriculture to build a sustainable economy. Restoring public trust will require not a superficial but a transparent, fair, and balanced budget.
(The writer can be contacted on [email protected])
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Govt plans tax to counter India's water threat
Govt plans tax to counter India's water threat

Express Tribune

time7 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Govt plans tax to counter India's water threat

Pakistan has sought the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) permission to impose a special 1% tax on every taxable product produced in the country, except electrical energy and medicines, to fund two mega water storage dams as a solution to deal with Indian water aggression. The decision to impose a new cess has been taken after majority of the provincial governments showed reluctance to finance the early completion of the Diamer-Bhasha Dam and the Mohmand Dam, according to the sources in the Ministry of Water Resource and the Ministry of Finance. However, the government was also meeting opposition from the IMF, which has urged the federal government to try to find a space within the approved Rs1 trillion federal Public Sector Development programme, the sources revealed. The Diamer-Bhasha Dam worth Rs480 billion and Mohmand Dam – originally estimated to cost Rs310 billion – had been approved in 2018 but still a minimum Rs540 billion was needed for their completion. India has threatened to cut water supplies after it held the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) in abeyance in violation of the treaty provisions and in the breach of the international law. Islamabad has plainly told India that any such act would be considered as an act of war. The sources said that as an alternate strategy, Pakistan has decided to fast track the construction of the two dams. However, due to its political priorities and pressing demands by the coalition partners, the government has reduced the water sector development budget by 28% to Rs133 billion for the next fiscal year. Now it wants to offset this by introducing a new tax. The sources said that the government has decided to levy a 1% cess on the gross value of all local taxable supplies to raise the additional funds, subject to the approval by the IMF and by parliament. They said that all the goods produced in Pakistan and subjected to tax are proposed to be charged at a new cess rate of 1%. The goods that are currently exempted from the sales tax under the Sixth Schedule, or are charged at a zero rate under the Fifth Schedule of the sales tax law would be immune to the cess. Likewise, the electrical energy goods and pharmaceutical goods are proposed to be exempted from the new cess. Cess is different from a normal tax and it can only be levied for a specific purpose, like the Gas Infrastructure Development Cess (GIDC) that had been imposed to fund Iran-Pakistan Gas Pipeline. Effectively, every good produced in Pakistan and consumed by all households would be subject to 1% new special tax, said the sources. The Ministry of Finance spokesman Qumar Abbasi and the Secretary Water Resources Ministry Syed Ali Murtaza did not respond to the request for comments. They have been asked to confirm the development and also the IMF's position. A senior Finance Ministry official said that the proposal was under consideration but the discussions with the IMF were still going on. He said that the cess would not be imposed through the Finance Act 2025, and instead a new separate bill will be introduced in parliament, subject to the IMF clearance. In the case of GIDC, the Supreme Court has decided that the cess can only be levied for a specific purpose and it requires separate legislation. This binds the government's hands from introducing the cess through the Finance Act, which is currently under discussion in parliament. The GIDC case is also an example of how the government is indifferent. The textile and fertiliser companies have not yet deposited over Rs400 billion in the kitty despite collecting those from the consumers. The finance and petroleum ministries are not able to make an effective strategy. One of the options is that instead of levy a new 1% cess, the government should amend the GIDC law and divert the already collected money towards building dams. On the intervention of the Petroleum Minister Ali Pervaiz, the government has again constituted a committee under the chairmanship of Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb to recover the GIDC. But this committee too is moving at a snail's pace. The sources said that the IMF's view was that the government should fund the dam projects from the PSDP instead of imposing more burden on the people. However, the Ministry of Water Resources has informed the government that it would take 15 years to complete the Mohmand Dam and over 20 years to finish work on the Diamer-Bhasha Dam at the current pace of the budget allocations. The PSDP is already overstretched and there is no space to fund these projects beyond the allocations made in the new budget, said Ahsan Iqbal, the federal minister for Planning and Development. He said that out of the Rs1 trillion allocations, effectively, Rs640 billion was available for funding the PSDP. Iqbal said that the remaining Rs360 billion had been allocated for spending on N-25 Karachi-Quetta road, provincial schemes and special areas' allocations. The sources said that after the National Economic Council (NEC) meeting earlier this month, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif had also chaired a special meeting with the provinces to convince them to fund these two dams to deal with Indian aggression. In a follow-up meeting with Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar, the provinces except Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa showed reluctance to fund federal projects, said the sources. The cost of the Diamer-Bhasha Dam had been estimated at Rs480 billion seven years ago and it still needs Rs365 billion more to complete the work against a price that is likely to increase further. For the next fiscal year, only Rs25 billion has been allocated for project, which is even less than this fiscal year. Likewise, the Mohmand Dam was approved at a cost of Rs310 billion seven years ago and it still requires a minimum of Rs173 billion more at the old price. Only Rs35.7 billion has been allocated in the new fiscal year. Earlier this week, Ahsan Iqbal said that the government has advanced the completion of both the projects by two years and these dams will be completed by 2030. He said that on completion, Pakistan will have 7 million acre feet of additional water storage capacity. Pakistan's two reservoirs Tarbela and Mangla dams are facing storage related issues due to sedimentation and other technical issues. The Sindh government has given a deficit budget for the next fiscal year and also showed zero-balance for the outgoing fiscal year. This has surprised many, as the provincial government had a cash surplus of Rs395 billion till March this year, according to the Ministry of Finance's fiscal operations summary. For the next fiscal year, Sindh has shown a Rs38.5 billion deficit budget, which defeats the IMF's core objective of getting Rs1.4 trillion cash surpluses from all the four provinces.

Gold falls as investor focus turns to G7 meeting, Fed rate decision
Gold falls as investor focus turns to G7 meeting, Fed rate decision

Business Recorder

time8 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Gold falls as investor focus turns to G7 meeting, Fed rate decision

LONDON: Gold fell on Monday as investors weighed the impact of the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict, while also focusing on the Group of Seven (G7) leaders meeting and the US Federal Reserve policy decision later this week. Spot gold fell 0.4% to $3,419.89 an ounce, as of 1059 GMT, after hitting its highest level since April 22 earlier in the session. US gold futures were down 0.4% to $3,439.80. 'Geopolitical tensions are not disappearing near term, as well rates are likely to be cut further by the central bank (Fed), so that should provide a floor to gold,' said Giovanni Staunovo, an analyst at UBS. Iranian missiles struck Israel's Tel Aviv and the port city of Haifa before dawn on Monday, part of a wave of attacks by Tehran in retaliation for Israel's strikes on Friday. The dangers of further escalation loomed over a summit of G7 leaders in Canada, as wars in Ukraine and the Middle East add to global economic uncertainty. But there was no sign of panic among investors as currency markets stayed calm and Wall Street stock futures firmed after an early dip. 'Investors will be watching developments in the Middle East very closely, especially the risk of other countries being dragged into the conflict,' said Ole Hansen, head of commodity strategy at Saxo Bank. Gold is considered a safe-haven asset during times of geopolitical and economic uncertainty. It also tends to thrive in a low-interest rate environment. The Fed's interest rate decision on Wednesday followed by Fed Chair Jerome Powell's comments will be eagerly watched.

Finalisation of Finance Bill 2025: Senate panel asks FBR to stay out of provinces' domain
Finalisation of Finance Bill 2025: Senate panel asks FBR to stay out of provinces' domain

Business Recorder

time8 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Finalisation of Finance Bill 2025: Senate panel asks FBR to stay out of provinces' domain

ISLAMABAD: The Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Revenue, Monday, warned the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to remain out of the domain of provinces during finalisation of the Finance Bill 2025-26. The meeting chaired by Senator Saleem Mandviwalla, held its fourth consecutive session in the Parliament House, to review the Finance Bill, which includes the Annual Budget Statement presented to the Upper House on June 10 under Article 73 of the Constitution. Mandviwalla warned that the FBR should not enter into the domain of provinces by including services in different provisions of the Finance Bill 2025-26. Sindh Revenue Board (SRB) has submitted different observations on Finance Bill 2025-26 where the FBR has illegally entered into the domain of services, he added. FBR Member Inland Revenue (Policy) Dr Najeeb Ahmad informed that the gradual withdrawal of sales tax exemption from erstwhile tribal areas in phase-wise manner has been agreed between the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR). Budget FY2025-26: Sindh announces to expand sales tax to all major services The committee examined the tax exemption policy for FATA/ PATA, which will begin phasing out with a 10 per cent GST in the next fiscal year— gradually increasing to 18 per cent. The FBR Member said that this two-stage process has been agreed with the IMF for the withdrawal of sales tax exemption on erstwhile tribal areas. Senator Shibli Faraz asked what tangible benefits have tax exemptions brought to these regions. Where is the investment and employment, he asked. The finance minister is scheduled to brief the committee on this issue in the next session. The meeting was attended by Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb, Senators Farooq Hamid Naek, Syed Shibli Faraz, Anusha Rehman Ahmad Khan, Mohsin Aziz, Ahmed Khan, Manzoor Ahmad, Mohammad Abdul Qadir, and senior officials from the FBR and other key departments. Opening the session, Chairman Mandviwalla lauded the 'diligence and active presence' of the federal minister for finance, stating: 'The minister's consistent participation and valuable input during these sessions reflect the government's commitment to transparent fiscal reforms.' Senator Anusha Rehman raised critical points about the regulation of e-commerce platforms emphasising not to burden unemployed individuals specifically (youth and women) making ends meet from home. Only register platforms doing business above Rs20million. On the proposed e-billing system, Senator Mohsin Aziz noted, 'Malaysia began phased implementation three years ago. We must assess our readiness.' Chairman Mandviwalla acknowledged the valuable suggestions of Senator Mohsin Aziz and Senator Anusha Rehman, stating to bring written proposals for phased implementation of e-billing. 'Talking will not suffice.' The committee also discussed the Islamabad Capital Territory (Tax on Service) 2001, Provisions of the Finance Bill, 2005. It was discussed that as per the IMF benchmark 'negative list of services' should also be developed. While discussing the Public Finance Management Act, 2019 a major disclosure rocked the session, revealing billions held and invested by public sector entities which are not transferred to central treasury but invested by these entities for profit. Senator Anusha Rehman condemned this, stating the government is borrowing its own money from banks and paying interest, while institutions profit off public funds. The committee directed the Establishment Division and Ministry of Finance to submit complete account details of all such institutions, lists of investments and profits earned, legal basis for withholding funds from the national treasury. The committee, while discussing the Federal Excise Provisions of Finance Bill, 2025, approved abolishing federal excise duty (FED) on first purchase of immovable property. The Senate Committee will reconvene Tuesday with the finance minister scheduled to address tax exemption policies and provide further clarity on institutional financial practices. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store