Fentanyl crisis takes center stage in US-China trade negotiations: Here's why
The ongoing US-China trade talks have placed fentanyl—a deadly synthetic opioid—at the heart of economic diplomacy, underscoring how a public health emergency has become a central bargaining chip in global commerce. The Trump administration has repeatedly accused China of enabling the flow of fentanyl and its chemical precursors into the United States, leading to a surge in overdose deaths and prompting unprecedented tariffs that have reshaped the trade landscape.
Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid up to 50 times stronger than heroin and 100 times more potent than morphine. Just 2 milligrams—an amount smaller than a few grains of sand—can cause a fatal overdose. The US has faced a relentless wave of fentanyl-related deaths, with tens of thousands of Americans dying annually from overdoses linked to the drug and its analogues. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that synthetic opioids, primarily fentanyl, are responsible for over 70,000 overdose deaths in the US each year.
In response to the crisis, President Trump stated an emergency and imposed a 20% "fentanyl tariff" on all Chinese imports, explicitly linking trade penalties to China's alleged failure to stem the flow of fentanyl precursors to Mexican drug cartels, which then traffic the drug into the US. This fentanyl tariff remains in place even as broader tariffs have been temporarily reduced following recent trade negotiations.
'The flow of contraband drugs like fentanyl to the United States, through illicit distribution networks, has created a national emergency, including a public health crisis. Chinese officials have failed to take the actions necessary to stem the flow of precursor chemicals to known criminal cartels,' stated the White House.
China has pushed back, arguing that the US opioid crisis is rooted in domestic misuse and regulatory failures, not Chinese exports. Still, in a move seen as a gesture of goodwill, China recently tightened controls on two key chemicals used in fentanyl production, adding them to a list of strictly regulated substances.
Both 4-ANPP and NPP are widely recognized as the most immediate precursors used in illicit fentanyl synthesis. Chinese authorities have also added other related substances to their control lists in line with United Nations recommendations, and are working to schedule additional chemicals such as 4-piperidone and 1-boc-4-piperidone.
Chinese officials, however, maintain that the ultimate responsibility lies with the US:
'Fentanyl is the U.S.'s problem, not China's. The responsibility to resolve this issue lies with the United States,' said Guo Jiakun, spokesperson for China's Foreign Ministry.
The 20% fentanyl tariff is now a sticking point in ongoing negotiations. While both countries have agreed to temporarily lower other tariffs, the fentanyl-related duties remain, reflecting the issue's political and public health gravity. The US insists that further progress on trade depends on China's willingness to clamp down on fentanyl precursors, while China views the tariff as punitive and based on a mischaracterization of the crisis.
US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) reports that seizures of fentanyl at the border have doubled in the past two years, yet the supply remains robust, fueling the urgency behind the US's hardline stance.
The ongoing dispute threatens to disrupt global supply chains, with the fentanyl crisis now influencing tariffs on a wide range of goods, from electronics to pharmaceuticals.
The August 14 window is critical: if no further agreement is reached, tariffs could snap back to higher levels, with the fentanyl tariff remaining a central point of contention.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
10 minutes ago
- Business Standard
End US visa programs: Why Trump supporters want H-1B visa removed
Once again, the H-1B visa, much loved by Indian professionals, is back in the spotlight—this time, for all the wrong reasons. Amid a fresh wave of layoffs in the US tech sector, questions are mounting over why companies are continuing to hire foreign workers through the H-1B route while cutting jobs at home. After Microsoft laid off around 9,000 employees in phases earlier this year, Intel has now announced plans to slash over 25,000 jobs. The backlash has been swift. US Vice President JD Vance on Friday publicly criticised Microsoft, saying he does not buy the 'bulls**t story' that the company can't find qualified American workers. 'That displacement and that math worries me a bit,' Vance said at a bipartisan event hosted by the Hill and Valley Forum. 'We want the very best and the brightest to make America their home. But I don't want companies to fire 9,000 American workers and then to go and say, 'We can't find workers here in America.' That's a bulls**t story,' said Vance. Former Trump adviser Steve Bannon, a vocal critic of the H-1B system, called for an end to all employment-based visa programmes. 'We need to cut all the visa programs. If we are going to do it, let's do it hard-core and clean it up,' said Bannon on his podcast. He said foreign workers were not better educated, but tech companies wanted 'indentured servants' who would work under pressure for less money. 'The situation in Silicon Valley is a festering sore,' Bannon said, claiming that around 12 million trained IT graduates in the US are unemployed while jobs are given to visa holders. 'There is always a way to get 'Einsteins',' he said, adding that talented individuals should be encouraged to stay in their home countries and 'make them great again like they are doing in Japan'. Vance's remarks were quickly countered by an Indian-origin tech investor who accused him of misleading the public. In a post on X, the investor wrote, 'Microsoft didn't bring in new foreign workers after laying people off, they renewed visas for long-time employees who've been in the U.S. legally for many many years, stuck in green card backlogs.' He argued that companies were simply allowing employees to stay in the roles they had already earned. 'Saying that's 'replacing Americans' is like saying letting a loyal employee stay and renew his visa is the same as hiring someone new off the street,' the post said. The investor also pointed out that many of the 9,000 employees laid off were H-1B holders. 'They got no severance, no safety net, just a 60-day countdown to leave the country. If you care about fairness, fix the backlog. Don't weaponise lies.' US weighs change to H-1B selection system At the policy level, the Trump administration is reviewing changes to how H-1B visas are awarded. The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in a filing to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs earlier this month, proposed replacing the current lottery system with a 'weighted selection process'. The change would apply to the capped portion of the visa programme—85,000 visas per year, including 65,000 for general applicants and 20,000 for those with advanced degrees from US universities. The rule is still under review and the specifics are yet to be made public, but US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is listed as the implementing agency. 'The H-1B is the primary way through which the United States attracts high-skilled immigrants. That it is randomly allocated is insane,' said Connor O'Brien, a research analyst at the Economic Innovation Group. He added, 'Eliminating the H-1B lottery in favour of a system that prioritises higher earners first is a no-brainer... Giving away these visas randomly is an enormous, missed opportunity to attract truly scarce talent.' Federal agency warns against bias in hiring The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has issued a warning to employers, saying that favouring foreign workers over American citizens in recruitment violates federal law. 'Unlawful bias against American workers, in violation of Title VII, is a large-scale problem in multiple industries nationwide,' said EEOC acting chair Andrea Lucas on February 19, 2025. She alleged that some companies had policies that preferred illegal aliens, migrant workers, and visa holders over American workers. 'The law applies to you, and you are not above the law,' she said. 'The EEOC is here to protect all workers from unlawful national origin discrimination, including American workers.' The agency outlined common reasons for such practices: * Lower wage costs through loopholes or off-the-books payments * Assumptions that foreign workers are less likely to raise complaints * Client preferences for foreign workers * Perceptions that foreign workers have a stronger work ethic Counterview: H-1B workers are well-paid and boost US economy The American Immigration Council disputes the notion that H-1B workers harm domestic employment. Its research shows that in 2021, H-1B holders had a median salary of 108,000, more than double the national average of 45,760. Between 2003 and 2021, their median wage rose by 52 per cent, compared to 39 per cent for the general workforce. 'The US economy relies on H-1B visas to address skilled labour shortages, particularly in technology, engineering, and healthcare, where domestic supply is insufficient,' Jidesh Kumar, managing partner at King Stubb & Kasiva, told Business Standard. 'Tech giants and startups alike depend on H-1B professionals for cutting-edge research and product development. Many also go on to become entrepreneurs, creating jobs and boosting the economy.' Kumar warned that tightening the programme could drive global talent to other destinations. 'Restricting the programme could force top global talent to seek opportunities in countries like Canada or the UK, potentially undermining the US's position as a leader in innovation and economic growth,' he said. Indian applicants dominate H-1B pool In the 2023 financial year, about 191,000 Indian professionals were granted H-1B visas. The number rose to approximately 207,000 in FY 2024. Despite this, over one million Indians remain stuck in the employment-based green card backlog due to country-specific quotas and annual limits, according to USCIS data. For FY 2026, USCIS selected 120,141 H-1B registrations—a sharp drop from previous years and the lowest since 2021. Analysts have linked this to increased scrutiny of multiple registrations and a hike in the application fee.
Time of India
10 minutes ago
- Time of India
UK Vs China WW3 Over Taiwan? Britain Vows To Use Force Against Beijing If Tensions Escalate
/ Jul 28, 2025, 05:31PM IST The United Kingdom has signalled that it may resort to military force against China if tensions over Taiwan escalate. British Defence Secretary John Healey emphasised that diplomacy remains the preferred option but warned that London would "secure peace through strength" if necessary. His remarks came during a visit to Australia as the HMS Prince of Wales aircraft carrier docked in Darwin for a Pacific deployment. The UK and Australia reaffirmed their commitment to joint military exercises and cooperation to enhance deterrence. Despite the strong language, the UK maintains adherence to the One-China policy while engaging in informal relations with Taiwan. China views Taiwan as a renegade province and reserves the right to use force for reunification. Recent tensions, including the passage of a British warship through the Taiwan Strait, have heightened regional security concerns and drawn sharp criticism from Beijing.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
10 minutes ago
- First Post
Did EU get a raw deal in Trump trade pact? 7 facts
While the agreement may have averted a full-blown trade war and restored some predictability, many analysts argue the EU signed away too much: steep tariffs, massive purchases and little leverage in return. Whether this fiscal toll brings long-term value or leaves Brussels as a weaker negotiator remains under scrutiny. read more The sweeping trade agreement unveiled Sunday between the United States and European Union, forged under intense pressure from President Donald Trump, has sent shockwaves through European capitals, with many questionings whether the deal leaves the EU at a stark disadvantage. Here are seven crucial facts illustrating the challenges and concessions embedded in the pact: US imposes across-the-board 15% tariff on EU exports The agreement sets a 15% baseline tariff on nearly all EU goods entering the US, a sharp escalation from the previous average US tariff of about 1.6% on a trade-weighted basis for EU products. Core EU exports, including cars, machinery and manufactured goods are now hit by the full 15% rate. While this prevented Trump's threatened 30% or even 50% duties, it remains a dramatic rise and the highest generalised tariff level imposed on the EU in decades. Major EU concessions on US energy A central element of the deal is the EU's agreement to purchase approximately $750 billion in US energy over the coming years, with a particular focus on liquefied natural gas (LNG) to replace Russian supplies. This marks one of the largest single-sector purchase commitments ever included in a transatlantic trade deal and reflects significant US leverage on Europe's energy security. $600 billion in new EU investments in the US Brussels has agreed to direct around $600 billion in additional investments to the United States in forthcoming years, covering green energy, manufacturing, and military equipment. For context, this matches the scale of the recently announced EU investment pledges for China, underlining the magnitude of this concession. Deal struck during Trump's private tour The agreement was finalised on Trump's private golf estate in Scotland outside EU soil while the UK, no longer a member of the EU, secured a different trade arrangement with the US seen as more favourable. The optics highlight a European desperation to avert more punitive tariffs especially as London was exempted from the harshest terms on steel and aluminium. EU pulls back on retaliation, misses broader show of strength In opting for a settlement, Brussels scrapped or dialled back threatened counter-tariffs, unlike China and Canada both of which have previously matched Trump's measures step for step. Some analysts and European commentators argue the EU missed a chance to assert broader strength instead settling under pressure to avoid economic escalation. Trump's core agenda intact: Steel and aluminium tariffs remain unchanged Despite EU negotiating efforts, the deal leaves in place Trump's 50% tariffs on European steel and aluminium, with only vague promises of a future quota-based relaxation. These metals remain an especially sore point among EU industry lobbyists and the longevity of these trade barriers highlights the limited EU leverage in core strategic sectors. Narrow exemptions: Some sectors spared but automobiles face full impact Certain sectors notably aircraft parts, select chemicals and some agri-products won zero-tariff exemption status. However, automobiles, representing a major chunk of EU exports to the US, fall under the full 15% tariff, a significant new cost for German, French and Italian carmakers already grappling with global market headwinds. While European leaders hailed the agreement as 'providing certainty' and averting a full-scale trade war, many in Europe see it as a lopsided settlement extracted at a moment of vulnerability. The tariff levels, energy purchase commitments, and investment pledges all signify a substantial shift in the transatlantic economic balance, one that, at least for now, appears to favour the US and President Trump's tough bargaining tactics. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
