Why Is It So Hard to Find Good (Non Cash-Grab) Pride Merch?
'Hi, gay!'
Nothing kicks off Pride Month quite like corporate rainbow-washing. Every June, mega retailers get into the LGBTQ+ spirit by plastering rainbows and cheeky words like 'slay!' onto colorful tees and hoodies. As a member of the community, I'm not hating on this approach per se: It's the spirit of allyship that counts. Especially as our current administration continues to threaten LGBTQ+ health and rights across the nation, some pro-gay energy via fashion is harmless and, in fact, welcomed.
But still: As someone who partakes in Pride Month but rarely wears flashy colors, I wonder why it's so hard to find good Pride merch that isn't a blatant cash-grab. Using the vague spirit of acceptance in a splashy way to tick an inclusivity box? Not very slay. Luckily, there are a few brands who have created Pride merch with intention this month—partnering with LGBTQ+ causes to use fashion for good. And better yet, in addition to the charitable components, the designs are even tasteful, too.
Take New York designer Connor Ives and his signature 'Protect The Dolls' tee, which has already been worn by celebrities like Pedro Pascal and Troye Sivan. Not only does it have a clear message, but all of its proceeds are also donated directly to Trans Lifeline—a trans-lead charity that delivers life-saving services to those who need them. Diesel, meanwhile, released a special hoodie that benefits the Tom of Finland Foundation; It features imagery from the foundation's collection of erotic queer art, which it aims to preserve and support.
Other chic and thoughtful Pride merch on the scene? Brands like David Yurman have released Pride-themed jewelry that benefits The Trevor Project, providing life-saving resources for LGBTQ+ youth. Levi's has released denim items supporting Outright International, a global organization dedicated to advancing LGBTQ+ human rights.
Turns out, you can authentically support the community, and wear more unexpected and discrete Pride merch. Not that there is anything wrong with the full-on rainbow approach—now is the month to be loud and proud. Just try not to buy the soulless corporate pieces, 'kay?
Below, shop Pride merch that benefits good causes.
Human Rights Campaign
Rainbow sweat shorts
$55
HRC
Converse
Chuck Taylor platform sneakers
$90
CONVERSE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
27 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Supreme Court makes it easier to claim 'reverse discrimination' in employment, in a case from Ohio
WASHINGTON (AP) — A unanimous Supreme Court made it easier Thursday to bring lawsuits over so-called reverse discrimination, siding with an Ohio woman who claims she didn't get a job and then was demoted because she is straight. The justices' decision affects lawsuits in 20 states and the District of Columbia where, until now, courts had set a higher bar when members of a majority group, including those who are white and heterosexual, sue for discrimination under federal law. The court ruled in an appeal from Marlean Ames, who has worked for the Ohio Department of Youth Services for more than 20 years. Ames contends she was passed over for a promotion and then demoted because she is heterosexual. Both the job she sought and the one she had held were given to LGBTQ people. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 bars sex discrimination in the workplace. A trial court and the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Ames. The 6th circuit is among the courts that had required an additional requirement for people like Ames, showing 'background circumstances' that might include that LGBTQ people made the decisions affecting Ames or statistical evidence of a pattern of discrimination against members of the majority group.
Boston Globe
30 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Supreme Court makes it easier to claim ‘reverse discrimination' in employment, in a case from Ohio
Ames contends she was passed over for a promotion and then demoted because she is heterosexual. Both the job she sought and the one she had held were given to LGBTQ people. Advertisement Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 bars sex discrimination in the workplace. A trial court and the 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Ames. The 6th circuit is among the courts that had required an additional requirement for people like Ames, showing 'background circumstances' that might include that LGBTQ people made the decisions affecting Ames or statistical evidence of a pattern of discrimination against members of the majority group. The appeals court noted that Ames didn't provide any such circumstances.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
EU Court of Justice official says Hungary LGBTQ content ban violates EU law
June 5 (UPI) -- A legal scholar at the European Union's top court on Thursday said that Hungary's law limiting access to LGBTQ content in schools and on television violates EU law. Tamara Capeta, advocate general of the Court of Justice of the European Union, said in a nonbinding opinion that Hungary's Law LXXIX that Hungary failed to provide proof that barring content that portrays the ordinary lives of the LGBTQ community impacts the development of minors in its defense of the law. "Consequently, those amendments are based on a value judgment that homosexual and non-cisgender life is not of equal value or status as heterosexual and cisgneder life," Capeta said. Capeta said Hungary disregarded articles of the EU's Charter of Fundamental Rights that refer to "the prohibition of discrimination on grounds of sex and sexual orientation, the respect for private and family life, the freedom of expression and information," and the "right to human dignity." According to Capeta, the Hungarian law cannot be justified as it allegedly interferes with the healthy development of minors and parents' rights to raise their children as they personally choose under the guise that it protects minors from pornographic content. Passed in 2021, it, among its amendments, prohibits minors from having any access to content that promotes or shows gender identities that don't correspond to the sex assigned at birth, sex reassignment or homosexuality. The EU had already brought an infringement action against Hungary in regard to Law LXXIX in December of 2022, but then Hungary further stirred the EU over LGBTQ rights in recent months when it passed a ban on Pride events in March, and again in April when its parliament amended its constitution to ban public LGBTQ gatherings, in what it has said defends children's rights.
