You Can Tell When War Is Breaking Out Because the Pentagon's Pizza Orders Spike Drastically
As painstakingly documented by X account Pentagon Pizza Report, a "busier than usual" indicator on the Google Maps profile of the Domino's in Arlington has been associated with major acts of war taking place around the world.
Most recently, the franchise received an onslaught of orders just before closing last night — almost perfectly coinciding with Israel's devastating attack on Iran.
Even long before the advent of live, GPS-based customer tracking on Google Maps, famished Pentagon workers have long given away that there's something much darker going on by ordering copious numbers of pies.
"The Pentagon Pizza Index has been a surprisingly reliable predictor of seismic global events — from coups to wars — since the 1980s," The Economist's head of data journalism Alex Selby-Boothroyd wrote in a LinkedIn post.
"On the night of August 1st 1990, for example, the CIA ordered 21 pizzas in a single night just before the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait (a new record)," he added. "Who says pie charts aren't useful?"
And it's not just Domino's. As Euronews reported last week, the Papa John's close to the Pentagon has also been found to be "busier than usual" during the days leading up to Iran launching drones into Israeli territory in April 2024.
A separate event chronicled by Pentagon Pizza Report also predicted military activity on June 1, followed just hours later by an escalation between Israel and Iran.
Of course, making any definitive statements about any correlation would be foolish. But it's an intriguing sign that even the most secretive parts of the US government can easily show their cards without meaning to.
"Bottom line for journalists," Wolf Blitzer told CNN in 1990. "Always monitor the pizzas."
More on pizza: Chef Admits His Smash Hit Pizza Was Invented by ChatGPT
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Alphabet's Recent Numbers Were Strong, but This Metric Could be a Red Flag
Key Points Alphabet reported another quarter of double-digit growth last week. According to some metrics, Google is losing market share in search. A judge ruled that its search engine was an illegal monopoly. 10 stocks we like better than Alphabet › The launch of OpenAI's ChatGPT in late 2022 sparked a lot of changes in the industry and the market, including the start of some panic among investors and analysts about the future of Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL) and its cash cow, Google Search. As a result, the giant tech stock has still managed to do well in the last two years, but it has underperformed "Magnificent Seven" peers like Microsoft, Meta Platforms, and Amazon (see chart below). At least part of the reason for that underperformance seems to be related to potential AI-based challenges to Google Search. Despite those concerns, Alphabet continues to deliver steady growth, and that pattern was on display again in its second-quarter earnings report. Alphabet impresses again The tech giant reported 14% revenue growth year over year in the second quarter to $96.4 billion, easily beating the consensus at $94 billion and showing that advertising demand on its platform is alive and well. Growth was well distributed with Google Search revenue up 11.7% to $54.2 billion, and overall advertising revenue up 10.4% to $71.3 billion. The cloud business remained strong with revenue up 32% year over year to $13.6 billion. On the bottom line, operating income increased 14% to $31.3 billion and earnings per share improved from $1.89 to $2.31, ahead of estimates at $2.19. Alphabet doesn't give guidance, but the results showed that the business continues to execute despite fears about the sustainability of its business model. However, there is one metric outside of the earnings report that shows why investors may be right to worry about the company's long-term future. Is the search empire in trouble? According to some third-party measurements, Google's market share in search has declined slowly but steadily over the last two years as alternatives like ChatGPT and Perplexity AI have hit the market. StatCounter reports that Google's market share has fallen from 91.1% in June 2024 to 89.6% in June 2025. That might not seem alarming as it represents just 150 basis points, and Google still dominates. But viewed another way, market share for Google's competitors has risen about 15% over the last year, which is not inconsequential. There are other risks to Google not seen in the numbers. As alternatives emerge in the area, there are great challenges to its supremacy and the relationships that help it maintain its dominance in search. For example, Alphabet stock tumbled when Apple acknowledged in court that it is considering making AI search engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude options in its Safari browser, potentially jeopardizing Google's status as the default search engine. Apple has also considered acquiring Perplexity, which could lead it to displace Google entirely as the default search engine. Google prizes its default status in Safari enough to pay Apple $20 billion a year, but that pay-to-play relationship could also be coming to an end after a judge ruled the company was operating an illegal monopoly, which could lead to the end of the payments to Apple. Overall, the risks to both Google's market share and Alphabet's status in the face of antitrust rulings shouldn't be ignored. Is Alphabet a buy? The good news for Alphabet investors is that those risks seem priced into the stock. It currently trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of 20.5, which is less than the S&P 500 at around 27.5. Alphabet has also responded to the threat from AI search engines with new features like AI Overview and AI Mode, which uses its Gemini large language model, to give users a similar experience to what they'd get from Perplexity or ChatGPT. At the current stock price, Alphabet looks like a buy. Investors shouldn't ignore the threats to its market share or on the regulatory front, but it seems capable of continuing to deliver double-digit growth. That should make the stock a winner over the coming years, despite the evolving competitive landscape in the AI era. Should you buy stock in Alphabet right now? Before you buy stock in Alphabet, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Alphabet wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $638,629!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,098,838!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,049% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 Jeremy Bowman has positions in Amazon and Meta Platforms. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Alphabet's Recent Numbers Were Strong, but This Metric Could be a Red Flag was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
US defense bill proposes examination of Apple display supplier
By Stephen Nellis SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) -A measure added into a massive U.S. defense spending bill in recent weeks will, if passed, ask the Pentagon to determine whether one of Apple's display suppliers should be listed as a Chinese military company. Being on the list does not block companies from doing business in the U.S. but will in coming years block them from being part of the U.S. military's supply chain. The bill, known as the National Defense Authorization Act, was approved in July by key committees in both houses of the U.S. Congress. The final bill, considered a "must-pass" because it funds the U.S. military, is expected to become law later in the year. When the bill was approved by the U.S. House of Representatives Armed Services Committee, a newly added amendment for the first time asked the U.S. Defense Department to consider whether BOE Technology Group Co, listed on Apple's official suppliers list, should be added to a list of firms that allegedly aid China's military. BOE and Apple did not respond to requests for comment. Craig Singleton, a China expert at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a Washington think-tank, said Beijing had offered billions of dollars in subsidies, tax breaks and loans to help firms such as BOE dominate global panel production. "This creates a single‑source vulnerability that could be easily exploited to disrupt or degrade U.S. military operations, not to mention undermine commercial supply chains, during a conflict or period of heightened bilateral tension with Beijing," Singleton added. A study published last month by New York-based NERA Economic Consulting and commissioned by BOE's U.S. subsidiary found that the display industry, which includes major Korean players such as Samsung Electronics and LG Electronics, remains highly competitive, with no single player capable of significantly affecting global prices. "There is no credible risk of a supply chain disruption by mainland China display manufacturers," the report said.
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Your chats with Meta's AI might end up on Google — just like ChatGPT until it turned them off
OpenAI's ChatGPT raised some eyebrows this week when people realized that certain chats were able to be found by Google search. Although people had checked a box to share the chats publicly, it seemed likely that not everyone understood what they were doing. On Thursday, OpenAI said that it would stop having shared chats be indexed by Google. Meanwhile, Meta's stand-alone MetaAI app also allows users to share their chats — and it will continue to allow Google to index them, meaning that they can show up in a search. I did a bunch of Google searches and found lots of MetaAI conversations in the results. The Meta AI app, launched this spring, lets people share chats to a "Discover" feed. Google crawlers can "index" that feed and then serve up the results when people use Google search. So, for instance, if you do a site-specific search on Google for " and the keyword "balloons," you might come up with a chat someone had with the MetaAI bot about where to get the best birthday balloons — if that person tapped the button to allow the chat to be shared. As Business Insider reported in June, the Meta AI Discover feed had been full of examples of chats that seemed personal in nature — medical questions, specific career advice, relationship matters. Some contained identifying information like phone numbers, email addresses, or full names. Although all of these people did click to share, based on the personal nature of some of the chats, I could only guess that people might have misunderstood what it meant to share the conversation. After Business Insider wrote about this a few weeks ago, the Meta AI app made some tweaks to warn users more clearly about how the Discover feed works. Now, when you choose to share a conversation, you get a pop-up with the warning: "Conversations on feed are public so anyone can see them and engage." The additional warning seems to be working. Scrolling through the Discover feed, I now see mainly instances of people using it for image creation and far fewer accidental private text conversations (although there seemed to still be at least a few of those). Meanwhile, Daniel Roberts, a representative for Meta, confirmed that Meta AI chats that were shared to its Discover feed would continue to be indexed by Google. He reiterated the multi-step process I just described. For now, Meta AI can only be used via its mobile app, not the web. This might lead people to think that even the Discover feed exists as a sort of walled garden, separate from "the internet" and existing only within the Meta AI app. But posts from the Discover feed (and only those public posts) can be shared as links around the web — and that's where the Google indexing comes in. If this sounds slightly confusing, it is. That may also be confusing to users. Now, it's possible that some people really do want to share their AI chats with the general public, and are happy to have those chats show up on Google searches along with their Instagram or Facebook handles. But I'm still not sure I'd understand why anyone would want to share their interactions — or why anyone else would want to read them.
