Most people in the UK support sanctions against Israel, new poll finds
The new polling, commissioned by human rights organisation Global Justice Now and carried out by Yonder Consulting, found that 62% of people in the UK would support sanctions being imposed on Israel as a means to exert pressure on it to stop its brutal attacks on Gaza. Just 11% of respondents said they would oppose sanctions.
The polling also found that 65% support banning all arms sales to Israel until it ends its assault on Gaza (with 11% in opposition), while 60% would support suspending the existing trade deal between the UK and Israel (with 13% in opposition).
READ MORE: POLL: How would you vote in the Hamilton by-election?
The poll, which surveyed 2109 UK adults between May 28 and 29, also showed that support for sanctions against Israel is higher in Scotland than the UK as a whole.
It found that 66% of people in Scotland support sanctions on Israel (9% oppose), while 66% support a ban on arms sales to Israel (10% oppose), and 61% support a trade deal suspension (12% oppose).
The Scotland-specific results are based on the 177 people in Scotland who were surveyed out of the 2109 total.
While the UK Government said last month that it was suspending negotiations on a new free trade deal with Israel, its existing trade agreement with Israel is still in place.
Despite branding the Israeli government's actions as "egregious", the UK Government sent its trade envoy to Israel just days after the suspension to "promote trade" between the two countries.
It was also revealed that the Labour Government licensed exports of more military equipment to Israel in the final three months of 2024 than the Tories did for all of 2020-2023.
READ MORE: 'Brave and powerful' documentary on Gaza protests to have Scottish premiere
The National also reported how a group of Labour MPs visited Israel on a lobbying trip reportedly just last week, organised by the party's most prominent pro-Israeli group, Labour Friends of Israel.
Global Justice Now called on the UK Government to impose sanctions, arguing that it has "a duty to prevent genocide".
Tim Bierley, a campaigner with Global Justice Now, said: 'As Israel erases Gaza before our eyes, today's polling makes clear that across all regions, age and income groups, the British public wants our government to take far stronger action against Israel's genocidal attacks.
'Just as the UK has placed comprehensive sanctions on Russia over its invasion of Ukraine, it must urgently exert meaningful pressure on Israel.
'Despite issuing stronger rebukes in recent weeks, the government continues to license key exports for arms used to massacre Palestinians and offer Israel privileged trade terms, as if war crimes should have no effect on business-as-usual.
'Under international law, the UK has a duty to prevent genocide – and any MPs who ignore public sentiment would do well to remember their duty to represent the voice of ordinary people.'
The Foreign Office has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
15 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Sarwar says surprise by-election win could help Labour back to power at Holyrood
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar said his party's shock victory in a Holyrood by-election could help propel him into power next year – as he declared he wants to 'gain scores of seats across the country' in a bid to defeat the SNP. Mr Sarwar and his party celebrated in the early hours of Friday morning after Labour's Davy Russell was elected as the new MSP for Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse, winning the seat from the SNP. With the votes showing a swing of more than 7% from the SNP to Labour, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said on Friday the result showed people have 'voted for change'. The by-election had been held following the death earlier this year of Scottish Government minister Christina McKelvie. When the votes were counted, Mr Russell polled 8,559, SNP candidate Katy Loudon took 7,957 votes, while Reform's Ross Lambie secured 7,088. And although Mr Russell was elected with fewer votes than Labour secured in the seat in the 2021 Scottish Parliament election, the SNP's support fell from just over 46% of all ballots then to 29.35% in the by-election. Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice insisting they were 'delighted' with coming third – despite speculation prior to the count that they could come in second or may even pull off a surprise victory. Labour's win came after Scotland's First Minister John Swinney – who made numerous campaign visits to the area – had declared the contest to be a 'two-horse race' between the SNP and Nigel Farage's Reform. But speaking at a media event in Hamilton on Friday morning, Mr Sarwar accused the SNP leader of running a 'disgraceful' campaign. Mr Sarwar also insisted the by-election could 'help lead the way' to him becoming Scotland's next first minister in the May 2026 Holyrood elections. The Scottish Labour leader said he believed the victory to be 'even more significant' than the party's win in the nearby Rutherglen and Hamilton West by-election in October 2023 – which he said had been key in helping to secure Labour's general election win in July last year. Mr Sarwar declared: 'I think in some ways this by-election result is even more significant than the Rutherglen by-election result two years ago. 'It is right to say, I believe, the result in Rutherglen helped lead the way in helping to elect a UK Labour Government and I also believe the by-election result here will help lead the way to elect a Scottish Labour government next year.' Looking ahead to that election, Mr Sarwar told the PA news agency: 'I want us to gain scores of seats across the country so we can remove this SNP government from office.' He went on to accuse Mr Swinney of running a 'disgraceful campaign' in the by-election, saying that despite the SNP having been in power for 18 years, 'the best he had to offer was 'vote SNP to stop Farage''. And while Reform UK came in third in the by-election, Mr Sarwar said Mr Farage's party could not win the Scottish Parliament elections. He insisted: 'Nigel Farage is not standing to be first minister. 'It is a straight choice – it is either going to be John Swinney, or it's going to be me.' The Scottish Labour leader continued: 'The choice is stark next year. Our Parliament is not about protests, our election is not about protest, it is about choosing a government here in Scotland. 'The choice is stark – a third decade of the SNP with John Swinney as first minister or a new direction for Scotland with me as first minister.' However, Mr Tice told BBC Radio 4's that the result in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse was 'truly remarkable'. He said: 'We've come from nowhere to being in a three-way marginal, and we're within 750 votes of winning that by-election and just a few hundred votes of defeating the SNP, so it's an incredible result.' Mr Swinney, meanwhile, said the SNP was 'clearly disappointed' with the result. The party leader said Labour had 'won by an absolute landslide' in Rutherglen and Hamilton West – noting the SNP 'came much closer' this time round. But he added: 'The people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse have made clear that we still have work to do. 'Over the next few days, we will take time to consider the result fully.'
The Guardian
16 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Don't think Nigel Farage will kill off the Tories? Just look at Reform UK's surge in Scotland
If you were doubting that Nigel Farage had a serious chance of heading a hard-right British government in 2029, the people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse just poured a bucket of particularly icy water over your head. Though Labour won the Scottish parliamentary byelection, defying predictions it would be beaten into third place, Reform UK chalked up more than a quarter of the vote – trailing the victors by an unsubstantial 1,500 voters. This tells a devastating story. Nigel Farage's outfit seriously outperformed the level of support indicated by Scottish polling: the last four surveys had Reform on between 12% and 19%, yet it secured 26% of the vote after standing here for the first time. This suggests it is mobilising previous non-voters whom pollsters are not picking up. The latest UK-wide YouGov poll, which asked people how they would vote if there were a general election tomorrow, put Reform in first place, eight points ahead of Labour. Imagine if that polling in fact underestimates their reach. There is, however, an important caveat. The multimillionaire businessman Zia Yusuf did an impressive job as Reform's chair in professionalising its operations: his resignation speaks to a perennial threat of internal chaos. Like Ukip, Reform may be hobbled by its excessive dependence on its frontman. The SNP, meanwhile, has ruled Holyrood for nearly two decades in an age in which most incumbents are clobbered. The party has lost its best asset, Nicola Sturgeon. Even so, it did not expect to lose 17 points in this byelection. Its activists are divided on whether this loss is down to the party soft-pedalling on the independence cause, or failing to address voters' bread-and-butter concerns. It seems almost certain that it suffered the opposite phenomenon to Reform: its demotivated supporters stayed at home. The byelection offered up yet more striking evidence that the Tories are being replaced as the standard bearers of the right, as they bagged a paltry 6% of the vote. This is the end stage of a process kickstarted by David Cameron in 2010: try to placate the right of his own party by throwing them endless red meat, making them fatter and hungrier. It's the same phenomenon that is unfolding across the west: the old centre-right is dying, and being replaced by a radical right that is increasingly contemptuous of democratic norms. Given Reform's racist claim that the Scottish Labour leader, Anas Sarwar, would 'prioritise the Pakistani community', its defeat is hardly reassuring, as it still finds popular support among hardcore Scottish unionists. As the pre-eminent psephologist John Curtice notes, Labour was in fact down on its already weak 2021 performance in this seat, triumphing only because of the fragmentation of the electorate. The result shows Labour is not on course to retake the seat of Scottish power, he concludes. The big message, he says, is that if Farageism is making inroads even in Scotland, its strength has been underestimated. What next? Starmer's foot soldiers have a strategy. Having achieved unparalleled unpopularity by attacking state provision for disabled people and elderly people, they are opting for a 'squeeze' message. They believe Farage replacing the Tories is beneficial, because he has a lower ceiling of support than the traditional party of the right. Our electoral system will force voters to make a binary choice between a Labour government they strongly dislike, and a Farage premiership most fear. The choice is between two bad options – and they're hoping that voters will pick the least worse. Cast your mind back to the decision of Hillary Clinton's team to intentionally promote Donald Trump as the Republican standard-bearer for much the same reason. That didn't go well. Labour must surely understand how Farage's capacity to enthuse non-voters raises the ceiling to an unpredictable height. Starmer's team clearly looks to Canada, where an incumbent liberal government was on course for electoral meltdown, until progressives abandoned the leftwing New Democrats to prevent the hard-right Conservatives triumphing. Yet there are key differences. One is the small factor of the US president openly planning to annex their country. Another is that although Justin Trudeau's administration may have been deeply disappointing from a progressive perspective, it did not ceaselessly alienate its natural supporters, as Labour has done, including by adopting rhetoric on immigration associated with the far right. Labour won about two-thirds of the seats in the general election with only one-third of the overall vote share. Surely it recognises that Reform could do the same. This ability is only entrenched by our first past the post electoral system, which even the former Conservative minister Tobias Ellwood has described as 'dated and unrepresentative'. Faced with a choice between lesser evils, the strategy for progressives ought to be clear: cement a pact between the Green party and other leftwing candidates, focus on 50 or so seats, and throw every resource at them. In a resulting hung parliament, they could force an end to this antiquated electoral system. But the central belt of Scotland just underlined an important lesson. The west is in crisis: the rise of the radical right is both a symptom and an accelerant, and nowhere is immune. Owen Jones is a Guardian columnist
The Herald Scotland
23 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
‘Momentum is building': Green industries praise clean energy rules for new homes
With a significant amount of the UK's carbon footprint coming from gas heating of homes, the FHS will require new housing in England to produce fewer carbon emissions than those built under current regulations. The renewable energy sector, alongside green campaigners, have welcomed the 'common sense' proposals. Trevor Hutchings, chief executive of the Renewable Energy Association (REA) said: 'The growth of solar power has been one of the UK's biggest renewable energy success stories, demonstrating without a doubt that we don't have to choose between lowering our emissions and lowering household energy bills. 'Today's announcement – which the REA has long campaigned for – takes this one step further – not only enabling thousands of future homeowners to experience the benefits of affordable and clean power, but supercharging growth in the British renewable energy industry and driving forward our energy transition.' Chris O'Shea, chief executive of Centrica, said: 'The age of solar is well and truly upon us, with millions of households up and down the country already benefiting from generating their own free electricity from the sun. 'With the Future Home Standard expected in the autumn, momentum is building behind Great Britain's rooftop revolution.' Mike Childs, head of policy, science and research at Friends of the Earth, called the move 'plain common sense' but warned that ministers must act to help decarbonise homes that are already built. 'The Spending Review next week must ensure that the forthcoming Warm Homes Plan is sufficiently funded so that that everyone can enjoy these benefits, and no one is left behind because they can't afford the changes,' he said. Greenpeace UK's head of politics Ami McCarthy said: 'It's extraordinary that such a common-sense solution has taken so long to be rolled out, and this Government deserves full credit for this breakthrough. 'Now ministers need to urgently reform the UK's energy system as a whole and stop gas from setting the price of electricity so that everyone, whether living in a new build or not, gets to enjoy the lower bills that cheap, clean renewable power can bring.' Under the proposed changes, developers must meet solar panel coverage equivalent to 40% of the building's flood area – and those that cannot must install a 'reasonable amount of solar coverage'. The changes will be subject to practical limits with flexibility in place for new homes surrounded by trees or with lots of shade overhead, the Government said. Liberal Democrat MP Max Wilkinson praised the move after ministers previously rejected his 'Sunshine Bill' – a similar law which would have seen new builds come with solar panels equivalent to at least 40% of their ground floor area as standard. The Cheltenham MP told the PA news agency: 'This news will help us fight the cost-of-living crisis by lowering people's energy bills while reducing carbon emissions too. 'I've been campaigning on this since long before I was an MP and was determined to build on its success after I was elected. 'I welcome today's news from the Government and I'm pleased we can all look forward to a brighter future – but there will be more work to do to ensure solar for new builds begins without delay.' Housebuilders largely welcomed the announcement but warned against introducing burdensome paperwork which may harm the Government's efforts to reach its target to build 1.5 million new homes by 2029. Neil Jefferson, chief executive at the Home Builders Federations, said: 'Moving forward, as we look to meet the more challenging carbon reductions set by Government, we will see solar PV panels on the overwhelming majority of new homes. 'We welcome recognition from Government that there needs to be flexibility around the number of panels on roofs in some locations, to reflect orientation and house design. 'We need to ensure the process to agree the number of panels in such locations is workable and not overly bureaucratic such that it does not delay attempts to increase housing supply.' Mark Wakeford, national chairman of the National Federation of Builders, said: 'Solar panels on new homes make sense because they lower bills and progress the clean energy revolution we so desperately need. 'Credit must also be given for recent announcements on grid investment and connection reforms, as these were important challenges to recognise and solve for a rooftop revolution to happen in practice.'
